Eremiasaurus ("desert lizard") is a genus of , an extinct group of , who lived during the Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous. The first known of this taxon were teeth discovered in the Ouled Abdoun Basin in Morocco, and described in 1952 by Camille Arambourg as coming from Mosasaurus. However, it was in 2012 that Aaron R. H. LeBlanc and his colleagues described the only known species, E. heterodontus, from two more or less complete skeletons that had been discovered in the same geological area as the teeth originally described by Arambourg. Subsequently, fossil teeth discovered in Israel, Brazil, and the Ganntour Basin in Morocco were subsequently attributed to the genus.
It is a relatively small mosasaurid, with the syntype specimens suggesting a size of around long. The animal's skull is robust and is characterized by its very pronounced heterodonty (hence its specific epithet), a trait rarely observed in others mosasaurs. This particular dentition leaves it unclear what prey the animal consumed. The anatomy of the caudal vertebrae of Eremiasaurus suggests that it would have been a predator capable of swimming at high speed. Eremiasaurus lived in the southern margin of the Tethys Ocean. This paleo-ocean had a significant diversity of aquatic and had a temperate and warm oceanic climate. The fossil record also shows that there would have been niche partitioning between Eremiasaurus and the various other mosasaur species identified within the Ouled Abdoun Basin.
In 2012, paleontologists Aaron R. H. LeBlanc, Michael W. Caldwell and Nathalie Bardet officially described Eremiasaurus heterodontus on the basis of two specimens discovered within the phosphate deposits of the Ouled Abdoun Basin in Morocco, and more precisely in the area of Sidi Daoui, located near the town of Oued Zem. The , cataloged UALVP 51744 and OCP DEK/GE 112 respectively, are two more or less complete specimens representing almost the entire known skeleton of the genus. The rationale for using syntypes rather than a single holotype comes from the fact that UALVP 51744, the most complete specimen, is derived from the commercial field without precise locality data. However, OCP DEK/GE 112 was exhumed by one of the describers, Nathalie Bardet, allowing its detailed geographic and Stratigraphy position to be recorded. The precise zone concerning this discovery is located at the level of Upper Couche III, dating from the Upper Maastrichtian of the Late Cretaceous, an area where other mosasaurids have been found, including Mosasaurus and Thalassotitan atrox. The genus name Eremiasaurus comes from the Ancient Greek ἐρημία ( eremia, "desert") and σαῦρος ( saûros, "lizard"), a portmanteau literally meaning "desert lizard", in reference to the arid climate of present-day Morocco where the marine reptile was discovered. The specific epithet heterodontus also comes from the Ancient Greek ἕτερος ( heteros, "different") and ὀδόντος ( odóntos, "tooth"), together meaning "different teeth". This is a reference to the very visible heterodonty on the animal's jaws, which is an unusual trait for a mosasaur.
Later articles, including one published the same year as the genus was described, mention that specimens referred to Eremiasaurus were also discovered in geological formations of Brazil and Israel, which correspond to the same latitude and time period as that of Ouled Abdoun basin. In 2014, Henri Cappetta and his colleagues reported the presence of fossil teeth of Eremiasaurus in the Ganntour Basin, still in Morocco, occupying all the Maastrichtian stratigraphic series.
The Mandible is thin compared to the size of the teeth lodged along the dentary. The dorsal margin of the dentary is slightly convex in lateral view. This convexity is not as pronounced as in most Prognathodon species and rather resembles that in Mosasaurus and P. kianda. The coronoid bears a large posterior process oriented vertically, which gives the dorsal margin of the bone an angle of nearly 90° between the horizontal anterior end and the vertical hind wing. The articular bones form broad rectangular extensions of the lower jaws behind the . An exceptional case among mosasaurs, Eremiasaurus seems to have a hyoid bone, an element rarely found in the fossils of representatives of this group. This bone is slightly widened in its posterior part.
Eremiasaurus has one tooth in the , twelve to thirteen teeth in the maxillae, fifteen teeth in the dentary bones, and an unknown number of teeth in the . The taxon is characterized by its very marked heterodonty, with the teeth differing in many points in the jaws by their shape and size. The only other known mosasaur to have such an attribute is the possible Tylosaurinae Kaikaifilu, also dating from the late Maastrichtian, but from present-day Antarctica. In the anterior part of the jaws, the teeth are straight and conical in shape. Towards the middle, the teeth are blade-shaped, laterally compressed, and have serrated carinae (cutting edges) at both the front and back. In the posterior part of the jaws, the teeth are asymmetrical and have smooth Tooth enamel. The pterygoid teeth become increasingly curved backward. In the anterior part of the snout, the teeth of the upper and lower jaws come into close contact with each other, leaving interdental traces in the bones between the adjacent teeth crowns.
Eremiasaurus' caudal vertebrae are most similar to Plotosaurus. Among the most notable features are the presence of a ventral deviation of the tail, a fanning of the caudal Vertebra, and an unusually long series of pygal (modified Sacrum) vertebrae. The large number of pygal vertebrae, accompanied by a reduced number of intermediate caudals is unique to Eremiasaurus. The presence of a ventral tail deflection, as in Plotosaurus, and a wide range of neural spines in the same region of the caudal vertebral series suggest a similar development of an incipient dorsal fin lobe in Eremiasaurus, though less developed. These changes in proportions, such as an increase in the number of pygal vertebrae, suggest a high-speed pursuit predator, converging with the vertebral proportions of Plotosaurus.
The scapula and coracoid appear to be sutured tightly anterior to the glenoid fossa. This same pit is also slightly domed, another distinctive feature of the taxon. Posterior to this fossa the posterior edge of the scapula extends dorsally before extending to form the posterior margin of the scapular blade, similar to Clidastes. The lateral aspect of the scapula is wide, smooth and flat. The humerus is subequal in height and width, unlike Mosasaurus and Plotosaurus, where they are wider than they are tall. Like all mosasaurids, the iliac crest is reduced to a forward-leaning cylindrical process. The distal end of the ilium is enlarged and bears facets for articulation with the pubis and ischium. The tibia is a rectangular element, longer proximally than anteroposteriorly. The fibula is bell-shaped, with the distal end being much wider than the proximal end, unlike Mosasaurus and Plotosaurus, where both ends of the fibula are of less width. This bone is also about three-quarters the length of the tibia, unlike Tylosaurus and Platecarpus, in which the fibula is the same length as the tibia. The largest of the known elements of the tarsus is interpreted to be an Talus bone. This bone is kidney-shaped, with a pedunculated fibular facet on the dorsal side. The Phalanx bone are elongated spindle-shaped with moderately enlarged Epiphysis, different from the stout, block-like proportions seen in Mosasaurus and Plotosaurus.
A 2017 phylogenetic analysis of the mosasauroids used several analyses to find the most valid classifications, as if a grouping was consistently recorded it was likely a true one. Most phylogenetic trees found Eremaisaurus to be within Mosasaurini, even after refinements were made by a later study. Below is the cladogram from the most recent major phylogenetic analysis of the Mosasaurinae subfamily by Madzia & Cau (2017), which was self-described as a refinement of a larger study by Simões et al. (2017):
Description
Skull and teeth
Postcranial skeleton
Classification
Paleoecology
See also
Further reading
|
|