Product Code Database
Graptolites are a group of colonial animals, members of the subclass Graptolithina within the class Pterobranchia. These Filter feeder organisms are known chiefly from found from the Middle Cambrian (Miaolingian, Wuliuan) through the Lower Carboniferous (Mississippian). A possible early graptolite, Chaunograptus, is known from the Middle Cambrian. Recent analyses have favored the idea that the living pterobranch Rhabdopleura represents an extant graptolite which diverged from the rest of the group in the Cambrian.
Fossil graptolites and Rhabdopleura share a colony structure of interconnected zooids housed in organic tubes (theca) which have a basic structure of stacked half-rings (fuselli). Most extinct graptolites belong to two major orders: the bush-like sessile Dendroidea and the Plankton, free-floating Graptoloidea. These orders most likely evolved from encrusting pterobranchs similar to Rhabdopleura. Due to their widespread abundance, planktonic lifestyle, and well-traced evolutionary trends, graptoloids in particular are useful index fossils for the Ordovician and Silurian periods.
The name graptolite comes from the Greek language graptos meaning "written", and lithos meaning "rock", as many graptolite fossils resemble Logogram written on the rock. Carl Linnaeus originally regarded them as 'pseudofossil' rather than true fossils, though later workers supposed them to be related to the hydrozoans; now they are widely recognized as hemichordates.
Graptolite fossils were later referred to a variety of groups, including other branching colonial animals such as Bryozoa ("moss animals") and Hydrozoa. The term Graptolithina was established by Bronn in 1849, who considered them to represent Orthocone cephalopods. By the mid-20th century, graptolites were recognized as a unique group closely related to living pterobranchs in the genera Rhabdopleura and Cephalodiscus, which had been described in the late 19th century. Graptolithus, as a genus, was officially abandoned in 1954 by the ICZN.Bulman, M. (1970) In Teichert, C. (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part V. Graptolithina, with sections on Enteropneusta and Pterobranchia. (2nd Edition). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, XXXII + 163 pp.
Early in the development of a colony, the tubarium splits into a variable number of branches (known as stipes) and different arrangements of the theca, features which are important in the identification of graptolite fossils. Colonies can be classified by their total number of theca rows (biserial colonies have two rows, uniserial have one) and the number of initial stipes per colony (multiramous colonies have many stipes, pauciramous colonies have two or one). Each thecal tube is mostly made up by two series of stacked semicircular half-rings, known as fuselli (sing: fusellum). The fuselli resemble growth lines when preserved in fossils, and the two stacks meet along a suture with a zig-zag pattern. Fuselli are the major reinforcing component of a tubarium, though they are assisted by one or more additional layers of looser tissue, the cortex.
The earliest graptolites appeared in the fossil record during the Cambrian, and were generally sessile animals, with a colony attached to the sea floor. Several early-diverging families were encrusting organisms, with the colony developing horizontally along a substrate. Extant Rhabdopleura fall into this category, with an overall encrusting colony form combined with erect, vertical theca. Most of the erect, dendritic or bushy/fan-shaped graptolites are classified as dendroids (order Dendroidea). Their colonies were attached to a hard substrate by their own weight via an attachment disc. Graptolites with relatively few branches were derived from the dendroid graptolites at the beginning of the Ordovician period. This latter major group, the graptoloids (order Graptoloidea) were pelagic and planktonic, drifting freely through the water column. They were a successful and prolific group, being the most important and widespread macroplanktonic animals until they died out in the early part of the Devonian period. The dendroid graptolites survived until the Carboniferous period.
On the other hand, Cephalodiscida is considered to be a sister subclass of Graptolithina. One of the main differences between these two groups is that Cephalodiscida species are not colonial organisms. In Cephalodiscida organisms, there is no common canal connecting all zooids. Cephalodiscida zooids have several arms, while Graptolithina zooids have only one pair of arms. Other differences include the type of early development, the gonads, the presence or absence of gill slits, and the size of the zooids. In the fossil record, where mostly tubaria (tubes) are preserved, it is complicated to distinguish between groups.
Graptolithina includes several minor families as well as two main extinct orders, Dendroidea (benthic graptolites) and Graptoloidea (planktic graptolites). The latter is the most diverse, including 5 suborders, where the most assorted is Axonophora (biserial graptolites, etc.). This group includes Diplograptids and Neograptids, groups that had great development during the Ordovician. Old taxonomic classifications consider the orders Dendroidea, Tuboidea, Camaroidea, Crustoidea, Stolonoidea, Graptoloidea, and Dithecoidea but new classifications embedded them into Graptoloidea at different taxonomic levels.
Taxonomy of Graptolithina by Maletz (2014):
Subclass Graptolithina Bronn, 1849
Inferring by analogy with modern pterobranchs, they were able to migrate vertically through the water column for feeding efficiency and to avoid predators. With ecological models and studies of the facies, it was observed that, at least for Ordovician species, some groups of species are largely confined to the epipelagic and mesopelagic zone, from inshore to open ocean.Cooper, R., Sue Rigby, Loydell, D. & Bates, D. (2012) Palaeoecology of the Graptoloidea. Earth-Science Reviews, 112(1):23-41. Living rhabdopleura have been found in deep waters in several regions of Europe and America but the distribution might be biased by sampling efforts; colonies are usually found as of shells.
Their locomotion was relative to the water mass in which they lived but the exact mechanisms (such as turbulence, buoyancy, active swimming, and so forth) are not clear yet. One proposal, put forward by Melchin and DeMont (1995), suggested that graptolite movement was analogous to modern free-swimming animals with heavy housing structures. In particular, they compared graptolites to "sea butterflies" (Sea butterfly), small swimming Pteropoda Snail. Under this suggestion, graptolites moved through rowing or swimming via an undulatory movement of paired muscular appendages developed from the cephalic shield or feeding tentacles. In some species, the thecal aperture was probably so restricted that the appendages hypothesis is not feasible. On the other hand, buoyancy is not supported by any extra thecal tissue or gas build-up control mechanism, and active swimming requires a lot of energetic waste, which would rather be used for the tubarium construction.
There are still many questions regarding graptolite locomotion but all these mechanisms are possible alternatives depending on the species and its habitat. For benthic species, that lived attached to the sediment or any other organism, this was not a problem; the zooids were able to move but restricted within the tubarium. Although this zooid movement is possible in both planktic and benthic species, it is limited by the stolon but is particularly useful for feeding. Using their arms and tentacles, which are close to the mouth, they filter the water to catch any particles of food.
The life cycle begins with a planktonic planula-like larva produced by sexual reproduction, which later becomes the sicular zooid who starts a colony. In Rhabdopleura, the colonies bear male and female zooids but fertilized eggs are incubated in the female tubarium, and stay there until they become larvae able to swim (after 4–7 days) to settle away to start a new colony. Each larva surrounds itself in a protective cocoon where the metamorphosis to the zooid takes place (7–10 days) and attaches with the posterior part of the body, where the stalk will eventually develop.
The development is indirect and lecithotrophic, and the larvae are ciliated and pigmented, with a deep depression on the ventral side.Röttinger, E. & Lowe, C. (2012) Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: hemichordates. Development, 139:2463-2475.Sato, A., Bishop, J. & Holland, P. (2008). Developmental Biology of Pterobranch Hemichordates: History and Perspectives. Genesis, 46:587-591. Astogeny happens when the colony grows through asexual reproduction from the tip of a permanent terminal zooid, behind which the new zooids are budded from the stalk, a type of budding called monopodial. It is possible that in graptolite fossils the terminal zooid was not permanent because the new zooids formed from the tip of latest one, in other words, sympodial budding. These new organisms break a hole in the tubarium wall and start secreting their own tube.
Hedgehog (hh), a highly conserved gene implicated in neural developmental patterning, was analyzed in Hemichordates, taking Rhabdopleura as a pterobranch representative. It was found that hedgehog gene in pterobranchs is expressed in a different pattern compared to other hemichordates as the enteropneust Saccoglossus kowalevskii. An important conserved glycine–cysteine–phenylalanine (GCF) motif at the site of autocatalytic cleavage in hh genes, is altered in R. compacta by an insertion of the amino acid threonine (T) in the N-terminal, and in S. kowalesvskii there is a replacement of serine (S) for glycine (G). This mutation decreases the efficiency of the autoproteolytic cleavage and therefore, the signalling function of the protein. It is not clear how this unique mechanism occurred in evolution and the effects it has in the group, but, if it has persisted over millions of years, it implies a functional and genetic advantage.Sato, A., White-Cooper, H., Doggett, K. & Holland, P. 2009. Degenerate evolution of the hedgehog gene in a hemichordate lineage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18):7491-7494.
These colonial animals are also found in and , but generally these rocks were deposited in conditions which were more favorable for bottom-dwelling life, including scavengers, and undoubtedly most graptolite remains deposited here were generally eaten by other animals.
Fossils are often found flattened along the bedding plane of the rocks in which they occur, though may be found in three dimensions when they are infilled by iron pyrite or some other minerals. They vary in shape, but are most commonly or branching (such as Dictyonema), sawblade-like, or "tuning fork"-shaped (such as Didymograptus murchisoni). Their remains may be mistaken for fossil by the casual observer, as it has been the case for the first graptolite descriptions.
Graptolites are normally preserved as a black carbon film on the rock's surface or as light grey clay films in tectonics distorted rocks. The fossil can also appear stretched or distorted. This is due to the strata that the graptolite is within, being folded and compacted. They may be sometimes difficult to see, but by slanting the specimen to the light they reveal themselves as a shiny marking. Pyritized graptolite fossils are also found.
A well-known locality for graptolite fossils in Britain is Abereiddy Bay, Dyfed, Wales, where they occur in rocks from the Ordovician Period. Sites in the Southern Uplands of Scotland, the Lake District and Welsh Borders also yield rich and well-preserved graptolite faunas. A famous graptolite location in Scotland is Dob's Linn with species from the boundary Ordovician-Silurian. Since the group had a wide distribution, fossils are also abundant in several parts of the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany and China, among others.
The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) influenced changes in the morphology of the colonies and thecae, giving rise to new groups like the planktic Graptoloidea. Later, some of the greatest extinctions that affected the group were the Hirnantian in the Ordovician and the Lundgreni in the Silurian, where graptolite populations were dramatically reduced (see also Lilliput effect).
Graptolite diversity was greatly reduced during the Sedgwickii Event in the Aeronian. This event has been attested in locations such as today's Canada, Libya as well as in La Chilca Formation of Argentina (then part of Gondwana).
Colors =
Period = from:-640 till:0
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:100 start:-600
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:10 start:-640
BackgroundColors = canvas:canvas
TextData=
LineData =
barData=
PlotData=
Ecology
Graptolites were a major component of the early Paleozoic ecosystems, especially for the zooplankton because the most abundant and diverse species were planktonic. Graptolites were most likely suspension feeders and strained the water for food such as plankton.
Life cycle
The study of the developmental biology of Graptholitina has been possible by the discovery of the species R. compacta and R. normani in shallow waters; it is assumed that graptolite fossils had a similar development as their extant representatives. The life cycle comprises two events, the ontogeny and the astogeny, where the main difference is whether the development is happening in the individual organism or in the modular growth of the colony.
Graptolites in evolutionary development
In recent years, living graptolites have been used as a hemichordate model for Evo-Devo studies, as have their sister group, the acorn worms. For example, graptolites are used to study asymmetry in hemichordates, especially because their gonads tend to be located randomly on one side. In Rhabdopleura normani, the testicle is located asymmetrically, and possibly other structures such as the oral lamella and the gonopore.Sato, A. & Holland, P. (2008). Asymmetry in a Pterobranch Hemichordate and the Evolution of Left-Right Patterning. Developmental Dynamics, 237:3634 –3639) The significance of these discoveries is to understand the early vertebrate left-right asymmetry due to chordates being a sister group of hemichordates, and therefore, the asymmetry might be a feature that developed early in deuterostomes. Since the location of the structures is not strictly established, also in some enteropneusta, it is likely that asymmetrical states in hemichordates are not under a strong developmental or evolutionary constraint. The origin of this asymmetry, at least for the gonads, is possibly influenced by the direction of the basal coiling in the tubarium, by some intrinsic biological mechanisms in pterobranchs, or solely by environmental factors.
Geological relevance
Preservation
Graptolites are common fossils and have a worldwide distribution. They are most commonly found in and mudrocks where sea-bed fossils are rare, this type of rock having formed from sediment deposited in relatively deep water that had poor bottom circulation, was deficient in oxygen, and had no scavengers. The dead planktic graptolites, having sunk to the sea floor, would eventually become entombed in the sediment and were thus well preserved.
Stratigraphy
Graptolite fossils have predictable preservation, widespread distribution, and gradual change over a geologic time scale. This allows them to be used to date stratum of rocks throughout the world. They are important index fossils for dating Palaeozoic rocks as they evolved rapidly with time and formed many different distinctive species. Geologists can divide the rocks of the Ordovician and Silurian periods into graptolite biozones; these are generally less than one million years in duration. A worldwide ice age at the end of the Ordovician eliminated most graptolites except the neograptines. Diversification from the neograptines that survived the Ordovician Glacier began around 2 million years later.Bapst, D., Bullock, P., Melchin, M., Sheets, D. & Mitchell, C. (2012) Graptoloid diversity and disparity became decoupled during the Ordovician mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9):3428-3433.
id:canvas value:rgb(1,1,1)
id:period value:rgb(1,0.7,0.7) # light red
id:era value:rgb(1,1,0.7) # light blue
id:taxon1 value:rgb(0.5,1,0.5) # light green
id:taxon2 value:rgb(0.6,1,0.6) # light green
id:taxon3 value:rgb(0.7,1,0.7) # light green
id:taxon4 value:rgb(0.8,1,0.8) # light green
id:taxon5 value:rgb(0.9,1,0.9) # light green
id:filler value:gray(0.8) # background bar
id:black value:black
fontsize:S
pos:(5,51)
text:"m.y.a."
pos:(229,15)
text:Extinction - spiral forms survive
pos:(140,28)
text:Extinction event - one genus survives
pos:(68,15)
text:[[First planktonic forms
planktonic]]
layer:front
at:-422.9 frompos:1 tillpos:54 color:black width:0.1
at:-443.5 frompos:28 tillpos:54 color:black width:0.1
at:-490 frompos:1 tillpos:54 color:black width:0.1
bar:era1 text:
bar:era2 text:era
bar:era3 text:
bar:period1 text:
bar:period2 text:period
bar:period3 text:
bar:taxon1 text:
bar:taxon2 text:
bar:taxon3 text:taxon
bar:taxon4 text:
bar:taxon5 text:
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:12 shift:(0,-3)
bar:era1 color:era
from: -64.3 till: 0
from: -251.1 till: -64.3
from: -543 till: -251.1
from: -640 till: -543
bar:era2 color:era fontsize:M
from: -64.3 till: 0 text:[[Cenozoic]]
from: -251.1 till: -64.3 text:[[Mesozoic]]
from: -543 till: -251.1 text:[[Paleozoic]]
from: -640 till: -543 text:[[Precambrian]]
bar:era3 color:era
from: -64.3 till: 0
from: -251.1 till: -64.3
from: -543 till: -251.1
from: -640 till: -543
bar:period1 color:period
from: -1.6 till: 0
from: -64.3 till: -1.6
from: -146 till: -64.3
from: -208 till: -146
from: -251.1 till: -208
from: -286 till: -251.1
from: -360 till: -286
from: -408.5 till: -360
from: -443.5 till: -408.5
from: -490 till: -443.5
from: -543 till: -490
from: -640 till: -543
bar:period2 color:period fontsize:S
from: -1.6 till: 0
from: -64.3 till: -1.6 text:[[Tertiary]]
from: -146 till: -64.3 text:[[Cretaceous]]
from: -208 till: -146 text:[[Jurassic]]
from: -251.1 till: -208 text:[[Tri-
Triassic]] shift:(0,2)
from: -286 till: -251.1 text:[[Per- Permian]] shift:(0,2)
from: -360 till: -286 text:[[Carbon- Carboniferous]] shift:(0,2)
from: -408.5 till: -360 text:[[Devo- Devonian]] shift:(0,2)
from: -443.5 till: -408.5 text:[[Sil- Silurian]] shift:(0,2)
from: -490 till: -443.5 text:[[Ordo- Ordovician]] shift:(0,2)
from: -543 till: -490 text:[[Camb- Cambrian]] shift:(0,2)
from: -640 till: -543 text:[[Ediacaran]]
bar:period3 color:period
from: -1.6 till: 0
from: -64.3 till: -1.6
from: -146 till: -64.3
from: -208 till: -146
from: -251.1 till: -208
from: -286 till: -251.1
from: -360 till: -286
from: -408.5 till: -360
from: -443.5 till: -408.5
from: -490 till: -443.5
from: -543 till: -490
from: -640 till: -543
bar:taxon1 color:taxon1 fontsize:S
from: -510 till: 0 text:"Rhabdopleurids" shift:(0,-4)
bar:taxon2 color:taxon2 fontsize:S
from: -510 till: -320 text:"Dendroidea" shift:(0,-4)
bar:taxon3 color:taxon3 fontsize:S
from: -465 till: -442 text:"Graptoloidea→" shift:(-46,-4)
from: -425 till: -422.9 text:"←Anisograptids" shift:(45,-4)
bar:taxon4 color:taxon4 fontsize:S
from: -443.5 till: -422.9 text:"Dichograptids→" shift:(-48,-4)
from: -402 till: -383 text:"←Monograptids" shift:(49,-4)
bar:taxon5 color:taxon5 fontsize:S
from: -443.5 till: -383 text:"Diplograptids→" shift:(-62,-4)
Ranges of Graptolite taxa.
Researchers
The following is a selection of graptolite and pterobranch researchers:
See also
External links
|
|
