Product Code Database
Example Keywords: hair -dungeon $12
   » » Wiki: Materialism
Tag Wiki 'Materialism'.
Tag

In and , materialism is a form of holding that is the fundamental of , so that all things, including and , arise from material interactions and depend on physical processes, including those of the and . It contrasts with monistic , which treats consciousness as fundamental, and is related to naturalism, the view that only and forces operate in the , and to , the view that all that exists is ultimately physical. Physicalism extends materialism by including forms of physicality beyond ordinary matter (e.g. , energy, forces, ), and some use the terms interchangeably.

Alternative philosophies opposed or alternative to materialism or physicalism include idealism, pluralism, dualism, , , and other forms of .


Overview
Materialism is the philosophical doctrine that matter has a primary position in the nature of the world, with mind or consciousness emerging as a secondary, dependent reality or not existing at all. In its extreme form, materialism asserts that the real world consists of only material things, with the important qualification that space and time must also be included if these are realities rather than mere systems of relations. Materialism belongs to the class of , and is thus different from ontological theories based on dualism or pluralism. For singular explanations of the phenomenal reality, materialism is in contrast to , , and spiritualism. It can also contrast with , , and dual-aspect monism. It can be linked to the concept of , as espoused by Enlightenment thinkers.

In contemporary philosophy, the terms "materialism" and "physicalism" are often treated as interchangeable, though they have distinct histories. "Materialism" appears in English toward the end of the 17th century, while "physicalism" was introduced in the 1930s by and of the as a linguistic thesis arguing for the translatability of all statements into physical language. One reason to prefer "physicalism" is that physics has revealed entities that are not matter in the classical sense of an inert substance; forces such as gravity are physical but not obviously "material" by the traditional understanding. Modern philosophical materialists extend the definition to include other scientifically observable entities such as , , and the spacetime continuum; some philosophers, such as , suggest that the concept of "matter" is elusive and poorly defined. The Myths We Live By.


Non-reductive materialism
Materialism is often associated with reductionism, according to which the objects or phenomena individuated at one level of description, if they are genuine, must be explicable in terms of the objects or phenomena at some other level of description—typically, at a more reduced level.

Non-reductive materialism explicitly rejects this notion, taking the material constitution of all particulars to be consistent with the existence of real objects, properties or phenomena not explicable in the terms canonically used for the basic material constituents. held this view, according to which empirical laws and explanations in "special sciences" like psychology or geology are invisible from the perspective of basic physics.Fodor, Jerry A. 1981. RePresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. . ( Excerpt of Ch. 1).


History

Early history

Before Common Era
Materialism developed, possibly independently, in several geographically separated regions of during what termed the ( 800–200 BC).

In ancient Indian philosophy, materialism developed around 600 BC with the works of Ajita Kesakambali, , Kanada and the proponents of the Cārvāka school of philosophy. Kanada became one of the early proponents of . The school (c. 600–100 BC) developed one of the earliest forms of atomism (although their proofs of God and their positing that consciousness was not material precludes labelling them as materialists). and the school continued the atomic tradition.

Ancient Greek like , and prefigure later materialists. The Latin poem De Rerum Natura by (99 – c. 55 BC) reflects the mechanistic philosophy of Democritus and Epicurus. According to this view, all that exists is matter and void, and all phenomena result from different motions and conglomerations of base material particles called atoms (literally "indivisibles"). De Rerum Natura provides mechanistic explanations for phenomena such as erosion, evaporation, wind, and sound. Famous principles like "nothing can touch body but body" first appeared in Lucretius's work. Democritus and Epicurus did not espouse a monist ontology, instead espousing the ontological separation of matter and space (i.e. that space is "another kind" of being).

is a philosophy of materialism from classical antiquity that was a major forerunner of . Classical atomism predates : 5th‑century BCE thinkers and explained all change as the collisions of indivisible atoms moving in the void. Epicureanism refined this materialist picture. Epicurus held that everything—including mind—consists solely of atoms moving in the void; to explain how parallel falling atoms could meet, he postulated the clinamen, an extremely slight lateral deviation that initiates collisions without supernatural causes and that need not imply genuine indeterminism.


Early Common Era
(27 – c. 100 AD) was a Chinese thinker of the early said to be a materialist. Later Indian materialist Jayaraashi Bhatta (6th century) in his work Tattvopaplavasimha ( The Upsetting of All Principles) refuted the Nyāya Sūtra . The materialistic Cārvāka philosophy appears to have died out some time after 1400; when Madhavacharya compiled Sarva-darśana-samgraha ( A Digest of All Philosophies) in the 14th century, he had no Cārvāka (or Lokāyata) text to quote from or refer to. History of Indian Materialism, Ramakrishna Bhattacharya

In early 12th-century , Arabian philosopher ( Abubacer) discussed materialism in his philosophical novel, Hayy ibn Yaqdhan ( Philosophus Autodidactus), while vaguely foreshadowing historical materialism.Urvoy, Dominique. 1996. "The Rationality of Everyday Life: The Andalusian Tradition? (Aropos of Hayy's First Experiences)." pp. 38–46 in The World of Ibn Tufayl: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Ḥayy Ibn Yaqẓān, edited by . , .


Modern philosophy
In France, (1592–1665) Pierre Gassendi (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) represented the materialist tradition in opposition to the attempts of René Descartes (1596–1650) to provide the with dualist foundations. There followed the materialist and abbé (1664–1729), along with the French materialists: Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709–1751), (1713–1784), Étienne Bonnot de Condillac (1714–1780), Claude Adrien Helvétius (1715–1771), German-French Baron d'Holbach (1723–1789), and other French Enlightenment thinkers.
(2026). 9781591603634, Salem Publishing Solutions. .

In England, materialism was developed in the philosophies of (1561–1626), (1588–1679), Thomas Hobbes (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), and (1632–1704).

(2026). 9781136810534, Taylor & Francis. .
Scottish Enlightenment philosopher (1711–1776) became one of the most important materialist philosophers in the 18th century.
(2026). 9780429535376, Taylor & Francis. .
John "Walking" Stewart (1747–1822) believed matter has a dimension, which had a major impact on the philosophical poetry of William Wordsworth (1770–1850).

In late modern philosophy, German atheist signaled a new turn in materialism in his 1841 book The Essence of Christianity, which presented a account of religion as the outward projection of man's inward nature. Feuerbach introduced anthropological materialism, a version of materialism that views materialist anthropology as the universal science., , Social Action and Human Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 18.

Feuerbach's variety of materialism heavily influenced ,Nicholas Churchich, Marxism and Alienation, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1990, p. 57: "Although Marx has rejected Feuerbach's abstract materialism," Lenin says that Feuerbach's views "are consistently materialist," implying that Feuerbach's conception of causality is entirely in line with dialectical materialism." who in the late 19th century elaborated the concept of historical materialism—the basis for what Marx and outlined as scientific socialism:

Through his Dialectics of Nature (1883), Engels later developed a "materialist dialectic" philosophy of nature, a worldview that , the father of Russian , called dialectical materialism.see Plekhanov, Georgi: 1891. "For the Sixtieth Anniversary of Hegel's Death;" 1893. Essays on the History of Materialism; and 1895. The Development of the Monist View of History. In early 20th-century Russian philosophy, further developed dialectical materialism in his 1909 book Materialism and Empirio-criticism, which connects his opponents' political conceptions to their anti-materialist philosophies.

A more naturalist-oriented materialist school of thought that developed in the mid-19th century was German materialism, which included Ludwig Büchner (1824–1899), the Dutch-born (1822–1893), and (1817–1895),. 1990. The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.

p. 165: "During the 1850s German...scientists conducted a controversy known...as the materialistic controversy. It was specially associated with the names of Vogt, Moleschott and Büchner."

p. 173: "Frenchmen were surprised to see Büchner and Vogt.... The French were surprised at German materialism." The Nineteenth Century and After, Vol. 151. 1952. p. 227: "the Continental materialism of Moleschott and Buchner." even though they had different views on core issues such as the evolution and the origins of life., Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert: Bürgerliche Kultur, naturwissenschaftliche Bildung und die deutsche Öffentlichkeit, 1848–1914. Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998, pp. 210, 293–99.

According to Marxist theoretician , despite the multiplicity of named schools, philosophy ultimately confronts a single binary: materialism versus idealism.

(1979). 9780873480222, Pathfinder Press.


Contemporary history

Analytic philosophy
Contemporary analytic philosophers (e.g. , Willard Van Orman Quine, Donald Davidson, and ) operate within a broadly physicalist or scientific materialist framework, producing rival accounts of how best to accommodate the , including functionalism, , and identity theory.Ramsey, William. 2003 2019. " Eliminative Materialism § Specific Problems With Folk Psychology" (rev.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Scientific materialism is often synonymous with, and has typically been described as, a reductive materialism. In the early 21st century, and Patricia Churchland advocated a radically contrasting position (at least in regard to certain hypotheses): eliminative materialism. Eliminative materialism holds that some mental phenomena simply do not exist at all, and that talk of such phenomena reflects a spurious "" and introspection illusion. A materialist of this variety might believe that a concept like "belief" has no basis in fact (e.g. the way folk science speaks of demon-caused illnesses).

With reductive materialism at one end of a continuum (our theories will reduce to facts) and eliminative materialism at the other (certain theories will need to be eliminated in light of new facts), revisionary materialism is somewhere in the middle.

In contrast, argues that the existence of first-person perspectives, i.e., one existing as oneself and not as someone else, refutes physicalism. List argues that since first-personal facts cannot supervene on physical facts, this refutes not only physicalism, but also most forms of dualism that have purely third-personal metaphysics.


Continental philosophy
Contemporary continental philosopher attempted to rework and strengthen classical materialist ideas. Contemporary theorists such as , working with this reinvigorated materialism, have come to be classified as new materialists.
(2013). 9781607852810, Open Humanities Press. .
has become its own subfield, with courses on it at major universities, as well as numerous conferences, edited collections and monographs devoted to it. Jane Bennett's 2010 book Vibrant Matter has been particularly instrumental in bringing theories of monist ontology and back into a critical theoretical fold dominated by poststructuralist theories of language and discourse.
(2010). 9780822346333, Duke University Press. .
New materialism has been criticized by scholars of critical race, Indigenous, and , who argue it neglects questions of race, gender, and colonialism, and by others who question whether its claims are genuinely novel given that Indigenous and animist traditions have long held views about the agency or of matter.;
(2026). 9780822352549, Duke University Press.
; ;

In Being and Event (1988), developed a materialist position using Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. Badiou argues that mathematics, rather than physics or human perception, reveals the metaphysical structure of reality, and that this structure is pure multiplicity without any foundational substance or unifying One.

Quentin Meillassoux has developed speculative materialism, a position that seeks to escape what he calls "correlationism", the post-Kantian view that thought cannot access reality independent of its relation to the subject.


Defining "matter"
The nature and definition of matter—like other key concepts in science and philosophy—have occasioned much debate:


Article by a philosopher who opposes atomism
Information on Buddhist atomism
Article on traditional Greek atomism
"Atomism from the 17th to the 20th Century" Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

One challenge to the conventional concept of matter as tangible "stuff" came with the rise of in the 19th century. Relativity shows that matter and energy (including the spatially distributed energy of fields) are interchangeable. This enables the ontological view that energy is prima materia and matter is one of its forms. In contrast, the of particle physics uses quantum field theory to describe all interactions. On this view it could be said that fields are prima materia and the energy is a property of the field.

According to the dominant cosmological model, the , less than 5% of the universe's energy density is made up of the "matter" the Standard Model describes, and most of the universe is composed of and , with little agreement among scientists about what these are made of.Bernard Sadoulet "Particle Dark Matter in the Universe: At the Brink of Discovery?" Science 5 January 2007: Vol. 315. no. 5808, pp. 61 - 63

With the advent of quantum physics, some scientists believed the concept of matter had merely changed, while others believed the conventional position could no longer be maintained. Werner Heisenberg said: "The ontology of materialism rested upon the illusion that the kind of existence, the direct 'actuality' of the world around us, can be extrapolated into the atomic range. This extrapolation, however, is impossible...atoms are not things."Heisenberg, Werner. 1962. Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science.

The concept of matter has changed in response to new scientific discoveries. Thus materialism has no definite content independent of the particular theory of matter on which it is based. According to , any property can be considered material, if one defines matter such that it has that property.Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind

The philosophical materialist uses a more precise term than matter, the stroma.


Physicalism
George Stack distinguishes between materialism and physicalism:

But not all conceptions of physicalism are tied to verificationist theories of meaning or direct realist accounts of perception. Rather, physicalists believe that no "element of reality" is missing from the mathematical formalism of our best description of the world. "Materialist" physicalists also believe that the formalism describes fields of insentience. In other words, the intrinsic nature of the physical is non-experiential.


Religious and spiritual views

Christianity

Criticism and alternatives

From contemporary physicists
, a physicist who played a major role in the Manhattan Project, rejected materialism: "The premise that you can describe in terms of physics the whole function of a human being... including knowledge and consciousness, is untenable. There is still something missing."

Erwin Schrödinger said, "Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else.""General Scientific and Popular Papers." In Collected Papers, Vol. 4. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn. p. 334.

Werner Heisenberg said the advent of quantum physics had undermined atomistic materialism. Specifically, he argued that the discovery of quantum entities existing as probability amplitudes rather than definite particles supports a mathematical, , rather than materialist, conception of physical reality, arguing that "modern physics takes a definite stand against the materialism of Democritus and for Plato and the Pythagoreans".


Quantum mechanics
Some 20th-century physicists (e.g.,
(2012). 9783642783746, Springer. .
and ),. "Quantum interactive dualism - an alternative to materialism." Journal of Consciousness Studies and some modern physicists and science writers (e.g., , , and ) have argued that materialism is flawed due to certain recent findings in physics, such as quantum mechanics and . According to Gribbin and Davies (1991):


Digital physics
The objections of Davies and Gribbin are shared by proponents of , who view information rather than matter as fundamental. The physicist and proponent of digital physics John Archibald Wheeler wrote, "all matter and all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and this is a participatory universe."Zurek, Wojciech H., ed. 1990. "Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links." In Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Some founders of quantum theory, such as , shared their objections. He wrote:

concurred with Planck, saying, "The Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter."Jeans, James. 1937. The Mysterious Universe. p. 137.


Philosophical objections
In the Critique of Pure Reason, argued against materialism in defending his transcendental idealism (as well as offering arguments against subjective idealism and mind–body dualism).Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. (2nd ed., pp. 244–7).Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. A379, p. 352: "If, however, as commonly happens, we seek to extend the concept of dualism, and take it in the transcendental sense, neither it nor the two counter-alternatives — pneumatism idealism on the one hand, materialism on the other — would have any sort of basis. … Neither the transcendental object which underlies outer appearances nor that which underlies inner intuition, is in itself either matter or a thinking being, but a ground (to us unknown)…" But Kant argues that change and time require an enduring substrate. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. : "Kant argues that we can determine that there has been a change in the objects of our perception, not merely a change in our perceptions themselves, only by conceiving of what we perceive as successive states of enduring substances (see Substance)."Kant, Immanuel. "The refutation of idealism." pp. 345–52 in Critique of Pure Reason (1st ed.), edited by N. K. Smith. B274, p. 245:

"All determination of time presupposes something permanent in perception. This permanent cannot, however, be something in me…"

/poststructuralist thinkers also express skepticism about any all-encompassing metaphysical scheme. Philosopher . 1990. The Myths We Live By. argues that materialism is a self-refuting idea, at least in its eliminative materialist form.Baker, L. 1987. Saving Belief. Princeton: Princeton University PressReppert, V. 1992. "Eliminative Materialism, Cognitive Suicide, and Begging the Question." Metaphilosophy 23:378–92.Seidner, Stanley S. 10 June 2009. "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology." Mater Dei Institute. p. 5.. 1990. "The Status of Content." Philosophical Review 99:157–84; and 1991. "The Status of Content Revisited." Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71:264–78.


Varieties of idealism
Arguments for , such as those of and , often take the form of an argument against materialism; indeed, Berkeley's idealism was called . Now, matter can be argued to be redundant, as in , and mind-independent properties can, in turn, be reduced to subjective . Berkeley gives an example of the latter by pointing out that it is impossible to gather direct evidence of matter, as there is no direct experience of matter; all that is experienced is perception, whether internal or external. As such, matter's existence can only be inferred from the apparent (perceived) stability of perceptions; it finds absolutely no evidence in direct experience.

If matter and energy are seen as necessary to explain the physical world, but incapable of explaining mind, dualism results. , and process philosophy seek to ameliorate the perceived shortcomings of traditional (especially mechanistic) materialism without abandoning materialism entirely.


Materialism as methodology
Some critics object to materialism as part of an overly skeptical, narrow or approach to theorizing, rather than to the ontological claim that matter is the only substance. and Anglican John Polkinghorne objects to what he calls promissory materialism—claims that materialistic science will eventually succeed in explaining phenomena it has not so far been able to explain.However, critics of materialism are equally guilty of prognosticating that it will never be able to explain certain phenomena. "Over a hundred years ago saw clearly that science would never resolve the mind–body problem." Are We Spiritual Machines? Dembski, W. Polkinghorne prefers "dual-aspect monism" to materialism.

Some scientific materialists have been criticized for failing to provide clear definitions of matter, leaving the term materialism without any definite meaning. states that since the concept of matter may be affected by new scientific discoveries, as has happened in the past, scientific materialists are being dogmatic in assuming the opposite.


See also


Notes
a. Indeed, it has been noted it is difficult if not impossible to define one category without contrasting it with the other.. .
(1979). 9780873480222, Pathfinder Press.


Bibliography
  • Campbell, Keith. "Materialism". Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 6, 2nd edition, Macmillan Reference USA, 2006, pp. 5–18.
  • Stoljar, Daniel. "Physicalism" Https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/


Further reading


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time