Taurodontism is defined as the enlargement of pulp chambers with the furcation area being displaced toward the apex of the root of a tooth. It cannot be diagnosed clinically and requires radiographic visualization since the crown of a taurodontic tooth appears normal and its distinguishing features are present below the Alveolar process. Taurodontism can present in Deciduous teeth or Permanent teeth dentition, unilaterally or bilaterally, but is most common in the permanent molar teeth of humans. The underlying mechanism of taurodontism is the failure or late invagination of Hertwig's epithelial root sheath, which leads an apical shift of the root furcation.
Radiographic characteristics of taurodontism include:
Earlier classification systems considered only the apical displacement of the pulp chamber floor; whereas, later systems additionally consider the position of the pulp chamber in relation to the cemento-enamel junction and Alveolar ridge.
Where, A = the lowest point of the pulp chamber roof, B = the highest point of the pulp chamber floor, and C = the longest root’s apex.
Using this formula, a tooth is a taurodont if the landmark ratio is ≥ 0.2 and the distance from the highest point of the pulp chamber floor (B) to the cemento-enamel junction (D) is ≥ 2.5 mm. The full classification system based on this formula are displayed in the table below:
+ !Classification !Landmark ratio | |
Normal | < 0.2 |
Hypo-taurodont | ≥ 0.2 - 0.209 |
Meso-taurodont | ≥ 0.3 - 0.399 |
Hyper-taurodont | ≥ 0.4 - 0.75 |
Historically, there has been professional debate regarding the taurodont classification systems as to: 1) how much displacement and/or morphologic change constitutes taurodontism, 2) whether classification should be indexed stepwise or on a continuum, and 3) whether to include certain teeth in the occurrence of taurodontism. For example, as are narrow mesio-distally, taurodontism is hard to identify radiographically on premolars. Therefore, some researchers exclude premolars from their classification systems. Additionally, there has been criticism over the use of landmarks that undergo changes. For example, due to trauma or wear, Dentin can be deposited which can then alter some measurements; thus, caution should be employed when diagnosing taurodontism in this case. Finally, as these measurements are dimensionally quite small, they are also subject to large relative error.
Prosthodontics and Orthodontics should also exercise caution in using taurodont teeth as sites for dental anchorage. Due to the apical displacement of the furcation area, the taurodont tooth is not held as securely in the Dental alveolus. Conversely, this may make taurodont teeth easier to extract.
Finally, taurodont teeth may have favorable prognosis from a Periodontology point of view, as the furcation area is apical and thus less susceptible to periodontal damage.
The trait " is common among extant New World monkeys, , and fossil Hominini".Irish, J.D. & Scott, G.R. (2016). A Companion to Dental Anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell. Page 197. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from link.
Taurodontism may be related to:
|
|