Ornithosuchidae is an extinct family of Pseudosuchia (distant relatives of modern Crocodilia) from the Triassic period. Ornithosuchids were quadrupedal and facultatively bipedal (e.g. like Chimpanzee), meaning that they had the ability to walk on two legs for short periods of time. They had distinctive, downturned snouts, unique, "crocodile-reversed" ankle bones, and several other features that distinguish them from other archosaurs. Ornithosuchids were geographically widespread during the Carnian and Norian stages of the Late Triassic with members known from Argentina, Brazil, and the United Kingdom. Four genera, comprising Ornithosuchus, Venaticosuchus, Dynamosuchus, and Riojasuchus are presently known. The family was first erected by German paleontologist Friedrich von Huene in 1908.Huene, F. von. 1908. "Die Dinosaurier der europäischen Triasformation mit Berücksichtigung der aussereuropäischen Vorkommnisse". Geologische und Paläontologische Abhandlungen 1(Suppl.): 1–419
Several other features distinguish ornithosuchids from all other early archosaurs. Ornithosuchus and Riojasuchus both possess a small fenestra, or hole, between the palatine bone and of the palate, i.e. the roof of the mouth. The contact between the nasal bone and of the skull is small or absent, excluded by a large contact between the frontal bone and lacrimal bone. In other archosaurs, including , , , and , the nasal-prefrontal contact separates the frontal from the lacrimal.
The femur (thigh bone) has a pronounced anterior trochanter. The anterior trochanter, sometimes known as the "lesser trochanter" (but unrelated to the lesser trochanter of the femur in humans), is a ridge on the outer surface of the femur, near the femoral head. It was probably an insertion point for m. iliofemoralis cranialis, which helps to raise the leg. Most archosaurs and archosaur relatives lack a distinct anterior trochanter, but ornithosuchids are an exception, along with most Dinosauromorpha (dinosaurs and their close relatives).
Much like the femur, the fibula (outer shin bone) also has a distinctive point for muscle insertion. The muscle in question is the iliofibularis, which helps to straighten the limbs. In most archosaurs, the iliofibularis is inserted onto the fibula by means of a tiny ridge on the proximal part of the fibula, near the knee. However, ornithosuchids have a much larger, knob-shaped iliofibularis insertion point located about midway down the shaft of the fibula. Phytosaurs and aetosaurs also share a knob-like attachment point midway down the fibula, so whether the case in ornithosuchids is a unique case of convergent evolution, or alternatively the retention of a trait independently lost by several archosaur lineages is unclear.
Unlike most other early archosaurs, the pedal (the distalmost bones of the feet that form claws) are laterally compressed. They are sharp and recurved. The unguals are very deep, being taller than they are long, especially on the inner digits. This type of claw is not seen in any other Triassic archosaur except for pterosaurs.
Major archosaur groups have often been distinguished from each other based on the structure of their ankles. In most crurotarsans, the Talus bone has a convex projection that fits into a concave space in the calcaneum. This condition is often referred to as a "crocodile-normal" ankle, as it is the most common ankle type in crurotarsans. Ornithosuchids are unique among crurotarsans, and all other archosaurs, in their possession of a "crocodile-reversed" ankle, in which the placement of the concavity is reversed; instead of being on the calcaneum, it is on the astragalus. In ornithosuchids, the calcaneum bears a convex projection that is analogous to the convex projection on the "crocodile-normal" astragalus.
By contrast, a 2023 study on the jaw biomechanics of Riojasuchus by Tarboda et al. instead yielded results that the authors interpreted as being indicative of piscivory. They argued that the dental configuration of Riojasuchus was ill-suited to scavenging, largely due to a lack of apparent occlusion between the mandibular and premaxillary teeth. Taborda et al. compared the jaw musculature of Riojasuchus to the putatively piscivorous theropod Spinosaurus.
In 2025, a study by Sennikov provided another different hypothesis, wherein he proposed that ornithosuchids were 'medium sized hyperanisodont carnivorous macrophages'. This study postulates that ornithosuchids were not only active, terrestrial hunters, but that they specialised in hunting prey the same size as or larger than themselves. He argued that the slow, powerful bite of ornithosuchids would be highly inefficient for piscivory, rebuking the hypothesis laid out by Taborda et al. in 2023. Based on postcrania from Riojasuchus, he posited that ornithosuchids grappled their prey in order to subdue them before delivering the killing blow with their jaws, a hunting methodology that he compared to Machairodontinae.
Paleobiology
Phylogeny
External links
|
|