Product Code Database
Example Keywords: machine -iphone $6-123
   » » Wiki: Xirong
Tag Wiki 'Xirong'.
Tag

Xirong () or Rong were various people who lived primarily in and around the western extremities of (in modern and ). They were known as early as the (1765–1122 BCE), as one of the that frequently (and often violently) interacted with the civilization. They typically resided to the west of from the (1046–221 BCE) onwards. They were mentioned in some ancient Chinese texts as perhaps genetically and linguistically related to the people of the .Nicola Di Cosmo, Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History ,Cambridge University Press, 2004 pp. 108-112.


Etymology
The historian Li Feng says that during the period, since the term Rong "warlike foreigners" was "often used in bronze inscriptions to mean 'warfare', it is likely that when a people was called 'Rong', the Zhou considered them as political and military adversaries rather than as cultural and ethnic 'others'."Li, Feng (2006), Landscape And Power In Early China, Cambridge University Press, p. 286. Paul R. Goldin also proposes that Rong was a "pseudo-ethnonym" meaning "bellicose".Goldin, Paul R. "Steppe Nomads as a Philosophical Problem in Classical China" in Mapping Mongolia: Situating Mongolia in the World from Geologic Time to the Present. Penn Museum International Research Conferences, vol. 2. Ed. Paula L.W. Sabloff. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. 2011. p. 235

After the , the term usually referred to various peoples in the west during early and late medieval times. Xirong was also the name of a state during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods of Chinese history.

The Xirong together with the eastern , northern , and southern were collectively called the (). The "Record of Rites" details ancient stereotypes about them.

The people of those five regions – the Middle states, and the Rong, Yi, (and other wild tribes round them) – had all their several natures, which they could not be made to alter. The tribes on the east were called Yi. They had their hair unbound, and tattooed their bodies. Some of them ate their food without its being cooked. Those on the south were called Man. They tattooed their foreheads, and had their feet turned in towards each other. Some of them (also) ate their food without its being cooked. Those on the west were called Rong. They had their hair unbound, and wore skins. Some of them did not eat grain-food. Those on the north were called Di. They wore skins of animals and birds, and dwelt in caves. Some of them also did not eat grain-food. The people of the Middle states, and of those Yi, Man, Rong, and Di, all had their dwellings, where they lived at ease; their flavours which they preferred; the clothes suitable for them; their proper implements for use; and their vessels which they prepared in abundance. In those five regions, the languages of the people were not mutually intelligible, and their likings and desires were different. To make what was in their minds apprehended, and to communicate their likings and desires, (there were officers) – in the east, called transmitters; in the south, representationists; in the west, Di-dis; and in the north, interpreters. Book of Rites, Wangzhi 36. This translation: (1879), The Li Ki, Clarendon Press, vol.1, pp. 229-230. Chinese text also available at [2]: 中國戎夷,五方之民,皆有其性也,不可推移。東方曰夷,被髮文身,有不火食者矣。南方曰蠻,雕題交趾,有不火食者矣。西方曰戎,被髮衣皮,有不粒食者矣。北方曰狄,衣羽毛穴居,有不粒食者矣。中國、夷、蠻、戎、狄,皆有安居、和味、宜服、利用、備器,五方之民,言語不通,嗜欲不同。達其志,通其欲:東方曰寄,南方曰象,西方曰狄鞮,北方曰譯。 The

Note: "middle states" () in this quotation refers to the "Middle Kingdom", i.e. .

Spade-foot three-legged pottery vessels as well as one and two handled pots were primary cultural characteristics of the Xirong.

William H. Baxter and (2014)Baxter, William H. and Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford University Press, . reconstruct the name of Róng as . Today, similar-sounding self-designated among modern-day peoples in western China include of , and Nung and of northwestern ( see also ). Průšek suggests relations between the Rong during the Zhou dynasty and the Rén ( < OC *niŋ) tribes during ,Jaroslav Průšek. Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the period 1400-300 BC. New York, 1971. p.38 however, the Rén () dwelt in southern Shandong and northern Jiangsu, thus east, not west, of the Shang.Di Cosmo, Nicola (1999). "The northern frontier in pre-imperial China". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge University Press. p. 908 of pp. 885–966.


Timeline
According to Nicola Di Cosmo,Cambridge History of Ancient China (1999) Chapter 13 'Rong' was a vague term for warlike foreigner. He places them from the upper valley and along the to the basin as far as the Taihang Mountains. This would be the northwestern edge of what was then China and also the transition zone between agricultural and steppe ways of life.

  • c. 964 BCE: King Mu of Zhou defeated the and the following year attacked the Western Rong and Xurong.
  • 859 BCE: King Yi of Zhou (Ji Xie): Zhou capital attacked by the Rong of .
  • 877–841 BCE: King Li of Zhou: Western Rong and raid deep into Zhou territory
  • 827–782 BCE: King Xuan of Zhou sends the State of Qin to attack Western Rong who submit and cede territory, sends the State of Jin against the Northern Rong (probably 788); following year destroys the RongJiang clan.
  • 781–771 BCE: King You of Zhou is killed by the Quanrong, ending the .
  • During the Western Zhou various Rong groups are interspersed among the cities of the North China Plain. It seems that the were pressing the Rong from the north.
  • 714 BCE: Northern (Bei) or Mountain (Shan) Rong attack the State of Zheng.
  • 706 BCE: The same group attacks Qi.
  • 693–662 BCE: Duke Zhuang of Lu, ruler of the State of Lu, has many wars with the Rong.
  • 664 BCE: attack the State of Yan.
  • 662 BCE: drive the Rong out of .
  • 650 BCE: Beirong attacked by the States of Qi and Xu.
  • after 650 BCE the Rong are rarely mentioned. They seem to have been mostly absorbed by the States of Qi and Jin.Nicola Di Cosmo in Cambridge History of Ancient China, page 924
  • 314 BCE: Qin defeated the last hostile Rong tribe.Mark Edward Lewis in Cambridge History of Ancient China, page 635 Threats from unified nomadic incursions would eventually reappear under the identity during the subsequent and dynasties.


Ethnicity
It is believed that the Quanrong during the Western Zhou-Warring States period (1122–476 BC) spoke a branch of the languages, and united with the Jiang clan to rebel against the Zhou.Chapter 14 of Keightley,'The Origins of Chinese Civilization',1983 mentioned that even King Wen of Zhou had ancestries from the "western barbarians" (西夷). Mencius Li lou II. text: "孟子曰:「舜生於諸馮,遷於負夏,卒於鳴條,東夷之人也。文王生於岐周,卒於畢郢,西夷之人也。" D.C.Lau (1970:128)'s translation: "Mencius said, 'Shun was an Eastern barbarian; he was born in Chu Feng, moved to Fu Hsia, and died in Ming T'iao. King Wen was a Western barbarian; he was born in Ch'i Chou and died in Pi Ying."

7th-century scholar made these remarks about the , one group included to the "western barbarians": "Among the barbarians (戎; Róng) in the Western Regions, the look of the Wusun is the most unusual. The present barbarians (胡人; húrén) who have green eyes and red hair, and look like macaque monkeys, are the offspring of this people"; Book of Han, with commentary by Yan Shigu Original text: 烏孫於西域諸戎其形最異。今之胡人青眼、赤須,狀類彌猴者,本其種也。Yu, Taishan. A Study of Saka History, (1998) pp. 141-142. Sino-Platonic Papers, Number 80. University of Pennsylvania. Book of Han, vol. 96b the exonym Húrén "foreigners, barbarians", was used from the 6th century to denote , especially , in , besides other non-Chinese peoples.Atwood, Christopher P. (2015). "The Qai, the Khongai, and the Names of the Xiōngnú". International Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2: p. 62 of 35–63.

Genetic data on ancient Qiang remains associated with the Xirong were determined to display high genetic affinity with contemporary Sino-Tibetan peoples as well as with ancient 'Yellow River farmers' of the .


See also


Citations

Sources
  • (in Chinese) "Exploring the roots of the Qin" .
  • (in Chinese)
    (1993). 9787101006070, Zhonghua Publishing.
  • Grand dictionnaire Ricci de la langue chinoise. 7 volumes. Instituts Ricci (Paris – Taipei). Desclée de Brouwer. 2001. Vol. III, p. 555.
  • A Hypothesis about the Source of the Sai Tribes. Taishan Yu. Sino-Platonic Papers No. 106. September, 2000. Dept. of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Pennsylvania.

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time