Product Code Database
Example Keywords: slacks -grand $8-153
   » » Wiki: Politics
Tag Wiki 'Politics'.
Tag

Politics () is the set of activities that are associated with in , or other forms of power relations among individuals, such as the distribution of or . The branch of that studies politics and is referred to as political science.

Politics may be used positively in the context of a "political solution" which is compromising and non-violent,. or descriptively as "the art or science of government", but the word often also carries a negative connotation.. The concept has been defined in various ways, and different approaches have fundamentally differing views on whether it should be used extensively or in a limited way, empirically or normatively, and on whether conflict or co-operation is more essential to it.

A variety of methods are deployed in politics, which include promoting one's own political views among people, with other political subjects, making , and exercising internal and external force, including against adversaries...... Politics is exercised on a wide range of social levels, from and of traditional , through modern , and up to , to the international level.

In modern states, people often form political parties to represent their ideas. Members of a party often agree to take the same position on many issues and agree to support the same changes to law and the same leaders. An is usually a competition between different parties.

A is a framework which defines acceptable political methods within a society. The history of political thought can be traced back to early antiquity, with seminal works such as 's Republic, 's Politics, 's political manuscripts and 's .


Etymology
The English word politics has its roots in the name of 's classic work, Politiká, which introduced the term () . In the mid-15th century, Aristotle's composition was rendered in Early Modern English as ,"The book of " (Bhuler 1961/1941:154).Buhler, C. F., ed. 1961 1941. The Dictes and Sayings of the Philosophers. London: Early English Text Society, Original Series No. 211 . which became Politics in .

The singular politic first attested in English in 1430, coming from —itself taking from ,. a Latinization of the Greek () from () and ().


Definitions
  • : "who gets what, when, how".
  • : "the authoritative allocation of values for a society".
  • : "the most concentrated expression of economics".
  • Otto von Bismarck: "the capacity of always choosing at each instant, in constantly changing situations, the least harmful, the most useful"Reichstag speech by Bismarck, January 29, 1886, in: Bismarck, The Collected Works. Friedrichsruher edition, vol. 13: Speeches. Edited by Wilhelm Schüßler, Berlin 1930, p. 177.
  • : "a distinctive form of rule whereby people act together through institutionalized procedures to resolve differences".
  • : "comprises all the activities of co-operation, negotiation and conflict within and between societies".


Approaches
There are several ways in which approaching politics has been conceptualized.


Extensive and limited
has differentiated views of politics based on how extensive or limited their perception of what accounts as 'political' is.. The extensive view sees politics as present across the sphere of human social relations, while the limited view restricts it to certain contexts. For example, in a more restrictive way, politics may be viewed as primarily about ,. while a feminist perspective could argue that sites which have been viewed traditionally as non-political, should indeed be viewed as political as well.. This latter position is encapsulated in the slogan " the personal is political", which disputes the distinction between private and public issues. Politics may also be defined by the use of power, as has been argued by Robert A. Dahl..


Moralism and realism
Some perspectives on politics view it empirically as an exercise of power, while others see it as a social function with a basis.. This distinction has been called the difference between and political realism .. For moralists, politics is closely linked to , and is at its extreme in thinking. For example, according to , the view of was that, "to be political…meant that everything was decided through words and persuasion and not through violence";. while according to , "politics is the way in which free societies are governed. Politics is politics, and other forms of rule are something else.". In contrast, for realists, represented by those such as Niccolò Machiavelli, , and , politics is based on the use of power, irrespective of the ends being pursued..


Conflict and co-operation
argues that politics essentially comes down to conflict between conflicting interests. Political scientist Elmer Schattschneider argued that "at the root of all politics is the universal language of conflict",
(1960). 9780030133664, Dryden P.
while for the essence of politics is the distinction of 'friend' from 'foe'.
(1999). 9781859842447, Verso. .
This is in direct contrast to the more co-operative views of politics by Aristotle and Crick. However, a more mixed view between these extremes is provided by Irish political scientist Michael Laver, who noted that:
Politics is about the characteristic blend of conflict and co-operation that can be found so often in human interactions. Pure conflict is war. Pure co-operation is true love. Politics is a mixture of both..


History
The history of politics encompasses the entirety of and is not confined to the development of modern


Prehistoric
Early human forms of social organization—bands and tribes—lacked centralized political structures.
(2025). 9780374533229, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
These are sometimes referred to as stateless societies.


Early states
In ancient history, civilizations did not have definite boundaries as have today, and their borders could be more accurately described as . Early dynastic Sumer, and early dynastic Egypt were the first civilizations to define their . Moreover, up to the 12th century, many people lived in non-state societies. These range from relatively egalitarian and to complex and highly stratified .


State formation
There are a number of different theories and hypotheses regarding early state formation that seek generalizations to explain why the state developed in some places but not others. Other scholars believe that generalizations are unhelpful and that each case of early state formation should be treated on its own.

Voluntary theories contend that diverse groups of people came together to form states as a result of some shared rational interest.. The theories largely focus on the development of agriculture, and the population and organizational pressure that followed and resulted in state formation. One of the most prominent theories of early and primary state formation is the hydraulic hypothesis, which contends that the state was a result of the need to build and maintain large-scale irrigation projects.

Conflict theories of state formation regard conflict and dominance of some population over another population as key to the formation of states. In contrast with voluntary theories, these arguments believe that people do not voluntarily agree to create a state to maximize benefits, but that states form due to some form of oppression by one group over others. Some theories in turn argue that warfare was critical for state formation.


Ancient history
The first states of sorts were those of early dynastic Sumer and early dynastic Egypt, which arose from the and Predynastic Egypt respectively around approximately 3000 BC.. Early dynastic Egypt was based around the in the north-east of , the kingdom's boundaries being based around the Nile and stretching to areas where existed.. Early dynastic was located in southern , with its borders extending from the to parts of the and rivers.

Egyptians, Romans, and the Greeks were the first people known to have explicitly formulated a political philosophy of the state, and to have rationally analyzed political institutions. Prior to this, states were described and justified in terms of religious myths..

Several important political innovations of classical antiquity came from the Greek city-states ( ) and the . The Greek city-states before the 4th century granted citizenship rights to their free population; in these rights were combined with a form of government that was to have a long afterlife in political thought and history.


Modern states
The Peace of Westphalia (1648) is considered by political scientists to be the beginning of the modern international system,..Jackson, R. H. 2005. "The Evolution of World Society" in The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, edited by P. Owens. and S. Smith. : Oxford University Press. p. 53. . in which external powers should avoid interfering in another country's domestic affairs.. The principle of non-interference in other countries' domestic affairs was laid out in the mid-18th century by Swiss jurist Emer de Vattel. States became the primary institutional agents in an interstate system of relations. The Peace of Westphalia is said to have ended attempts to impose supranational authority on European states. The "Westphalian" doctrine of states as independent agents was bolstered by the rise in 19th century thought of , under which legitimate were assumed to correspond to —groups of people united by language and culture.

In , during the 18th century, the classic non-national states were the multinational : the , Kingdom of France, Kingdom of Hungary,Eric Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990; ) chapter II "The popular protonationalism", pp. 80–81 French edition (Gallimard, 1992). According to Hobsbawm, the main source for this subject is Ferdinand Brunot (ed.), Histoire de la langue française, Paris, 1927–1943, 13 volumes, in particular volume IX. He also refers to Michel de Certeau, Dominique Julia, Judith Revel, Une politique de la langue: la Révolution française et les patois: l'enquête de l'abbé Grégoire, Paris, 1975. For the problem of the transformation of a minority official language into a widespread national language during and after the French Revolution, see Renée Balibar, L'Institution du français: essai sur le co-linguisme des Carolingiens à la République, Paris, 1985 (also Le co-linguisme, PUF, Que sais-je?, 1994, but out of print) The Institution of the French language: essay on colinguism from the Carolingian to the Republic. Finally, Hobsbawm refers to Renée Balibar and Dominique Laporte, Le Français national: politique et pratique de la langue nationale sous la Révolution, Paris, 1974. the , the , the , and the . Such empires also existed in Asia, Africa, and the Americas; in the , immediately after the death of Muhammad in 632, were established, which developed into multi-ethnic transnational empires.

(2025). 9780199327959, Oxford University Press. .
The multinational empire was an absolute monarchy ruled by a king, or . The population belonged to many ethnic groups, and they spoke many languages. The empire was dominated by one ethnic group, and their language was usually the language of public administration. The ruling was usually, but not always, from that group. Some of the smaller European states were not so ethnically diverse, but were also states, ruled by a . A few of the smaller states survived, such as the independent principalities of , , , and the republic of .

Most theories see the nation state as a 19th-century European phenomenon, facilitated by developments such as state-mandated education, mass , and . However, historians also note the early emergence of a relatively unified state and identity in and the .

(2025). 9780974896106, Peace Education Books. .
Scholars such as Steven Weber, David Woodward, , and Jeremy Black have advanced the hypothesis that the nation state did not arise out of political ingenuity or an unknown undetermined source, nor was it an accident of history or political invention.Black, Jeremy.1998. . pp. 59–98, 100–147.. 1977–1978 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France. Rather, the nation state is an inadvertent byproduct of 15th-century intellectual discoveries in political economy, , , political geography, and Rizaldy, Aldino, and Wildan Firdaus. 2012. " Direct Georeferencing: A New Standard in Photogrammetry for High Accuracy Mapping ." International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 39(B1):5–9. Bellezza, Giuliano. 2013. " On Borders: From Ancient to Postmodern Times ." Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 40-4(W3):1–7. combined with Mikhailova, E. V. 2013. " Appearance and Appliance of the Twin-Cities Concept on the Russian-Chinese Border ." Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 40-4(W3):105–110. Pickering, S. 2013. " Borderlines: Maps and the spread of the Westphalian state from Europe to Asia Part One – The European Context". Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 40-4(W3):111–116. . . and advances in map-making technologies..

Some nation states, such as and , came into existence at least partly as a result of political campaigns by , during the 19th century. In both cases, the territory was previously divided among other states, some of them very small. Liberal ideas of played a role in German unification, which was preceded by a , the . National self-determination was a key aspect of United States President 's , leading to the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the after the First World War, while the became the after the Russian Civil War. lead to the creation of new nation states in place of multinational empires in the .


Globalization
Political globalization began in the 20th century through intergovernmental organizations and supranational unions. The League of Nations was founded after World War I, and after World War II it was replaced by the . Various have been signed through it. Regional integration has been pursued by the , , the , and . International political institutions on the international level include the International Criminal Court, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization.


Political science
The study of politics is called political science. It comprises numerous subfields, namely three: Comparative politics, international relations and .
(2025). 9780198820604, Oxford University Press. .
Political science is related to, and draws upon, the fields of economics, , sociology, history, philosophy, geography, psychology, , , and .

Comparative politics is the science of comparison and teaching of different types of , political actors, legislature and associated fields. International relations deals with the interaction between as well as intergovernmental and transnational organizations. Political philosophy is more concerned with contributions of various classical and contemporary thinkers and philosophers.

Political science is methodologically diverse and appropriates many methods originating in , , and cognitive neuroscience. Approaches include , , rational choice theory, , , post-structuralism, realism, institutionalism, and pluralism. Political science, as one of the , uses methods and techniques that relate to the kinds of inquiries sought: primary sources such as historical documents and official records, secondary sources such as scholarly journal articles, research, , , experimental research, and model building.


Political system
political system defines the process for making official decisions. It is usually compared to the , , , and other . According to , "A political system can be designated as the interactions through which values are authoritatively allocated for a society." Each political system is embedded in a society with its own political culture, and they in turn shape their societies through . The interactions between different political systems are the basis for .


Forms of government
Forms of government can be classified by several ways. In terms of the structure of power, there are (including constitutional monarchies) and (usually presidential, semi-presidential, or parliamentary).

The separation of powers describes the degree of horizontal integration between the , the executive, the , and other independent institutions.


Source of power
The source of power determines the difference between , , and .

In a democracy, political legitimacy is based on popular sovereignty. Forms of democracy include representative democracy, , and . These are separated by the way decisions are made, whether by representatives, , or by citizen juries. Democracies can be either republics or constitutional monarchies.

Oligarchy is a power structure where a minority rules. These may be in the form of , , , , , , , , , , , , , , or .

Autocracies are either (including military dictatorships) or absolute monarchies.


Vertical integration
In terms of level of vertical integration, political systems can be divided into (from least to most integrated) , , and .

A federation (also known as a federal state) is a characterized by a of partially under a central federal government (). In a federation, the self-governing status of the component states, as well as the division of power between them and the central government, is typically constitutionally entrenched and may not be altered by a unilateral decision of either party, the states or the federal political body. Federations were formed first in Switzerland, then in the United States in 1776, in Canada in 1867 and in Germany in 1871 and in 1901, . Compared to a , a has less centralized power.


State
All the above forms of government are variations of the same basic , the . The state has been defined by as a political entity that has monopoly on violence within its territory, while the Montevideo Convention holds that states need to have a defined territory; a permanent population; a government; and a capacity to enter into international relations.

A stateless society is a that is not by a state.. In stateless societies, there is little of ; most positions of authority that do exist are very limited in and are generally not permanently held positions; and social bodies that resolve disputes through predefined rules tend to be small.

(2025). 9780814722190, NYU Press. .
Stateless societies are highly variable in economic organization and cultural practices..

While stateless societies were the norm in human prehistory, few stateless societies exist today; almost the entire global population resides within the jurisdiction of a . In some regions nominal state authorities may be very weak and wield . Over the course of history most stateless peoples have been integrated into the state-based societies around them.

(2025). 9780814727096, NYU Press. .

Some political philosophies consider the state undesirable, and thus consider the formation of a stateless society a goal to be achieved. A central tenet of is the advocacy of society without states. The type of society sought for varies significantly between anarchist schools of thought, ranging from extreme to complete collectivism.

(2025). 9780192802767, Oxford University Press. .
In , Marx's theory of the state considers that in a society the state, an undesirable institution, would be unnecessary and wither away. A related concept is that of stateless communism, a phrase sometimes used to describe Marx's anticipated post-capitalist society.


Constitutions
are written documents that specify and limit the powers of the different branches of government. Although a constitution is a written document, there is also an unwritten constitution. The unwritten constitution is continually being written by the legislative and judiciary branch of government; this is just one of those cases in which the nature of the circumstances determines the form of government that is most appropriate. England did set the fashion of written constitutions during the Civil War but after the Restoration abandoned them to be taken up later by the American Colonies after their emancipation and then after the Revolution and the rest of Europe including the European colonies.

Constitutions often set out separation of powers, dividing the government into the executive, the , and the (together referred to as the trias politica), in order to achieve checks and balances within the state. Additional independent branches may also be created, including civil service commissions, election commissions, and supreme audit institutions.


Political culture
Political culture describes how impacts politics. Every is embedded in a particular political culture. 's definition is that, "Political culture is the set of attitudes, beliefs, and sentiments, which give order and meaning to a political process and which provide the underlying assumptions and rules that govern behavior in the political system."

Trust is a major factor in political culture, as its level determines the capacity of the state to function.. is the degree to which a political culture is concerned with issues which are not of immediate physical or material concern, such as and . has also an impact on political culture.


Political dysfunction

Political corruption
Political corruption is the use of powers for illegitimate private gain, conducted by government officials or their network contacts. Forms of political corruption include , , , and . Forms of political patronage, in turn, includes , earmarking, , , and ; as well as political machines, which is a political system that operates for corrupt ends.

When corruption is embedded in political culture, this may be referred to as or neopatrimonialism. A form of government that is built on corruption is called a ('rule of thieves').


Insincere politics
The words "politics" and "political" are sometimes used as pejoratives to mean political action that is deemed to be overzealous, performative, or insincere.


Levels of politics

Macropolitics
Macropolitics can either describe political issues that affect an entire political system (e.g. the ), or refer to interactions between political systems (e.g. international relations).

Global politics (or world politics) covers all aspects of politics that affect multiple political systems, in practice meaning any political phenomenon crossing national borders. This can include , nation-states, multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations or international organizations. An important element is international relations: the relations between nation-states may be peaceful when they are conducted through , or they may be violent, which is described as . States that are able to exert strong international influence are referred to as , whereas less-powerful ones may be called or . The international system of power is called the world order, which is affected by the balance of power that defines the degree of polarity in the system. are potentially destabilizing to it, especially if they display or .

Politics inside the limits of political systems, which in contemporary context correspond to national , are referred to as domestic politics. This includes most forms of , such as , , or , which are executed by the state .


Mesopolitics
Mesopolitics describes the politics of intermediary structures within a political system, such as or movements.

A political party is a political organization that typically seeks to attain and maintain political power within , usually by participating in political campaigns, educational outreach, or . Parties often espouse an expressed or vision, bolstered by a written with specific goals, forming a among disparate interests..

Political parties within a particular political system together form the , which can be either multiparty, , dominant-party, or , depending on the level of pluralism. This is affected by characteristics of the political system, including its . According to Duverger's law, first-past-the-post systems are likely to lead to two-party systems, while proportional representation systems are more likely to create a multiparty system.


Micropolitics
Micropolitics describes the actions of individual actors within the political system. This is often described as political participation. Political participation may take many forms, including:


Political values

Democracy
Democracy is a system of processing conflicts in which outcomes depend on what participants do, but no single force controls what occurs and its outcomes. The uncertainty of outcomes is inherent in democracy. Democracy makes all forces struggle repeatedly to realize their interests and devolves power from groups of people to sets of rules.

Among modern political theorists, there are three contending conceptions of democracy: aggregative, deliberative, and radical.


Aggregation
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit the preferences of citizens, and aggregate them together to determine what social policies the society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on , where the policy with the most votes gets implemented.

Different variants of aggregative democracy exist. Under minimalism, democracy is a system of government in which citizens have given teams of political leaders the right to rule in periodic elections. According to this minimalist conception, citizens cannot and should not "rule" because, for example, on most issues, most of the time, they have no clear views or their views are not well-founded. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view most famously in his book Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.Joseph Schumpeter, (1950). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper Perennial. . Contemporary proponents of minimalism include William H. Riker, , and .

According to the theory of , on the other hand, citizens should vote directly, not through their representatives, on legislative proposals. Proponents of direct democracy offer varied reasons to support this view. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites. Most importantly, citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies.

Governments will tend to produce laws and policies that are close to the views of the median voter—with half to their left and the other half to their right. This is not a desirable outcome as it represents the action of self-interested and somewhat unaccountable political elites competing for votes. suggests that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individual and governments. Downs laid out this view in his 1957 book An Economic Theory of Democracy..


Polyarchy
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration (not necessarily that all people are equally satisfied by the collective decision). He uses the term to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation.. Similarly, argues that "democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal".. 2006. Is Democracy Possible Here? Princeton: Princeton University Press. . p. 134.


Deliberation
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by . Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups., and Dennis Thompson. 2002. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press. Cohen, Joshua. 1997. "Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy." In Essays on Reason and Politics: Deliberative Democracy, edited by J. Bohman and W. Rehg. Cambridge: The MIT Press. pp. 72–73.Ethan J. 2006. "Can Direct Democracy Be Made Deliberative?" Buffalo Law Review 54. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule.


Equality
Equality is a state of affairs in which all people within a specific or isolated group have the same , especially socioeconomic status, including protection of and , as well as access to certain and . Furthermore, it may also include , economic equality and other . Social equality requires the absence of legally enforced or boundaries and the absence of based on by an inalienable aspect of a person's identity. To this end, there must be equal justice under law, and equal opportunity regardless of, sex, gender, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, origin, or class, income or property, language, , convictions, opinions, health or disability.


Left–right spectrum
A common way of understanding politics is through the left–right political spectrum, which ranges from left-wing politics via to right-wing politics. This classification is comparatively recent and dates from the French Revolution, when those members of the National Assembly who supported the , the common people and a sat on the left and supporters of the , aristocratic privilege and the Church sat on the right.

Today, the left is generally , seeking social in . The more extreme elements of the left, named the far-left, tend to support means for achieving this. This includes ideologies such as and . The center-left, on the other hand, advocates for more approaches, for example that of .

In contrast, the right is generally motivated by , which seeks to conserve what it sees as the important elements of society such as law and order, limited government and preserving individual freedoms. The far-right goes beyond this, and often represents a turn against progress, seeking to undo it. Examples of such ideologies have included and . The center-right may be less clear-cut and more mixed in this regard, with supporting the spread of and , and one-nation conservatives more open to social welfare programs.

According to , one of the major exponents of this distinction, the left believes in attempting to eradicate social inequality—believing it to be unethical or unnatural, while the right regards most social inequality as the result of ineradicable natural inequalities, and sees attempts to enforce social equality as utopian or authoritarian.. Some ideologies, notably Christian Democracy, claim to combine left and right-wing politics; according to Geoffrey K. Roberts and Patricia Hogwood, "In terms of ideology, Christian Democracy has incorporated many of the views held by liberals, conservatives and socialists within a wider framework of moral and Christian principles.". Movements which claim or formerly claimed to be above the left-right divide include Fascist economic politics in Italy and in Argentina..


Freedom
Political freedom (also known as political liberty or autonomy) is a central in political thought and one of the most important features of societies. has been described as freedom from oppression or coercion and unreasonable external constraints on action, often enacted through civil and political rights, while is the absence of disabling conditions for an individual and the fulfillment of enabling conditions, e.g. economic compulsion, in a society. This capability approach to freedom requires economic, social and cultural rights in order to be realized.


Authoritarianism and libertarianism
and libertarianism disagree the amount of individual freedom each person possesses in that society relative to the state. One author describes authoritarian political systems as those where "individual and goals are subjugated to group goals, expectations and conformities", while libertarians generally oppose the and hold the as sovereign. In their purest form, libertarians are , who argue for the total abolition of the state, of political parties and of other political entities, while the purest authoritarians are, by definition, who support state control over all aspects of society. Https://www.dictionary.com/browse/totalitarian?s=t" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> Archived from the original on 25 September 2018.

For instance, classical liberalism (also known as liberalism)Adams, Ian. 2001. Political Ideology Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 20. is a doctrine stressing individual freedom and limited government. This includes the importance of human rationality, individual , , , the protection of , constitutional limitation of government, and individual freedom from restraint as exemplified in the writings of , , , , , and others. According to the libertarian Institute for Humane Studies, "the libertarian, or 'classical liberal', perspective is that individual well-being, prosperity, and social harmony are fostered by 'as much liberty as possible' and 'as little government as necessary'."IHS. 2019. " What Is Libertarian?." Institute for Humane Studies. George Mason University. For anarchist political philosopher L. Susan Brown (1993), "liberalism and are two political philosophies that are fundamentally concerned with individual freedom yet differ from one another in very distinct ways. Anarchism shares with liberalism a radical commitment to individual freedom while rejecting liberalism's competitive property relations."Brown, L. Susan. 1993. . Black Rose Books.


See also
  • Historic recurrence
  • Index of politics articles – alphabetical list of political subjects
  • List of banned political parties
  • List of politics awards
  • List of years in politics
  • Outline of political science – structured list of political topics, arranged by subject area
  • – lists of political topics
  • Political censorship
  • Political corruption
  • Political polarization
  • Political representation of nature
  • Political scandal
  • Political stability


Notes

Citations

Bibliography


Further reading
  • Adcock, Robert. 2014. Liberalism and the Emergence of American Political Science: A Transatlantic Tale. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Adcock, Robert, Mark Bevir, and Shannon Stimson (eds.). 2007. Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges Since 1870. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Almond, Gabriel A. 1996. "Political Science: The History of the Discipline", pp. 50–96, in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.), The New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • , "Ruthless and Truthless" (review of , The Assault on Truth: Boris Johnson, Donald Trump and the Emergence of a New Moral Barbarism, Simon and Schuster, 2021, , 192 pp.; and and , eds., Political Advice: Past, Present and Future, I.B. Tauris, February 2021, , 240 pp.), London Review of Books, vol. 43, no. 9 (6 May 2021), pp. 3, 5–8.
  • Munck, Gerardo L., and Richard Snyder (eds.). Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.
  • Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • (2025). 9780713993646, Allen Lane.

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
4s Time