Product Code Database
Example Keywords: tie -the $82-192
   » » Wiki: Dioscoreales
Tag Wiki 'Dioscoreales'.
Tag

The Dioscoreales are an order of , organized under modern classification systems, such as the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group or the Angiosperm Phylogeny Web. Among monocot plants, Dioscoreales are grouped with the , wherein they are a to the . In total, the order Dioscoreales comprises three families, 22 and about 850 .

Dioscoreales contains the family , which notably includes the yams ( ) and several other and plants, some of which are heavily cultivated as staple food sources in certain countries.

Certain species are found solely in arid climates (incl. parts of ), and have adapted to this harsh environment as -forming, caudiciformes, including Dioscorea elephantipes, the "elephant's foot" or "elephant-foot yam".

Older systems tended to place all lilioid monocots with reticulate veined leaves (such as and together with Dioscoraceae) in Dioscoreales; as currently circumscribed by phylogenetic analysis, using combined and molecular methods, Dioscreales now contains many reticulate-veined within the Dioscoraceae, as well as the myco-heterotrophic and the .


Description
Dioscoreales are or forest floor plants. They may be or . include tuberous roots, glandular hairs, characteristics and the presence of . Other characteristics of the order include the presence of , annular that are found in both the and . The leaves are often unsheathed at the base, have a distinctive petiole and reticulate veined lamina. Alternatively they may be small and scale-like with a sheathed base. The are , and may be bisexual or , while the flowers or bear glandular hairs. The may be conspicuous or reduced and the style is short with well developed style branches. The persist in the development of the , which is a dry capsule or . In the seed, the endotegmen is and the embryo short.

All of the species except the genera placed in express simultaneous microsporogenesis. Plants in show successive microsporogenesis which is one of the traits indicating that the family is sister to all the other members included in the order.


Taxonomy

Pre-Darwinian
For the early history from (1853) onwards, see Caddick et al. (2000) Table 1, Caddick et al. (2002a) Table 1 and Table 2 in Bouman (1995). The taxonomic classification of Dioscoreales has been complicated by the presence of a number of morphological features reminiscent of the , leading some authors to place the order as intermediate between the monocotyledons and the dicotyledons.

While Lindley did not use the term "Dioscoreales", he placed the family Dioscoraceae together with four other families in what he referred to as an Alliance (the equivalent of the modern Order) called Dictyogens. He reflected the uncertainty as to the place of this Alliance by placing it as a class of its own between Endogens (monocots) and Exogens (dicots) The botanical authority is given to (1835) by APG for his description of the family Dioscoreae or Ordo, while other sources cite Hooker (Dioscoreales Hook.f.) for his use of the term "Dioscorales" in 1873 with a single family, Dioscoreae. However, in his more definitive work, the Genera plantara (1883), he simply placed Dioscoraceae in the Epigynae "Series".


Post-Darwinian
Although 's Origin of Species (1859) preceded Bentham and Hooker's publication, the latter project was commenced much earlier and was initially sceptical of . The new approach changed the way that taxonomists considered plant classification, incorporating information into their schemata, but this did little to further define the circumscription of Dioscoreaceae. The major works in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century employing this approach were in the literature. Authors such as , and Wettstein placed this family in the , a major subdivision of monocotyledons. it remained to Hutchinson (1926) to resurrect the Dioscoreales to group Dioscoreaceae and related families together. Hutchinson's circumscription of Dioscoreales included three other families in addition to Dioscoreaceae, , and . Of these only Trichopodaceae was included in the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) classification (see below), but was subsumed into Dioscoraceae. Stenomeridaceae, as was also included in Dioscoreaceae as subfamily Stenomeridoideae, the remaining genera being grouped in Dioscoreoideae. Roxburghiaceae on the other hand was segregated in the as . Most taxonomists in the twentieth century (the exception was the 1981 which placed most such plants in order , subclass , class =monocotyledons, division =angiosperms) recognised Dioscoreales as a distinct order, but demonstrated wide variations in its composition.

, in the second version of his taxonomic classification (1982) raised the Liliiflorae to a and placed Dioscoreales as an order within it. In , Dioscoreales contained only three families, Dioscoreaceae, ( i.e. Hutchinson's Roxburghiaceae) and . The latter two families had been treated as a separate order (, or Roxburghiales) by other authors, such as Huber (1969). The APG would later assign these to Pandanales and respectively. Dahlgren's construction of Dioscoreaceae included the Stenomeridaceae and Trichopodaceae, doubting these were distinct, and Croomiaceae in Stemonaceae. Furthermore, he expressed doubts about the order's homogeneity, especially Trilliaceae. The Dioscoreales at that time were marginally distinguishable from the . In his examination of Huber's Stemonales, he found that the two constituent families had as close an affinity to Dioscoreaceae as to each other, and hence included them. He also considered closely related families and their relationship to Dioscoreales, such as the Taccaceae, then in its own order, Taccales. Similar considerations were discussed with respect to two Asparagales families, Smilacaceae and Petermanniaceae.

In Dahlgren's third and final version (1985) that broader circumscription of Dioscoreales was created within the superorder , subclass (monocotyledons), class (angiosperms) and comprised the seven families , , , , , and . has either been treated as a separate family closely related to or as a tribe (Thismieae) within a more broadly defined Burmanniaceae, forming a separate order, , in the Dahlgren system. The related were treated as tribe Narthecieae within the in a third order, the , by Dahlgren. Dahlgren considered the Dioscoreales to most strongly resemble the ancestral monocotyledons, and hence sharing "dicotyledonous" characteristics, making it the most central monocotyledon order. Of these seven families, Bouman considered Dioscoreaceae, Trichopodaceae, Stemonaceae and Taccaceae to represent the "core" families of the order. However, that study also indicated both a clear delineation of the order from other orders particularly Asparagales, and a lack of homogeneity within the order.


Molecular phylogenetics and the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
The increasing availability of molecular phylogenetics methods in addition to morphological characteristics in the 1990s led to major reconsiderations of the relationships within the monocotyledons. In that large multi-institutional examination of the using the the authors used Dahlgren's system as their basis, but followed Thorne (1992) in altering the of the superorders from " -iflorae" to " -anae". This demonstrated that the Lilianae comprised three lineages corresponding to Dahlgren's orders Dioscoreales, Liliales, and Asparagaless.

Under the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group of 1998, which took Dahlgren's system as a basis, the order was placed in the and comprised the five families , Dioscoreaceae, Taccaceae, and Trichopodaceae.

In (2003), a number of changes were made to Dioscoreales, as a result of an extensive study by Caddick and colleagues (2002), using an analysis of three , , atpB and 18S rDNA, in addition to morphology. These studies resulted in a re-examination of the relationships between most of the genera within the order. Thismiaceae was shown to be a to Burmanniaceae, and so was included in it. The families Taccaceae and Trichopodaceae were included in Dioscoreaceae, while could also be grouped within Dioscoreales. APG III (2009) did not change this, so the order now comprises three families Burmanniaceae, Dioscoreaceae and Nartheciaceae.

Although further research on the deeper relationships within Dioscoreales continues, the (2016) authors felt it was still premature to propose a restructuring of the order. Specifically these issues involve conflicting information as to the relationship between and Burmanniaceae, and hence whether Thismiaceae should be subsumed in the latter, or reinstated.


Phylogeny
Molecular phylogenetics in Dioscoreales poses special problems due to the absence of in mycoheterotrophs. Dioscoreales is and is placed as a to , as shown in Cladogram I.


Evolution
The data for the evolution of the order is collected from molecular analyses since there are no such fossils found. It is estimated that Dioscoreales and its sister clade split up around 121 million years ago during Early Cretaceous when the was formed. Then it took 3 to 6 million years for the to differentiate in Mid .


Subdivision
The three families of Dioscreales constitutes about 22 genera and about 849 species making it one of the smaller monocot orders. Of these, the largest group is (yams) with about 450 species. By contrast the second largest genus is Burmannia with about 60 species, and most have only one or two.

Some authors, preferring the original APG (1998)families, continue to treat Thismiaceae separately from Burmanniaceae and Taccaceae from Dioscoreaceae. But in the 2015 study of Hertwerk and colleagues, seven genera representing all three families were examined with an eight gene dataset. Dioscoreales was monophyletic and three subclades were represented corresponding to the APG families. Dioscoreaceae and Burmanniaceae were in a sister group relationship.


Etymology
Named after the , which in turn was named by in 1753 to honour the Greek physician and botanist .


Distribution and habitat
Species from this order are distributed across all of the continents except . They are mainly or representatives, but some members of families and are found in cooler regions of and . Order Dioscoreales contains plants that are able to form an underground organ for reservation of as many other . An exception is the family which is entirely myco-heterotrophic and contains species that lack abilities.


Ecology
The three families included in order Dioscoreales also represent three different ecological groups of plants. contains mainly vines ( ) and other crawling species ( ). on the other hand is a family composed of herbaceous plants with a rather lily-like appearance ( ) while is entirely myco-heterotrophic group.


Uses
Many members of produce (yams) which form in tropical regions. They have also been the source of for the pharmaceutical industry, including the production of oral .


Notes

Bibliography

Articles and chapters


Books and symposia


Databases

APG

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time