Product Code Database
Example Keywords: ipod -jeans $2
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Consubstantiality
Tag Wiki 'Consubstantiality'.
Tag

Consubstantiality, a term derived from , denotes identity of substance or essence in spite of difference in aspect. Collins English Dictionary: "consubstantial"

It appears most commonly in its adjectival form, "consubstantial", Chamber's Twentieth Century Dictionary: "of the same substance, nature, or essence, esp. of the Trinity", "united in one common substance" from Latin consubstantialis, Charlton T. Lewis, Charles Short, A Latin Dictionary: consubstantialis and its best-known use is in regard to an account, in Christian theology, of the relation between and God the Father.


Theological use
The affirmation that Jesus Christ is "consubstantial with the Father" appears in the . Encyclopædia Britannica: "Nicene Creed" was the language in which the Nicene Creed was originally enunciated. The word used was Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon: ὁμοούσιος ( ) and means "of the same substance." This may be contrasted with the term ὁμοιούσιος ( ), meaning "of like substance" and, therefore, not the "same substance," as was proposed, for example, at a later church council (the Council of Seleucia regarding the Arian controversy) in the year 359.

The term οὐσία () is an noun, formed on the feminine present of the verb , , meaning "to be, I am", so similar grammatically to the English noun "being". There was no equivalent grammatical formation in , and it was translated as essentia or substantia and then indirectly into English as "essence" or "substance". coined essentiaConte, G.B.: "Latin Literature: a history" (1987) p. 199 and the philosopher Seneca and rhetorician used it as equivalent for οὐσία, while rendered οὐσία both as essentia or substantia. In order to designate οὐσία, theologian favored the use of substantia over essentia, while Augustine of Hippo and took the opposite stance, preferring the use of essentia as designation for οὐσία.

The word "consubstantial" was used by the Council of Chalcedon (451) to declare that Christ is "consubstantial with the Father in respect of the Godhead, and the same consubstantial with us in respect of the manhood".David M. Gwynn. Christianity in the Later Roman Empire: A Sourcebook. Bloomsbury Publishing; 20 November 2014. . p. 256.

In contemporary Christian theology, the is also described as consubstantial with the Father and Son.Steven D. Cone. Theology from the Great Tradition. Bloomsbury Publishing; 22 February 2018. . p. 417.


Alternative translations of the Nicene-Creed term
In the 1662 Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England, the adjective "consubstantial" in the Nicene Creed is rendered by the phrase "being of one substance". The Order of the Administration of the Lord's Supper or Holy Communion. The same phrase appeared already in the Book of Common Prayer (1549) The Book of Common Prayer – 1549 and continues to be used, within "Order Two", in , which within "Order One" gives the ecumenical English Language Liturgical Consultation version, "of one Being".

The Eastern Orthodox Church use "of one essence".

The , in its official translation of the Nicene Creed, uses the term "consubstantial" as a translation of "consubstantialem" (in “ὁμοούσιον"), instead of "of one Being with the Father" (or, in the United States only, "one in Being with the Father"), which were the English translations used until November 2011.


In rhetoric
In , "consubstantiality", as defined by , is "a practice-related concept based on stylistic identifications and symbolic structures, which persuade and produce acceptance: an acting-together within, and defined by, a common context". To be consubstantial with something is to be identified with it, to be associated with it; yet at the same time, to be different from what it is identified with. It can be seen as an extension or in relation to the subject.

Burke explains this concept with two entities, A and B. He goes on to explain that "A is not identical with his colleague, B. But insofar as their interests are joined, A is identified with B. Or he may identify himself with B even when their interests are not joined, if he assumes they are, or is persuaded to believe so...In being identified with B, A is 'substantially one' with a person other than himself. Yet at the same time, he remains unique, an individual locus of motives. Thus he is both joined and separate, at once a distinct substance and consubstantial with another."

"Consubstantiality may be necessary for any way of life, Burke says. And thus rhetoric, as he sees it, potentially builds community. It can tear it down as well. In the end, rhetoric relies on an unconscious desire for acting-together, for taking a 'sub-stance' together".David Blakesley. The Elements of Dramatism. Longman; 2002. . p. 15–16. Same in pdf form


See also

Sources

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs