Product Code Database
Example Keywords: energy -resident $40-153
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Observability
Tag Wiki 'Observability'.
Tag

Observability is a measure of how well internal states of a can be inferred from knowledge of its external outputs. In , the observability and of a linear system are mathematical duals.

The concept of observability was introduced by the Hungarian-American engineer Rudolf E. Kálmán for linear dynamic systems. A dynamical system designed to estimate the state of a system from measurements of the outputs is called a for that system, such as .


Definition
Consider a physical system modeled in state-space representation. A system is said to be observable if, for every possible evolution of state and control vectors, the current state can be estimated using only the information from outputs (physically, this generally corresponds to information obtained by ). In other words, one can determine the behavior of the entire system from the system's outputs. On the other hand, if the system is not observable, there are state trajectories that are not distinguishable by only measuring the outputs.


Linear time-invariant systems
For time-invariant linear systems in the state space representation, there are convenient tests to check whether a system is observable. Consider a SISO system with n state variables (see state space for details about systems) given by

\dot{\mathbf{x}}(t) = \mathbf{A} \mathbf{x}(t) + \mathbf{B} \mathbf{u}(t)
\mathbf{y}(t) = \mathbf{C} \mathbf{x}(t) + \mathbf{D} \mathbf{u}(t)


Observability matrix
If and only if the column rank of the observability matrix, defined as

\mathcal{O}=\begin{bmatrix} C \\ CA \\ CA^2 \\ \vdots \\ CA^{n-1} \end{bmatrix}

is equal to n, then the system is observable. The rationale for this test is that if n columns are linearly independent, then each of the n state variables is viewable through linear combinations of the output variables y.


Related concepts

Observability index
The observability index v of a linear time-invariant discrete system is the smallest natural number for which the following is satisfied: \text{rank}{(\mathcal{O}_v)} = \text{rank}{(\mathcal{O}_{v+1})}, where

\mathcal{O}_v=\begin{bmatrix} C \\ CA \\ CA^2 \\ \vdots \\ CA^{v-1} \end{bmatrix}.


Unobservable subspace
The unobservable subspace N of the linear system is the kernel of the linear map G given bySontag, E.D., "Mathematical Control Theory", Texts in Applied Mathematics, 1998
\begin{align} G \colon \mathbb{R}^{n} &\rightarrow \mathcal{C}(\mathbb{R};\mathbb{R}^n) \\
        x(0)  &\mapsto  C e^{A t} x(0)
     
\end{align}
where \mathcal{C}(\mathbb{R};\mathbb{R}^n) is the set of continuous functions from \mathbb{R} to \mathbb{R}^n . N can also be written as

N = \bigcap_{k=0}^{n-1} \ker(CA^k)= \ker{\mathcal{O}}

Since the system is observable if and only if \operatorname{rank}(\mathcal{O}) = n, the system is observable if and only if N is the zero subspace.

The following properties for the unobservable subspace are valid:

  • N \subset Ke(C)
  • A(N) \subset N
  • N= \bigcup \{ S \subset R^n \mid S \subset Ke(C), A(S) \subset N \}


Detectability
A slightly weaker notion than observability is detectability. A system is detectable if all the unobservable states are stable.

Detectability conditions are important in the context of .


Linear time-varying systems
Consider the continuous time-variant system

\dot{\mathbf{x}}(t) = A(t) \mathbf{x}(t) + B(t) \mathbf{u}(t) \,
\mathbf{y}(t) = C(t) \mathbf{x}(t). \,

Suppose that the matrices A, B and C are given as well as inputs and outputs u and y for all t \in t_0,t_1; then it is possible to determine x(t_0) to within an additive constant vector which lies in the of M(t_0,t_1) defined by

M(t_0,t_1) = \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \varphi(t,t_0)^{T}C(t)^{T}C(t)\varphi(t,t_0) \, dt
where \varphi is the state-transition matrix.

It is possible to determine a unique x(t_0) if M(t_0,t_1) is nonsingular. In fact, it is not possible to distinguish the initial state for x_1 from that of x_2 if x_1 - x_2 is in the null space of M(t_0,t_1).

Note that the matrix M defined as above has the following properties:

  • M(t_0,t_1) is
  • M(t_0,t_1) is positive semidefinite for t_1 \geq t_0
  • M(t_0,t_1) satisfies the linear matrix differential equation
: \frac{d}{dt}M(t,t_1) = -A(t)^{T}M(t,t_1)-M(t,t_1)A(t)-C(t)^{T}C(t), \; M(t_1,t_1) = 0
  • M(t_0,t_1) satisfies the equation
: M(t_0,t_1) = M(t_0,t) + \varphi(t,t_0)^T M(t,t_1)\varphi(t,t_0)
(1970). 9780471105855, John Wiley & Sons.


Observability matrix generalization
The system is observable in t_0,t_1 if and only if there exists an interval t_0,t_1 in \mathbb{R} such that the matrix M(t_0,t_1) is nonsingular.

If A(t), C(t) are analytic, then the system is observable in the interval t_0,t_1 if there exists \bar{t} \in t_0,t_1 and a positive integer k such thatEduardo D. Sontag, Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems.

\operatorname{rank} \begin{bmatrix}
& N_0(\bar{t}) & \\
& N_1(\bar{t}) & \\
& \vdots & \\
& N_{k}(\bar{t}) &
     
\end{bmatrix} = n,

where N_0(t):=C(t) and N_i(t) is defined recursively as

N_{i+1}(t) := N_i(t)A(t) + \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t}N_i(t),\ i = 0, \ldots, k-1


Example
Consider a system varying analytically in (-\infty,\infty) and matrices
A(t) = \begin{bmatrix} t & 1 & 0\\ 0 & t^{3} & 0\\ 0 & 0 & t^{2} \end{bmatrix},\, C(t) = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.
Then \begin{bmatrix} N_0(0) \\ N_1(0) \\ N_2(0) \end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}
     
1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1& 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} , and since this matrix has rank = 3, the system is observable on every nontrivial interval of \mathbb{R}.


Nonlinear systems
Given the system \dot{x} = f(x) + \sum_{j=1}^mg_j(x)u_j , y_i = h_i(x), i \in p. Where x \in \mathbb{R}^n the state vector, u \in \mathbb{R}^m the input vector and y \in \mathbb{R}^p the output vector. f,g,h are to be smooth vector fields.

Define the observation space \mathcal{O}_s to be the space containing all repeated , then the system is observable in x_0 if and only if \dim(d\mathcal{O}_s(x_0)) = n, where

d\mathcal{O}_s(x_0) = \operatorname{span}(dh_1(x_0), \ldots , dh_p(x_0), dL_{v_i}L_{v_{i-1}}, \ldots , L_{v_1}h_j(x_0)),\ j\in p, k=1,2,\ldots.Lecture notes for Nonlinear Systems Theory by prof. dr. D.Jeltsema, prof dr. J.M.A.Scherpen and prof dr. A.J.van der Schaft.

Early criteria for observability in nonlinear dynamic systems were discovered by Griffith and Kumar, Kou, Elliot and Tarn, and Singh.

There also exist an observability criteria for nonlinear time-varying systems.


Static systems and general topological spaces
Observability may also be characterized for steady state systems (systems typically defined in terms of algebraic equations and inequalities), or more generally, for sets in \mathbb{R}^n. Just as observability criteria are used to predict the behavior of or other observers in the dynamic system case, observability criteria for sets in \mathbb{R}^n are used to predict the behavior of data reconciliation and other static estimators. In the nonlinear case, observability can be characterized for individual variables, and also for local estimator behavior rather than just global behavior.


See also


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time