Product Code Database
Example Keywords: mario -grand $63
   » » Wiki: Divisionism
Tag Wiki 'Divisionism'.
Tag

Divisionism, also called chromoluminarism, is the characteristic style in Neo-Impressionist painting defined by the separation of colors into individual dots or patches that interact optically..Homer, William I. Seurat and the Science of Painting. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1964.

By requiring the viewer to combine the colors optically instead of physically mixing , Divisionists believed that they were achieving the maximum scientifically possible. founded the style around 1884 as chromoluminarism, drawing from his understanding of the scientific theories of Michel Eugène Chevreul, and , among others. Divisionism developed along with another style, , which is defined specifically by the use of dots of paint and does not necessarily focus on the separation of colors.Ratliff, Floyd. Paul Signac and Color in Neo-Impressionism. New York: Rockefeller UP, 1992. .


Theoretical foundations and development
Divisionism is the technique of painting separate dots or patches of different colors in close proximity that interact optically in the viewer's perception to generate more luminous colors. The paints are not actually mixed but viewed close together, so the separate colors of light reflected by the paints mixes in the eye and brain; the process is called additive mixing and is also used by computer monitors. This is different from mixing different paints together to produce a new color by subtractive mixing, which is also how produce colors. Despite the theory, Seurat's paintings don't actually use true additive mixture, since the colors reflected by his paints as he used them don't actually mix in the eye. Instead, Seurat used highly contrasting colors in close proximity, but not close enough to mix additively; this effect is called simultaneous contrast, which creates a mild shimmering appearance and slightly increases the colors' apparent visual intensity.

originated in in the 1870s, and is characterized by the use of quick, short, broken brushstrokes to accurately capture the momentary effects of light and atmosphere in an outdoor scene. The Impressionists sought to create an "impression" of a momentary scene as perceived by the viewer, rather than a mechanically precise replication of the scene. Divisionism, also known as , developed from Impressionism in the 1880s. The Divisionists used a technique of placing small, distinct dots of color next to one another on the canvas, rather than mixing the colors on the palette. This created a more vibrant and dynamic effect, but also required a higher level of skill and precision. Neo-Impressionism emerged in the late 19th century, used more precise and geometric shapes to build compositions and was strongly influenced by the scientific study of and optical color effects, to create a more harmonious and luminous painting.

Scientists or artists whose theories of light or color had some impact on the development of Divisionism include Charles Henry, , David Pierre Giottino Humbert de Superville, David Sutter, Michel Eugène Chevreul, and Hermann von Helmholtz.


Beginnings with Georges Seurat
Divisionism, along with the Neo-Impressionism movement as a whole, found its beginnings in Georges Seurat's masterpiece, A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte. Seurat had received classical training at the École des Beaux-Arts, and, as such, his initial works reflected the style. In 1883, Seurat and some of his colleagues began exploring ways to express as much light as possible on the canvas.Sutter, Jean. The Neo Impressionists. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, 1970. . By 1884, with the exhibition of his first major work, Bathers at Asnières, as well as croquetons of the island of Île de la Jatte, his style began taking form with an awareness of Impressionism, but it was not until he finished La Grande Jatte in 1886 that he established his theory of chromoluminarism. In fact, La Grande Jatte was not initially painted in the Divisionist style, but he reworked the painting in the winter of 1885–86, enhancing its optical properties in accordance with his interpretation of scientific theories of color and light. Smith, Paul. Seurat, Georges. Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online


Paul Signac and other artists

Color theory
Charles Blanc's Grammaire des arts du dessin introduced Seurat to the theories of color and vision that would inspire chromoluminarism. Blanc's work, drawing from the theories of Michel Eugène Chevreul and Eugène Delacroix, stated that optical mixing would produce more vibrant and pure colors than the traditional process of mixing pigments. Mixing pigments physically is a subtractive process with cyan, magenta and yellow being the . On the other hand, if colored light is mixed together, an results, a process in which the primary colors are red, green and blue.

In Divisionist color theory, artists interpreted the scientific literature through making light operate in one of the following contexts:

Local color
As the dominant element of the painting, local color refers to the true color of subjects, e.g. green grass or blue sky.
Direct sunlight
As appropriate, yellow-orange colors representing the sun's action would be interspersed with the natural colors to emulate the effect of direct sunlight.
Shadow
If lighting is only indirect, various other colors, such as blues, reds and purples, can be used to simulate the darkness and shadows.
Reflected light
An object that is adjacent to another in a painting could cast reflected colors onto it.
Contrast
To take advantage of Chevreul's theory of simultaneous contrast, contrasting colors might be placed in close proximity.

Seurat's theories intrigued many of his contemporaries, as other artists seeking a reaction against Impressionism joined the Neo-Impressionist movement. , in particular, became one of the main proponents of divisionist theory, especially after Seurat's death in 1891. In fact, Signac's book, D’Eugène Delacroix au Néo-Impressionnisme, published in 1899, coined the term Divisionism and became widely recognized as the manifesto of Neo-Impressionism.


Divisionism in France and Northern Europe
In addition to Signac, other , largely through associations in the Société des Artistes Indépendants, adopted some Divisionist techniques, including and , Albert Dubois-Pillet, , , Henri-Edmond Cross and Hippolyte Petitjean. Additionally, through Paul Signac's advocacy of Divisionism, an influence can be seen in some of the works of Vincent van Gogh, , , and . Rapetti Rodolphe Signac, Paul Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online

In 1907 Metzinger and Delaunay were singled out by the critic as Divisionists who used large, mosaic-like 'cubes' to construct small but highly symbolic compositions.Ruhrberg, Karl. "Seurat and the Neo-Impressionists". Art of the 20th Century, Vol. 2. Cologne: , 1998. . Both artists had developed a new sub-style that had great significance shortly thereafter within the context of their Cubist works. , and , in the Netherlands, developed a similar mosaic-like Divisionist technique circa 1909. The later (1909–1916) would adapt the style, in part influenced by 's Parisian experience (from 1907), into their dynamic paintings and sculpture.Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968


Divisionism in Italy
The influence of Seurat and Signac on some Italian painters became evident in the First Triennale in 1891 in . Spearheaded by Grubicy de Dragon, and codified later by in his Principi scientifici del divisionismo of 1906, a number of painters mainly in Northern Italy experimented to various degrees with these techniques.

Pellizza da Volpedo applied the technique to social (and political) subjects; in this he was joined by and . Among Pellizza's Divisionist works were Speranze deluse (1894) and Il sole nascente (1904). Il Sole Nascente is found at the Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna, Rome. It was, however, in the subject of landscapes that divisionism found strong advocates, including Giovanni Segantini, Gaetano Previati, Angelo Morbelli and . Further adherents in painting subjects were , , Giuseppe Cominetti, Camillo Innocenti, and . Divisionism was also in important influence in the work of ( Souvenirs de Voyage, 1911); ( Arc Lamp, 1909); Arc Lamp is found in Museum of Modern Art, New York Carlo Carrà ( Leaving the scene, 1910); and ( The City Rises, 1910). The City Rises is also found in the MoMADerived from paragraph in Associazione Pellizza da Volpedo , which cites Enciclopedia dell'arte, Milano (Garzanti) 2002, and also see Voci del Divisionismo italiano in Bollettino Anisa, N. 12 Anno XIX, n. 1, May 2000.


Criticism and controversy
Divisionism quickly received both negative and positive attention from , who generally either embraced or condemned the incorporation of scientific theories in the Neo-Impressionist techniques. For example, Joris-Karl Huysmans spoke negatively of Seurat's paintings, saying "Strip his figures of the colored fleas that cover them, underneath there is nothing, no thought, no soul, nothing".Rewald, John. Seurat: a biography. New York: H.N. Abrams, 1990. . Leaders of Impressionism, such as and , refused to exhibit with Seurat, and even , who initially supported Divisionism, later spoke negatively of the technique.

While most divisionists did not receive much critical approval, some critics were loyal to the movement, including notably Félix Fénéon, Arsène Alexandre and Antoine de la Rochefoucauld.


Scientific misconceptions
Although Divisionist artists strongly believed their style was founded in scientific principles, some people believe that there is evidence that Divisionists misinterpreted some basic elements of optical theory.Lee, Alan. "Seurat and Science." Art History 10 (June 1987): 203-24. For example, one of these misconceptions can be seen in the general belief that the Divisionist method of painting allowed for greater luminosity than previous techniques. Additive luminosity is only applicable in the case of colored light, not juxtaposed pigments; in reality, the luminosity of two pigments next to each other is just the average of their individual luminosities. Furthermore, it is not possible to create a color using optical mixture that could not also be created by physical mixture. Logical inconsistencies can also be found with the Divisionist exclusion of darker colors and their interpretation of simultaneous contrast.


Gallery
File:Georges Seurat, 1889-90, Le Chahut, Kröller-Müller Museum (detail).jpg|, 1889–90, , Kröller-Müller Museum (detail) File:Theo Van Rysselberghe portrait-of-irma-sethe-1894.jpg|Théo van Rysselberghe, 1894, Portrait of Irma Sèthe File:Henri Matisse, 1899, Still Life with Compote, Apples and Oranges, oil on canvas, 46.4 x 55.6 cm, The Cone Collection, Baltimore Museum of Art.jpg|, 1899, Still Life with Compote, Apples and Oranges, Baltimore Museum of Art File:Pablo Picasso, 1901, Old Woman (Woman with Gloves), oil on cardboard, 67 x 52.1 cm, Philadelphia Museum of Art.jpg|, 1901, Old Woman (Woman with Gloves, Woman With Jewelry), Philadelphia Museum of Art File:André Derain, 1905, Le séchage des voiles (The Drying Sails), oil on canvas, 82 x 101 cm, Pushkin Museum, Moscow. Exhibited at the 1905 Salon d'Automne.jpg|André Derain, 1905, Le séchage des voiles (The Drying Sails), File:Jean Metzinger, c.1905, Baigneuses, Deux nus dans un jardin exotique, oil on canvas, 116 x 88.8 cm, Colección Carmen Thyssen-Bornemisza.jpg|, c.1905, Baigneuses, Deux nus dans un jardin exotique (Two Nudes in an Exotic Landscape), File:Robert Antoine Pinchon, 1905, La Seine à Rouen au crépuscule, oil on paperboard, 65 x 54 cm.jpg|Robert Antoine Pinchon, 1905, La Seine à Rouen au crépuscule File:Robert Delaunay, c.1906, Paysage au disque solaire, oil on canvas, 54 x 46 cm, Musée National d'Art Moderne.jpg|, 1906, Paysage au disque, Musée National d'Art Moderne File:La fuite des nymphes.jpg|Henri-Edmond Cross, 1906, La fuite des nymphes, Musée d'Orsay File:Dune III, by Piet Mondriaan.jpg|, 1909, Dune III, Gemeentemuseum Den Haag File:Paul Signac, 1909, The Pine Tree at Saint Tropez, oil on canvas, 72 x 92 cm, Pushkin Museum, Moscow.jpg|, 1909, The Pine Tree at Saint Tropez, File:Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage, oil on canvas, 47 x 75 cm, private collection.jpg|, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage ( Memories of a Journey, Ricordi di viaggio), private collection File:Hippolyte Petitjean - Pont neuf.jpg|Hippolyte Petitjean, c.1912, Le Pont Neuf, Metropolitan Museum of Art


See also


Further reading
  • Blanc, Charles. The Grammar of Painting and Engraving. Chicago: S.C. Griggs and Company, 1891. [4].
  • Block, Jane. "Neo-Impressionism." Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. [5].
  • Block, Jane. "Pointillism." Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. [6].
  • , ed. Seurat in Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978. .
  • Cachin, Françoise. Paul Signac. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society, 1971. .
  • Clement, Russell T., and Annick Houzé. Neo-impressionist painters: a sourcebook on Georges Seurat, Camille Pissarro, Paul Signac, Théo van Rysselberghe, Henri Edmond Cross, Charles Angrand, Maximilien Luce, and Albert Dubois-Pillet. Westport, CT: Greenwood P, 1999. .
  • Chevreul, Michel Eugène. The Principles of Harmony and Contrast of Colors. London: Henry G. Bohn, York Street, Covent Garden, 1860
  • Dorra, Henri. Symbolist Art Theories: A Critical Anthology. Berkeley: U of California, 1994.
  • Gage, John. "The Technique of Seurat: A Reappraisal." The Art Bulletin 69 (Sep. 1987): 448-54. JSTOR. The Technique of Seurat: A Reappraisal.
  • Herbert, Robert. Georges Seurat, 1859-1891, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1991. .
  • Herbert, Robert L. Neo-Impressionism. New York: The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 1968.
  • Hutton, John G. Neo-impressionism and the search for solid ground: art, science, and anarchism in fin-de-siècle France. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State UP, 1994. .
  • Puppo, Dario del. "Il Quarto Stato." Science and Society, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 13, 1994.
  • Meighan, Judith. "In Praise of Motherhood: The Promise and Failure of Painting for Social Reform in Late-Nineteenth-Century Italy." Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2002.
  • "Radical Light: Italy's Divisionist Painters." History Today, August 2008.
  • Rewald, John. Georges Seurat. New York: Wittenborn & Co., 1946.
  • Roslak, Robyn. Neo-Impressionism and Anarchism in Fin-de-Siecle France: Painting, Politics and Landscape. N.p.: n.p., 2007.
  • Signac, Paul. D’Eugène Delacroix au Neo-Impressionnisme. 1899. [10].
  • Winkfield, Trevor. "The Signac Syndrome." Modern Painters Autumn 2001: 66-70.
  • Tim Parks on divisionist movement of painters in Italy


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time