Product Code Database
Example Keywords: gps -cave $1-118
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Synapsida
Tag Wiki 'Synapsida'.
Tag

Synapsida is a diverse group of that includes all and their extinct relatives. It is one of the two major of the group , the other being the more diverse group (which includes all extant and therefore, ). Unlike other amniotes, synapsids have a single temporal fenestra, an opening low in the behind each , leaving a beneath each; this accounts for the name "synapsid". The distinctive temporal fenestra developed about 318 million years ago during the Late Carboniferous period, when synapsids and sauropsids diverged, but was subsequently merged with the orbit in early mammals.

The basal amniotes () from which synapsids evolved were historically simply called "reptiles". Therefore, synapsids were then described as mammal-like reptiles in classical systematics, and non- synapsids were also referred to as or pelycosaur-grade synapsids. These terms have now fallen out of favor and are only used informally (if at all) in modern literature, as it is now known that all extant reptiles are more closely related to each other and birds than to synapsids, so the word "reptile" has been re-defined to mean only members of Sauropsida or even just an under-clade thereof. In a sense, synapsids are in fact a of sauropsids, rather than a part of the sauropsid lineage.

(1988). 9780716718222, W.H. Freeman & Co..
(2025). 9780632056378, Blackwell Science Ltd.
Therefore, calling synapsids "mammal-like reptiles" is incorrect under the new definition of "reptile", so they are now referred to as stem mammals, proto-mammals, paramammals or pan-mammals. Most lineages of pelycosaur-grade synapsids were replaced by the more advanced therapsids, which evolved from pelycosaurs, at the end of the Early Permian during the so-called Olson's Extinction.

Synapsids were the largest terrestrial vertebrates in the period (299 to 251 mya), rivalled only by some large such as . They were the dominant land of the late and early , with such as , and being the during the Permian, and such as during the . Synapsid population and diversity were severely reduced by the Capitanian mass extinction event and the Permian–Triassic extinction event, and only two groups of therapsids, the and (consisting of and ) are known to have survived into the . These therapsids rebounded as during the early Mesozoic, with the dicynodont making up as much as 95% of all land species at one time,

(2025). 9780500285732, Thames & Hudson.
but declined again after the Smithian–Spathian boundary event with their dominant largely taken over by the rise of sauropsids, first by the and then by the and . The cynodont group , which includes the group , were the only synapsids to survive beyond the Triassic, and mammals are the only synapsid lineage that have survived past the , having lived mostly nocturnally to avoid competition with dinosaurs. After the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction wiped out all non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs, synapsids (as mammals) rose to dominance once again during the .


Linnaean and cladistic classifications
At the turn of the 20th century, synapsids were thought to be one of the four main subclasses of . However, this notion was disproved upon closer inspection of skeletal remains, as synapsids are differentiated from reptiles by their distinctive temporal openings. These openings in the bones allowed the attachment of larger jaw muscles, hence a more efficient bite.

Synapsids were subsequently considered to be a later reptilian lineage that became mammals by gradually increasingly mammalian features, hence the name "mammal-like reptiles" (also known as ). These became the traditional terms for all (early) synapsids. More recent studies have debunked this notion as well, and reptiles are now classified within (sauropsids), the sister group to synapsids, thus making synapsids their own group.

As a result, the terms "mammal-like reptile" and "pelycosaur" are seen as outdated and disfavored in technical literature, and the term stem mammal (or sometimes protomammal or paramammal) is used instead. , it is now understood that synapsids comprise an independent branch of the tree of life. The of Synapsida is not in doubt, and the expressions such as "Synapsida contains the mammals" and "synapsids gave rise to the mammals" both express the same phylogenetic hypothesis. This terminology reflects the modern approach to animal relationships, according to which the only valid groups are those that include all of the descendants of a common ancestor: these are known as groups, or .

Additionally, (reptiles) has been revised into a monophyletic group and is considered entirely distinct from Synapsida, falling within , the sister group of Synapsida within Amniota.


Primitive and advanced synapsids
The synapsids are traditionally divided for convenience, into , an advanced group of synapsids and the branch within which mammals evolved, and stem mammals, (previously known as ), comprising the other six more primitive families of synapsids.Benton, Michael J. (2005). Vertebrate Paleontology, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. . p. 120. Stem mammals were all rather lizard-like, with sprawling gait and possibly horny , while therapsids tended to have a more erect pose and possibly hair, at least in some forms. In traditional taxonomy, the Synapsida encompasses two distinct grades: the low-slung stem mammals have given rise to the more erect therapsids, who in their turn have given rise to the mammals. In traditional vertebrate classification, the stem mammals and therapsids were both considered orders of the subclass Synapsida.


Practical versus phylogenetic usage of "synapsid" and "therapsid"
In phylogenetic nomenclature, the terms are used somewhat differently, as the daughter clades are included. Most papers published during the 21st century have treated "Pelycosaur" as an informal grouping of primitive members. Therapsida has remained in use as a clade containing both the traditional therapsid families and mammals.

Although Synapsida and Therapsida include modern mammals, in practical usage, those two terms are used almost exclusively when referring to the more basal members that lie outside of .


Characteristics

Temporal openings
Synapsids evolved a temporal fenestra behind each eye orbit on the lateral surface of the skull. It may have provided new attachment sites for jaw muscles. A similar development took place in the , which evolved two rather than one opening behind each eye. Originally, the openings in the skull left the inner cranium covered only by the jaw muscles, but in higher therapsids and mammals, the has expanded to close the opening. This has left the lower margin of the opening as an arch extending from the lower edges of the braincase.


Teeth
Synapsids are characterized by having differentiated teeth. These include the , , and .Angielczch, Kennenth; Kammerer, Christian F.; Frobisch, Jorg. (2013). Early Evolutionary History of Synapsida. Springer Science & Business Media. , p. 11 The trend towards differentiation is found in some and early reptilians in the form of enlargement of the first teeth on the , forming a sort of protocanines. This trait was subsequently lost in the line, but developed further in the synapsids. Early synapsids could have two or even three enlarged "canines", but in the therapsids, the pattern had settled to one canine in each upper jaw half. The lower canines developed later.


Jaw
The jaw transition is a good classification tool, as most other fossilized features that make a chronological progression from a reptile-like to a mammalian condition follow the progression of the jaw transition. The , or lower jaw, consists of a single, tooth-bearing bone in mammals (the dentary), whereas the lower jaw of modern and prehistoric reptiles consists of a conglomeration of smaller bones (including the dentary, , and others). As they evolved in synapsids, these jaw bones were reduced in size and either lost or, in the case of the articular, gradually moved into the ear, forming one of the middle ear bones: while modern mammals possess the , and , basal synapsids (like all other tetrapods) possess only a stapes. The malleus is derived from the articular (a lower jaw bone), while the incus is derived from the (a cranial bone).Salentijn, L. Biology of Mineralized Tissues: Prenatal Skull Development, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine post-graduate dental lecture series, 2007

Mammalian jaw structures are also set apart by the dentary-squamosal jaw joint. In this form of jaw joint, the dentary forms a connection with a depression in the known as the . In contrast, all other jawed vertebrates, including reptiles and nonmammalian synapsids, possess a jaw joint in which one of the smaller bones of the lower jaw, the articular, makes a connection with a bone of the called the to form the articular-quadrate jaw joint. In forms transitional to mammals, the jaw joint is composed of a large, lower jaw bone (similar to the dentary found in mammals) that does not connect to the squamosal, but connects to the quadrate with a receding articular bone.


Palate
Over time, as synapsids became more mammalian and less 'reptilian', they began to develop a , separating the mouth and . In early synapsids, a secondary palate began to form on the sides of the , still leaving the mouth and nostril connected.

Eventually, the two sides of the palate began to curve together, forming a U shape instead of a C shape. The palate also began to extend back toward the throat, securing the entire mouth and creating a full . The maxilla is also closed completely. In fossils of one of the first , the beginnings of a palate are clearly visible. The later has a full and completely closed palate, forming a clear progression.


Skin and fur
In addition to the glandular skin covered in fur found in most modern mammals, modern and extinct synapsids possess a variety of modified skin coverings, including (bony armor embedded in the skin), (protective structures of the dermis often with a horny covering), hair or fur, and scale-like structures (often formed from modified hair, as in and some ). While the skin of reptiles is rather thin, that of mammals has a thick layer.
(2025). 9780471295051, John Wiley & Sons.

The ancestral skin type of synapsids has been subject to discussion. The type specimen of the oldest known synapsid preserved scales. Impressions of are preserved in the () synapsid trace fossil Bromackerichnus requiescens from the Tambach Formation (), the only known early synapsid body impression most likely belonging to a based on its association with . Among the early synapsids, only two species of small have been found to possess ; fossilized rows of indicate bony armour on the neck and back. However, some recent studies have cast doubt on the placement of Varanopidae in Synapsida, while others have countered and lean towards this traditional placement. Skin impressions indicate some early synapsids basal possessed rectangular scutes on their undersides and tails. The pelycosaur scutes probably were nonoverlapping structures with a horny overlay, like those found in modern and . These differed in structure from the , which are an epidermal feature (like mammalian hair or avian feathers). Recently, skin impressions from the genus suggest that at least varanopsids developed scales similar to those of .

It is currently unknown exactly when mammalian characteristics such as and first appeared, as the fossils only rarely provide direct evidence for soft tissues. An exceptionally well-preserved skull of , a therapsid from the Upper Permian, preserves smooth skin with what appear to be glandular depressions,

(2025). 9780071122351, McGraw-Hill. .
an animal noted as being semi-. The oldest known fossil showing unambiguous imprints of hair is the (late middle ) and several contemporary , both non-mammalian
See also the news item at
(see below, however). More primitive members of the are also hypothesized to have had fur or a fur-like covering based on their inferred warm-blooded metabolism. While more direct evidence of fur in early cynodonts has been proposed in the form of small pits on the snout possibly associated with , such pits are also found in some reptiles that lack whiskers. There is evidence that some other non-mammalian cynodonts more basal than Castorocauda, such as , had , which are associated with the grooming and maintenance of fur. The apparent absence of these glands in non-mammaliaformes may suggest that fur did not originate until that point in synapsid evolution. It is possible that fur and associated features of true warm-bloodedness did not appear until some synapsids became extremely small and nocturnal, necessitating a higher metabolism. The oldest examples of nocturnality in synapsids is believed to have been in species that lived more than 300 million years ago.

However, from Russia and possibly South Africa showcase that at least some synapsids did already have pre-mammalian hair in this epoch. These are the oldest impressions of hair-like structures on synapsids.


Mammary glands
Early synapsids, as far back as their known evolutionary debut in the Late Carboniferous period, may have laid parchment-shelled (leathery) eggs, which lacked a calcified layer, as most modern reptiles and do. This may also explain why there is no fossil evidence for synapsid eggs to date. Because they were vulnerable to , secretions from apocrine-like glands may have helped keep the eggs moist.

According to Oftedal, early synapsids may have buried the eggs into moisture laden soil, hydrating them with contact with the moist skin, or may have carried them in a moist pouch, similar to that of monotremes ( carry their eggs and offspring via a temporary pouch), though this would limit the mobility of the parent. The latter may have been the primitive form of egg care in synapsids rather than simply burying the eggs, and the constraint on the parent's mobility would have been solved by having the eggs "parked" in nests during foraging or other activities and periodically be hydrated, allowing higher clutch sizes than could fit inside a pouch (or pouches) at once, and large eggs, which would be cumbersome to carry in a pouch, would be easier to care for. The basis of Oftedal's speculation is the fact that many species of anurans can carry eggs or tadpoles attached to the skin, or embedded within cutaneous "pouches" and how most curl around their eggs to keep them moist, both groups also having glandular skin.

The glands involved in this mechanism would later evolve into true mammary glands with multiple modes of secretion in association with hair follicles. Comparative analyses of the evolutionary origin of milk constituents support a scenario in which the secretions from these glands evolved into a complex, nutrient-rich milk long before true mammals arose (with some of the constituents possibly predating the split between the synapsid and lines). were almost certainly able to produce this, which allowed a progressive decline of yolk mass and thus egg size, resulting in increasingly hatchlings as milk became the primary source of nutrition, which is all evidenced by the small body size, the presence of , and limited tooth replacement in advanced cynodonts, as well as in .


Patagia
Aerial locomotion first began in non-mammalian cynodonts, with , , and bearing exquisitely preserved, fur-covered wing membranes that stretch across the limbs and tail. Their fingers are elongated, similar to those of bats and and likely sharing similar roles both as wing supports and to hang on tree branches.

Within true mammals, aerial locomotion first occurs in . A fossil has an exquisitely preserved furry with delicate wrinkles and that is very extensive, "sandwiching" the poorly preserved hands and feet and extending to the base of the tail. , a close relative, shares a similar femur adapted for flight stresses, indicating a similar lifestyle.

mammals would only achieve powered flight and gliding long after these early aeronauts became extinct, with the earliest-known gliding and evolving in the .


Metabolism
Recently, it has been found that was developed as early as in the late Carboniferous. The presence of fibrolamellar, a specialised type of bone that can grow quickly while maintaining a stable structure, shows that Ophiacodon would have used its high internal body temperature to fuel a fast growth comparable to modern endotherms.


Evolutionary history
Over the course of synapsid evolution, progenitor taxa at the start of adaptive radiations have tended to be derived carnivores. Synapsid adaptive radiations have generally occurred after extinction events that depleted the biosphere and left vacant niches open to be filled by newly evolved taxa. In non-mammaliaform synapsids, those taxa that gave rise to rapidly diversifying lineages have been both small and large in body size, although after the Late Triassic, progenitors of new synapsid lineages have generally been small, unspecialised generalists.

The earliest known synapsid coexisted with the earliest known sauropsid which lived during the age of the Late Carboniferous. It was one of many types of primitive synapsids that are now informally grouped together as stem mammals or sometimes as protomammals (previously known as ). The early synapsids spread and diversified, becoming the largest terrestrial animals in the latest Carboniferous and periods, ranging up to in length. They were sprawling, bulky, possibly cold-blooded, and had small brains. Some, such as Dimetrodon, had large sails that might have helped . A few relict groups lasted into the later Permian but, by the middle of the Late Permian, all had either died off or evolved into their successors, the therapsids.

The therapsids, a more advanced group of synapsids, appeared during the and included the largest terrestrial animals in the Middle and . They included herbivores and carnivores, ranging from small animals the size of a rat (e.g.: ), to large, bulky herbivores a ton or more in weight (e.g.: ). After flourishing for many millions of years, these successful animals were all but wiped out by the Permian–Triassic mass extinction about 250 mya, the largest known in Earth's history, possibly related to the volcanic event.

Only a few therapsids went on to be successful in the new early landscape; they include and , the latter of which appeared later in the Early Triassic. However, they were accompanied by the early (soon to give rise to the ). Some of these archosaurs, such as , were small and lightly built, while others, such as , were as big as or bigger than the largest therapsids.

After the Permian extinction, the synapsids did not count more than three surviving clades. The first comprised the , which only lasted the first 20 million years of the Triassic period. The second were specialised, beaked herbivores known as (such as the ), which contained some members that reached large size (up to a tonne or more). And finally there were the increasingly mammal-like carnivorous, herbivorous, and insectivorous cynodonts, including the from the age, an early representative of which was Cynognathus.

Unlike the dicynodonts, which were large, the cynodonts became progressively smaller and more mammal-like as the Triassic progressed, though some forms like remained large. The first mammaliaforms evolved from the cynodonts during the early age of the Late Triassic, about 225 mya.

During the evolutionary succession from early therapsid to cynodont to eucynodont to mammal, the main lower jaw bone, the dentary, replaced the adjacent bones. Thus, the lower jaw gradually became just one large bone, with several of the smaller jaw bones migrating into the and allowing sophisticated hearing.

Whether through climate change, vegetation change, ecological competition, or a combination of factors, most of the remaining large cynodonts (belonging to the ) and dicynodonts (of the family Kannemeyeriidae) had disappeared by the age, even before the Triassic–Jurassic extinction event that killed off most of the large . The remaining Mesozoic synapsids were small, ranging from the size of a shrew to the badger-like mammal .

During the Jurassic and Cretaceous, the remaining non-mammalian cynodonts were small, such as . No cynodont grew larger than a cat. Most Jurassic and Cretaceous cynodonts were , though some were . The family , which first appeared near the end of the Triassic, was carnivorous and persisted well into the . The other, , first appeared at the same time as the tritheledonts, but was herbivorous. This group became extinct at the end of the Early Cretaceous epoch. Dicynodonts are generally thought to have become extinct near the end of the Triassic period, but there was evidence this group survived, in the form of six fragments of fossil bone that were found in Cretaceous rocks of , Australia. If true, it would mean there is a significant of Dicynodonts in . However, these fossils were re-described in 2019 as being in age, and possibly belonging to a .

Today, the 5,500 species of living synapsids, known as the , include both aquatic () and flying () species, and the largest animal ever known to have existed (the ). Humans are synapsids, as well. Most mammals are and give birth to live young rather than laying eggs with the exception being the .

Triassic and Jurassic ancestors of living mammals, along with their close relatives, had high metabolic rates. This meant consuming food (generally thought to be insects) in much greater quantity. To facilitate rapid , these synapsids evolved (chewing) and specialized teeth that aided chewing. Limbs also evolved to move under the body instead of to the side, allowing them to breathe more efficiently during locomotion. This helped make it possible to support their higher metabolic demands.


Relationships
Below is a of the most commonly accepted of synapsids, showing a long stem lineage including Mammalia and successively more basal clades such as Theriodontia, Therapsida and Sphenacodontia:
(2025). 9780253356970, Indiana University Press.

Most uncertainty in the phylogeny of synapsids lies among the earliest members of the group, including forms traditionally placed within Pelycosauria. As one of the earliest phylogenetic analyses, Brinkman & Eberth (1983) placed the family with as the most basal offshoot of the synapsid lineage. Reisz (1986) removed Varanopidae from Caseasauria, placing it in a more derived position on the stem. While most analyses find Caseasauria to be the most basal synapsid clade, Benson's analysis (2012) placed a clade containing and Varanopidae as the most basal synapsids, with Caseasauria occupying a more derived position. Benson attributed this revised phylogeny to the inclusion of postcranial characteristics, or features of the skeleton other than the skull, in his analysis. When only cranial or skull features were included, Caseasauria remained the most basal synapsid clade. Below is a modified from Benson's analysis (2012):

However, more recent examination of the phylogeny of basal synapsids, incorporating newly described basal caseids and eothyridids, returned Caseasauria to its position as the sister to all other synapsids. Brocklehurst et al. (2016) demonstrated that many of the postcranial characters used by Benson (2012) to unite Caseasauria with and were absent in the newly discovered postcranial material of eothyridids, and were therefore acquired convergently.


See also
  • List of prehistoric mammals
  • Lists of synapsids
  • Mammal classification
  • Timeline of the evolutionary history of life
  • Vertebrate paleontology


Notes

Further reading


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
4s Time