Understanding

 ( Cognition ) 

Understanding is a Cognition process related to an abstract or physical object, such as a person, situation, or message whereby one is able to use to model that object. Understanding is a relation between the knower and an object of understanding. Understanding implies abilities and dispositions with respect to an object of knowledge that are sufficient to support intelligent behavior.

Understanding is often, though not always, related to learning concepts, and sometimes also the theory or theories associated with those concepts. However, a person may have a good ability to predict the behavior of an object, animal or system—and therefore may, in some sense, understand it—without necessarily being familiar with the concepts or theories associated with that object, animal, or system in their culture. They may have developed their own distinct concepts and theories, which may be equivalent, better or worse than the recognized standard concepts and theories of their culture. Thus, understanding is correlated with the ability to make .

---

Definition Understanding and knowledge are both words without unified definitions.

Ludwig Wittgenstein looked past a definition of knowledge or understanding and looked at how the words were used in natural language, identifying relevant features in context.Ludwig Wittgenstein, On Certainty, remark 42 It has been suggested that knowledge alone has little value whereas knowing something in context is understanding, which has much higher relative value but it has also been suggested that a state short of knowledge can be termed understanding.

Catherine Z. Elgin (2017). 9780262036535, MIT Press. . ISBN 9780262036535

Someone's understanding can come from perceived causes

or non causal sources, suggesting knowledge being a pillar of where understanding comes from. We can have understanding while lacking corresponding knowledge and have knowledge while lacking the corresponding understanding. Even with knowledge, relevant distinctions or correct conclusion about similar cases may not be made,

Alison Hills (2010). 9780199213306, Oxford University Press. . ISBN 9780199213306

suggesting more information about the context would be required, which eludes to different degrees of understanding depending on the context. To understand something implies abilities and Disposition with respect to an object of knowledge that are sufficient to support intelligent behavior.

Carl Bereiter (2005). 9781135644796, Routledge. . ISBN 9781135644796

Understanding could therefore be less demanding than knowledge, because it seems that someone can have understanding of a subject even though they might have been mistaken about that subject. But it is more demanding in that it requires that the internal connections among ones' beliefs actually be "seen" or "grasped" by the person doing the understanding when found at a deeper level.

Explanatory realism and the propositional model suggests understanding comes from causal propositions but, it has been argued that knowing how the cause might bring an effect is understanding. As understanding is not directed towards a discrete proposition, but involves grasping relations of parts to other parts and perhaps the relations of part to wholes.

Linda Zagzebski (2008). 9780534252342, Cengage Learning. . ISBN 9780534252342

The relationships grasped help understanding, but the relationships are not always causal.

(2025). 9780198235880, Clarendon Press. . ISBN 9780198235880

So understanding could therefore be expressed by knowledge of dependencies.

---

As a model

Gregory Chaitin propounds a view that comprehension is a kind of data compression. In his 2006 essay "The Limits of Reason", he argues that understanding something means being able to figure out a simple set of rules that explains it. For example, we understand why day and night exist because we have a simple conceptual model—the rotation of the earth—that explains a tremendous amount of data—changes in brightness, temperature, and atmospheric composition of the earth. We have compressed a large amount of information by using a simple model that prediction it. Similarly, we understand the number 0.33333... by thinking of it as one-third. The first way of representing the number requires five concepts ("0", "decimal point", "3", "infinity", "infinity of 3"); but the second way can produce all the data of the first representation, but uses only three concepts ("1", "division", "3"). Chaitin argues that comprehension is this ability to compress data. This perspective on comprehension forms the foundation of some models of intelligent agents, as in Nello Cristianini's book "The Shortcut", where it is used to explain that machines can understand the world in fundamentally non-human ways.

Nello Cristianini (2025). 9781003335818 ISBN 9781003335818

---

External links

Categories: Cognition, Concepts In Epistemology, Knowledge, Thought

Post Comment