Product Code Database
Example Keywords: wii -data $24-111
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Phycitinae
Tag Wiki 'Phycitinae'.
Tag

The Phycitinae are a of (family Pyralidae). Even though the Pyralidae subfamilies are all quite diverse, Phycitinae stand out even by standards of their family: with over 600 considered valid and more than 4000 placed here at present, they unite up more than three-quarters of living snout moth diversity. Together with the closely related , they are apparently the most advanced lineage of snout moths.

Phycitinae occur all over Earth's land masses, except in completely inhospitable areas; the majority of species has a distribution however. Phycitinae have even been found on very remote , and a few species have been intentionally or unintentionally distributed by humans beyond their native range.

The subfamily was established as a systematic group by Philipp Christoph Zeller in 1839, who called them "Phycideen". The of Phycitinae is Phycidea Zeller, 1839, with Tinea sinuella Fabricius, 1794 as . Phycidea is nowadays considered a synonym of the genus .

Dioryctria abietella (Denis & Schiffermüller) has reproductive organs and spermatophore that are morphologically similar to those of other Lepidoptera. Many females had eggs in their bulla seminalis, but they didn't entirely obstruct sperm transportation. The spermatophore's opening end has a serrulate surface with a tiny horn. These microstructures are most likely used to keep the ductus seminalis opening aligned.


Description
In general, Phycitinae are smallish and slender-bodied moths, resembling (family Tineidae) in appearance, though they have the well-developed proboscis typical of snout moths and in many cases also the tell-tale "snout" consisting of elongated and straight labial palps. They are usually inconspicuous; while the forewings of some are quite prominently patterned, even these have usually rather nondescript greyish-brown colours and in the natural environment the pattern is . Yet a few of Phycitinae, such as Oncocera semirubella, are unusually brightly coloured by moth standards, while those of genus resemble members of unrelated "" family and like these are called "ermine moths" due to their bright white forewings with tiny black spots.

Despite their diversity, the group is considered by and large as traditionally circumscribed. Due to the sheer number of contained here, this has not been thoroughly tested, and some little-known genera traditionally included in the Phycitinae may of course simply be convergent and do not really belong here. Altogether however, the of the – with the sclerotised (hardened) ring around the base of seta SD1 – as well as the identical frenula of male and female adults' wings – a single bristle composed of several acanthae – are held to be characteristic by which the Phycitinae can be recognized. Furthermore, in the female of this subfamily the originates in the . A useful character in the field is that the forewings of many adult Phycitinae lack one or more veins, usually the seventh one.

These moths may resemble , but caddisfly antennae point forwards while Phycitinae antennae curve backwards.


Ecology
Phycitinae are mostly leaf rolling, but some are in or feeders, and a wide range of are utilized. This subfamily even features some and caterpillars. The latter, e.g. , can be beneficial in , as they eat small such as . Others have been used in biological pest control against , for example the stem-boring caterpillars of which destroy ( Alternanthera philoxeroides), an originally South American plant that has spread around the to the detriment of local .

Yet again others – namely the "carob moths" and "flour moths" of genera , and , as well as some species of and – are themselves pests of economic significance; the aforementioned genera's caterpillars infest dry vegetable foods (such as and nuts), while others (e.g. ) are pests of living plants. Ecological relationships and interaction with humans is not always clear cut in this large group; the famous South American cactus moth ( Cactoblastis cactorum) from the Paraná Basin is quite beneficial by keeping down invasive ( Opuntia) wherever neither it nor these are native, such as in . It is a species however, and having been introduced to comparable in Northern Hemisphere America, it is wreaking havoc in and the southern United States' Opuntia farms. Similarly, in A. philoxeroides control, care must be taken not to harm native species of the widespread genus , many of which are highly valued plants. A. malloi is also not fully and will for example eat ( A. sessilis), which though a nuisance weed where introduced is not known to be strongly invasive.


Systematics
Due to the large diversity, the and of the Phycitinae is by no means fully resolved, though there is progress towards this goal. As noted above, some genera placed in this subfamily might actually belong elsewhere; particularly some of those that cannot be assigned firmly to one of the main Phycitinae subdivisions ( ) are interesting in this regard. Delimitation versus the – generally considered the closest living relatives of the present subfamily – may thus warrant more attention, but altogether, considering the sheer size of this group, Phycitinae have not been particularly challenging as regards their taxonomy and systematics.

New genera of Phycitinae are still being established and others are revalidated in our time. Some genera widely recognized are , but might include further undiscovered species. Some, on the other hand, might not be valid. Despite the review of genera progressing, the large number of Phycitinae taxa means that a lot of genera have not been reviewed since the 1956 landmark studies by United States Department of Agriculture and Hans Georg Amsel of the State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe, if not since longer.


Tribes
A large part of the subfamily is divided among four tribes of various size. Some notable genera and species are also listed:

Ragonot, 1885

  • About 64 genera, see main article

Roesler, 1968

Roesler, 1968

  • About 150 genera, see main article


Genera incertae sedis
Some Phycitinae and species whose affiliation as to tribe is unclear are:

was originally included in the Phycitinae, as it somewhat resembles ; it seems impossible to assign with certainty to any one of the major lineages of snout moths however.


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time