Product Code Database
Example Keywords: data protection -data $39-104
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Megafauna
Tag Wiki 'Megafauna'.
Tag

In , megafauna (from μέγας 'large' and 'animal life') are large animals. The precise definition of the term varies widely, though a common threshold is approximately , this lower end being centered on humans, with other thresholds being more relative to the sizes of animals in an ecosystem, the spectrum of lower-end thresholds ranging from to . Large body size is generally associated with other traits, such as having a slow rate of reproduction and, in large herbivores, reduced or negligible adult mortality from being killed by predators.

Megafauna species have considerable effects on their local environment, including the suppression of the growth of woody vegetation and a consequent reduction in frequency. Megafauna also play a role in regulating and stabilizing the abundance of smaller animals.

During the , megafauna were diverse across the globe, with most continental ecosystems exhibiting similar or greater in megafauna as compared to ecosystems in Africa today. During the , particularly from around 50,000 years ago onwards, most large mammal species became extinct, including 80% of all mammals greater than , while small animals were largely unaffected. This pronouncedly size-biased extinction is otherwise unprecedented in the geological record. Humans and climatic change have been implicated by most authors as the likely causes, though the relative importance of either factor has been the subject of significant controversy.


History
One of the earliest occurrences of the term "megafauna" is Alfred Russel Wallace's 1876 work The geographical distribution of animals. He described the animals as "the hugest, and fiercest, and strangest forms". In the 20th and 21st centuries, the term usually refers to large animals. There are variations in thresholds used to define megafauna as a whole or certain groups of megafauna. Many scientific literature adopt Paul S. Martin's proposed threshold of to classify animals as megafauna. However, for freshwater species, is the preferred threshold. Some scientists define herbivorous terrestrial megafauna as having a weight exceeding , and terrestrial carnivorous megafauna as more than . Additionally, Owen-Smith coined the term to describe herbivores that weighed over , which has seen some use by other researchers.

Among living animals, the term megafauna is most commonly used for the largest terrestrial mammals, which include (but are not limited to) , , , , and larger . Of these five categories of large herbivores, only bovines are presently found outside of and , but all the others were formerly more wide-ranging, with their ranges and populations continually shrinking and decreasing over time. Wild are another example of megafauna, but their current ranges are largely restricted to the , specifically in Africa and Asia. Megafaunal species may be categorized according to their dietary type: (e.g., ), (e.g., ), and (e.g., ).


Ecological strategy
Megafauna animals – in the sense of the largest mammals and birds – are generally , with high longevity, slow population growth rates, low mortality rates, and (at least for the largest) few or no natural predators capable of killing adults. These characteristics, although not exclusive to such megafauna, make them vulnerable to human , in part because of their slow population recovery rates.


Evolution of large body size
One observation that has been made about the evolution of larger body size is that rapid rates of increase that are often seen over relatively short time intervals are not sustainable over much longer time periods. In an examination of mammal body mass changes over time, the maximum increase possible in a given time interval was found to scale with the interval length raised to the 0.25 power. This is thought to reflect the emergence, during a trend of increasing maximum body size, of a series of anatomical, physiological, environmental, genetic and other constraints that must be overcome by evolutionary innovations before further size increases are possible. A strikingly faster rate of change was found for large decreases in body mass, such as may be associated with the phenomenon of . When normalized to generation length, the maximum rate of body mass decrease was found to be over 30 times greater than the maximum rate of body mass increase for a ten-fold change.


In terrestrial mammals
Subsequent to the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event that eliminated the non-avian dinosaurs about (million years) ago, terrestrial mammals underwent a nearly exponential increase in body size as they diversified to occupy the ecological niches left vacant. Starting from just a few kg before the event, maximum size had reached ~ a few million years later, and ~ by the end of the . This trend of increasing body mass appears to level off about 40 Ma ago (in the late ), suggesting that physiological or ecological constraints had been reached, after an increase in body mass of over three orders of magnitude. However, when considered from the standpoint of rate of size increase per generation, the exponential increase is found to have continued until the appearance of 30 Ma ago. (Since generation time scales with body mass0.259, increasing generation times with increasing size cause the log mass vs. time plot to curve downward from a linear fit.)

Megaherbivores eventually attained a body mass of over . The largest of these, and , have been hindgut fermenters, which are believed to have an advantage over foregut fermenters in terms of being able to accelerate gastrointestinal transit in order to accommodate very large food intakes. A similar trend emerges when rates of increase of maximum body mass per generation for different mammalian are compared (using rates averaged over time scales). Among terrestrial mammals, the fastest rates of increase of body mass0.259 vs. time (in Ma) occurred in (a slope of 2.1), followed by (1.2) and proboscids (1.1), all of which are hindgut fermenters. The rate of increase for (0.74) was about a third of the perissodactyls. The rate for (0.65) was slightly lower yet, while , perhaps constrained by their habits, had the lowest rate (0.39) among the mammalian groups studied.

Terrestrial mammalian carnivores from several groups (the – formerly considered a , the , and the carnivorans and ) all reached a maximum size of about (the carnivoran and the may have been somewhat larger). The largest known carnivore, Proborhyaena gigantea, apparently reached , also close to this limit. A similar theoretical maximum size for mammalian carnivores has been predicted based on the metabolic rate of mammals, the energetic cost of obtaining prey, and the maximum estimated rate coefficient of prey intake. It has also been suggested that maximum size for mammalian carnivores is constrained by the stress the can withstand at top running speed.

Analysis of the variation of maximum body size over the last 40 Ma suggests that decreasing temperature and increasing continental land area are associated with increasing maximum body size. The former correlation would be consistent with Bergmann's rule, and might be related to the advantage of large body mass in cool climates, better ability of larger organisms to cope with seasonality in food supply, or other factors; the latter correlation could be explained in terms of range and resource limitations. However, the two parameters are interrelated (due to sea level drops accompanying increased glaciation), making the driver of the trends in maximum size more difficult to identify.


In marine mammals
Since tetrapods (first , later ) returned to the sea in the , they have dominated the top end of the marine body size range, due to the more efficient intake of oxygen possible using lungs. The ancestors of are believed to have been the semiaquatic , no larger than dogs, of about 53 million years (Ma) ago. By 40 Ma ago, cetaceans had attained a length of or more in , an elongated, serpentine whale that differed from modern whales in many respects and was not ancestral to them. Following this, the evolution of large body size in cetaceans appears to have come to a temporary halt and then to have backtracked, although the available fossil records are limited. However, in the period from 31 Ma ago (in the ) to the present, cetaceans underwent a significantly more rapid sustained increase in body mass (a rate of increase in body mass0.259 of a factor of 3.2 per million years) than achieved by any group of terrestrial mammals. This trend led to the largest animal of all time, the modern . Several reasons for the more rapid evolution of large body size in cetaceans are possible. Fewer constraints on increases in body size may be associated with suspension in water as opposed to standing against the force of gravity, and with swimming movements as opposed to terrestrial locomotion. Also, the greater heat capacity and thermal conductivity of water compared to air may increase the advantage of large body size in marine , although diminishing returns apply.

Among the toothed whales, maximum body size appears to be limited by food availability. Larger size, as in and , facilitates deeper diving to access relatively easily-caught, large cephalopod prey in a less competitive environment. Compared to odontocetes, the efficiency of baleen whales' scales more favorably with increasing size when planktonic food is dense, making larger sizes more advantageous. The technique of appears to be more energy efficient than the of whales; the latter technique is used with less dense and patchy plankton. The cooling trend in Earth's recent history may have generated more localities of high plankton abundance via wind-driven , facilitating the evolution of gigantic whales.

Cetaceans are not the only marine mammals to reach tremendous sizes. The largest mammal of all time are marine , the largest of which is the southern elephant seal, which can reach more than in length and weigh up to . Other large pinnipeds include the northern elephant seal at , at , and Steller sea lion at . The are another group of marine mammals which adapted to fully aquatic life around the same time as the cetaceans did. Sirenians are closely related to elephants. The largest sirenian was the Steller's sea cow, which reached up to in length and weighed , and was hunted to extinction in the 18th century.


In flightless birds
Because of the small initial size of all mammals following the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs, nonmammalian vertebrates had a roughly ten-million-year-long window of opportunity (during the Paleocene) for evolution of gigantism without much competition. During this interval, niches were often occupied by reptiles, such as terrestrial (e.g. ), large snakes (e.g. ) or , or by flightless birds (e.g. in South America). This is also the period when megafaunal flightless herbivorous birds evolved in the Northern Hemisphere, while flightless evolved to large size on land masses and . Gastornithids and at least one lineage of flightless paleognath birds originated in Europe, both lineages dominating niches for large herbivores while mammals remained below (in contrast with other landmasses like and , which saw the earlier evolution of larger mammals) and were the largest European tetrapods in the .

Flightless paleognaths, termed , have traditionally been viewed as representing a lineage separate from that of their small flighted relatives, the . However, recent genetic studies have found that tinamous nest well within the ratite tree, and are the of the extinct of New Zealand. Similarly, the small kiwi of New Zealand have been found to be the sister group of the extinct of Madagascar. These findings indicate that and gigantism arose independently multiple times among ratites via parallel evolution.

Predatory megafaunal flightless birds were often able to compete with mammals in the early . Later in the Cenozoic, however, they were displaced by advanced carnivorans and died out. In North America, the and were apex predators but became extinct by the . In South America, the related shared the dominant predatory niches with metatherian during most of the Cenozoic but declined and ultimately went extinct after eutherian predators arrived from North America (as part of the Great American Interchange) during the . In contrast, large herbivorous flightless ratites have survived to the present.

However, none of the flightless birds of the Cenozoic, including the predatory , possibly omnivorous Dromornis stirtoni

(2025). 9780253342829, Indiana University Press. .
or herbivorous , ever grew to masses much above ; thus, they never attained the size of the largest mammalian carnivores, let alone that of the largest mammalian herbivores. It has been suggested that the increasing thickness of avian eggshells in proportion to egg mass with increasing egg size places an upper limit on the size of birds.
(2025). 9780253342829, Indiana University Press. .
The largest species of Dromornis, D. stirtoni, may have gone extinct after it attained the maximum avian body mass and was then outcompeted by marsupial that evolved to sizes several times larger.
(2025). 9780253342829, Indiana University Press. .


In giant turtles
were important components of late megafaunas, being present in every nonpolar continent until the arrival of . The largest known terrestrial tortoise was Megalochelys atlas, an animal that probably weighed about .

Some earlier aquatic Testudines, e.g. the marine of the Cretaceous and freshwater of the Miocene, were considerably larger, weighing more than .


Megafaunal mass extinctions

Timing and possible causes
Numerous extinctions occurred during the latter half of the Last Glacial Period when most large mammals went extinct in the , Australia-New Guinea, and , including over 80% of all terrestrial animals with a body mass greater than . Small animals and other organisms like plants were generally unaffected by the extinctions, which is unprecented in previous extinctions during the last 30 million years.

Various theories have attributed the wave of extinctions to human hunting, climate change, disease, extraterrestrial impact, competition from other animals or other causes. However, this extinction near the end of the was just one of a series of megafaunal extinction pulses that have occurred during the last 50,000 years over much of the Earth's surface, with and (where the local megafauna had a chance to evolve alongside modern humans) being comparatively less affected. The latter areas did suffer gradual attrition of megafauna, particularly of the slower-moving species (a class of vulnerable megafauna epitomized by ), over the last several million years.

Outside the mainland of , these megafaunal extinctions followed a highly distinctive landmass-by-landmass pattern that closely parallels the spread of humans into previously uninhabited regions of the world, and which shows no overall correlation with climatic history (which can be visualized with plots over recent geological time periods of climate markers such as or ).

(2025). 9780520231412, University of California Press. .
and nearby islands (e.g., ) were struck first around 46,000 years ago, followed by about 41,000 years ago (after formation of a land bridge to Australia about 43,000 years ago). The role of humans in the extinction of Australia and New Guinea's megafauna has been disputed, with multiple studies showing a decline in the number of species prior to the arrival of humans on the continent and the absence of any evidence of human predation; the impact of climate change has instead been cited for their decline. Similarly, lost most of its megafauna apparently about 30,000 years ago, 13,000 years ago and about 500 years later,
(2025). 9781402087929, Springer.
(2025). 9781402087929, Springer.
Cyprus 10,000 years ago,
(1999). 9780306460883, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. .
the 6,000 years ago, New Caledonia and nearby islands 3,000 years ago, 2,000 years ago, 700 years ago, the Mascarenes 400 years ago, and the Commander Islands 250 years ago. Nearly all of the world's isolated islands could furnish similar examples of extinctions occurring shortly after the arrival of , though most of these islands, such as the , never had terrestrial megafauna, so their extinct fauna were smaller, but still displayed .

An analysis of the timing of megafaunal extinctions and extirpations over the last 56,000 years has revealed a tendency for such events to cluster within , periods of abrupt warming, but only when humans were also present. Humans may have impeded processes of migration and recolonization that would otherwise have allowed the megafaunal species to adapt to the climate shift. In at least some areas, interstadials were periods of expanding human populations.

An analysis of fungal spores (which derive mainly from the dung of megaherbivores) in swamp sediment cores spanning the last 130,000 years from Lynch's Crater in , Australia, showed that the megafauna of that region virtually disappeared about 41,000 years ago, at a time when climate changes were minimal; the change was accompanied by an increase in charcoal, and was followed by a transition from rainforest to fire-tolerant vegetation. The high-resolution chronology of the changes supports the hypothesis that human hunting alone eliminated the megafauna, and that the subsequent change in flora was most likely a consequence of the elimination of browsers and an increase in fire. The increase in fire lagged the disappearance of megafauna by about a century, and most likely resulted from accumulation of fuel once browsing stopped. Over the next several centuries grass increased; sclerophyll vegetation increased with a lag of another century, and a sclerophyll forest developed after about another thousand years. During two periods of climate change about 120,000 and 75,000 years ago, sclerophyll vegetation had also increased at the site in response to a shift to cooler, drier conditions; neither of these episodes had a significant impact on megafaunal abundance. Similar conclusions regarding the culpability of human hunters in the disappearance of Pleistocene megafauna were derived from high-resolution chronologies obtained via an analysis of a large collection of eggshell fragments of the flightless Australian bird Genyornis newtoni, from analysis of Sporormiella fungal spores from a lake in eastern North America and from study of deposits of Shasta ground sloth dung left in over half a dozen caves in the American Southwest.

(2025). 9781402087929, Springer.
(2025). 9780520231412, University of California Press. .

Continuing human hunting and environmental disturbance has led to additional megafaunal extinctions in the recent past, and has created a serious danger of further extinctions in the near future (see examples below). Direct killing by humans, primarily for meat or other body parts, is the most significant factor in contemporary megafaunal decline.

A number of other occurred earlier in Earth's geologic history, in which some or all of the megafauna of the time also died out. Famously, in the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, the non-avian dinosaurs and most other giant reptiles were eliminated. However, the earlier mass extinctions were more global and not so selective for megafauna; i.e., many species of other types, including plants, marine invertebrates and plankton, went extinct as well. Thus, the earlier events must have been caused by more generalized types of disturbances to the .


Consequences of depletion of megafauna
Depletion of herbivorous megafauna results in increased growth of woody vegetation, and a consequent increase in frequency. Megafauna may help to suppress the growth of invasive plants. Large herbivores and carnivores can suppress the abundance of smaller animals, resulting in their population increase when megafauna are removed.


Effect on nutrient transport
Megafauna play a significant role in the lateral transport of mineral nutrients in an ecosystem, tending to translocate them from areas of high to those of lower abundance. They do so by their movement between the time they consume the nutrient and the time they release it through elimination (or, to a much lesser extent, through decomposition after death). In South America's , it is estimated that such lateral diffusion was reduced over 98% following the megafaunal extinctions that occurred roughly 12,500 years ago. Given that availability is thought to limit productivity in much of the region, the decrease in its transport from the western part of the basin and from floodplains (both of which derive their supply from the uplift of the ) to other areas is thought to have significantly impacted the region's ecology, and the effects may not yet have reached their limits. In the sea, cetaceans and pinnipeds that feed at depth are thought to translocate nitrogen from deep to shallow water, enhancing ocean productivity, and counteracting the activity of , which tend to do the opposite.


Effect on methane emissions
Large populations of megaherbivores have the potential to contribute greatly to the atmospheric concentration of , which is an important . Modern produce methane as a byproduct of foregut fermentation in digestion and release it through belching or flatulence. Today, around 20% of annual methane emissions come from livestock methane release. In the , it has been estimated that could have emitted 520 million tons of methane to the atmosphere annually, contributing to the warmer climate of the time (up to 10 °C (18 °F) warmer than at present). This large emission follows from the enormous estimated biomass of sauropods, and because methane production of individual herbivores is believed to be almost proportional to their mass.

Recent studies have indicated that the extinction of megafaunal herbivores may have caused a reduction in atmospheric methane. This hypothesis is relatively new. One study examined the methane emissions from the that occupied the of North America before contact with European settlers. The study estimated that the removal of the bison caused a decrease of as much as 2.2 million tons per year. Another study examined the change in the methane concentration in the atmosphere at the end of the Pleistocene epoch after the extinction of megafauna in the Americas. After early humans migrated to the Americas about 13,000 , their hunting and other associated ecological impacts led to the extinction of many megafaunal species there. Calculations suggest that this extinction decreased methane production by about 9.6 million tons per year. This suggests that the absence of megafaunal methane emissions may have contributed to the abrupt climatic cooling at the onset of the . The decrease in atmospheric methane that occurred at that time, as recorded in , was 2 to 4 times more rapid than any other decrease in the last half million years, suggesting that an unusual mechanism was at work.


Gallery
===Pleistocene extinct megafauna===
( pictured)]]
( Panthera atrox )]]
]]
, a camel-sized member of the extinct ungulate order ]]
(front) and '']]

=== Other extinct Cenozoic megafauna ===

was among the largest land mammals]]
(Otodus megalodon )]]
]]
'']]

===Extant===

]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
and calf]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]
]]


See also
  • Australian megafauna
  • Bergmann's rule
  • Charismatic megafauna
  • Cope's rule
  • Deep-sea gigantism
  • Largest organisms
  • Largest prehistoric animals
  • List of heaviest land mammals
  • List of largest mammals
  • List of megafauna discovered in modern times
  • Megafauna (mythology)
  • Quaternary extinction event


Notes

External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
6s Time