Product Code Database
Example Keywords: super mario -mmorpg $7-180
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Ahasuerus
Tag Wiki 'Ahasuerus'.
Tag

Ahasuerus ( ; , commonly Achashverosh; , in the ; in the ) is a name applied in the to three rulers of and to a official (or Median king) first appearing in the in the Book of Esther and later in the Book of Tobit. It is a transliteration of either or ; both are names of multiple Achaemenid dynasty Persian kings.


Etymology
The Hebrew form is believed to have derived from the name of , Xšayāršā (< xšaya 'king' + aršan 'male' > 'king of all male; Hero among Kings'). That became Babylonian Aḫšiyâršu (𒄴𒅆𒐊𒅈𒋗, aḫ-ši-ia-ar-šu) and then Akšîwâršu (𒀝𒅆𒄿𒈠𒅈𒍪, ak-ši-i-wa6-ar-šu) and was borrowed as and thence into as Ahasuerus, the form traditionally used in English Bibles., NASB, , ESV, 21st Century King James Version, ASV, Young's Literal Translation, Darby Translation, Holman Christian Standard Bible, etc.Nichol, F. D., Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Volume 3, Review and Herald Publishing Association (Washington, D.C., 1954 edition), p.459, "Historical Setting" The Persian name was independently rendered in as Ξέρξης Xérxēs. Many newer English translations and paraphrases of the Bible, The Message, NLT, CEV, NCV, , , etc. have used the name Xerxes.


Book of Esther
"Ahasuerus" is given as the name of a king, the husband of , in the Book of Esther. He is said to have "ruled over a hundred and twenty-seven provinces from to " – that is, over the Achaemenid Empire. Some consider the narrative of Esther was to provide an for , and that the name Ahasuerus is usually understood to refer to , who ruled the Achaemenid Empire between 486 and 465 BC. Outside of the book of Esther, history records that Xerxes was married to Amestris, not or Esther. Moreover, it is understood that Persian kings did not marry outside a restricted number of Persian noble families. In the , the Book of Esther refers to the king as 'Artaxerxes', who was the younger son of Xerxes ().


Identification of "Ahasuerus" as Xerxes I
Numerous scholars have proposed theories as to who Ahasuerus represents. Most scholars today identify him with , as did 19th-century Bible commentaries.
(2025). 9781009266123, Cambridge University Press. .
Three factors, among others, contribute to this identification:

  1. It is believed the Hebrew 'Ahasuerus' descended from the Persian names for Xerxes I.
  2. Historian describes Xerxes I as being susceptible to women and in the habit of making extravagant offers to them, just as he did to Esther ("up to half my kingdom"). Herodotus mentions that the Persian empire stretched from India to Ethiopia and also refers to the magnificent royal palace in Shushan (), corroboration of what is stated in the Book of Esther. In addition Herodotus mentions an assembly of Persian nobles called by Xerxes to advise him on the proposed war against Greece. Although Herodotus does not give the location of this assembly, the date – "after Egypt was subdued" – corresponds to Xerxes' third year when Esther records an assembly of Persian nobility at a feast. ( Histories VII.8) Herodotus also mentions that following his defeat at Salamis Xerxes I became involved in intrigues involving his wife Amestris and his daughter-in-law, with whom he became enamoured. (Histories IX.108) Herodotus relates this occurred in the tenth month of his seventh year as king – the same time Ahasuerus was choosing beautiful women for his harem (Esther 2:16).
  3. Annals from the reign of Xerxes I mention an otherwise unattested official by the name of "Marduka", which some have proposed refers to , as both are mentioned serving in the king's court.


Identification of "Ahasuerus" as Artaxerxes I
While today the king of Esther is usually identified as Xerxes I, the ancient traditions identify him with his son, . The Septuagint, the Vulgate, the of Esther Rabbah, I, 3, and the identify him as Artaxerxes. Many historians and exegetes from ancient times and the Middle Ages also identified Ahasuerus with Artaxerxes I, including, most notably, ,Flavius Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book 11, chapter 6, section 1 who relates that "Artaxerxes" was the name by which he was known to the Greeks. "Ahasuerus". Jewish Encyclopedia. The Ethiopic text calls him Arťeksis, usually the Ethiopic equivalent of Artaxerxes.


Identification of "Ahasuerus" as Artaxerxes II
Some have speculated that the king was . In his Chronography, the 13th century Syriac historian also identifies Ahasuerus as Artaxerxes II citing the sixth century AD historian John of Ephesus.E. A. W. Budge, The Chronography of Bar Hebraeus, Gorgias Press, reprinted 2003Jan Jacob van Ginkel, John of Ephesus. A Monophysite Historian in Sixth-century Byzantium, Groningen, 1995 in his Lives (AD 75) records alternative names Oarses and Arsicas for Artaxerxes II Mnemon given by (c. 360–340 BCWolfgang Felix, "Dinon", in Encyclopaedia Iranica, 1996–2008) and (Artexerxes II's physicianJona Lendering, Ctesias of Cnidus; Livius, Articles on Ancient History, 1996–2008) respectively.John Dryden, Arthur Hugh Clough, Plutarch's Lives, Little, Brown and Company, 1885 These derive from the Persian name Khshayarsha as do "Ahasuerus" ("(Arta)Xerxes") and the "Arshu" for Artaxerxes II found on a contemporary inscription ( LBAT 162M. A. Dandamaev, W. J. Vogelsang, A Political History of the Achaemenid Empire, BRILL, 1989). These sources thus arguably identify Ahasuerus as Artaxerxes II in light of the names used in the Hebrew and Greek sources and accords with the contextual information from Pseudo-Hecataeus and Jacob Hoschander, The Book of Esther in the Light of History, Oxford University Press, 1923 as well as agreeing with Al-Tabari and Masudi's placement of events.


Book of Ezra
Ahasuerus is also given as the name of a King of Persia in the Book of Ezra. Modern commentators associate him with who reigned from 486 to 465 BC. Other identifications have been made for Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible Https://bible.cc/ezra/4-7.htm< /ref> or with (Greek Smerdis) who reigned (perhaps as an imposter) for seven months between Cambyses II and . Clarke's Commentary on the Bible Https://Bible.cc/ezra/4-7.htm< /ref>


Book of Daniel
Ahasuerus is given as the name of the father of Darius the Mede in the Book of Daniel. Josephus names as the father of Darius the Mede, and the description of the latter as uncle and father-in-law of Cyrus by mediaeval Jewish commentators matches that of , who is said to be the son of Astyages by . Thus this Ahasuerus is commonly identified with Astyages. He is alternatively identified, together with the Ahasuerus of the Book of Tobit, as Cyaxares I, said to be the father of Astyages. Views differ on how to reconcile the sources in this case. One view is that the description of Ahasuerus as the "father" of Darius the Mede should be understood in the broader sense of "forebear" or "ancestor". Another view notes that on the Behistun Inscription, "Cyaxares" is a family name, and thus considers the description as literal, viewing Astyages as an intermediate ruler wrongly placed in the family line in the Greek sources.

Most scholars view Darius the Mede as a literary fiction, or possibly a conflation of Darius the Great with prophecies about the Medes.

(2025). 9780830891009, InterVarsity Press. .


Book of Tobit
In some versions of the Book of Tobit, Ahasuerus is given as the name of an associate of Nebuchadnezzar, who, together with him, destroyed just before Tobit's death. A traditional view is that he is identical to the Ahasuerus of Daniel 9:1Maas, Anthony (1907). "Assuerus". In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved April 15, 2009 – via New Advent. In the Greek () edition, the two names in this verse appear instead as one name, (also the name of another character in the story of Tobit). Other Septuagint texts have the name Achiachar. Western scholars have proposed that Achiachar is a variant form of the name " of ", who historically did destroy Nineveh, in 612 BC.


In legends
In some versions of the legend of the , his true name is held to be Ahasuerus – even though the biblical king is not described as a Jew and nothing in the Biblical account of him is similar to that myth. This is the name by which refers to the Wandering Jew in The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God.Kant, I. Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes. 1763. AA 2:76


Notes

Sources


External links
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time