In sociology, elite religion is defined as the symbols, rituals and beliefs which are recognized as legitimate by the leadership of that religion.[Bock, Wilbur. "Symbols in Conflict: Official versus Folk Religion," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 5 (Spring 1966): 204-12.] Elite religion is often contrasted with folk religion, or the religious symbols and beliefs of the masses. Elite religion is then the "official religion" as championed by the leaders of a religion.[Liebman, Charles. The Ambivalent American Jew. Jewish Publication Society. (1973): 83-86.] Some researchers see the concept as potentially applying to a range of internal religious divisions such as orthodoxy versus heterodoxy, between the clergy and the laity, or between the religion's wealthy adherents and the poor.[Duffy, E. (2006). Elite and popular religion: The Book of Hours and lay piety in the Later Middle Ages. Studies in Church History, 42, 140-161.]
Contrast with folk religion
Whereas the primary expression of elite religion is in religious ideology, folk religion is primarily expressed in religious rituals and
religious symbol. Elite religion's ideology is characterized as internally unified, while the beliefs or ideas that underlie different religious folk rituals may be incompatible with one another.
[Liebman, C. S. (1970). Reconstructionism in American Jewish Life. The American Jewish Year Book, 3-99.] Folk religious practices concerning key rituals, such as coming of age ceremonies, may become the object of intense elite criticism.
[Schoenfeld, S. (1987). Folk Judaism, elite Judaism and the role of bar mitzvah in the development of the synagogue and Jewish school in America. Contemporary Jewry, 9(1), 67.]
Strengthening denominationalism
Sociologist
Charles Liebman theorized that the strengthening of elite religion over members of a particular group led to the growth of denominationalism.
[
]
See also