Product Code Database
Example Keywords: stocking -resident $46
   » » Wiki: Lufengosaurus
Tag Wiki 'Lufengosaurus'.
Tag

Lufengosaurus (, meaning "Lufeng lizard") is a of which lived during the Early period in what is now southwestern ."Lufengosaurus." In: Dodson, Peter & Britt, Brooks & Carpenter, Kenneth & Forster, Catherine A. & Gillette, David D. & Norell, Mark A. & Olshevsky, George & Parrish, J. Michael & Weishampel, David B. The Age of Dinosaurs. Publications International, LTD. p. 38. .


History of Discovery
The first remains of Lufengosaurus were found during the late 1930s by in the Lower Lufeng Formation at Shawan, near Lufeng in the of China. From 1938 onwards, Meinian was joined by paleontologist (Chinese: 杨钟健, Yáng Zhōngjiàn). Young would go on to name the animal's , Lufengosaurus huenei, in 1940, with the generic name referring to Lufeng where it was found and the specific name honoring Young's old tutor, the German paleontologist Friedrich von Huene.Young, C.-C. 1940. " Preliminary notes on the Lufeng vertebrate fossils". Bulletin of the Geological Society of China 20(3-4): 235-239 Young would go on to publish a detailed description of the animal the following year and would assign specimen IVPP V15 as the of the species, this specimen consisting of a nearly complete with a well-preserved .

A second species of Lufengosaurus, L. magnus, was also named by Young in 1940 in the same paper as Lufengosaurus huenei and would be fully described by him in 1947. As its specific name suggests, with the word magnus meaning "the large one" in , this species was considered separate from L. huenei due to its significantly larger size, with it being up to a third larger than L. huenei in length. However, most authors have regarded it as a junior synonym of L. huenei, with its specimens being said to simply represent larger individuals of the type species.

Another "" Young named in 1940, , was noted by him to be distinct from Lufengosaurus on behalf of the limbs being at least 50% smaller, though similarities in overall form were noted. This genus has subsequently been referred to Lufengosaurus on two separate occasions: once by in 1976 and once in a 2017 SVP presentation by Wang and colleagues. The referral is however doubted by some.

Lufengosaurus would be referred to another genus yet again in the 1980s, with suggesting that Lufengosaurus and were species of the genus 1981.Cooper M. (1981) "The prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen from Zimbabwe: its biology, mode of life and phylogenetic significance". Occasional Papers Of The National Museums and Monuments of Rhodesia Series B Natural Sciences 6(10): 689-840 However, a reanalysis in 2005 by Paul Barrett and colleagues, performed on the skull of Lufengosaurus huenei established it firmly as a valid genus separate from both Massospondylus and Yunnanosaurus based on craniodental characteristics. This same 2005 study would provide an extensive and detailed redescription of the cranial osteology of the holotype skull of the animal.

The year 1985 saw name a new species of the animal in a list of Jurassic reptiles from China. Zhao named it Lufengosaurus "changduensis", with the naming of the animal being prompted by the recovery of a specimen from .Zhao X., 1985, "The Jurassic Reptilia". In: Wang, Cheng and Wang (eds.). The Jurassic System of China. Stratigraphy of China, Volume 11. pp. 286-289 The species has however remained undescribed and thus a , with neither the reported Tibetan specimen nor any other material being formally assigned to it after it was named.

In 2015, preserved was found in a Lufengosaurus fossil by an international team led by of 's National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center. The protein, described in Nature Communications (2017 January 31), was over 100 million years older than any previously recorded fossil protein, having sizeable implications for our understanding of protein preservation.


Description
Lufengosaurus is often described as a rather small early , about long. However, when the L. magnus specimens are included, its size is more considerable: Gregory S. Paul estimated a length of and a weight of in 2010, while Benson et al. (2014) estimated a mass of .Paul, G.S., 2010, The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Princeton University Press p. 135 For an early sauropodomorph, its neck is rather long and the forelimbs are relatively short. From these it was inferred that the species was bipedal, even before it became common to assume this for all basal sauropodomorphs. Yang published a full osteology of Lufengosaurus in 1941, but was severely hampered in his diagnosis by the war conditions, preventing a full access to literature and making an adequate comparison with related forms impossible. Of the skull a modern description exists. The skull of the holotype is long.


Skull
Lufengosaurus snout was deep and broad, and it had distinctive bony bumps just behind its large and on its . A bony ridge on the side of its might have helped anchor . If so, then Lufengosaurus must have had larger cheeks than most other . Its closely spaced, serrated teeth suited a diet of leaves.
(2025). 9780756699109, Dorling Kindersley.

About thirty major specimens have been discovered, including those of juveniles.Sekiya, T. & Dong, Z. 2010. "A New Juvenile Specimen of Lufengosaurus huenei Young, 1941 (Dinosauria: Prosauropoda) from the Lower Jurassic Lower Lufeng Formation of Yunnan, Southwest China". Acta Geologica Sinica 84(1): 11-21 In 1958 a specimen of Lufengosaurus was the first complete dinosaur skeleton mounted in China; a commemorative postage stamp of 8 yuan was issued on 15 April 1958 to celebrate the event, the first time ever a dinosaur was depicted on a stamp. The skeleton is now on display in the Paleozoological Museum of China in .


Classification
Young originally assigned Lufengosaurus to the Plateosauridae of the suborder Prosauropoda, noting that it stood close to Plateosaurus fraasianus. It is still sometimes considered a member of Plateosauridae, though some cladistic analyses have found it to be a member of Massospondylidae instead. This matches with our current knowledge of Lufengosaurus' anatomy, which has proven to be more similar to taxa like Coloradisaurus and Massospondylus than was previously thought, with Lufengosaurus formerly being considered to have more anatomical similarities with Plateosaurus. Lufengosaurus has historically had a maximum of three named species, only one of these being almost unilaterally considered valid nowadays: L. huenei. The other two species, L. magnus and L. "changduensis", are respectively considered a junior synonym and a nomen nudum. Specimens assigned to L. magnus in the past are now referred to the type species instead.

Barret, Upchurch and Wang recovered Lufengosaurus as being the sister taxon to Gyposaurus sinensis in their 2005 cladistic analysis. A differing result was recovered from a cladistic analysis done by Fernando E. Novas and colleagues in 2011, which recovered the animal as the sister taxon to Glacialisaurus hammeri. This result was replicated by Oliver W. M. Rauhut and colleagues' 2020 analysis. A simplified version of the resulting cladogram, not showing the part including the Sauropodiform taxa, is shown below.


Palaeobiology
Like all early sauropodomorphs, Lufengosaurus had much longer hindlimbs than forelimbs and was probably bipedal. It was herbivorous, although it had sharp claws (with an especially large thumb claw) and teeth. These features have been used to support claims, the most recent by Cooper in 1981, that Lufengosaurus may have been at least partially omnivorous, but the sharp teeth witnessed in Lufengosaurus and other early sauropodomorphs are similar to those seen in – which are herbivorous. Alternatively, the claws may have been used for defense or raking foliage from trees. Embryos of this genus also represent the earliest evidence of vertebrate soft tissue preservation. Lufengosaurus likely engaged in parental feeding as a fully altricial animal, given that the bone development in its femora is closer to that of altricial pigeons than precocious chickens.


Palaeoecology
While originally considered to be a Triassic locality, nowadays the Lufeng Formation is dated to the Lower Jurassic instead (Hettangian-Sinemurian), implying that Lufengosaurus existed in a more recent timeframe than previously thought.


Sources
  • (1988). 9780565010737, China Ocean Press, Beijing & British Museum (Natural History).
  • (1992). 9783540520849, China Ocean Press, Beijing.


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time