The Sachsenspiegel (; ; modern ; all literally "Saxon Mirror") is one of the most important law books and compiled during the Holy Roman Empire. Originating between 1220 and 1235 as a record of local customary law and rulings, it was used in places until as late as 1900. Some legal principles recorded in the Sachsenspiegel continued to apply into recent time laws. It is important not only for its lasting effect on later German and Dutch law but also as an early example of written prose in a Low German language.
History
The
Sachsenspiegel was one of the first prose works written in the Middle Low German language. The original title is
Sassen Speyghel,
Sachsenspiegel being a later
Standard German translation. It is believed to have been compiled and translated from
Latin by the
Saxons administrator Eike of Repgow at the behest of his liege lord Count Hoyer of Falkenstein in the years 1220 to 1235.
[Some sources give the period during which the Sachsenspiegel was written as 1220 to 1230, but 1220 to 1235 is given by others, such as sources at the Library of Congress ([1]), the European Court of Human Rights ([2]) and Tufts University ([3])] Where the original was compiled is unclear. It was thought to have been written at Burg Falkenstein, but in 2007 Peter Landau, an expert in medieval canon law, suggested that it may have been written at the
Altzella Abbey (now Altzella).
[The suggestion that the Sachsenspiegel was written at Altzelle was made in a paper given by Professor Landau at the Deutscher Rechtshistorikertag 2004 and later published in an article (Landau, Peter: Die Entstehungsgeschichte des Sachsenspiegels: Eike von Repgow, Altzelle und die anglo-normannische Kanonistik; Monumenta Germaniae Historica: Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 2005, Vol 61, No. 1, pp 73–101), cited at the German Wikipedia article on Kloster Altzella and http://www.rechtsbuchforschung.de .]
Opposition from the church
During the 14th century,
Augustinians friar
Johannes Klenkok of lower Saxony opposed the Sachsenspiegel in a pamphlet known as Decadicon because he considered ten articles or principles to contradict the Christian gospel and decisions of the church of Rome, collected as Corpus Juris Canonici.
[Klenkok lost a lawsuit over family inheritance in a ruling based on traditional Saxonian laws as captured in the Sachsenspiegel; see Ocker, pp 10, 11.] Klenkok presents criticisms on Sachsenspiegel's views of ecclesiastical and secular authorities, court procedure and private law. His position was that papal authority outrules every discussion of matters as legitimate procedure, the limitations of hereditary rights, the extent of testamentary power, the rights of novices and monks to family property, and the authority that determines superior and inferior legal norms and court decisions. So Klenkok's position was fundamentally a simple one: Papal authority supersedes every other political and legal authority.
The work sparked broad societal embitterment and irritation; the counselors of the city of Magdeburg, for instance, wrote warning letters to 400 or more cities, princes and lords that an Augustinian brother was trying to weaken Saxon law. Following a written debate, Klenkok did expand his Decadicon to twenty-one propositions of Saxon law and turned to his former disciple, French canonist, and cardinal of the Curia in Avignon Papacy, Pierre de la Vergne.[Ocker, pp 52–63.] In the end, Pope Gregory XI condemned 14 articles with his papal bull Salvator Humani Generis that was issued in 1374, but this did not reduce the success of the Sachsenspiegel.[Ocker, pp 66–69.]
Influence
The rules, laws, court decisions and principles compiled in the Sachsenspiegel have been influenced by much older (provincial) Roman law principles.
The Sachsenspiegel served as a model for law books in German language (Middle High German) like the Sachsenspiegel, the Deutschenspiegel, and the Schwabenspiegel. The Duchy of Saxony covered most of what nowadays is the northwestern part of Germany and eastern part of the Netherlands, but the rules spread more widely. The state of Utrecht, for instance, in 1632 knew the rule "Who comes first, grinds first", as published in the Placaatboek, a collection of decisions, rulings and local laws. The rule that married women stood under the custody of their husband, meaning that they could legally not act and had no say in juridical or childraising matters, was a rule of law in the Netherlands until 1956, in Belgium until 1958.
In Prussia, the Sachsenspiegel was used until the introduction of the Allgemeines Landrecht für die preußischen Staaten General in 1794. In Saxony, it was used until the introduction of the Saxon Civil Code in 1865. In Anhalt and Thuringia, the Sachsenspiegel was not replaced until the introduction of the German Civil Code in 1900. Its precedents continued to be cited as pertinent case law as recently as 1932 by the Reichsgericht (Supreme Court of the Reich) (RGZ 137, 373).
The influence of the Sachsenspiegel, or at least parallels with it, can still be found in modern German and Dutch law, for instance in inheritance law, the law of neighborly relations (Nachbarrecht; e.g., nuisance, party walls, etc.) or rights. The Sachsenspiegel is also important because, for the first time in history, the institution of slavery itself is condemned, because it is a violation of man's likeness to God.
The Sachsenspiegel contains two branches of law: common law and feudal law.
Saxon custom
Saxon customary law, or Landrecht, was the law of free people including the peasant
. It contains important rules and regulations concerning property rights, inheritance, marriage, the delivery of goods, and certain torts (e.g.
trespass,
nuisance). It also treats criminal law and the composition of courts. In other words, it deals with criminal and civil law. The customs of the people were not a stand-alone pack of laws but influenced by older law systems like Roman law.
Feudal law
Feudal law, or
Lehnrecht, determined the relationship between different states and rulers, for example the election of
and
Monarch, feudal rights, etc. Though it has no modern equivalent, it encompasses what one would call today
public law.
The Sachsenspiegel acquired special significance through its exposition of the seven or "shields of knighthood":
-
King
-
Ecclesiastical princes
-
Lay princes
-
Free lords (freie Herren)
-
Schöffenbarfreie, vassals (Lehnsmänner) of free lords, ministeriales
-
Vassals of Schöffenbarfreie etc.
-
Unnamed
Manorial tenants and burgesses (inhabitants of a borough) were not mentioned.
Extant copies
Four (of the original seven) illuminated manuscripts copies are still extant. They are named after their present locations: Heidelberg, Oldenburg, Dresden, and Wolfenbüttel, and date from 1295 to 1371. In total, over 400 versions of the manuscript exist today.
The Dresden manuscript has been described as the "most artistically valuable" by the World Digital Library. It is located in the collection of the Saxon State Library and was created between 1295 and 1363 around Meissen, Germany. This version has 924 illustrations on 92 pages. The illustrations depict about 4,000 people. It suffered water damage after the Bombing of Dresden in World War II and underwent restoration in the 1990s.
An early printed edition of the Sachsenspiegel was produced by Anna Rügerin in Augsburg, dated 22 June 1484. It is the first documented evidence of a woman working as a typographer.
Proverbs
Some German and Dutch
date from the Sachsenspiegel:
-
, (First come, first served, literally: "Who comes first, grinds first"), which is a rule for the order for grinding of corn by a miller and still is being used as a rule of habit at for instance a bakery or box office in Germany and the Netherlands.
-
, . This is a rule for the jurisdiction of courts that still is one of the principles in private international law.
See also
-
Germanic tribal laws
-
Pleading in English Act 1362, English law mandating use of English instead of French in oral argument in court
-
Ordinance of Villers-Cotterêts, 1539, French legislation mandating use of French in law, in place of Latin
-
Proceedings in Courts of Justice Act 1730, British law mandating use of English instead of Latin in court writing
External links
