Product Code Database
Example Keywords: world of -modern $60
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Carphodactylidae
Tag Wiki 'Carphodactylidae'.
Tag

The Carphodactylidae, informally known as the southern padless geckos, are a family of , in the . The family consists of 34 described in 7 , all of which are to . They belong to the superfamily (or Diplodactyloidea), an ancient group of east geckos now only found in . Despite their well-developed limbs, molecular phylogenies have demonstrated that Carphodactylidae is the to , a highly specialized family of legless lizards.

Carphodactylids, despite being the most species-poor family of geckos, are still diverse in habits. Many have unusual, specialized tails with reduced rates of . They lack adhesive toepads and instead cling to bark or substrate with sharply curved claws and a limited array of lamellae. Carphodactylids are relatively large by gecko standards; most are and all are , with a typical clutch size of two eggs. Unlike most Australian geckos, species diversity is concentrated in humid forests along the northeastern edge of Australia. Nevertheless, some genera are diverse in arid regions as well.

(2025). 9780123869203, Elsevier.
(2025). 9781421438238, Johns Hopkins University Press.


Genera
The following are considered members of the Carphodactylidae:, , (2004). "Phylogenetic relationships among gekkotan lizards inferred from c-mos nuclear DNA sequences and a new classification of the Gekkota". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 353– 368. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00393.x, (2011). "Systematics and evolution of the Australian knob-tail geckos ( Nephrurus, Carphodactylidae, Gekkota): plesiomorphic grades and biome shifts through the Miocene". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59 (3): 664–674.


Günther, 1897Chameleon gecko1

N. laevissimus
Günther, 1876Knob-tailed geckos11
Couper, Covacevich, & , 2000Long-necked northern leaf-tailed gecko1

P. nepthys
P. platurus (Shaw, 1790)Schinz, 1822Australian leaf-tailed geckos11

S. swaini
S. cornutus (Ogilby, 1892)Couper, Covacevich & Moritz, 1993Australian leaf-tailed geckos7

U. milii
U. milii (Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1825), 1965Thick-tailed or barking geckos2
U. sphyrurus (Ogilby, 1892)& , 2011Border thick-tailed gecko1


Classification

Historical usage (Carphodactylini)
Members of the family now known as Carphodactylidae were first grouped together in Kluge (1967)'s reconfiguration of gecko systematics. He named a tribe, Carphodactylini, which included Carphodactylus, Nephrurus, and Phyllurus ("padless carphodactylins") as close relatives in a subgroup. The tribe also included Pseudothecadactylus and all and geckos ("padded carphodactylins") in another subgroup. Carphodactylini was diagnosed by a large patch of preanal pores formed by multiple rows, though these pores were noted as vestigial in Nephrurus and absent in Phyllurus.

Under Kluge's classification scheme, Carphodactylini was the to , which contained other Australian legged geckos. Both tribes formed the within the family , alongside the legless lizards of the subfamily . "Padless carphodactylins" (particularly Carphodactylus) were considered the most primitive and generalized members of Carphodactylini, and by extension Diplodactylinae. A morphological phylogenetic analysis by (1990) generally supported Kluge's classification scheme, though the internal relationships of carphodactylin species were very different.

Summary of Kluge's classification scheme:

Results of Bauer, 1990:

However, the and structure of Carphodactylini (as defined by morphological traits) started to become unclear once molecular phylogenies were developed. King (1987) found that Nephrurus and Phyllurus apparently retained an ancestral structure, but that Carphodactylus, "padded carphodactylins", and several species of (a supposed diplodactylin) shared a derived structure, necessitating a major revision of Kluge's structure. However, there is much debate over whether chromosomes are useful for inferring gecko systematics. Donnellan et al. (1999) estimated gecko relationships using C-mos, a conserved throughout . Their results considered Carphodactylini to be a assemblage, with and Pseudothecadactylus incrementally closer to diplodactylins (including Oedura).

Simplified results of Donnellan et al., 1999, focusing on Australasian geckos:


Modern usage (Carphodactylidae)
Carphodactylidae, in its present-day usage, was codified by et al. (2004). They expanded on the study of Donnellan et al. (1999), and found that Carphodactylini and Diplodactylinae, as previously used, were . "Padless carphodactylins" formed a clade sister to pygopodines, while "padded carphodactylins" formed a grade of geckos basal to diplodactylins. This prompted several renames of major clades. The clade of "padless carphodactylins" was given the new family Carphodactylidae, while the family was erected to encompass traditional diplodactylins and "padded carphodactylins". The family was basically restricted to the legless pygopodines, and subsequent studies would rename the Australasian radiation to or Diplodactyloidea.

Simplified results of Han et al., 2004, using new names as defined in the study:

Although placing carphodactylids sister to pygopodids was an unusual result, nearly all subsequent molecular phylogenies have supported it. Shared morphological traits are scant, but the two families both have an unusually complex with its lower end wrapping around the rear branch of the . & Bauer (2011) looked into carphodactylid ingroup relationships in more depth using an analysis based on C-mos along with RAG1 (a nuclear gene) and ND2 (a mitochondrial gene). They had difficulty with resolving the base of Carphodactylidae, but strongly supported the erection of a new genus, . et al. (2019) found a different result while running phylogenetic analyses on 4268 ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) in diplodactyloid geckos. Their analysis placed Orraya as the earliest-diverging carphodactylid, suggesting that the ancestral habit for the family may have been similar to the cryptic leaf-tailed genera ( Orraya, Phyllurus, Saltuarius).

Simplified results of the combined nuclear and mitochondrial analysis of Oliver & Bauer, 2011:

Simplified results of Skipwith et al., 2019:

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time