During the Crusades, turcopoles (also "turcoples" or "turcopoli"; from the , literally "sons of Turks")[Whitworth Porter, History of the Knights of Malta, or The Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, p.287[1]] In addition to the two Military Orders, the army of the Kingdom of Jerusalem employed king's Turcoples under the direction of a Grand Turcopolier.
Byzantine origins
The crusaders first encountered Turcopoles in the
Byzantine army during the
First Crusade. Reference is made to 30 Turcoples being lent by the Emperor Alexius I to act as guides for one division of the Franks. These auxiliaries were of mixed
Byzantine Greeks and
Turkic peoples[The term "Turkic" refers to populations such as the Pechenegs, Oghuz Turks, Uzes, Cumans and Bulgars.] origins.
Raymond of Aguilers writes that they were called Turcopoles because they were either reared with Turks or because their fathers were Turks and their mothers Christians. Albert of Aix writes that their fathers were Turks and their mothers Greeks. From the 12th century, evidence suggest that non-Turks fighting in the Turkish fashion were also included in the Turcopoles, for example, in the 14th century Turcopoles who were employed by the Catalan company included Greeks who shaved their heads like the Turks in order to be employed in this capacity.
The term underwent a semantic evolution, extending to , mainly equipped with bows, regardless of ethnic origins.
Some Byzantine Turcopole units under the command of General Tatikios accompanied the First Crusade and may have provided a model for the subsequent employment of indigenous auxiliary light horse in the .
Composition
It has been argued that, while Turcopoles certainly included light cavalry and mounted archers, the term was a general one also applicable to indigenous Syrian footmen serving as feudal levies in the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Evidence that Syrian levies, whether designated as turcoples or not, provided the bulk of the
Farang-led infantry of
Outremer is not available but there are specific references to their participation in the Siege of Tripoli by Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse ⋅.
[Ian Heath, page 6 "Armies and Enemies of the Crusades 1096-1291", Wargames Research Group Publication]
The Turcopoles employed by the crusader states were not necessarily Turkish or multiracial mercenaries. Many were probably recruited from Christianized Seljuq (Kınık) Turks or from Syrian Orthodox Christians living under Crusader rule. By the second half of the 12th century, the recorded names of individual Turcoples indicate that some were Poulains, a twelfth-century term designating Latin Christian settlers in the crusader states of the Middle East. Poulains in this context were Frankish descendants of Crusaders who had remained in Palestine after the capture of Jerusalem in 1099.[Ian Heath, page 7 "Armies and Enemies of the Crusades 1096-1291", Wargames Research Group Publication] In addition to indigenous Christians and converted Turks, the Turcopoles of Outremer may at various dates have included contingents from the West trained to serve as mounted archers.[ J. Richard, Les Turcoples au service des royaumes de Jerusalem et de Chypre: Musulmans converted ou Chretiens orientaux?, Melanges Dominique Sourdel/Revue des estates islamiques]
Equipment
In the
Holy Land, Turcopoles were more lightly equipped than the
and
sergeants (mounted
men-at-arms), armed with
and bows to help combat the more mobile Muslim forces. Turcopoles served as light cavalry, providing
, scouts, and mounted archers, and sometimes rode as a second line in a charge to back up the
Frankish" knights and sergeants.
Turcopoles had lighter and faster horses than the western mounted troops and wore much lighter armour. Usually this comprised only a quilted
gambeson or
jerkin and a conical steel helmet.
Regulations of the Hospitallers made a clear distinction between the heavy war saddles of the knights of the military order and the "Turkish saddles" issued to the Syrian Turcoples who served with them.
Specialist roles
As lightly armed and mobile auxiliaries the Turcopoles were of particular value when scouting and raiding expeditions were undertaken. On such occasions the heavily armoured and relatively slow moving horsemen of the western armies were at a disadvantage. Accordingly this was the sole occasion when Turcopoliers (Turcopole commanders) could issue direct orders to accompanying knights.
Employment by military orders
Turcopoles served in both the secular armies of Outremer and the ranks of the military orders. In the latter, Turcopoles had lower status than Frankish sergeants and were subject to various restrictions. These included having to eat at a separate table from the other mounted soldiers of the Templars or Hospitallers. In contrast to the unsalaried brother-knights and brother-sergeants of the fighting orders, Turcopoles were paid warriors.
An indication of the approximate numbers of Turcopoles available to the military orders is given by a pledge made by the Hospitallers in 1186, when an invasion of Egypt was being planned. Of a total Hospitaller contingent of 1000 men, half were to be Turcopoles.
Funding
A perennial problem for the Christian states of Outremer was the limited quantities of Frankish manpower, horses and weapons available. To a certain extent this weakness was redressed through the employment of locally recruited Turcopoles, riding indigenous horses and using the same equipment as their opponents. The cost of paying the mercenary element amongst the Turcopoles was one of the specific reasons for repeated cash donations being sent to the crusader states from Europe.
Battle of Hattin
At the decisive Battle of Hattin in 1187, the
Regni Ierosolimitani brevis hystoria records 4000 turcopoles as being part of the defeated Christian army. The historian
Steven Runciman considers this number exaggerated, and notes that the Muslim light cavalry present were probably better armed than the Turcopoles.
The Turcopoles captured at Hattin were, as perceived renegades,
probably executed at
Saladin's order.
Later history
The
also considered Turcopoles to be traitors and apostates, killing all those whom they captured. The Turcopoles who survived the Fall of Acre followed the military orders out of the Holy Land and were established on
Cyprus with the
Knights Templar, plus
Rhodes and
Malta with the Knights Hospitaller. The
Teutonic Order also called its own native light cavalry the "Turkopolen".
Turcopoliers and attendants
The Turcopoles had their own leaders called Turcopoliers who outranked ordinary sergeants, at least in battle. The senior office-holders of the
Knights Templar included a Turcopolier who commanded both the mercenary cavalry recruited by the Order in the east and the sergeant-brothers.
[Helen Nicholson: The Knights Templar - a New History, p. 118, ] The personal attendants of the Grand Master of the Temple included a Turcopole
[Piers Paul Read: The Templars, p. 133, ] - possibly as an interpreter or orderly. The Hospitallers included in their rank-structure a Turcopolier, who originally was probably a sergeant-brother but who in 1303 was accorded the senior status of
conventual bailli (official in the Central Convent).
Since the establishment of the Langues of the Knights Hospitaller in 1319, the
Pilier (head) of the Langue of
England (including
Wales,
Scotland and
Ireland) was the order's Turcopolier;
[Francesco Balbi (1568): The Siege of Malta] and in charge of the coastal defences of Rhodes and Malta.
[Whitworth Porter, History of the Knights of Malta, or The Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, p.287[2]]
See also
Further reading
-
Michael Haag, "The Templars: History and Myth", p. 158, Profile Books, London 2009.
-
Jean Richard, "Les turcoples au service des royaumes de Jérusalem et de Chypre: musulmans convertis ou chrétiens orientaux?", in idem, Croisades et Etats latins d’Orient Points de vue et Documents (Aldershot, Ashgate, 1992) (Variorum Collected Studies Series: CS383),
