Product Code Database
Example Keywords: sony -jacket $38
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Serpukhovian
Tag Wiki 'Serpukhovian'.
Tag

The Serpukhovian is in the ICS geologic timescale the uppermost stage or youngest age of the Mississippian, the lower subsystem of the . The Serpukhovian age lasted from Ma to .; 2004: A Geologic Time Scale 2004, Cambridge University Press. It is preceded by the and is followed by the . The Serpukhovian correlates with the lower part of the Stage of European stratigraphy and the middle and upper parts of the Stage of North American stratigraphy.


Name and definition
The Serpukhovian Stage was proposed in 1890 by Russian stratigrapher Sergei Nikitin and was introduced in the official stratigraphy of European Russia in 1974.Nikitin S.N., 1890 Kamennougolnyye otlozheniya Podmoskovnogo kraya i artezianskiye vody pod Moskvoy / Каменноугольные отложения Подмосковного края и артезианские воды под Москвой. Trudy Geol. komiteta. 2, 5, 138 pp. (In Russian); 2009: Early Bashkirian Rugosa (Anthozoa) from the Donets Basin, Ukraine. Part 1. Introductory considerations and the genus Rotiphyllum Hudson, 1942, Acta Geologica Polonica 59 (1), pp. 1–37. It was named after the city of , near . The ICS later used the upper Russian subdivisions of the Carboniferous in its international geologic time scale.

The base of the Serpukhovian is informally defined by the first appearance of the , though the utility and systematic stability of this species is not yet certain. No lower has been assigned to the Serpukhovian Stage yet. Two candidate GSSPs have been proposed: the Verkhnyaya Kardailovka section in the South of , and the Naqing (Nashui) section in , .

The top of the stage (the base of the Pennsylvanian subsystem and Bashkirian stage) is at the first appearance of the conodont in the lower Bird Spring Formation, which overlies the Battleship Formation in Nevada.; 1999: The IUGS boundary in the middle of the Carboniferous: Arrow Canyon, Nevada, USA, Episodes 22 (4), pp 272–283 It is also slightly above the first appearance of the , genozone of the and the ammonoid of .; 2006: Global time scale and regional stratigraphic reference scales of Central and West Europe, East Europe, Tethys, South China, and North America as used in the Devonian–Carboniferous–Permian Correlation Chart 2003 (DCP 2003), Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 240 (1-2): pp 318–372


Subdivision

Biostratigraphy
In Europe, the Serpukhovian Stage includes three conodont biozones: the postbilineatus Zone (youngest), Gnathodus bollandensis Zone, and Lochriea ziegleri Zone (in part, oldest). There are three biozones: the transitorius Zone (youngest), protvae Zone, and postrugosus Zone (oldest).

In North America, the stage encompassed four conodont biozones: the muricatus Zone (youngest), unicornis Zone, naviculus Zone, and Gnathodus bilineatus Zone (in part, oldest).


Regional subdivisions
In the regional stratigraphy of Russia (and Eastern Europe as a whole), the Serpukhovian is subdivided into four substages, from oldest to youngest: the Tarusian, Steshevian, Protvian, and Zapaltyubian. The former three are found in the and are named after places near Serpukhov ( and ). Strata belonging to the Zapaltyubian are not exposed in the Moscow Basin, though they are found in the and the .

In the regional stratigraphy of the United Kingdom (and Western Europe as a whole), the Serpukhovian corresponds to the lower half of the regional stage. This portion of the Namurian includes three substages, from oldest to youngest: the Pendleian, Arnsbergian and Chokierian. Only the lowermost Chokierian falls in the Serpukhovian, the upper part of the substage corresponds to the earliest .; 2006: The Carboniferous system, use of the new official names for the subsystems, series and stages, Geologica Acta 4 (3), pp 403–407

In North America, the Serpukhovian corresponds to the upper part of the regional stage, while in the Serpukhovian is roughly equivalent to the Dewuan regional stage.


Serpukhovian extinction
The largest extinction event of the Carboniferous Period occurred in the early Serpukhovian. This extinction came in the form of ecological turnovers, with the demise of diverse Mississippian assemblages of and . After the extinction, they were replaced by species-poor cosmopolitan ecosystems. The extinction selectively targeted species with a narrow range of temperature preferences, as cooling seawater led to habitat loss for tropical specialists. Ammonoids appear to have not been impacted by this event, as they reached a zenith in diversity at this time. The long-term ecological impact of the Serpukhovian extinction may have exceeded that of the Ordovician-Silurian extinction, where taxonomic diversity was abruptly devastated but quickly recovered to pre-extinction levels.

(1996) plotted an extinction rate of around 23-24% for the Serpukhovian as a whole, based on marine which persist through multiple stages. Bambach (2006) found an early Serpukhovian extinction rate of 31% among all marine genera. Using an extinction probability procedure generated from the Paleobiology Database, McGhee et al. (2013) estimated an extinction rate as high as 39% for marine genera. On the other hand, Stanley (2016) estimated that the extinction was much smaller, at a loss of only 13-14 % of marine genera.

Relative to other biological crises, the Serpukhovian extinction was much more selective in its effects on different evolutionary faunas. Stanley (2007) estimated that the early Serpukhovian saw the loss of 37.5% of marine genera in the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna. Only 15.4% of marine genera in the modern evolutionary fauna would have been lost along the same time interval. This disconnect, and the severity of the extinction as a whole, is reminiscent of the Late Devonian extinction events. Another similarity is how the Serpukhovian extinction was seemingly driven by low rates of speciation, rather than particularly high rates of extinction.

It is disputed whether the aftermath of the extinction saw a relative stagnation of biodiversity or a major increase. Some studies have found that in the following Late Paleozoic Ice Age (LPIA) of the Late Carboniferous and , both speciation and extinction rates were low, with this stagnation in biological diversity driven by a reduction of carbonate platforms, which otherwise would have helped to maintain high biodiversity. More recent studies have instead argued that biodiversity surged during the LPIA in what is known as the Carboniferous-Earliest Permian Biodiversification Event (CPBE). Foraminifera especially saw extremely rapid diversification. The CPBE may have been caused by the dramatically increased marine provincialism resulting from sea level fall during the LPIA, combined with the assembly of Pangaea, which limited the spread of taxa from one region of the world ocean to another.


See also


Further reading
  • ; 1890: Carboniferous deposits of the Moscow region and artesian waters near Moscow, Trudy Geologicheskogo Komiteta 5(5), pp. 1–182 .


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs