An identifier is a name that identifies (that is, labels the identity of) either a unique class of objects or a unique instance of such objects; the class or instance may be an idea, person, physical countable object (or class thereof), or physical mass noun substance (or class thereof). The abbreviation " ID" may refer to identity, identification (the process of identifying), or an identifier (that is, an instance of identification).
An identifier may be a word, number, letter, symbol, or any combination of those. If the identifier follows an encoding system—wherein parts of the identifier represent ideas or longer names—it is often referred to as a code or ID code. Identifiers that do not follow any encoding scheme are often said to be arbitrary IDs as they have no greater meaning.
A unique identifier (UID) is an identifier that refers to —only one particular object in the universe. A part number is an identifier, but it is not a unique identifier—for that, a serial number would be needed, to identify of the part design. For example, the identifier "Model T" identifies the class (or model) of automobiles that Ford's Model T comprises; whereas the unique identifier "Model T Serial Number 159,862" identifies one specific member of that class—that is, one particular Model T car, owned by one specific person.
Metadata
In metadata, an identifier is a language-independent label, sign or token that uniquely identifies an object within an identification scheme. The suffix "identifier" is also used as a representation term when naming a
data element.
ID codes may inherently carry metadata along with them. For example, if a food package has the identifier 2011-09-25T15:42Z-MFR5-P02-243-45, you not only have that data, you also have (if you are aware of how that data encodes its information) the metadata that tells you that it was packaged on September 25, 2011, at 3:42pm UTC, manufactured by Licensed Vendor Number 5, at the Peoria, IL, USA plant, in Building 2, and was the 243rd package off the line in that shift, and was inspected by Inspector Number 45.
Arbitrary identifiers might lack metadata. For example, if a food package just says 100054678214, its ID may not tell anything except identity—no date, manufacturer name, production sequence rank, or inspector number. In some cases, arbitrary identifiers such as sequential serial numbers leak information (i.e. the German tank problem). Opaque identifiers—identifiers designed to avoid leaking even that small amount of information—include "really " and Version 4 UUIDs.
In computer science
In
computer science, identifiers (IDs) are lexical tokens that name
Entity class. Identifiers are used extensively in virtually all information processing systems. Identifying entities makes it possible to refer to them, which is essential for any kind of symbolic processing.
In computer languages
In computer languages, identifiers are tokens (also called
) which name language entities. Some of the kinds of entities an identifier might denote include variables,
data type, labels,
, and packages.
Ambiguity
Identifiers (IDs) versus Unique identifiers (UIDs)
A resource may carry multiple identifiers. Typical examples are:
-
One person with multiple names, nicknames, and forms of address (titles, salutations)
-
For example: One specific person may be identified by all of the following identifiers: Jane Smith; Jane Elizabeth Meredith Smith; Jane E. M. Smith; Jane E. Smith; Janie Smith; Janie; Little Janie (as opposed to her mother or sister or cousin, Big Janie); Aunt Jane; Auntie Janie; Mom; Grandmom; Nana; Kelly's mother; Billy's grandmother; Ms. Smith; Dr. Smith; Jane E. Smith, PhD; and Fuzzy (her jocular nickname at work).
-
One document with multiple versions
-
One substance with multiple names (for example, CAS index names versus IUPAC names;
The inverse is also possible, where multiple resources are represented with the same identifier (discussed below).
Implicit context and namespace conflicts
Many
and
nomenclature systems originate within a small
namespace. Over the years, some of them bleed into larger namespaces (as people interact in ways they formerly had not, e.g., cross-border trade, scientific collaboration, military alliance, and general cultural interconnection or assimilation). When such dissemination happens, the limitations of the original naming convention, which had formerly been latent and moot, become painfully apparent, often necessitating
,
,
translation/
transcoding, and so on. Such limitations generally accompany the shift away from the original context to the broader one. Typically the system shows implicit context (context was formerly assumed, and narrow), lack of capacity (e.g., low number of possible IDs, reflecting the outmoded narrow context), lack of
extensibility (no features defined and reserved against future needs), and lack of specificity and disambiguating capability (related to the context shift, where longstanding uniqueness encounters novel nonuniqueness). Within computer science, this problem is called
naming collision. The story of the origination and expansion of the
CODEN system provides a good case example in a recent-decades, technical-nomenclature context. The capitalization variations seen with specific designators reveals an instance of this problem occurring in
, where the proper noun/common noun distinction (and its complications) must be dealt with. A universe in which every object had a UID would not need any namespaces, which is to say that it would constitute one gigantic namespace; but human minds could never keep track of, or semantically interrelate, so many UIDs.
Name vs. identifier
The concepts of
name and
identifier are
denotation equal, and the terms are thus denotatively
; but they are not always
connotation synonymous, because
and
ID numbers are often connotatively distinguished from names in the sense of traditional
natural language naming. For example, both "
Jamie Zawinski" and "
Netscape employee number 20" are identifiers for the same specific human being; but normal English-language connotation may consider "Jamie Zawinski" a "name" and not an "identifier", whereas it considers "Netscape employee number 20" an "identifier" but not a "name." This is an
emic indistinction rather than an
etic one.
Identifiers in various disciplines
|
|
| international (via ISV) |
| Australian |
| U.S. and NATO |
| originated in U.S.; today international (via ISV) |
| originated in U.S.; today international |
| Handle System Namespace, international scope |
| originated in Germany; today international |
| originated in E.U.; may be seen internationally |
| |
| U.S. |
| international |
| international |
| many scopes, e.g., specific computer systems |
| international |
| ISBN is part of the EAN Namespace; international scope |
| international |
| international |
| international |
| U.S., with some international bibliographic usefulness |
| Denmark |
| Many different systems |
| |
| U.S., with some international bibliographic usefulness |
| many scopes, e.g., company-specific, government-specific |
| |
| U.S. |
| Australian |
| international |
|
See also
Notes
External links
