Product Code Database
Example Keywords: playstation -slippers $73-150
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Protorosauria
Tag Wiki 'Protorosauria'.
Tag

Protorosauria is an , likely group of basal reptiles from the latest ( stage) to the end of the ( stage) of , and . It was named by the English and Thomas Henry Huxley in 1871 as an order, originally to solely contain . Other names which were once considered equivalent to Protorosauria include Prolacertiformes and Prolacertilia.

(2025). 9780231135221, Columbia University Press.

Protorosaurs are distinguished by their long necks formed by elongated cervical vertebrae, which have that extend backward to the vertebrae behind them. Protorosaurs also have a gap between the and the in the back of the skull near the jaw joint, making their skulls resemble those of . While previously thought to be , the group is now thought to consist of various groups of basal archosauromorph reptiles that lie outside , though some recent studies have recovered the group as monophyletic. A number of members of Protosauria have been found to belong to a monophyletic group (though not including Protorosaurus) which was named in 2024.


Classification
Protorosauria was considered to be a synonym of for many years.

Since 1998, many phylogenetic analyses have found Protorosauria, as used in its widest sense, to be a or taxon. Protorosaurus, , tanystropheids, and various other protorosaurs are usually placed near the base of Archosauromorpha, while and , two Triassic protorosaurs, are now thought to be in a more position as close relatives of . Most analyses since 1998 have found a strongly supported clade that includes only the genus and the .

For this reason Prolacerta, Pamelaria, and several other related forms (collectively called ) have been removed from Protorosauria. Because the name Prolacertiformes is defined based on the genus Prolacerta, the name Protorosauria is used for the remaining group.

Only recently has Protorosauria been defined in a sense as the most inclusive containing taxa such as , , and . Analyses, such as Dilkes (1998), Sues (2003), Modesto & Sues (2004), Rieppel, Fraser & Nosotti (2003), Rieppel, Li & Fraser (2008), Gottmann-Quesada and Sander (2009) and Renesto et al. (2010), recovered a large Protorosauria, that includes , (and relatives) and (and relatives). However, some analysis found Protorosaurus (and sometimes the closely related ) to be more advanced or more basal than the node Drepanosauridae+Tanystropheidae, but always more basal than Prolacerta.

Some studies still use the term Prolacertiformes to include prolacertids and traditional protorosaurs, while restricting the term Protorosauria to the smallest clade that includes Protorosaurus, Macrocnemus, and Tanystropheus; thus Protorosauria is a true clade, while Prolacertiformes is an evolutionary grade of early archosauromorphs.

Pritchard et al. (2015), Nesbitt et al. (2015), Ezcurra (2016) and Spiekman et al., 2021 found that even this definition of Protorosauria, like Prolacertiformes, was an unnatural group of various non-Crocopodan archosauromorphs. These studies found that tanystropheids were archosauromorphs more closely related to crocopods than to Protorosaurus. Nevertheless, Ezcurra noted that archosauromorph systematics required further study, and that phylogenetic support for Protorosauria being a natural group was only barely weaker than the support for the group being unnatural.


Included groups
The Protorosauria includes the Permian genus , closely related to . A wide variety of Permian and Triassic reptiles have been classified within Protorosauria, including the arboreal gliding reptile and the aquatic , which have extremely long necks.

Another enigmatic group of Triassic reptiles, the Drepanosauromorpha, have often been classified as belonging to the Protorosauria.

have also been proposed as protorosaurs or close relatives of them, although they are now regarded as a more group of .

While Senter (2004) reassigned the bizarre, arboreal drepanosaurids and to a group of more primitive called , subsequent studies failed to find the same result, instead supporting the hypothesis that they were protorosaurs.


Cladogram
The following shows the position of Protorosauria among the sensu Sean P. Modesto and Hans-Dieter Sues (2004).

Most recent studies have recovered Protorosauria as a whole as a paraphyletic, cladogram after Spiekman et al. 2021

Although Protorosauria as a whole is often found to be a paraphyletic, a large group of former "protorosaurs" (excluding Protorosaurus) is frequently found to be monophyletic. This clade was given the name "" by Spiekman et al. in 2024.

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs