Product Code Database
Example Keywords: jewel -ink $43-184
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Orrorin
Tag Wiki 'Orrorin'.
Tag

Orrorin is an of within from the Lukeino Formation and Mabaget Formation, both of .

The type species is O. tugenenesis, named in 2001, and a second species, O. praegens, assigned to the genus in 2022.


Discovery and naming

Ororrin tugenensis
The first part of the , a lower molar, was discovered by in 1974 and described by Pickford (1975).

The team that found the rest of the holotype of O. tugenensis was led by and from the French National Museum of Natural History. Starting from 17 October 2000, 20 fossils were found at four sites in the Lukeino Formation, Kenya: of these, the fossils at and are the oldest (), while those in and are found in the upper levels of the formation ().

Orrorin tugenensis was named and described by Senut et al. (2001).


Orrorin praegens
The second species, O. praegens, was first described by Ward (1985) and Ward & Hill (1988), and was initially described as praegens by Ferguson (1989) based on specimen KNM-TH 13150, a mandible discovered in the Mabaget Formation of during the early 1980s. The mandible is known as the Tabarin mandible, which was previously classified within Ardipithecus ramidus (or cf. A. cf. ramidus), "Ardipithecus" praegens or "" praegens.

Several referred remains of O. praegens were collected between 2005 and 2011 by the Franco-Kenyan Kenya Palaeontology Expedition and they, alongside the Tabarin mandible, were classified by et al. (2022) as being separate from , so they were classified within Orrorin as O. praegens.


Etymology
The name of genus Orrorin (plural Orroriek) means "original man" in , and the of O. tugenensis derives from in , where the first was found in 2000.

The epithet of O. praegens means roughly “group of people who came before.”


Fossils
The 20 specimens belonging to O. tugenensis are believed to be from at least five individuals. They include: the posterior part of a in two pieces; a and several isolated teeth; three fragments of ; a partial ; a proximal ; and a distal thumb phalanx.

Orrorin had small teeth relative to its body size. Its dentition differs from that found in in that its are smaller and less elongated and from in that its is thicker. The dentition differs from both these species in the presence of a mesial groove on the upper canines. The are ape-like but reduced, like those found in Miocene apes and female chimpanzees. Orrorin had small post-canines and was , like modern humans, whereas australopithecines were megadont. However, some researchers have denied that this is compelling evidence that Orrorin was more closely related to modern humans than australopithecines as early members of the genus Homo, who were almost certainly the direct ancestors of modern humans, were also megadonts.

In the femur, the is spherical and rotated anteriorly; the is elongated and oval in section and the lesser trochanter protrudes medially. While these suggest that Orrorin was bipedal, the rest of the indicates it climbed trees. While the proximal phalanx is curved, the distal phalanx is of human proportions and has thus been associated with toolmaking, but should probably be associated with grasping abilities useful for tree-climbing in this context.

After the fossils were found in 2000, they were held at the Kipsaraman village community museum, but the museum was subsequently closed. Since then, according to the Community Museums of Kenya chairman Eustace Kitonga, the fossils are stored at a secret bank vault in Nairobi.


Classification
If Orrorin proves to be a direct human ancestor, then according to some paleoanthropologists, australopithecines such as Australopithecus afarensis ("Lucy") may be considered a side branch of the hominid family tree: Orrorin is both earlier, by almost 3 million years, and more similar to modern humans than is A. afarensis. The main similarity is that the Orrorin femur is morphologically closer to that of than is Lucy's; there is, however, some debate over this point. This debate is largely centered around the fact that Lucy was female and the Orrorin femur it has been compared to belonged to a male.

Another point of view cites comparisons between Orrorin and other apes, rather than extant great apes, which shows instead that the femur shows itself as an intermediate between that of Australopiths and said earlier apes.

Other fossils (leaves and many mammals) found in the Lukeino Formation show that Orrorin lived in a dry evergreen forest environment, not the assumed by many theories of .


Evolution of bipedalism
The fossils of Orrorin tugenensis share no derived features of hominoid great-ape relatives. In contrast, " Orrorin shares several apomorphic features with modern humans, as well as some with australopithecines, including the presence of an obturator externus groove, elongated femoral neck, anteriorly twisted head (posterior twist in Australopithecus), compressed femoral neck, asymmetric distribution of cortex in the femoral neck, shallow superior notch, and a well developed gluteal tuberosity which coalesces vertically with the crest that descends the femoral shaft posteriorly." It does, however, also share many of such properties with several Miocene ape species, even showing some transitional elements between basal apes like the and Australopithecus.

According to recent studies Orrorin tugenensis is a basal hominid that adapted an early form of bipedalism. Based on the structure of its femoral head it still exhibited some arboreal properties, likely to forage and build shelters. The length of the femoral neck in Orrorin tugenensis fossils is elongated and is similar in shape and length to modern humans and Australopithicines. While it was originally claimed that its femoral head is larger in comparison to Australopithicines and is much closer in shape and relative size to Homo sapiens, this claim has been challenged by some researchers who have noted that the femoral heads of male australopithicines are more akin to those of Orrorin, and by extension modern humans, than those of female australopithicines. Proponents of the notion that Orrorin is more closely related to humans than Lucy is have addressed this by asserting that the male australopithicine femurs in question in fact belong to a different species than Lucy. O. tugenensis appears to have developed bipedalism 6 million years ago.

O. tugenensis shares an early hominin feature in which their iliac blade is flared to help counter the torque of their body weight; this shows that they adapted bipedalism around 6 MYA. These features are shared with many species of Australopithecus. It has been suggested by Pickford that the many features Orrorin shares with modern humans show that it is more closely related to Homo sapiens than to Australopithecus. This would mean that Australopithecus would represent a side branch in the homin evolution that does not directly lead to Homo. However the femora morphology of O. tugenensis shares many similarities with Australopithicine femora morphology, which weakens this claim. Another study conducted by Almecija suggested that Orrorin is more closely related to early hominins than to Homo. An analysis of the BAR 10020' 00 femur showed that Orrorin is an intermediate between Pan and Australopithecus afarensis. The current prevailing theory is that Orrorin tugenensis is a basal hominin and that bipedalism developed early in the hominin clade and successfully evolved down the human evolutionary tree. While the phylogeny of Orrorin is uncertain, the evidence of the evolution of bipedalism is an invaluable discovery from this early fossil hominin. A recent phylogenetic analysis also recovered Orrorin as a hominin.


See also
  • List of human evolution fossils (with images)


Sources


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs