> |
+Approximant-vowel correspondences
! Vowel
! Corresponding approximant
! Place of articulation
! Example |
Spanish ampl ío ('I extend') vs. ampl ió ('he extended') |
French aig u ('sharp') vs. aig uille ('needle') |
Korean 음식 ('food') vs. 의사 ('doctor') |
Spanish contin úo ('I continue') vs. contin uó ('he/she/it continued') and ('you continued') used only in the formal treatment of usted. |
This is an example. |
North American English wait er vs. wait ress |
- Because of the articulatory complexities of the American English rhotic, there is some variation in its phonetic description. A transcription with the IPA character for an alveolar approximant () is common, though the sound is more postalveolar. Actual retroflexion may occur as well and both occur as variations of the same sound.
[ citing , , and ] However, makes a distinction between the vowels of American English (which he calls "rhotacized") and vowels with "retroflexion" such as those that appear in Badaga language; , on the other hand, labels both as r-colored vowel and notes that both have a lowered third formant.[Both cited in ]
- Because the vowels are articulated with spread lips, spreading is implied for their approximant analogues, . However, these sounds generally have little or no lip-spreading. The fricative letters with a lowering diacritic, , may therefore be justified for a neutral articulation between spread and rounded .
[John Esling (2010) "Phonetic Notation", in Hardcastle, Laver & Gibbon (eds) The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed., p. 699]
In articulation and often diachronically, palatal approximants correspond to , velar consonant approximants to , and labialized approximants to . In American English, the rhotic consonant approximant corresponds to the rhotic vowel. This can create alternations (as shown in the above table).
In addition to alternations, glides can be inserted to the left or the right of their corresponding vowels when they occur next to a hiatus. For example, in Ukrainian, medial triggers the formation of an inserted that acts as a syllable onset so that when the affix is added to футбол ('football') to make футболіст 'football player', it is pronounced , but маоїст ('Maoist'), with the same affix, is pronounced with a glide. Dutch language for many speakers has a similar process that extends to mid vowels:
-
bioscoop → ('cinema')
-
zee + en → ('seas')
-
fluor → ('fluorine')
-
reu + en → ('male dogs')
-
Rwanda → ('Rwanda')
[There is dialectal and allophonic variation in the realization of . For speakers who realize it as , postulates an additional rule that changes any occurrence of from glide insertion into .]
-
Boaz → ('Boaz')
Similarly, vowels can be inserted next to their corresponding glide in certain phonetic environments. Sievers' law describes this behaviour for Germanic.
Non-high semivowels also occur. In colloquial Nepali language speech, a process of glide-formation occurs, where one of two adjacent vowels becomes non-syllabic; the process includes mid vowels so that ('cause to wish') features a non-syllabic mid vowel. Spanish features a similar process and even nonsyllabic can occur so that ahorita ('right away') is pronounced . It is not often clear, however, whether such sequences involve a semivowel (a consonant) or a diphthong (a vowel), and in many cases, it may not be a meaningful distinction.
Although many languages have , which lie between back/velar and front/palatal , there are few cases of a corresponding approximant . One is in the Korean diphthong or though it is more frequently analyzed as velar (as in the table above), and Mapudungun may be another, with three high vowel sounds, , , and three corresponding consonants, , and , and a third one is often described as a non-labialized voiced velar fricative; some texts note a correspondence between this approximant and that is parallel to – and –. An example is liq (?) ('white').[Listen to a recording ]
It has been noted that the expected symbols for the approximant correlates of are [Martin Ball & Joan Rahilly (2011) The symbolization of central approximants in the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 41 (2), pp. 231–237] or .
Approximants versus fricatives
In addition to less turbulence, approximants also differ from fricatives in the precision required to produce them. When emphasized, approximants may be slightly fricated (that is, the airstream may become slightly turbulent), which is reminiscent of fricatives. For example, the Spanish language word ayuda ('help') features a palatal approximant that is pronounced as a fricative in emphatic speech. Spanish can be analyzed as having a meaningful distinction between fricative, approximant, and intermediate .[Martínez-Celdrán, E. (2004) "Problems in the classification of approximants". Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34, 201–10] However, such frication is generally slight and intermittent, unlike the strong turbulence of fricative consonants.
For places of articulation further back in the mouth, languages do not contrast voiced fricatives and approximants. Therefore, the IPA allows the symbols for the voiced fricatives to double for the approximants, with or without a lowering diacritic.
Occasionally, the glottal "fricatives" are called approximants, since typically has no more frication than voiceless approximants, but they are often of the glottis without any accompanying manner or place of articulation.
Central approximants
Approximants with a dedicated IPA symbol are in bold.
-
bilabial approximant (usually transcribed )
[There have been repeated requests that the IPA created dedicated symbols for and – typically modifications of the base letters such as rotated letter and or reversed and – but so far the IPA has deemed that there is insufficient need for them.]
-
labiodental approximant
-
dental approximant (usually transcribed )
-
alveolar & post-alveolar approximant
-
retroflex approximant (a consonantal )
-
alveolo-palatal approximant or
-
palatal approximant (a consonantal )
-
velar approximant (a consonantal )
-
uvular approximant (usually transcribed )
-
pharyngeal approximant (a consonantal ; usually transcribed )
-
epiglottal approximant (usually transcribed )
-
breathy-voiced glottal approximant
-
creaky-voiced glottal approximant
Lateral approximants
In lateral approximants, the center of tongue makes solid contact with the roof of the mouth. However, the defining location is the side of the tongue, which only approaches the teeth, allowing free passage of air.
-
voiced alveolar lateral approximant
-
retroflex lateral approximant
-
alveolo-palatal lateral approximant or (usually transcribed )
-
voiced palatal lateral approximant
-
velar lateral approximant
-
uvular lateral approximant
Coarticulated approximants
-
Labialized retroflex approximant
-
labialized palatal approximant (a consonantal )
-
labialized velar approximant (a consonantal )
-
labialized uvular approximant
Voiceless approximants
Voiceless approximants are not recognized by all phoneticians as a discrete phonetic category. There are problems in distinguishing voiceless approximants from voiceless .
Phonetic characteristics
Fricative consonants are generally said to be the result of turbulent airflow at a place of articulation in the vocal tract. However, an audible voiceless sound may be made without this turbulent airflow: makes a distinction between "local friction" (as in or ) and "cavity friction" (as in voiceless vowels like and ). More recent research distinguishes between "turbulent" and "laminar" airflow in the vocal tract. It is not clear if it is possible to describe voiceless approximants categorically as having laminar airflow (or cavity friction in Pike's terms) as a way of distinguishing them from fricatives. write that "the airflow for voiced approximants remains laminar (smooth), and does not become turbulent. Voiceless approximants are rare in the languages of the world, but when they do occur the airflow is usually somewhat turbulent." Audible voiceless sounds may also be produced by means of turbulent airflow at the glottis, as in ; in such a case, it is possible to articulate an audible voiceless sound without the production of local friction at a supraglottal constriction. describes such sounds, but classes them as .
Distinctiveness
Voiceless approximants are rarely if ever distinguished phonemically from voiceless fricatives in the sound system of a language. discuss the issue and conclude "In practice, it is difficult to distinguish between a voiceless approximant and a voiceless fricative at the same place of articulation ... there is no evidence that any language in the world makes such a distinction crucial."
Disagreement over use of the term
Voiceless approximants are treated as a phonetic category by (among others) , , and . However, the term voiceless approximant is seen by some phoneticians as controversial. It has been pointed out that if approximant is defined as a speech sound that involves the articulators approaching each other but not narrowly enough to create turbulent airflow, then it is difficult to see how a voiceless approximant could be audible. As John C. Wells puts it in his blog, "voiceless approximants are by definition inaudible ... If there's no friction and no voicing, there's nothing to hear." A similar point is made in relation to frictionless continuants by : "There are no voiceless frictionless continuants because this would imply silence; the voiceless counterpart of the frictionless continuant is the voiceless fricative." argue that the increased airflow arising from voicelessness alone makes a voiceless continuant a fricative, even if lacking a greater constriction in the oral cavity than a voiced approximant.
argue that [[Burmese|Burmese language]] and [[Standard Tibetan]] have voiceless lateral approximants and [[Navajo|Navajo language]] and [[Zulu|Zulu language]] voiceless lateral fricatives , but also say that "in other cases it is difficult to decide whether a voiceless lateral should be described as an approximant or a fricative". compared voiceless laterals in [[Estonian Swedish]], Icelandic, and [[Welsh|Welsh language]] and found that Welsh-speakers consistently used , that Icelandic-speakers consistently used , and that speakers of Estonian Swedish varied in their pronunciation. They conclude that there is "a range of variants within voiceless laterals, rather than a categorical split between lateral fricatives and voiceless approximant laterals".
Occurrence in Western American English
Voiceless lateral approximants can occur after voiceless stops as allophone of its voiced counterpart, especially after the voiceless velar plosive , in Western American English.
Nasalized approximants
Examples are:
-
nasal palatal approximant
-
nasal labialized velar approximant
-
voiceless nasal glottal approximant
In Portuguese, the nasal glides and historically became and in some words. In Edo language, the nasalized allophones of the approximants and are nasal occlusives, and .
What are transcribed as nasal approximants may include non-syllabic elements of or diphthongs.
See also
Notes