Product Code Database
Example Keywords: energy -tetris $35-109
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Carletonomys
Tag Wiki 'Carletonomys'.
Tag

Carletonomys
 (

 C O N T E N T S 

Carletonomys cailoi is an from the () of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Although known only from a single (upper jaw) with the first molar, its features are so distinctive that it is placed in its own , Carletonomys. Discovered in 1998 and formally described in 2008, it is part of a well-defined group of rodents that also includes , , , and . This group is characterized by progressive specializations and a reduction in the complexity of molar morphology.

The single known molar is high-crowned () and flat-crowned (planar) and is distinctive in lacking the ridge that connects the front to the middle part of the molar, the , and in the configuration of another ridge, the . Carletonomys was probably and lived in a wet habitat.


Taxonomy
Carletonomys cailoi was discovered in 1998 in a deposit in San Cayetano Partido, southeastern Buenos Aires Province. The context suggests this locality is slightly over 1 million years old ( South American Land Mammal Age), making Carletonomys the oldest known oryzomyine.Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1276 The single known specimen is now in the collections of the Museo de La Plata. It was initially referred to the genus , which is currently known only from the island of Fernando de Noronha off northeastern , but in 2008 Argentinean mammalogist Ulyses Pardiñas established it as the of a new genus and species of rodent in a publication in the Journal of Mammalogy. The generic name, Carletonomys, combines the name of American mammalogist Michael Carleton with the μυς mys "mouse"Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1271 and the specific name, cailoi, honors Argentinean biologist Carlos "Cailo" Galliari.Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1272

The fossil has a number of features that suggest a relation to a group of rodents that includes the South American marsh rat , its living relatives and , and the extinct and Holochilus primigenus.Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1275 They share high-crowned () molars and several simplifications of molar morphology,Pardiñas, 2008, pp. 1273–1274; Weksler, 2006, p. 131 as well as other features that cannot be assessed in Carletonomys, which indicate specializations towards a lifestyle.Weksler, 2006, p. 131 It shows the most similarity to Noronhomys and Holochilus, so much so that Pardiñas considered placing it in either of these two genera, but its distinctive morphological features justify placement in a separate genus.Pardiñas, 2008, pp. 1274–1275

This group of genera encompasses only a small part of the diversity of the tribe , a group of over a hundred species distributed mainly in South America, including nearby islands such as the Galápagos Islands and some of the . Oryzomyini is one of several tribes recognized within the , which encompasses hundreds of species found across South America and into southern North America. Sigmodontinae itself is the largest subfamily of the family , other members of which include , , , and , all mainly from Eurasia and North America.Musser and Carleton, 2005


Description
The holotype is a right (upper jaw) with the upper first molar (M1) in it. It is broken off behind the M1, but much of the front part is preserved, including the , the flattened front portion of the (cheekbone). The M1 is moderately worn, indicating that it is from an adult individual. With an M1 length of 3.59 mm and width of 2.53 mm, C. cailoi was one of the largest oryzomyines known, rivaled only by and the extinct Antillean and " ".Pardiñas, 2008, table 1; Ray, 1962 The height of the M1 is 1.37 mm and it has four roots, including a large one in front, another large one on the inner (lingual) side, and two smaller ones on the outer (labial) side. The presence of a second labial root is a variable character among oryzomyines, occurring among others in Holochilus and Pseudoryzomys but not in Lundomys. The maxilla itself shows few significant characters. The back margin of the , which perforates the between the upper and the molars, is not visible, suggesting that the foramen was short, as in Holochilus. The configuration of the zygomatic plate shows features that distinguish C. cailoi from some of its relatives.Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1273

The molar is plane and hypsodont: the crowns are relatively high and the main cusps are about as high as the other parts of the crown, as they are in Holochilus. Most other oryzomyines have bunodont and brachydont molars, in which the crowns are lower and the cusps are higher than the rest of the crown.Weksler, 2006, p. 44 As in closely related species, the front part of the molar is relatively simple, lacking an , an additional ridge that is well-developed in most oryzomyines.Pardiñas, 2008, fig. 1; Weksler, 2006, p. 45 A shallow anteromedian flexus is present, superficially dividing the front cusp (). Uniquely, the , which connects the anterocone to the rest of the crown, is absent; although this structure is sometimes missing in young individuals of other oryzomyines, it usually develops as a result of wear in adults.Pardiñas, 2008, pp. 1272–1273 The two cusps on the middle part of the molar, the and the , are broadly connected. The , which connects the middle to the back pair of cusps, is attached to the back of the paracone. A complete is present, descending from the median mure slightly behind the paracone. The configuration of the paracone–median mure–mesoloph complex is unique to Carletonomys. The two posterior cusps, the and the , are connected at the back margin of the molar. Unlike in most oryzomyines, no is present, so that the metacone is situated directly at the back margin.Pardiñas, 2008, fig. 1; p. 1273


Ecology
Carletonomys was found in association with remains of several other animals, including fishes, turtles, frogs, birds, armadillos, and several rodents, including Reithrodon auritus, the ( Myocastor), both of which still live in the area, the extinct , and unidentified and . C. cailoi probably lived in a habitat under relatively warm and moist climatic conditions. Although the limited material known permits few inferences as to the animal's natural history, it likely fed on hard plant material, as do related, morphologically similar extant species.


Bibliography

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs