Product Code Database
Endothiodon (/ɛndoʊθiːoʊdɔːn/ "inner tooth" from Greek endothi (ἔνδοθῐ), "within", and odon (ὀδών), "tooth", most likely named for the characteristic of the teeth being placed internally to the maxilla) is an extinct genus of medium to large dicynodont from the Late Permian. Like other dicynodonts, Endothiodon was an herbivore, but it typically lacked the two tusks that characterized most other dicynodonts and instead had long rows of teeth inset in the jaws that replaced in waves. The anterior portion of the upper and lower jaw are curved upward, creating a distinct beak that is thought to have allowed them to be specialized grazers.Latimer E. M., Gow C. E., Rubidge B. S. "Dentition and feeding niche of Endothiodon (Synapsida;Anomodontia)" Palaeontologia Africana 32, 75-82 (1995)
Endothiodon was widespread and is found across the southern region of what was then a single large continent known as Pangea. It was originally only found in southern Africa but has now also been found in eastern Africa, India and Brazil, which were both close to Africa at the time. The finding in Brazil marks the first dicynodont to be reported for the Permian of South America. This finding also shows that part of the Rio do Rasto Formation in Brazil can now be correlated with deposits in India, Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
Historically, nine named species in total from South Africa have been attributed to Endothiodon during the late 19th and early 20th centuries (sometimes variably split into distinct genera), but these were reduced down to just three accepted species of Endothiodon in 1964. In the 21st century, these three were further thought to likely represent only a single species, the original type species E. bathystoma, a conclusion upheld by a thorough revision of their taxonomy in 2024. A second valid species, E. mahalanobisi, was discovered in India and named in 2000. Although smaller than E. bathystoma, E. mahalanobisi is recognised as a distinct species rather than simply juveniles of E. bathystoma. Apart from size, E. mahalanobisi also has a pointed snout with only a single, low longitudinal ridge (compared to three raised crests on E. bathystoma), a narrow pineal foramen lacking a bony boss or collar, and a flat prefrontal bone. A third species was discovered in Tanzania and named E. tolani in 2015. Unlike the other species, E. tolani has a pair of small tusks. Although initially discovered in and thought to characterise separate regions, their ranges have since been found to overlap in eastern Africa, with potentially all three present in Mozambique. E. bathystoma appears to be particularly widespread, with a range from Brazil, through southern and eastern Africa and into India.
It was first thought that the dentary contained three parallel rows of teeth. Instead of arranging the teeth in longitudinal rows, they are now known to fall into obliquely arranged Zahnreihen. In each Zahnreihe, the anteriormost tooth is the oldest and the posterior most tooth is the youngest. There is active ongoing replacement of these tooth rows. The distal portion of each tooth is compressed from side to side and is somewhat pear shaped in cross section. Teeth migrated labially throughout ontogeny rather than being resorbed as rows of new teeth developed.
The palate shows two distinct regions that are covered in minute foramina. These areas probably had a horny covering in life. The broad groove running along the tooth row on the dentary was probably also covered by a horny layer. It is possible that these regions allowed for occlusion where the upper teeth met the groove lateral to the lower teeth and the lower teeth met one of the regions of the palatine. This is still under scrutiny as the palatine region is short in comparison to the lower tooth row and the second horn covered area on the palatine does not oppose any structure in the lower jaw. Because the palatine region is shortened, effective occlusion for shearing would only be possible when the lower jaw was in a retracted position.Ray Sanghamitra "Endothiodont dicynodont from the Late Permian Kundaram formation, India" Paleontology 42:2, 375-404 (2000)
Four main endothiodont genera, Endothiodon, Esoterodon, Endogomphodon, and Emydochampsa, were variably utilised and separated under the subfamily Endothiodontinae. Often these genera were based on species originally assigned to Endothiodon, e.g. Endothiodon uniseries, originally named by Owen in 1879, was made the type species of the genus Esoterodon by Seeley in 1894.Seeley H. G. "Researches on the structure, organisation, and classification of the fossil reptilia. Part IX. Section 1. On the therosuchia. (Abstract)" The Royal Society 55, 224-226 (1894) In 1964, Cox comprehensively revised the taxonomy of endothiodonts and found that the characteristics used to separate the four genera were not valid. The four genera were thus synonymised under Endothiodon. From the original nine South African species attributable to Endothiodon, Cox was also able to narrow down just three species based on skull size and robustness of the lower jaw. However, Cox stated this arrangement was provisional, and diagnoses for each species were still inadequate to rule out the three species representing a growth series instead.
Since Cox's 1964 revision, another new species of Endothiodon was discovered in India and named E. mahalanobisi in 2000, the first species recognised outside of Africa. Compared to the other three species, it had a smaller inferred adult size, only a single low longitudinal ridge on the snout, a more elongated pineal foramen situated on a low boss located midway on the intertemporal bar in front of instead of surrounding the pineal foramen, and a slender dentary symphysis. Some of these characteristics such as the shape of the pineal foramen and the presence of three longitudinal ridges were thought to be distinguishing characteristics of the genera as a whole, but are now only valid at specific level. Another new species was collected in Tanzania in 1963 and was described in 2015 as E. tolani. It is distinguished from other Endothiodon based on the lack of a pineal boss and the presence of a pair of tusks lateral to the tooth row. Cox's suggestion that E. uniseries and E. whaitsi were likely synonymous with E. bathystoma was supported by researchers in the 21st century, and were provisionally treated as such. In 2024, the taxonomy of Endothiodon was thoroughly revised again by Iyra Maharaj, and formally argued for the three-species concept of Endothiodon including only E. bathystoma, E. mahalanobisi, and E. tolani.
The intrarelationships of Endothiodon were phylogenetically tested for the first time in 2024 by Maharaj and colleagues in 2024 using a specimen-level analysis of individual specimens assigned to E. bathystoma, E. mahalanobisi, E. tolani and E. uniseries. Their results found consistent clades corresponding to the first three species, whilst specimens assigned to E. uniseries were spread within E. bathystoma, supporting their synonymy. A simplified cladogram from Maharaj et al. (2024) following their proposed taxonomy is presented below, showing the relationships of Endothiodon species:
A taphonomic reconstruction of the Late Permian showed that there were well established, dense, riverine vegetation.Smith Roger M. H. "Vertebrate taphonomy of Later Permian floodplain deposits in the southwestern Karoo basin of South Africa" South African Museum 8, 45-67 (1993) It was originally thought that Endothiodon would grub matter out of the ground using its beak. This is now seen as implausible because of the position of the external nares on the snout being placed so far anteriorly. Instead, it is now thought that Endothiodon inhabited the dense riverine vegetation and would crop foliage with its beak before processing it with its specialized and extensive oral cavity. δ18O and δ13C values reveal that E. bathystoma fed on riverine vegetation, as well as that juveniles of the species incorporated insects into their diet.
|
|
