's The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers]] Patristics, also known as Patrology, is a branch of Theology studies focused on the writings and teachings of the Church Fathers, between the 1st to 8th centuries CE. Scholars analyze texts from both orthodox and heretical authors. Patristics emerged as a distinct discipline in the 19th century, supported by critical editions like Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca. The field employs textual analysis, archaeology, and historical criticism to analyze early Christianity's doctrinal, cultural, and intellectual development, incorporating traditions beyond Greek and Latin, such as Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and Ethiopian.
The term patristics similarly originates from pater in Latin and πᾰτήρ in Greek, both meaning "father," and was introduced by English philosopher Isaac Taylor.Clark, E. A. (2008). From patristics to early Christian studies. In S. A. Harvey & D. G. Hunter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies
Modern scholars, such as Shawn J. Wilhite (2024), define Patristics as spanning from 90–750 CE and incorporating both orthodox and heretical writings for historical context.Wilhite, S. J. (2024). The state of patristic studies. Religious Studies Review, 50(4), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17552(Quasten, 1986, p. 1) The field employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating textual analysis, archaeology, art history, philosophy, and religious history to reconstruct early Christianity's intellectual and cultural landscape.Kannengiesser, C. (1989). Fifty years of patristica. Theological Studies, 50
During the same century, Jerome was the pioneer in documenting the history of Christian theological literature. In his work De viris illustribus ( On Illustrious Men), he aimed to address the mockery from pagans who often ridiculed the intellectual capabilities of Christians.
With the advent of the printing press in the 15th century, interest in patristic writings surged. Medieval scholars, Protestant Reformers, and Caroline divines extensively studied the Church Fathers, particularly figures such as Augustine, Jerome, and John Chrysostom. However, these studies were often influenced by apologetic and polemical lenses, reflecting the theological debates of the time.
During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, scholars in Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy made significant philological advancements, acquiring and cataloging new manuscripts. The discovery of the Nag Hammadi Gnostic library and John Chrysostom's baptismal catecheses on Mount Athos (1955) were major milestones.(Kannengiesser, 1989, p. 640)
With the introduction of microfilming technology, institutions like the British Library, Vatican Library, and Bibliothèque Nationale preserved and expanded access to patristic manuscripts. Since the 1940s, scholarly efforts have focused on careful textual revisions and comparative analyses rather than new manuscript discoveries.
The Western definition of the Patristic Age has also been re-evaluated. Traditionally, Bede (d. 735) marks its conclusion in the Latin West, and John of Damascus (d. 749) in the Greek East. However, later Byzantine theologians such as Symeon the New Theologian and Gregory Palamas, along with Oriental Orthodox figures, continue to be studied in Patristics. This reevaluation challenges Eurocentrism periodization and acknowledges the continued intellectual and theological evolution of Christianity beyond the traditional Western framework.
Furthermore, McGrath (1998) notes several major areas of theology can be seen to have developed during the Patristic Period: the extent of the New Testament canon, the role of tradition, the fixing of the ecumenical creeds, the two natures of Christ, the doctrine of the Trinity, the doctrine of the Christian Church, and the doctrine of divine grace.McGrath. op.cit. pp. 27–37.
In response to these challenges, neo-patristic and post-patristic approaches advocate for reinterpreting or critically reassessing the Church Fathers in light of modern developments. These perspectives argue that early Christian writings reflect the concerns of their historical context and may require adaptation. However, these approaches remain controversial among orthodox theologians, who caution that such reinterpretations could undermine traditional theological continuity. Metropolitan of Nafpaktus ΝΕΟΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ "ΘΕΟΛΟΓΙΑ" Dr. Triantafyllos Sioulis, «Πατερικός φονταμενταλισμός» ή «μετα-πατερική θεολογική θολούρα»
For texts in Syriac and other Eastern languages, the Patrologia Orientalis (formerly Patrologia Syriaca) provides a significant, though incomplete, collection. It is largely supplemented by the Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium, which includes additional Eastern Christian writings.Wallace-Hadrill, D. S. (1974). Eusebius of Caesarea’s Commentary on Luke: Its Origin and Early History. Harvard Theological Review, 67(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816000003151Lang, D. M. (1957). Recent Work on the Georgian New Testament. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 19(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x00119214
Other critical editions and re-edited patristic texts, including newly discovered works and revised attributions, are found in:
Online collections
Others
/ref> Meanwhile, Patrologia was coined by Johann Gerhard, who published a book by the same name in 1653.Quasten, J. (1986). Patrology: Volume I, The beginnings of patristic literature. Christian Classics, Inc (p. 1). (Original work published 1950). The formal classification of patristics as a distinct theological discipline was later established by Johann Franz Buddeus in his Historical and Systematic Introduction to Theology (1730).Bitton-Ashkelony, B., de Bruyn, T., & Harrison, C. (Eds.). (2015). Patristic studies in the twenty-first century: Proceedings of an international conference to mark the 50th anniversary of the International Association of Patristic Studies
/ref>
Scope
/ref>
/ref>
Patrology and patristics
Historical development
Early engagement (pre-5th century)
Emergence as a discipline (15th–19th century)
/ref> Additionally, continued ecumenical dialogue reduced tensions between Chalcedonian and Oriental Orthodox traditions allowing for revitalized interest in non-Greek/Latin Fathers.
Discipline issues
Beyond the Western world
/ref>
Major centres of thought
Theological developments
Notable Church Fathers
Contemporary approaches
Sources and collection of texts
Original language collection
Peer-reviewed journals
See also
Ancient Christian texts and collections
Academic fields and studies
Key theological and historical topics
Notes
Sources
External links
|
|