Product Code Database
Example Keywords: grand theft -jewel $14
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Grapheme
Tag Wiki 'Grapheme'.
Tag

In , a grapheme is the smallest functional unit of a .Coulmas, F. (1996), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 174 The word grapheme is derived from 's ('write'), and the suffix -eme (by analogy with and other ). The study of graphemes is called . The concept of a grapheme is abstract; it is similar to the notion of a character in . (A specific geometric shape that represents any particular grapheme in a given is called a .) In orthographic and linguistic notation, a particular glyph (character) is represented as a grapheme (is used in its graphemic sense) by enclosing it within : e.g. .


Conceptualization
There are two main opposing grapheme concepts.Kohrt, M. (1986), The term 'grapheme' in the history and theory of linguistics. In G. Augst (Ed.), New trends in graphemics and orthography. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 80–96.

In the so-called referential conception, graphemes are interpreted as the smallest units of writing that correspond with sounds (more accurately ). In this concept, the sh in the written English word shake would be a grapheme because it represents the phoneme /ʃ/. This referential concept is linked to the dependency hypothesis that claims that writing merely depicts speech.

By contrast, the analogical concept defines graphemes analogously to phonemes, i.e. via written such as shake vs. snake. In this example, h and n are graphemes because they distinguish two words. This analogical concept is associated with the autonomy hypothesis which holds that writing is a system in its own right and should be studied independently from speech. Both concepts have weaknesses.Lockwood, D. G. (2001), Phoneme and grapheme: How parallel can they be? LACUS Forum 27, 307–316.

Some models adhere to both concepts simultaneously by including two individual units,Rezec, O. (2013), Ein differenzierteres Strukturmodell des deutschen Schriftsystems. Linguistische Berichte 234, pp. 227–254. which are given names such as phonological-fit grapheme for the grapheme according to the referential concept ( sh in shake), and graphemic grapheme for the grapheme according to the analogical conception ( h in shake).Herrick, E. M. (1994), Of course a structural graphemics is possible! LACUS Forum 21, pp. 413–424.

In newer concepts, in which the grapheme is interpreted as a dyadic ,Fedorova, L. (2013), The development of graphic representation in abugida writing: The akshara’s grammar. Lingua Posnaniensis 55:2, pp. 49–66. it is defined as a minimal unit of writing that is both lexically distinctive and correspondent to a linguistic unit (, , or ).Meletis, D. (2019), The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research.


Notation
Graphemes are often notated within : e.g. .The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language, second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 196 This is analogous to the slash notation used for . Analogous to the notation used for phones, are sometimes denoted with vertical lines, e.g. .
(2025). 9783110757774, De Gruyter Mouton.


Glyphs
In the same way that the of are speech sounds or phones (and different phones representing the same phoneme are called ), the surface forms of graphemes are (sometimes graphs), namely concrete written representations of symbols (and different glyphs representing the same grapheme are called ).

Thus, a grapheme can be regarded as an of a collection of glyphs that are all functionally equivalent.

For example, in written English (or other languages using the ), there are two different physical representations of the Latin letter "a": "a" and "ɑ". Since, however, the substitution of either of them for the other cannot change the meaning of a word, they are considered to be allographs of the same grapheme, which can be written . Similarly, the grapheme corresponding to "Arabic numeral zero" has a unique semantic identity and Unicode value but exhibits variation in the form of . Italic and bold face forms are also allographic, as is the variation seen in (as in Times New Roman) versus (as in ) forms.

There is some disagreement as to whether capital and lower case letters are allographs or distinct graphemes. Capitals are generally found in certain triggering contexts that do not change the meaning of a word: a proper name, for example, or at the beginning of a sentence, or all caps in a newspaper headline. In other contexts, capitalization can determine meaning: compare, for example and : the former is a language, the latter is for shining shoes.

Some linguists consider digraphs like the in ship to be distinct graphemes, but these are generally analyzed as sequences of graphemes. Non-stylistic ligatures, however, such as , are distinct graphemes, as are various letters with distinctive , such as .

Identical glyphs may not always represent the same grapheme. For example, the three letters , and appear identical but each has a different meaning: in order, they are the Latin letter A, the Cyrillic letter Azǔ/Азъ and the Greek letter . Each has its own in Unicode: , and .


Types of grapheme
The principal types of graphemes are (more accurately termed morphogramsJoyce, T. (2011), The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems, Written Language and Literacy 14:1, pp. 58–81. ), which represent words or (for example Chinese characters, the "&" representing the word and, ); characters, representing (as in Japanese ); and letters, corresponding roughly to (see next section). For a full discussion of the different types, see .

There are additional graphemic components used in writing, such as , mathematical symbols, such as the space, and other . Ancient often used silent to disambiguate the meaning of a neighboring (non-silent) word.


Relationship with phonemes
As mentioned in the previous section, in languages that use writing systems, many of the graphemes stand in principle for the (significant sounds) of the language. In practice, however, the of such languages entail at least a certain amount of deviation from the ideal of exact grapheme–phoneme correspondence. A phoneme may be represented by a multigraph (sequence of more than one grapheme), as the digraph sh represents a single sound in English (and sometimes a single grapheme may represent more than one phoneme, as with the Russian letter я or the Spanish c). Some graphemes may not represent any sound at all (like the b in English debt or the h in all Spanish words containing the said letter), and often the rules of correspondence between graphemes and phonemes become complex or irregular, particularly as a result of historical that are not necessarily reflected in spelling. "Shallow" orthographies such as those of standard and have relatively regular (though not always one-to-one) correspondence between graphemes and phonemes, while those of French and English have much less regular correspondence, and are known as deep orthographies.

Multigraphs representing a single phoneme are normally treated as combinations of separate letters, not as graphemes in their own right. However, in some languages a multigraph may be treated as a single unit for the purposes of ; for example, in a dictionary, the section for words that start with comes after that for . For more examples, see .


See also
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs