Product Code Database
Example Keywords: mobile world -apple $5
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Rauisuchia
Tag Wiki 'Rauisuchia'.
Tag

" Rauisuchia" is a paraphyletic group of mostly large and carnivorous . Rauisuchians are a category of archosaurs within a larger group called , which encompasses all archosaurs more closely related to than to birds and other . First named in the 1940s, Rauisuchia was a name exclusive to Triassic archosaurs which were generally large (often ), carnivorous, and quadrupedal with a pillar-erect hip posture, though exceptions exist for all of these traits. Rauisuchians, as a traditional group, were considered distinct from other Triassic archosaur groups such as early dinosaurs, (crocodile-like carnivores), (armored herbivores), and (lightly-built crocodilian ancestors).

However, more recent studies on archosaur evolution have upended this idea based on phylogenetic analyses and , a modern approach to taxonomy based on (nested groups of common ancestry). Since the early 2010s, archosaur classification schemes have stabilized on a system where Rauisuchia is rendered an evolutionary grade, or even a wastebin taxon. most likely originated from a rauisuchian ancestor based on a myriad of shared traits, and some "rauisuchians" (such as and ) appear to be more closely related to crocodylomorphs than to other "rauisuchians" (such as and ).

As a result, Rauisuchia in its traditional usage may be considered : a group which is defined by shared ancestry but also excludes a descendant taxon (in this case, crocodylomorphs). To designate it as an informal group in scientific literature, the name is often enclosed in quotation marks. Several groups have been erected to classify "rauisuchians" in a cladistic framework. The closest concept is the clade Paracrocodylomorpha, which includes most "rauisuchian" taxa and their crocodylomorph descendants. Paracrocodylomorpha is divided into two branches: , which includes a variety of strange "rauisuchians" (some of which were bipedal and/or herbivorous) and , which includes most typical "rauisuchians" and crocodylomorphs.


Characteristics
"Rauisuchians" had an erect gait with their legs oriented vertically beneath the body rather than sprawling outward. This type of gait is also seen in dinosaurs, but evolved independently in the two groups. In dinosaurs, the hip socket faces outward and the (thigh bone) connects to the side of the hip; while in rauisuchians, the hip socket faces downward to form a shelf of bone under which the femur connects. This has been referred to as the pillar-erect posture.

"Rauisuchians" lived throughout most of the Triassic. The group died out in the late Triassic, before the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event (barring crocodylomorphs, which survive to the present in the form of crocodilians). ‘Rauisuchian’ material from the lower Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho: Implications for Late Triassic biogeography and biostratigraphy After their extinction, dinosaurs were able to emerge as the sole large terrestrial predators, though there is still some debate over how the extinction influenced dinosaur evolution. The footprints of meat-eating dinosaurs may have suddenly increased in size at the start of the , when rauisuchians were absent. However, the apparent increase in dinosaur footprint size has instead been argued to be a result of increasing abundance of large theropods, rather than an abrupt acquisition of large size. Some "rauisuchians" may have existed in the very early Jurassic based on bone fragments from South Africa, but this identification is tentative.

The name "Rauisuchia" comes from the genus , which was named after fossil collector Dr. . The name Rauisuchus means Wilhelm Rau's crocodile.


History of classification
"Rauisuchians" were originally thought to be related to , but it is now known that they are .
(2025). 9780632056378, Blackwell Science.
Three families have historically been recognised: , , and , as well as a number of forms (e.g. those from the of Russia) that are too primitive and/or poorly known to fit in any of these groups.

There has been considerable suggestion that the group as currently defined is , representing a number of related lineages independently evolving and filling the same ecological niche of medium to top terrestrial predator. For example, Parrish (1993) and Juul (1994) considered poposaurid rauisuchians to be more closely related to than to prestosuchids. Nesbitt (2003) presented a different phylogeny with a Rauisuchia. The group may even be something of a "wastebasket taxon". Determining exact phylogenetic relationships is difficult because of the scrappy nature of a lot of the material. However, further discoveries and studies, such as a study on the braincase of (2002) and restudies of other forms, such as (2002) have shed some light on the evolutionary relationships of this poorly known group.


Cladistics
Despite its inclusion as an informal grouping in numerous studies, "Rauisuchia" has never received a formal definition. Most analyses in the past decade have found "Rauisuchia" to be a paraphyletic grouping, including all studies with a large sample size. Those that found the possibility that it was a natural group produced only weak support for this hypothesis. In his large 2011 analysis of archosaurian relationships, Nesbitt recommended that the term "Rauisuchia" be abandoned.

In a study of the , paleontologist defined a of rauisuchians called "Group X". This group includes Arizonasuchus, , , , and . One distinguishing feature of Group X is their lack of osteoderms, which are common among many other . Many more features are found in the , including fully fused and a long, thin crest on the ilium called the supra- crest. Additionally, many members of Group X have smooth and , which make up the upper portion of the rostrum. In other "rauisuchians" and many other crurotarsans, this area has bumps and ridges. "Group X" is now termed .

Nesbitt later erected another clade, "Group Y", in 2007. Group Y falls within Group X to include Sillosuchus, Shuvosaurus, and Effigia. Group Y is diagnosed by the presence of four or more sacral vertebrae with fully fused , which is also seen in (a case of evolutionary convergence). In addition, the cervical vertebrae that make up the are strongly amphicoelus, meaning that they are concave at both ends. The fourth trochanter, a ridge of on the for muscle attachment seen in nearly all archosaurs, is absent in Group Y. "Group Y" is now termed .

Although not placed within Group Y, Lotosaurus shares many similarities with members of the clade, foremost of which is , or toothless, jaws. Edentulism is also seen in Shuvosaurus and Effigia, which have beak-like jaws. Nesbitt suggested that the derived characters of Lotosaurus may indicate that it is a transitional form between basal members of Group X and members of Group Y.

Below is the from Nesbitt (2007):

In their phylogenetic study of archosaurs, Brusatte et al. (2010) found only weak support for Rauisuchia as a monophyletic grouping. As a result of their analysis, two clades were found to be within Rauisuchia, which they named Rauisuchoidea and Poposauroidea. Rauisuchoidea included Rauisuchidae and Prestosuchidae, as well as several basal taxa that were once assigned to the families, including and . Poposauroidea included poposaurids and ctenosauriscids, but the phylogeny had a large of genera in both groups that was difficult to resolve, which included Arizonasaurus, , and Sillosuchus. However, the characters linking these two groups were weak, and the question as to whether or not "Rauisuchia" forms a natural group remains unresolved. Brusatte et al. (2010) was one of the last studies to find a monophyletic Rauisuchia clade.

Below is the cladogram from Brusatte et al. (2010):

In a more thorough test of archosaurian relationships published in 2011 by Sterling Nesbitt, "rauisuchians" were found to be paraphyletic, with at the base of the clade Paracrocodylomorpha, and the rest of the "rauisuchians" forming a grade within the clade . Nesbitt noted that no previous study of "rauisuchian" relationships had ever included a wide variety of supposed "rauisuchians" as well as a large number of non-"rauisuchian" taxa as controls.


Fossil record
Well-known "rauisuchians" include of the Middle Triassic of Switzerland and Northern Italy, of the Late Triassic (late ) of Argentina, of the Middle-Late Triassic (late Ladinian-early Carnian) of Brazil, and of the Late Triassic () of the southwest United States. The first "rauisuchian" known to paleontology was , a German genus from the Late Triassic (Norian) of Germany. However, Teratosaurus was considered an early for much of its history,See for example Colbert, E.H., 1961, Dinosaurs: Their Discovery and Their World, Dutton, New York, 1961 p.67 before it was demonstrated to be non-dinosaurian in the 1980s. The concept of "rauisuchians" as a distinct group of reptiles distantly related to crocodiles was recognized by discoveries in Brazil in the 1940s (particularly Prestosuchus and ) and emphasized further by the description of Ticinosuchus in the 1960s.

The oldest known "rauisuchians", in terms of geological age, are probably from the end of the (late ). Most of these early fossils are fragmentary and dubious remains from Russia, but some are better-described and constrained, such as , a from the Heshanggou Formation of China. Xilousuchus is neither the earliest-branching archosaur nor "rauisuchian" despite its early age, and its presence in the Early Triassic suggests that other archosaur fossils are simply undiscovered from that time. The last known "rauisuchians", excluding their descendants the crocodylomorphs, are from the latter part of the Late Triassic. The shuvosaurid , from the "siltstone member" of the in , may be as young as the , the last stage of the Triassic. Effigia was recovered from the Coelophysis Quarry of .Nesbitt, S. (2007). "The anatomy of Effigia okeeffeae (Archosauria, Suchia), theropod-like convergence, and the distribution of related taxa." Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 302: 84 pp. http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/5840 The same site also preserves a large undescribed archosaur, CM 73372, which seemingly represents a transitional form between "rauisuchians" and crocodylomorphs. Indeterminate large paracrocodylomorph material from the Lower Elliot Formation of may be even younger, late Rhaetian or possibly even lowermost Jurassic.


List of rauisuchian genera
The following is a list of valid pseudosuchian genera which have been informally or formally classified as rauisuchians, as well as their modern cladistic interpretation. This list does not include genera named for dubious and poorly-diagnosed "rauisuchian" material from Russia ( , , , , , , , ) and China ( , ), nor taxa reclassified as non-"rauisuchian" archosaurs ( , , , ).
Sues & Schoch2013 Löwenstein Formation (Stubensandstein)A small "rauisuchian" based on a partial skull. Originally considered a species of , a contemporary theropod dinosaur.
Jalil & Peyer2007 Timezgadiouine Formation?A "rauisuchian" based on scant skull and postcranial material similar to that of , , and .
Welles1947 Moenkopi Formation? Rauisuchia? ()One of the most complete ctenosauriscids, owing to a partial skeleton with skull and hip material discovered in 2002. Vital for understanding the affinities of ctenosauriscids with .
Gower1999 (Lower Keuper)Late / One of the most completely-known "rauisuchians", with numerous fossils recovered from sites at , and -Eschenau.
1985 Bromsgrove Sandstone / / ()Named based on a distinctive -like ilium, but also possibly incorporating "rauisuchian" fossil material such as teeth and described from since the mid-19th century.
Sennikov2012 Lipovskaya Formation (Gamskian Gorizont)Late ? ()An early ctenosauriscid with low-spined cervical (neck) vertebrae similar to .
1964 Solling FormationLate to ?"" / / ()Known from slabs of sail-backed dorsal vertebrae first discovered in 1871 and originally named as the (preoccupied) genus Ctenosaurus in 1902. Its affinities were strongly debated until stabilizing as poposauroid archosaur upon the discovery of new and fossils .
Lacerda et al.2015 Middle Santa Maria Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Late or early N/AA medium-sized "rauisuchian" based on a hip bone which helps to fill a gap in the record of Brazilian archosaurs.
França2011 Lower Santa Maria Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Late or early A medium-sized "rauisuchian" named from 10 individuals (including several nearly-complete skeletons) which died and fossilized together, suggesting a social structure.
& 2006 ("siltstone member")Late or Derived ()A bizarre pseudosuchian convergent on , with a toothless skull, theropod-like hip, and very short arms. Discovered within a sediment block collected from the Quarry of , .
Tolchard et al.2021 Omingonde Formation or early A large and possibly bipedal "rauisuchian" based on a partial skeleton previously misattributed to the erythrosuchid .
Bonaparte1981 Los Colorados FormationLate One of the last and largest "rauisuchians", occurring alongside an increasingly diverse fauna of dinosaurs.
Dawley et al.1979 Popo Agie FormationLate ??One of the oldest predatory archosaurs from North America, based on skull and postcranial fragments from . Probably a close relative of .
Butler et al.2009 ? to ? ()A ctenosauriscid based on a single well-preserved vertebra with a very long neural spine. First mentioned in an unpublished 1966 by Alan Charig, but not formally described until 2009.
Zhang1975 ? to ?"Lotosauridae"An unusual quadruped combining a neural spine sail with a toothless skull. Known from abundant fossils clustered into a , but most of these fossils remain undescribed.
Romer1971 Chanares Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Late or earliest (?)A medium-sized "rauisuchian" with a skull similar to and .
Butler et al.2022 ? to ?"Pallisteriidae"Basal Paracrocodylomorpha?A possible paracrocodylomorph based on a massive partial skull. Mentioned as " Pallisteria angustimentum" in an unpublished 1967 manuscript by Alan Charig, but not formally described (and provided a new scientific name) until 2022.
Butler et al.2018 ? to ??Basal Paracrocodylomorpha?One of the most basal loricatans or poposauroids, first mentioned in a 1956 doctoral thesis by Alan Charig but not formally described until 2018.
Brusatte et al.2009 Krasiejów claypitLate ? ()A large rauisuchid, formerly named as a species of and currently considered a close relative of .
Mehl1915 Popo Agie Formation, , (Monitor Butte Member, Blue Mesa Member, )Late Carnian? to middle / ()A widespread bipedal carnivore with hip bones so similar to dinosaurs that for decades it was mistaken as one. Though skull fragments are very rare, the postcrania is well-described according to a nearly complete skeleton discovered in in 2003.
Chatterjee1985 Cooper Canyon Formation, ?, ? / ()A large rauisuchid with a short skull and possibly bipedal locomotion. One of the most well-described and widespread "rauisuchians" from North America, though not all fossils referred to the genus may actually belong to it. Proposed as an ancestor to when first described.
Huene1942 Lower Santa Maria Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Late or early ()Among the largest and most well-described "rauisuchians", a quadrupedal form based on multiple partial skeletons. One massive well-preserved skull has been named under the dubious genus "Karamuru vorax".
Huene1938 Lower Santa Maria Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Late or early (?)A poorly-known taxon, possibly a synonym or species of .
Li et al.2006 Guanling Formation (Panxian biota)Indeterminate A small, gracile archosaur, the only known "rauisuchians" with semiaquatic and habits owing to its narrow skull and tall tail vertebrae.
Huene1942 Upper Santa Maria Formation ( Assemblage Zone)Middle-late ()The namesake of Rauisuchia. Known primarily from skull, vertebral, and hindlimb fossils, which reconstruct a stocky quadrupedal predator with a boxy skull full of serrated teeth.
Reig1959 Ischigualasto FormationLate (?)A very large quadruped which lived alongside some of the earliest dinosaurs. Fossils include a well-preserved cranium.
Sennikov2023 Lipovskaya FormationLate ""A large rauisuchian based on distinctive vertebrae.
Chatterjee1993 Cooper Canyon FormationEarly-middle Theropoda / "Chatterjeeidae" ()An unusual beaked biped with two sets of fossils independently discovered in the mid-1990s: a toothless skull ( Shuvosaurus) attributed to an ornithomimosaur-like dinosaur, and postcranial material (" Chatterjeea") comparable to poposaurids. The synonymy between these two fossil sets would not be confirmed until the discovery of Effigia, a close relative.
Alcober & Parrish1997 Ischigualasto FormationLate ()A probable relative of and based on its vertebrae and hip fossils. May have reached up to 10 meters (33 ft) in length according to a large isolated vertebra.
Huene1938 ? to ?A Tanzanian archosaur named from hip and vertebral fragments. May be a species of .
Meyer1861 Löwenstein Formation (Stubensandstein) / / (?)The earliest "rauisuchian" to be named, though its fossil (a toothed bone) was misidentified as that of an early dinosaur. A complete re-evaluation of archosaur systematics in the 1980s involved the recognition that Teratosaurus (and other "rauisuchians") were completely unrelated to carnosaurian dinosaurs.
Krebs1965,

Mittlere GrenzbitumenzoneLate (non-paracrocodylomorph)Described from a flattened but complete skeleton from Monte San Giorgio on the Swiss-Italian border. Its discovery established knowledge of "rauisuchian" proportions and their association with footprints. Commonly considered the sister taxon to Paracrocodylomorpha.
Chatterjee & Majumdar1987 ? (?)A medium-sized probable rauisuchid with a proportionally large skull.
Lessner et al.2016 (Petrified Forest Member)Middle N/A ()Known from -like skull and hip fragments from the Hayden Quarry at , . Its discovery casts doubt on the assumption that all rauisuchid fossils from the southwestern United States can be referred to Postosuchus.
Wu1981 Heshanggou FormationLate or early / ()One of the better-understood early "rauisuchians", a including skull, braincase, and cervical (neck) fossils.
Young1973 Ermaying Formation? /?Based on a well-preserved but poorly-described partial skeleton, including a skull. Originally named as a species of , an which has subsequently been synonymized with .


See also

Notes

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
4s Time