Product Code Database
Example Keywords: ipad -arcade $36
   » » Wiki: Aletopelta
Tag Wiki 'Aletopelta'.
Tag

Aletopelta (; meaning 'wanderer shield') is a of basal from Southern that lived during the (upper stage, 75.5 Ma) in what is now the Point Loma Formation. The type and only species, Aletopelta coombsi, is known from a partial preserving osteoderms. It was originally described in 1996 by W. P. Coombs, Jr. and T.A. Deméré before being named in 2001 by Tracy Ford and James Kirkland. Aletopelta has an estimated size of 5 metres (16 feet) and weight of 2 tonnes (4,409 lbs). The formed a miniature and was scavenged upon by and .


Discovery and naming
In 1987, construction work was done on the College Boulevard near Carlsbad at the Californian coast. While paleontologically surveying the work, Bradford Riney noted that a skeleton had been uncovered by a ditch dug for a sewage pipe. Within days, the specimen was secured by the San Diego Natural History Museum. It was dubbed the "Carlsbad Ankylosaur".W.P. Coombs, Jr. and T.A. Deméré, 1996, "A Late Cretaceous nodosaurid ankylosaur (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from marine sediments of coastal California", Journal of Paleontology 70(2): 311-326 The skeleton was later described, but not named, in 1996 by Thomas Deméré and Walter Preston Coombs before being named in 2001 by Tracy Lee Ford and James Kirkland.T.L. Ford and J.I. Kirkland, 2001, "Carlsbad ankylosaur (Ornithischia, Ankylosauria): an ankylosaurid and not a nodosaurid", In: The Armored Dinosaurs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington pp 239-260 The skeleton originated from a layer of the marine Point Loma Formation which dates to the upper stage, 75.5 Ma. The formation has yielded specimens pertaining to calcareous nannoplankton, foraminifers, scaphopods, pelecypods, gastropods, cephalopods, ostracods, decapods, echinoids, elasmobranchs, and actinopterygians, with the addition of a , right containing and cervical of a .Hilton ( Dinosaurs and Other Mesozoic Reptiles of California, 2003), pp. 233-36. The type and only known specimen of Aletopelta was once a bloated carcass that had been washed out to sea, likely by a stream, which sank to the bottom with its underside facing upwards and became a miniature , as evidence by Pelecypoda such as sp. and sp. being attached to the bones and the presence of and gastropods found in association with the skeleton. The carcass was also scavenged upon by marine invertebrates and sharks such as and , which resulted with most of the long bones being hollow and many shallow pits on the osteoderms and ribs. The specimen, SDNHM 33909, consists of , fragmentary , partial , partial , possible fragment of right radius, , partial left and possibly right , , , , four or five partial , dorsal neural arch, neural arches of the , fragmentary , including shield and cervical half ring. The type specimen may represent an immature individual based on the unfused , partly fused scutes and unfused neural spines.

The generic name, Aletopelta, is composed of the words " aletes" (wanderer) and " pelte" (small shield), in reference to its armour and the fact that the containing the Peninsular Ranges Terrane was somewhere opposite the middle of in the Cretaceous, only moving northward due to , carrying the holotype specimen with it. The specific name, coombsi, honours the vertebrate palaeontologist Walter Preston Coombs, Jr., for their work and years of research.


Description

Size and distinguishing traits
Ford & Kirkland (2001) originally gave Aletopelta an estimated length of 6 metres (19.7 feet). However, Gregory S. Paul gave a lower estimate of 5 metres (16 feet) long and weight of 2 tonnes (4,409 lbs) in 2010.Paul, G.S., 2010, The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs, Princeton University Press p. 233

Ford and Kirkland (2001) originally diagnosed Aletopelta based on the teeth being wider than tall; the femur being much longer than both the tibia and fibula; the presence of three metatarsals; a pelvic shield composed of polygonal, low-peaked osteoderms; a large short-pointed spike in the shoulder region; the presence of hollow cap-like osteoderms across dorsum; the presence of hollow pup-tent-like osteoderms over neck and shoulders; triangular, dorsally compressed caudal osteoderms that are highly asymmetrical from top to bottom; and hollow and thin osteoderms. However, Arbour & Currie (2015) later diagnosed Aletopelta based on the presence of hexagonal pelvic osteoderms that form a semi-continuous sheet over the pelvis; the pelvic osteoderms lack a dendritic surface texture; the first cervical half ring is composed of osteoderms fused to an underlying bony band rather than being closely appressed adjacent osteoderms.


Classification
Deméré & Coombs (1996) originally interpreted SDNHM 33909 as an indeterminate that showed similarities with , and but refrained from naming it as they considered it to be undiagnostic. Ford (2000) considered that SDNHM 33909 formed the clade Stegopeltinae, along with Stegopelta and , within based on the presence of a pelvic shield composed of co-ossified hexagonal osteoderms.T.L. Ford. (2000). "A review of ankylosaur osteoderms from New Mexico and a preliminary review of ankylosaur armor", In: S. G. Lucas and A. B. Heckert (eds.), Dinosaurs of New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 17: 157-176 Ford & Kirkland (2001) also reinterpreted it as an ankylosaurid and considered it to be taxonomically distinct enough to be warranted as a new genus and species. Vickaryous et al. (2004) considered Aletopelta as a due to the lack of diagnostic characteristics.
(2025). 9780520242098, University of California Press.
Arbour & Currie (2015), however, considered it as a valid genus based on new characteristics and found Stegopeltinae to not be a valid clade. Arbour & Currie (2015) additionally recovered Aletopelta within a containing , , and more derived ankylosaurids. A similar position was recovered by Arbour & Evans (2017) and Rivera-Sylva et al. (2018) but also placed , , and within the polytomy. Park et al. (2019) also placed Aletopelta within a polytomy but with the inclusion of , and . Although most often being recovered as a basal ankylosaurid, Frauenfelder et al. (2022) found it to be the basalmost nodosaurid.

The results of a phylogenetic analysis conducted by Arbour & Currie (2015) is reproduced below.


See also
  • Timeline of ankylosaur research


External links
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs