Product Code Database
Megapnosaurus (meaning "big dead lizard", from Greek μέγα = "big", ἄπνοος = "not breathing", "dead", σαῦρος = "lizard") is an extinct genus of coelophysid Theropoda dinosaur that lived approximately 188 million years ago during the early part of the Jurassic Period in what is now Africa. The species was a small to medium-sized, lightly built, ground-dwelling, bipedal carnivore, that could grow up to long and weigh up to .
It was originally given the genus name Syntarsus, but that name was later determined to be preoccupied by a beetle. The species was subsequently given a new genus name, Megapnosaurus, by Ivie, Ślipiński & Węgrzynowicz in 2001. Some studies have classified it as a species within the genus Coelophysis, but this interpretation has been challenged by more subsequent studies and the genus Megapnosaurus is now considered valid.
Still in search of complete skeletons, Raath continued searching in the Jurassic rocks of Zimbabwe until finding what would become the most productive S. rhodesiensis-bearing locality near the Chitake River in 1972. The quarry contained hundreds of bones of at least 26 individuals from many growth stages, making it one of the most productive quarries for African Theropods. The quarry contained several skulls and cervical vertebrae, elements missing in previously collected specimens, and some specimens even preserved gastralia, sexual dimorphism, and gut contents. The fossils were described in detail by Raath in his thesis in 1977, including skeletal and musculoskeletal reconstructions of S. rhodesiensis. All specimens collected from Southcote, Maura River, and Chitake River now reside at the Queen Victoria Museum.
The next year Darlington Munyikwa and Raath described a partial snout of "S." rhodesiensis from the Elliot Formation in South Africa, but the material has been referred to Dracovenator. A " Syntarsus" specimen was discovered in the United Kingdom in the 1950s and consisted of several postcranial elements. The specimen have now been referred to a new genus and species, Pendraig in 2021. A partial coelophysoid sacrum and several additional elements from the Early Jurassic of Mexico were described as a new species of " Syntarsus", "Syntarsus" "mexicanum", in 2004. The remains were not given proper description in their naming and are likely from an indeterminate coelophysoid. Fragmentary coelophysid specimens (FMNH CUP 2089 and FMNH CUP 2090) from the Lufeng Formation of southern China have been identified as cf. Megapnosaurus, though phylogenetic analyses cannot be conducted due to poor preservation. A partial skeleton described from the Moenave Formation was listed with the name Syntarsus "moenavensis" by Tykoski in 2005, attributing the name to the describers of the specimen, though the name was not used in their study.
The bones of at least 30 M. rhodesiensis individuals were found together in a fossil bed in Zimbabwe, so paleontologists think it may have hunted in packs. The various fossils attributed to this species have been dated over a relatively large time span – the Hettangian, Sinemurian, and Pliensbachian stages of the Early Jurassic – meaning the fossils represent either a highly successful genus or a few closely related animals all currently assigned to Coelophysis.
Specimen UCMP V128659 was discovered in 1982 and referred to Megapnosaurus kayentakatae by Rowe (1989), as a subadult gracile individual and later, Tykoski (1998) agreed. Gay (2010) described the specimen as the new tetanurine taxon Kayentavenator,Gay, 2010. Notes on Early Mesozoic theropods. Lulu Press. 44 pp. but Mortimer (2010) pointed out that there was no published evidence that Kayentavenator is the same taxon as M. kayentakatae.
"Syntarsus" rhodesiensis was first described by Raath (1969) and assigned to Podokesauridae. The taxon "Podokesauridae", was abandoned since its Podokesaurus was destroyed in a fire and can no longer be compared to new finds. Over the years paleontologists assigned this genus to Ceratosauridae (Welles, 1984), Procompsognathidae (Parrish and Carpenter, 1986) and Ceratosauria (Gauthier, 1986). Most recently, it has been assigned to Coelophysidae by Tykoski and Rowe (2004), Ezcurra and Novas (2007) and Ezcurra (2007), which is the current scientific consensus.
According to Tykoski and Rowe (2004) Coelophysis rhodesiensis can be distinguished based on the following characteristics: it differs from Coelophysis bauri in the pit at the base of the nasal process of the premaxilla; it differs from C.? kayentakatae because the promaxillary fenestra is absent and the nasal crests are absent; the frontal bones on the skull are not separated by a midline anterior extension of the parietal bones; the anterior talus bone surface is flat; metacarpal I has a reduced distal medial condyle (noted by Ezcurra, 2006); the anterior margin of antorbital fossa is blunt and squared (noted by Carrano et al., 2012); the base of lacrimal vertical ramus width is less than 30% its height (noted by Carrano et al., 2012); the maxillary and dentary tooth rows end posteriorly at the anterior rim of the lacrimal bone (noted by Carrano et al., 2012)
Marsh and Rowe (2020) retain the generic name Syntarsus for both QG 1 and MNA V2623, and the respective specimens assigned to these taxa, as opposed to Coelophysis or Megapnosaurus, due to systematic relationships within Coelophysoidea in flux. As such, congenericity or the need for Megapnosaurus would not be supported if Coelophysis bauri, Syntarsus rhodesiensis, and Syntarsus kayentakatae do not form respective clades, as evidenced by their phylogenetic analyses.
Ezcurra et al. (2021) found Megapnosaurus rhodesiensis to have been quite distant from both Coelophysis bauri (currently the only undisputed species in genus Coelophysis) and "Syntarsus" kayentakatae (not currently classified in a valid genus). In this analysis, the closest relatives of M. rhodesiensis are Camposaurus, Segisaurus and Lucianovenator. Similar results were found in analyses years before, supporting this position.
Comparisons between the sclerotic ring of M. rhodesiensis and modern birds and non-avian reptiles indicate that it may have been nocturnal.
Classification
The cladogram below was recovered in a study by Ezcurra et al. (2021).
Paleoecology
Provenance and occurrence
The holotype of M. rhodesiensis (QG1) has been recovered in Upper Elliot Formation in South Africa, as well as the Chitake River bonebed quarry at the Forest Sandstone Formation in Rhodesia (now known as Zimbabwe). In South Africa, several individuals were collected in 1985 from mudstone deposited during the Hettangian stage of the Jurassic period, approximately 201 to 199 million years ago. In Zimbabwe, twenty-six individuals were collected in 1963, 1968 and 1972 from yellow sandstone deposited during the Hettangian stage of the Jurassic period, approximately 201 to 199 million years ago.
Fauna and habitat
The Upper Elliot Formation is thought to have been an ancient floodplain. Fossils of the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus and Ignavusaurus have been recovered from the Upper Elliot Formation, which boasts the world's most diverse fauna of early Jurassic ornithischian dinosaurs, including Abrictosaurus, Fabrosaurus, Heterodontosaurus, and Lesothosaurus, among others. The Forest Sandstone Formation was the paleoenvironment of protosuchid crocodiles, sphenodonts, the dinosaur Massospondylus and indeterminate remains of a prosauropod. Paul (1988) argued that members of the species lived among desert dunes and oases and hunted juvenile and adult prosauropods.
Paleobiology
Growth
Age determination studies using growth ring counts suggest that the longevity of M. rhodesiensis was approximately seven years. Recent research has found that M. rhodesiensis had highly variable growth between individuals, with some specimens being larger in their immature phase than smaller adults were when completely mature; this indicates that the supposed presence of distinct morphs is simply the result of individual variation. This highly variable growth was likely ancestral to dinosaurs but later lost, and may have given such early dinosaurs an evolutionary advantage in surviving harsh environmental challenges.
Feeding and diet
The supposed "weak joint" in the jaw, led to the early hypothesis that dinosaurs such as these were scavengers, as the front teeth and bone structure of the jaw were thought to be too weak to take down and hold struggling prey. M. rhodesiensis was one of the first dinosaurs to be portrayed with feathers, though there is no direct evidence that it actually had feathers. Paul (1988) suggested that members of the species may have hunted in packs, preying upon "prosauropods" (basal Sauropodomorpha) and early lizards.
Paleopathology
In M. rhodesiensis, healed fractures of the tibia and metatarsus have been observed, but are very rare. "The supporting butresses of the second sacral rib" in one specimen of Syntarsus rhodesiensis showed signs of fluctuating asymmetry. Fluctuating asymmetry results from developmental disturbances and is more common in populations under stress and can therefore be informative about the quality of conditions a dinosaur lived under.
Ichnology
Dinosaur footprints that were later attributed to M. rhodesiensis were discovered in Rhodesia in 1915. These tracks were discovered at the Nyamandhlovu Sandstones Formation, in eolian red sandstone that was deposited in the Late Triassic, approximately 235 to 201 million years ago.
|
|
