Product Code Database
Example Keywords: music games -skirt $87-181
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Strandflat
Tag Wiki 'Strandflat'.
Tag

Strandflat () is a landform typical of the coast consisting of a flattish on the coast and near-coast . In Norway, strandflats provide room for settlements and agriculture, constituting important cultural landscapes. The shallow and protected waters of strandflats are valued fishing grounds that provide sustenance to traditional fishing settlements. Outside Norway proper, strandflats can be found in other high-latitude areas, such as , , the , the Russian Far North, , , , and .

The strandflats are usually bounded on the landward side by a sharp break in slope, leading to mountainous terrain or . On the seaward side, strandflats end at submarine slopes.

(2026). 9780199245901, Oxford University Press.
The surface of strandflats is uneven and tilts gently towards the sea.

The concept of a strandflat was introduced in 1894 by Norwegian geologist .

(1999). 9780632053117, Blackwell Science Ltd.


Norwegian strandflat

Characteristics
Strandflats are not fully flat and may display some local relief, meaning that it is usually not possible to assign them a precise elevation above sea level. The Norwegian strandflats may go from above sea level to below sea level. The undulations in the strandflat relief may result in an irregular coastline with , small embayments, and peninsulas.

The width of the strandflat varies from and occasionally reaching up to in width. From land to sea the strandflat can be subdivided into the following zones: the supramarine zone, the skjærgård (skerry archipelago), and the submarine zone. Residual mountains surrounded by the strandflat are called .

On the landward side, the strandflat often terminates abruptly with the beginning of a steep slope that separates it from higher or more uneven terrain. In some locations this sharp boundary is lacking and the landward end of strandflat is diffuse. On the seaward side, the strandflat continues underwater down to depths of , where a steep submarine slope separates it from older low relief . These paleic surfaces are known as bankflat, and make up much of the continental shelf. At some locations, the landward end of the strandflat or the region slightly above contains relict partly filled with sediments that predate the last glacial period. These caves lie near the post-glacial marine limit or above it.

Overall, strandflats in county are larger and flatter than those of . Also in Nordland, many strandflats are found next to active .


Geological origin
Despite being together with the most studied coastal landform in Norway, as of 2013 there is no consensus as to the origin of strandflats. An analysis of the literature shows that during the course of the 20th century, explanations for the strandflat shifted from involving one or two processes to including many more. Thus most modern explanations are of type. Grand-scale observations on the distribution of strandflats tend to favour an origin in connection to the Quaternary glaciations, while in-detail studies have led scholars to argue that strandflats have been shaped by during the . According to this second view, the weathered surface would then have been buried in sediments to be freed from this cover during for a final reshaping by erosion. regarded the strandflats as modified paleic surfaces, conjecturing that paleic surfaces dipping gently to the sea would favoured strandflat formation.

In his original description, Reusch regarded the strandflat as originating from prior to glaciation, but adding that some levelling could have been caused by non-marine erosion. In his view, the formation of the strandflat preceded the fjords of Norway. Years later, in 1919, Hans Ahlmann assumed the strandflat formed by erosion on land towards a . In the mid-20th century, W. Evers argued in a series of publications that the strandflat was a low-erosion surface formed on land as part of a stepped sequence () that included the . This idea was refuted by , who noted that the position of the surfaces were not that of a piedmonttreppen.


Frost weathering, glaciers and sea ice
The Arctic explorer agreed with Reusch that marine influences formed the strandflat, but added in 1922 that was also of key importance. Nansen discarded ordinary marine abrasion as an explanation for the formation of the strandflat, as he noted that much of the strandflat lay in areas protected from major waves. In his analysis, Nansen argued that the strandflat formed after the fjords of Norway had dissected the landscape. This, he argued, facilitated marine erosion by creating more coast and by creating nearby for eroded material.

In 1929, favoured a glacial origin for the strandflat, an idea that was picked up by his son . Hans Holtedahl and E. Larsen went on to argue in 1985 for an origin in connection to the Quaternary glaciations with material loosened by , and transporting loose material and making the relief flat. Tormod Klemsdal added in 1982 that could have made minor contributions in "widening, levelling and splitting the strandflat".


Deep weathering and antiquity
Contrary to the glacial and hypotheses, Julius Büdel and Jean-Pierre Peulvast regard of rock into as important in shaping the strandflat. Büdel held that weathering took place in a distant past with tropical and sub-tropical climates, while Peulvast considered that present-day conditions and a lack of glaciation were enough to produce the weathering. As such, Peulvast considered the saprolite found in the strandflat, and the weathering that produced it, to predate the Last glacial period and possibly the Quaternary glaciations. For Büdel, the strandflat was a dotted with .

In 2013, Odleiv and co-workers put forward a mixed origin for the strandflat of . They argue that this strandflat in northern Norway could represent the remnants of a weathered of age that was buried in sediment for long time before made flat again by erosion in and times. A 2017 study concerning radiometric dating of , a clay formed by weathering, is interpreted to indicate that the strandflat at Bømlo in was weathered c. 210 million years ago during times. Haakon Fossen and co-workers disagree with this view citing studies to claim that the strandflat in Western Norway was still covered by sedimentary rock in the Triassic and did only got free of its sedimentary cover in the Jurassic. Same authors note that movement of geological faults in the Late Mesozoic imply the strandflats of Western Norway took their final shape after the or else they would occur at various heights above sea level. A similar opinion is expressed by Hans Holtedahl who wrote that "the strandflat must have formed later the main () uplift of the Scandinavian landmass". To this Holtedahl added that in Trøndelag between Nordland and Western Norway the strandflat could be a surface formed before the Jurassic, then buried in sediments and at some point freed from this cover. In the understanding of Tormod Klemsdal strandflats may be old surfaces shaped by deep weathering that escaped the uplift that affected the Scandinavian Mountains further east.

The strandflat at Bømlo is considered by Ola Fredin and co-workers to be equivalent to the sediment-capped top of offshore west of . This view is also disputed by Haakon Fossen and co-workers who state that the basement surface under the northern formed .


Outside Norway
Strandflats have been identified in high-latitude areas such as the coast of , , , , and in Russia and the western coasts of Sweden and . These strandflats are usually smaller than those in Norway.

In , strandflats can be found in the Antarctic Peninsula as well as in the South Shetland Islands. In addition there have been mentions of strandflats in South Georgia Island.

In in the South Shetland Islands, raised strandflats show that the island has been subject to a relative change in sea level. Raised corresponding to strandflats have also been identified in Scotland's . Possibly these formed in times and were later modified by the Quaternary glaciations.


Gallery
File:Siggjo viewed towards east.JPG|Aerial view of the strandflat at Bømlo File:Southern_Goddo.JPG|Aerial view of the strandflat at Goddo island near Bømlo File:Leaving_Lochmaddy_-_geograph.org.uk_-_929584.jpg|Skerry zone of a strandflat in ,


Explanatory footnotes

Citations

General literature
  • (1904). "The Bathymetrical Features of the North Polar Seas". In Nansen F. (ed.): The Norwegian North Polar Expedition 1893–1896. Scientific results, Vol IV. J. Dybwad, Christiania, 1–232.
  • (1894). Strandflaten, et nyt træk i Norges geografi. Norges geologiske undersokelse, 14, 1–14.

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs