Product Code Database
Example Keywords: wheels -indie $10-199
   » » Wiki: Raoellidae
Tag Wiki 'Raoellidae'.
Tag

Related Products

This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by..

Plays Of The Harvard Dramatic Club

This book may have occasional imperfections <br /> such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, <br /> ..

It focuses on the connection of representation of violence in literary works to historical traumas such as royal death, secularization and regicide. The author contends that dramatic and poetic forms function as historical archives both in their commemorat..

This new edition of the play presents a text and critical apparatus which take full advantage of recent advances in our understanding of Sophoclean manuscripts and scholarship. The introduction and commentary scrutinise all important aspects of the drama -..

The heartwarming Bafta-winning drama returns packed with shocks and surprises as it continues the compelling story of childhood sweethearts reunited after nearly 60 years apart as they and their families negotiate the highs and lows of life and relation..

The Opera House is the hub of cultural and social life in Eastville and everyone who's anyone is a regular visitor. As the lead Detective you must interrogate the leading characters and watch as the story unfolds revealing that the murderer wears a Scaramo..

Following the hit one-off drama which set up the story of one young woman who finds meaning in life by joining the army Lacey Turner (EastEnders) returns in the role of Molly Dawes in the new five-part series: Our Girl. Hot off the helicopter Molly find..

Critically-acclaimed medical drama Chicago Hope returns for a fourth season featuring gripping storylines and more outstanding acting. The hospital staff are faced with more drama as they deal with tough patients and moral dilemmas that challenge them bo..

Raoellidae () is a family of from the middle (early ) closely related to . They are known primarily from northern and , especially in the Subathu Group of India, although potential remains of the raoellid Khirtharia have been found in northern . They are relatively small animals; on average, raoellids were the size of a . However, Khirtharia major, at about twice the size of an average-sized raoellid, would have been approximately the size of a . Meanwhile, the smallest raoellid, Metkatius, was roughly the size of a .

Raoellidae is of particular importance to the understanding of cetacean evolution due to representing a transitional form between fully-aquatic artiodactyls and the semi-aquatic . The close relation to Cetacea was found when one of the technicians working for accidentally broke a fossilized skull of Indohyus. Thewissen noticed the prominent auditory bulla which were very similar to cetaceans. Then, he took the cross section of one of the bones of Indohyus and noticed it was much thicker than terrestrial mammals, hinting at an aquatic lifestyle and confirming their close relation to whales.


History

Etymology
The family Raoellidae is named after the genus Raoella. Raoella itself was named after A. Ranga Rao, a who worked extensively on raoellids. However, Raoella was synonymized with Indohyus by Kumar and Sahni (1985), which was reaffirmed by Thewissen, Gingerich, and Russel (1987). Due to the rules of taxonomic nomenclature, the name Raoellidae stayed despite Raoella no longer being valid.


Classification
Most raoellids were initially placed in clades of basal placental mammals, usually those within Artiodactyla. Indohyus was initally placed within , which is the family including the most basal , Khirtharia and Kunmunella were first assigned to , and Raoella was initially placed within Anthracotheriidae. Many raoellids were also placed within , in part due to Helohyidae being classified within Dichobunidae during the time when most raoellids were being named.

Raoellidae was named by Sahni et al. (1981) as the clade including the last common ancestor of Khirtharia, Kunmunella, and Raoella and all of its descendants. In 1985, the new species Metkatius was added to Raoellidae. The same study ruled that Raoella was a junior synonym of Indohyus and subsequently replaced Raoella with Indohyus as a member of Raoellidae. In 1987, Thewissen, Gingerich, and Russel merged Kunmunella into Indohyus and seperated Bunodentus from Khirtharia but kept it within Raoellidae. They also noted that Haqueina could possibly be a raoellid. In 2001, Thewissen, Williams, and Hussain reverted all of the changes made to Raoellidae by Thewissen, Gingerich, and Russel (1987) and included Haqueina as a raoellid. Orliac and Ducrocq (2012) recovered the same result except for not including Haqueina. Rajouria was added to Raoellidae in the paper describing it.


Characteristics
Raoellids are distinct for their semiaquatic nature, which is believed to represent a transitional form from basal artiodactyls to more derived forms like cetaceans. Raoellids were generally diminuitive creatures that were primarily , although similar to a modern day , would have likely been opportunistic and eat other animals on a somewhat regular basis, especially in the case of the more derived hyperbunodont forms of raoellids ( Khirtharia and Metkatius). Raoellids would have almost certainly be , unlike their closest living relatives. As artiodactyls, raoellids would have been and have hooves, but they would not have been as large as modern non-cetacean artiodactyls and raoellids other toes would have been visible in life.

Raoellidae was initially defined based off relatively few characteristics. They were thought to be basal artiodactyls with moderately long that were distinguished from other mammals primarily by bunolophodont molars and other dental features. It was also noted that the raoellids appeared similar to the of the same region. This was interpreted as raoellids having immigrated to the region, although they also said that Raoellidae was not very similar to Asian artiodactyls which could be interpreted that raoellids were, indeed, native to the Indian subcontinent. Theodor, Erfert, and Métias revised the definition of Raoellidae. Instead of having bunolophodont teeth, they believed raoellids to be very bunodont animals that have a variation in how lophodont they are. Raoellids were defined as having non-molariform premolars and molars that lack the paraconid/paraconule. The definition of Raoellidae was again modified by Orliac and Ducrocq (2012). According to them, raoellids are distinguished as a family by absence of a paraconid along with the reduction of the hypoconulid and parastyle. The teeth contain a large basin and are specialized for shearing. The first to third premolars lost the paracone completely along with one of their roots. The fourth premolar, in contrast, is double rooted and has endocristae that form a transverse loph.


Phylogeny

External phylogeny
When Raoellidae was first named by Sahni et al. (1980), it was placed as a basal group of artiodactyl. Sahni et al. also noted that despite all being basal families of artiodactyls, Raoellidae was not close morphologically to or . In 1987, Thewissen, Gingerich, and Russel maintained this stance, although stated that Raoellidae could be somewhat closely related to .

Thewissen et al. (2007), found well-preserved remains of the raoellid Indohyus which allowed for a phylogenetic analysis of Raoellidae within Artiodactyla. The only raoellids they included in the analysis were Indohyus and Khirtharia.

They found that Raoellidae was the sister group to Cetacea. Raoellidae and Cetacea were observed to be the only members of Cetaceamorpha (all more closely related to Cetaceans than to Hippopotamuses). This result was due to the auditory bulla found in Indohyus's skull and the denser bones characteristic of an aquatic or semi-aquatic lifestyle.

Orliac and Ducrocq (2012), when investigating the remains of a possible raoellid from China, did a phylogenetic analysis of Raoellidae in relation to early artiodactyls and cetaceans. They included Kunmunella, Indohyus, Metkatius, and Khirtharia in the analysis. The only cetacean they included was Pakicetus.

This study also found that Raoellidae was the sister group to Cetacea, even when using a more complete data set of raoellids. They also found to be , although this result is not very meaningful due to the small sample size of Diacodexids.


Internal phylogeny
After a by Orliac and Ducrocq (2012), they found that a molar of a raoellid from China was most closely related to a previously unnamed species of Khirtharia, placing it under this genus as the new species K. major. The phylogenetic tree that resulted from their analysis placed Haqueina outside of Raoellidae in the clade , a group of artiodactyls not closely related to . The study did not include Rajouria due to Rajouria only being described after this study was published.

It found that Raoellidae is . Kunmunella is the most basal member of Raoellidae, followed by Indohyus, and then Metkatius and Khirtharia.

Rana et al. (2021), in their description of Rajouria, completed a phylogenetic analysis of Raoellidae. They used a near identical method as the previous Orliac and Ducrocq, although added in the material for Rajouria and added two extra characters related to the teeth. This study also placed Haqueina outside of Raoellidae. However, they noted that H. haquei was much more similar to raoellids than H. haichinensis, which was the species included in their phylogenetic analysis.

This study reaffirmed the monophyly of Raoellidae. Rajouria is the most basal member of the family. Kunmunella and Indohyus are both equally basal members of Raoellidae, and the exact relationship between them is uncertain. Metkatius and Khirtharia are most closely related to each other and are the most derived members of Raoellidae.


Taxonomy
  • ?
    • Haqueina haichinensis
    • Haqueina haquei
    • Indohyus indirae
    • Indohyus major?
    • Khirtharia aurea
    • Khirtharia dayi
    • Khirtharia inflata
    • Khirtharia major?
    • Kunmunella kalakotensis
    • Kunmunella transversa
    • Metkatius babbiangalanensis
    • Metkatius kashmiriensis
    • Rajouria gunneli


See also
  • Evolution of cetaceans
  • Glossary of mammalian dental topography


Sources
Page 1 of 1
1
Post Comment
Font Size...
Font Family...
Font Format...

Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time