Core-and-veneer, brick and rubble, wall and rubble, ashlar and rubble, and emplekton all refer to a building technique where two parallel walls are constructed and the core between them is filled with rubble or other infill, creating one thick wall. Originally, and in later poorly constructed walls, the rubble was not consolidated. Later, mortar and cement were used to consolidate the core rubble and produce sturdier construction.
Modern masonry still uses core and veneer walls; however, the core is now generally concrete block instead of rubble, and moisture barriers are included. Often such walls end up as cavity walls by the inclusion of space between the external veneer and the core in order to provide for moisture and thermal control.
History
Greeks and Phoenicians
Both the early Phoenicians and Greeks used rubble-filled masonry walls.
The word
emplekton was borrowed from
Greek language ἔμπλεκτον and originally meant "rubble" but came to apply to the construction technique as well.
Romans
The Romans started with basic emplekton masonry walls,
but developed the technique further using temporary walls (forms) that were removed after the cemented rubble (concrete) had cured. This technique was called
opus caementicium, and eventually led to modern
ferroconcrete construction.
India
The buildings of the
Taj Mahal are constructed with walls of brick and rubble inner cores faced with either marble or sandstone locked together with iron
and clamps. Some of the walls of the mausoleum are several metres thick.
Ancestral Puebloans
In the large complexes at
Chaco Canyon, the Ancestral Puebloans used the wall and rubble technique, with walls of carefully shaped sandstone.
The Ancestral Puebloans used mud as their mortar, both with the veneer and to consolidate the core.
This core and veneer technique was also used at other Ancestral Puebloans sites outside of Chaco Canyon.
Later pueblos used mud bricks (adobe) for the veneer.
Mayan
In the
Puuc, and as far south as at least
Tikal, the
Maya peoples developed core-and-veneer walls to the point where, by the classic period, they were filled with concrete.
Problems
Traditional core-and-veneer walls suffered from moisture migration and thermal expansion and contraction.
They had a low tensile strength, hence a poor resistance to twisting or stretching.
Tensile strength was increased by increasing the width of the walls or by providing masonry "piers" (vertical columns or ribs), either inside the wall or as additional exterior support.
See also
Notes
External links
-
shows construction and cross-section of core-and-veneer wall
-
showing cross-section of a core-and-veneer wall.