Product Code Database
Example Keywords: the legend -xbox $28-142
   » » Wiki: Railway Coupling
Tag Wiki 'Railway Coupling'.

A coupling (or a coupler) is a mechanism for connecting in a train. The design of the coupler is standard, and is almost as important as the , since flexibility and convenience are maximised if all rolling stock can be coupled together.

The equipment that connects the couplings to the rolling stock is known as the draft gear.

The different types of coupling do not always have formal or official names, which makes descriptions of the couplings in use on any railway system problematic.

Buffers and chain
The standard type of coupling on railways following the British tradition is the buffer and chain coupling used on the pioneering of the of 1830. These couplings followed earlier practice but were made more regular. The vehicles are coupled by hand using a hook and links with a that draws the vehicles together. In Britain, this is called a screw coupling. Vehicles have , one at each corner on the ends, which are pulled together and compressed by the coupling device. This arrangement limits the slack in trains and lessens shocks. The earliest buffers were fixed extensions of the wagon frames, but later spring buffers were introduced.

This coupling is still the standard in European countries (except the former Soviet Union, where the is used).

Link and pin
The link-and-pin coupling was the original style of coupling used on North American railways. After most railroads converted to semi-automatic , the link-and-pin survived on . While simple in principle, the system suffered from a lack of standardisation regarding size and height of the links, and the size and height of the pockets.

The link-and-pin coupler consisted of a tube-like body that received an oblong link. During coupling, a rail worker had to stand between the cars as they came together and guide the link into the coupler pocket. Once the cars were joined, the employee inserted a pin into a hole a few inches from the end of the tube to hold the link in place. This procedure was exceptionally dangerous and many brakemen lost fingers or entire hands when they did not get them out of the way of the coupler pockets in time. Many more were killed as a result of being crushed between cars or dragged under cars that were coupled too quickly. Brakemen were issued with heavy clubs that could be used to hold the link in position, but many brakemen would not use the club, and risked injury.

The link-and-pin coupler proved unsatisfactory because:

  • It made a loose connection between the cars, with too much .
  • There was no standard design, and train crews often spent hours trying to match pins and links while coupling cars.
  • Crew members had to go between moving cars during coupling, and were frequently injured and sometimes killed.
  • The links and pins were often pilfered due to their value as scrap metal, resulting in substantial replacement costs. John H. White suggests that the railroads considered this to be more important than the safety issue at the time (see reference below).
  • Railroads progressively began to operate trains that were heavier than the link-and-pin system could cope with.

An episode of the 1958 TV series was devoted to the problems of link-and-pin couplings.

Albert coupler
To avoid the safety issues, Karl Albert, then director at the , developed during the 1920s the Albert coupler, a key and slot coupler with two pins. Cars to be coupled were pushed together, both couplings moving to the same side. One pin was inserted, then the cars were pulled to straighten the coupling and the other pin inserted. This operation required less exact shunting. Due the single piece design, only minimal slack was possible. The system became quite popular with tram systems and narrow gauge lines.

During the 1960s most cities replaced them by automatic couplers. But even in modern cars, Albert couplers get installed as emergency couplers for towing a faulty car.

The Miller Hook and Platform
The link and pin was replaced in North American passenger car usage during the latter part of the 19th century by the assemblage known as the , which included a new coupler called the Miller Hook. The Miller Platform (and hook coupler) was used for several decades before being replaced by the .

Norwegian (or meat chopper) couplings consist of a central buffer with a mechanical hook that drops into a slot in the central buffer. Setesdalsbanen - Many pictures of the Norwegian (chopper) coupler There may also be a U-shaped securing latch on the opposite buffer which is fastened over the top of the hook to secure it. The Norwegian is found only on of , or less, such as the , , the and the , , where low speeds and reduced train loads allow a simpler system. The Norwegian coupler allows sharper curves than the buffer-and-chain, which is an advantage on those railways.

On railway lines where rolling stock always points the same way, the mechanical hook may be provided only on one end of each wagon. Similarly, the hand brake handles may also be on one side of the wagons only.

Norwegian couplings are not particularly strong, and may be supplemented by auxiliary chains.

Not all Norwegian couplings are compatible with one another as they vary in height, width, and may or may not be limited to one hook at a time.

Coupling previously used in South Africa railways prior to World War 2.

Automatic Couplers
There are a number of automatic train couplings, most of which are mutually incompatible.

Janney/MCB/ARA/AAR/APTA Coupler
Later Car-Builders' Association" MCB coupler, now AAR () coupler; also commonly known as a BuckEye, Knuckle, or Alliance coupler. The AAR/APTA TypeE, TypeF, and TypeH couplers are all compatible Janney couplers, but used for different rail cars (general freight, tank cars, rotary hoppers, passenger, etc.).

The knuckle coupler or Janney coupler was invented by , who received a in 1873 (). Eli Janney — The Janney Coupler It is also known as a "buckeye coupler", notably in the , where some rolling stock (mostly for passenger trains) is fitted with it. Janney was a dry goods clerk and former officer from , who used his lunch hours to whittle from wood an alternative to the link and pin coupler. The term Buckeye comes from the nickname of the US state of , the "Buckeye State" and the which originally marketed the coupling. aec Ohio Brass company

In 1893, satisfied that an automatic coupler could meet the demands of commercial railroad operations and, at the same time, be manipulated safely, the passed the . Its success in promoting switchyard safety was stunning. Between 1877 and 1887, approximately 38% of all railworker accidents involved coupling. That percentage fell as the railroads began to replace link and pin couplers with automatic couplers. By 1902, only two years after the SAA's effective date, coupling accidents constituted only 4% of all employee accidents. Coupler-related accidents dropped from nearly 11,000 in 1892 to just over 2,000 in 1902, even though the number of railroad employees steadily increased during that decade.

When the Janney coupler was chosen to be the North American standard, there were 8,000 patented alternatives to choose from. The only significant disadvantage of using the Janney design is that sometimes the drawheads need to be manually aligned. Many AAR coupler designs exist to accommodate requirements of various car designs, but all are required to have certain dimensions in common which allow for one design to couple to any other.AAR Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, Section S, Part III:Coupler and Yoke Details, Issue 06/2007

The Janney coupler is used in the , , , , , , , , , , , , and elsewhere.

Changes since 1873

Bazeley Coupler

Willison/SA3 Coupler
The SA3 coupler works according to the same principles as the AAR coupler but is incompatible. Animation showing SA3 coupling (site in Russian) It was introduced during the rebuilding of the railway network in the after the and has since been used on the whole broad-gauge network, including . It is also used on the standard gauge networks of and on in for ore trains.

  • Russian trains are rarely longer than about and rarely exceed a maximum tonnage of about , so it is not clear what potential load these couplings are capable of. The trains on are about .
  • The force to break the SA-3 coupler is about ()
  • The maximum allowed tractive effort to the SA-3 is limited to () by Russian white papers.
  • The proposed European automatic coupler European proposal coupler is compatible with the Russian coupler but with automatic air, control and power connections. Implementation is permanently delayed except for a few users. See below.
  • The SA3 resembles a left-handed fist.

  • Some gauge cane tramway vehicles in have be fitted with miniature Willison couplers October 2013, pg 23

Unicoupler has been developed by from Germany in the 1970s and is widely used in Iran in freight cars. This type of coupler is compatible with SA-3 and Willison couplers. The Unicoupler is also known as AK69e. The Unicoupler was the West-European development, it was developed in parallel with a compatible East-European counterpart, the Intermat coupler. Index History

The is a newer compact Willison coupler developed by . Faiveley Transport It is mechanical fully compatible to the and the Unicoupler and if additional buffers are mounted it can be coupled with the conventional European screw coupling as well.

Multi-function couplers
Multi-function couplers (MFCs) are 'fully automatic' couplers that make all connections between the rail vehicles (mechanical, air brake and electrical) without human intervention, in contrast to autocouplers which just handle the mechanical aspects. The majority of trains fitted with these types of couplers are multiple units, especially those used in operations.

There are a few designs of fully automatic couplers in use worldwide, including the , various knuckle hybrids such as the Tightlock, (used in the UK), the Wedgelock coupling, (similar to Scharfenberg couplers in appearance), BSI coupling ( now Faiveley Transport) and the Schaku-Tomlinson Tightlock coupling.

There are a number of other automatic train couplings similar to the , but not necessarily compatible with it. Older US transit operators continue to use these non-Janney electro-pneumatic coupler designs and have used them for decades.


Westinghouse H2C
The H2C coupler is currently used on the , , , , , and class subway cars of the . The A ends of the cars typically have the Westinghouse coupler and the B ends use either a semi-permanent , or a Westinghouse coupler.

The WABCO N-Type coupler was first developed for the prototype system with the initial model N-1 as applied only to the three Skybus cars. The updated model N-2 with a larger gathering range was first applied to the new "Airporter" rapid transit cars on the line. The model N-2 used lightweight draft gear slung below the center sill, to allow for the wide swings required to go around sharp curves. This made the N-2 unsuitable for main line railroad use so an updated version N-2-A was developed for that market. The first of these were fitted in 1968 to the with 228 electrical contacts and the with 138 contacts. Starting in the 1970s the N-2-A was fitted to the entire family of MU's, the series of MU's and the / M series of MU railcars. The N-2 was also used by the , but was replaced due to issues with the electrical contacts. Later WABCO would create a new model N-3 for the system with a gathering range which required a rectangular funnel.

The WABCO N-type is sometimes referred to as the pin and cup coupler or spear coupler.

The Tomlinson coupler was developed by the for mass transit applications, but eventually found use in some mainline railroad vehicles as well. It consists of two squared metal hooks that engage with each other in a larger rectangular frame with air line connections above and below. Since the coupler's development the manufacturing arm of Ohio Brass was purchased by WABCO which now manufacturers the line along with the N-type. The Tomlinson coupler is the most widely used fully automatic heavy rail coupling in North America having been adopted by the , , , SEPTA , , , , and the for its R44/46 fleet and all modern classes starting with the R142. For applications outside of rapid transit the coupler had to be significantly enlarged to meet the increased strength requirements first appearing in this capacity on the and later on the fleet. Its relative lack of strength is one reason the has been more successful in the mainline railroad arena.

Scharfenberg coupler
The Scharfenberg coupler Scharfenberg coupler (Scharfenbergkupplung or Schaku) is probably the most commonly used type of fully automatic coupling. Designed in 1903 by Karl Scharfenberg in Königsberg, Germany (today ), it has gradually spread from transit trains to regular passenger service trains, although outside Europe its use is generally restricted to mass transit systems. The Schaku coupler is superior in many ways to the AAR (Janney/Knuckle) coupler because it makes the electrical and also the pneumatic connections and disconnections automatic. However there is no standard for the placement of these electro-pneumatic connections. Some rail companies have them placed on the sides while others have them placed above the mechanical portion of the Schaku coupler. The main disadvantage to the Scharfenberg coupler is its low maximum tonnage, which makes it unsuitable for freight operations.

Small air cylinders, acting on the rotating heads of the coupler, ensure the Schaku coupler engagement, making it unnecessary to use shock to get a good coupling. Joining portions of a passenger train can be done at very low speed (less than in the final approach), so that the passengers are not jostled about. Rail equipment manufacturers such as offer the Schaku coupler as an option on their mass transit systems and their passenger cars and locomotives. In all the trains of the are equipped with it, as are new light rail systems in , and . It is also used on vehicles in , , the , and the in . It also equips all the dedicated rolling stock used for the shuttle services in the .

* Maximum tonnage under .

United Kingdom
Due to the rush to dieselise and electrify, the United Kingdom ended up with a variety of incompatible couplings and electrical connections. The latter were categorised as yellow triangle, blue square, and so on. This has nothing to do with the physical connection of vehicles. Coupling codes, as they were known, became relevant only if multiple working of locomotives or multiple units was required. October 2008, p62

Automatic Buffing Contact Coupler

The -made Dellner coupling is a proprietary version of the Scharfenberg coupler, connecting both vehicle, pneumatics and electronics at the same time. The patented energy absorption D-BOX technology allows coupling at speeds of up to with no structural damage, and up to with deformation but with the vehicles remaining on track. The patented D-REX system provides high speed data connection at speeds of 100 Mbit/s.

Ward coupler
Ward coupler Ward coupler

Dual couplings and match wagons
[[File:CouplerAdapterPennStn.agr.JPG|thumb|Coupling adapter for use between [[Railway coupling#AAR coupler|AAR couplers]] on locomotives and fitted to commuter rail multiple units at New York's Pennsylvania Station. The adapter is seen from the bottom]] Sometimes a wagon with one coupling system needs to be coupled to wagons with another coupling type This may be needed when taking rolling stock from its manufacturer to the city where it is to be used. There are two solutions:

  • use a (s) which has different couplings at either end.
  • use a coupling adaptor.

Only some kinds of couplings coexist on the end of a wagon at the same time, because amongst other reasons they need to be at the same height. For example, in the state of , engines had the AAR coupler, with buffers, and the chain mounted on a lug cast into the AAR coupler.

A match wagon or match truck (also known as a "barrier vehicle" / wagon in Britain and "transition car" in North America) has different kinds of couplings at each end. If a pair of match wagons is used, a rake of wagons using coupling A can be inserted into a train otherwise using coupling B.

A coupling adaptor or compromise coupler might couple to an AAR coupling on a wagon, and present, for example, a meatchopper coupler or rapid transit coupler to the next wagon. Such an adaptor might weigh .

Dual coupling

Sets of carriages
Automatic couplers like the Janney are safer in a collision because they help prevent the carriages telescoping. British Rail therefore decided to adopt a Janney variant for its passenger carriages, with the coupler able to swing out of the way for coupling to engines with the traditional buffer and chain system.

In New South Wales, sets of carriages were permanently coupled with a , since the carriages were disconnected only at the workshops. Freight cars are sometimes coupled in pairs or triplets, using bar couplings in between.

sets of carriages or wagons share the , and have no need for couplings in the intermediate positions.

Brake couplings
are needed for any continuous braking systems.

Electronically controlled brakes
(ECP) need a method of connecting electrically adjacent wagons, both for power and for command signals, and this can be done by plugs and sockets, or by very short range radio signals.

Draw gear
Draw gear is the assembly behind the coupling at each end of the to take care of the and between the wagons of trains. Early draw gear was made of wood, gradually replaced by steel.

have a draft gear in a to absorb the pushing and pulling forces (). Draft gear at work

There is also a draw gear behind , , , as well as other

In the case of the draw gear behind the hooks, if any, absorbs the tension while the absorb the compression.

Some couplers may not even have a draw gear.

Model trains
On couplers vary according to scale, and have evolved over many years. Early model trains were coupled using various hook-and-loop arrangements, which were frequently asymmetrical, requiring all cars to be pointing in the same direction. In the larger scales, working scale or near-scale models of Janney couplers were quite common, but proved impractical in HO and smaller scales.

For many years, the "X2F" or "Horn-Hook" coupler was quite common in , as it could be produced as a single piece of moulded plastic. Similarly, for many years, a "lift-hook" coupler known as the Rapido and developed by , a German manufacturer of model trains, was commonly used in that scale.

The chief competitor of both these couplers, more popular among serious modellers, was the Magne-Matic, a magnetically released knuckle coupler developed by Keith and Dale Edwards, and manufactured by , a company they started. While they closely resemble miniature Janney couplers, they are somewhat different mechanically, with the knuckle pivoting from the center of the coupler head, rather than from the side. A steel pin, designed to resemble an air brake hose, allows the couplers to be released magnetically; the design of the coupler head prevents this from happening unless the train is stopped or reversed with a mated pair of couplers directly over an uncoupling magnet. An earlier, mechanically tripped version of the design had a straight pin extending down from the knuckle itself, which engaged a diamond-shaped mechanical "ramp" between the rails, which had to be raised above rail height when uncoupling was desired.

Once the Kadee patents ran out, a number of other manufacturers began to manufacture similar (and compatible) magnetic knuckle couplers.

Recently, an exact-scale HO model of the AAR coupler has been designed and manufactured by Frank Sergent. Sergent Engineering This design uses a tiny stainless steel ball to lock the knuckle closed. Uncoupling is achieved by holding a magnetic wand over the coupler pair to draw the balls out of the locking pockets.

In , an exact-scale working miniature version of the "Alliance" coupler was manufactured from the 1980s by GAGO models in Australia. Since 2002 it has been marketed by the Waratah Model Railway Company. Waratah Model Railway Company European modellers tend to use scale hook and chain couplings.

In British 00 scale (similar to H0 scale) models the 'tension lock' coupler developed by is standard. This is similar in operation to the meatchopper type of coupling. Remote uncoupling is possible by using a sprung ramp between the rails. The design of the hooks is such that the couplings will not uncouple when under tension (instead depressing the ramp). When the train is pushed over the ramp, it will lift the coupling hooks as the train passes over. By halting the train over the ramp, it is split at this point. While it works well, it is often seen as ugly and obtrusive (although smaller designs are available, these are not always fully compatible with other models) and many British modellers prefer to retrofit either Kadee types or working hook and chain couplings.

A recent development is an interchangeable coupling which plugs into a standardised socket, known as and which can be easily unplugged as required. This allows the modeller to easily standardise on whatever coupling is desired, without individual manufacturers needing to change their coupling type.

In , scale working are now being manufactured by Zamzoodled in the UK.

A comparison of coupler types was published in "An introduction to Couplers". , issue 3, 2009.

Different kinds of coupling have different accident rates.

  • The of 1926 involved the breakage of a "drawhook" leading to a runaway and then a collision. Drawhooks imply "".

See also


External links
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1


Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 


General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 


Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
4648 Page Refs
5s Time