Product Code Database
Example Keywords: smartphones -playstation $65-178
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Company
Tag Wiki 'Company'.
Tag

A company is a legal entity that represents an association of with a specific, shared objective, such as the earning of profit or the benefit of society. Depending on , companies can take on various forms, such as voluntary associations, nonprofit organizations, business entities, financial entities, , and educational institutions. Across jurisdictions, companies have generally evolved to have certain common legal features, including separate legal personality, limited liability, transferable shares, investor ownership, and a .

Depending on jurisdiction, the term "company" may or may not be synonymous with , , firm and . Companies are governed by , which is also known as corporate law in some jurisdictions. Incorporated companies are created by and registered with the state, whereas unincorporated companies are not.

When a company closes, it may need to be to avoid further legal obligations. Companies may associate and collectively register themselves as new companies known as , collections of parent and subsidiary corporations.


History
English law recognised long ago that a corporation would have , also known as corporate personality or . In 1612, Sir Edward Coke remarked in the Case of Sutton's Hospital, Case of Sutton's Hospital (1612) 10 Rep 32; 77 Eng Rep 960, 973
the Corporation itself is onely in abstracto, and resteth onely in intendment and consideration of the ; for a Corporation aggregate of many is , , & resteth only in intendment and consideration of the Law; and therefore it cannot have predecessor nor successor. They may not commit , nor be outlawed, nor , for they have no , neither can they appear in person, but by . A Corporation aggregate of many cannot do , for an invisible body cannot be in person, nor can swear, it is not subject to imbecilities, or death of the natural, , and divers other cases.
In 1776, wrote in the Wealth of Nations that mass corporate activity could not match private entrepreneurship, because people in charge of "other people's money" would not exercise as much care as they would with their own.A Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) Book V, ch 1, para 107

In 1843, William Gladstone took chairmanship of a Parliamentary Committee on Joint Stock Companies, which led to the Joint Stock Companies Act 1844.Report of the Parliamentary Committee on Joint Stock Companies (1844) British Parliamentary Papers vol VII


United States
At the end of the 19th century in the United States, the law allowed for the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few people, or a single person. In response, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was created to break up big business conglomerates, and the of 1914 gave the government power to halt mergers and acquisitions that could damage the public interest. By the end of the First World War, it was increasingly perceived that ordinary people had little voice compared to the "financial oligarchy" of bankers and industrial magnates.See , Other People's Money And How the Bankers Use It (1914) In particular, employees lacked voice compared to shareholders, but plans for a post-war "industrial democracy" (giving employees votes for investing their labor) did not become widespread.The Massachusetts governor passed "An Act to enable manufacturing corporations to provide for the representation of their employees on the board of directors" (April 3, 1919) Chap. 0070. This was a measure that allowed corporations to voluntarily give workers votes. It remains in the Massachusetts Laws, General Laws, Part I Administration of the Government, Title XII Corporations, ch 156 Business Corporations, §23

The Wall Street crash of 1929 saw the total collapse of stock market values, as shareholders realized that corporations had become overpriced. They sold shares en masse, meaning many companies found it hard to get finance. The result was that thousands of businesses were forced to close, and they laid off workers. Because workers had less money to spend, businesses received less income, leading to more closures and lay-offs. This downward spiral began the .AA Berle, 'For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note' (1932) 45(8) Harvard Law Review 1365, 1372. See also the Berle-Dodd debate. This led directly to the reforms of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. A new Securities and Exchange Commission was empowered to require corporations disclose all material information about their business to the investing public., 'Corporate Powers As Powers in Trust' (1931) 44 Harvard Law Review 1049, , 'For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?' (1932) 45 Harvard Law Review 1145 and , 'For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note' (1932) 45 Harvard Law Review 1365

After World War II, a general consensus emerged that directors were not bound purely to pursue "shareholder value" but could exercise their discretion for the good of all stakeholders, for instance by increasing wages instead of dividends, or providing services for the good of the community instead of only pursuing profits, if it was in the interests of the enterprise as a whole.e.g. AP Smith Manufacturing Co v Barlow, 13 N.J. 145, 98 A.2d 581, 39 ALR 2d 1179 (1953) and Shlensky v Wrigley, 237 N.E. 2d 776 (Ill. App. 1968) However, different states had different corporate laws. To increase revenue from , individual states had an incentive to lower their standards in a "race to the bottom" to attract corporations to set up their headquarters in the state, particularly where directors controlled the decision to incorporate. "Charter competition", by the 1960s, had led Delaware to become home to the majority of the largest US corporations. This meant that the case law of the Delaware Chancery and Supreme Court became increasingly influential.

During the 1980s, a huge takeover and merger boom decreased directors' accountability. To fend off a takeover, courts allowed boards to institute "poison pills" or "shareholder rights plans", which allowed directors to veto any bid – and probably get a payout for letting a takeover happen. More and more people's retirement savings were being invested into the stock market, through , and . This resulted in a vast growth in the industry, which tended to take control of voting rights. Both the financial sector's share of income, and executive pay for chief executive officers began to rise far beyond real wages for the rest of the workforce. The of 2001 led to some reforms in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (on separating auditors from consultancy work). The 2008 financial crisis led to minor changes in the (on soft regulation of pay, alongside markets). However, the basic shape of corporate law in the United States has remained the same since the 1980s.


Terminology and definition
A company can be defined as an "artificial person", invisible, intangible, created by or under law, Compare a definition of a corporation: "Perhaps the best definition of a corporation was given by Chief Justice John Marshall in a famous Supreme Court decision in 1819. A corporation, he said, 'is an artificial person, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of the law.' In other words, a corporation ... is an artificial person, created by law, with most of the legal rights of a real person."
(1985). 9780324829556, Cengage Learning. .
with a discrete (or "personality"), perpetual succession, and a . Except for some senior positions, companies remain unaffected by the death, insanity, or of an individual member.


Etymology
The English word, " company", has its origins in the term compagnie (first recorded in 1150), meaning "society, friendship, intimacy; body of soldiers",12th century: which came from the word companio ("one who eats bread with you"), first attested in the ( AD 500) as a of the Germanic expression gahlaibo (literally, "with bread"), related to Old High German galeipo ("companion") and to gahlaiba ("messmate").


Semantics and usage
By 1303, the word company referred to . Compare:
- '[...] the word having been used in reference to trade guilds from late 14c.'
     
The usage of the term company to mean "business association" was first recorded in 1553, Compare:
- 'From late 14c. as "a number of persons united to perform or carry out anything jointly," which developed a commercial sense of "business association" by 1550s, the word having been used in reference to trade guilds from late 14c.'
     
and the abbreviation "co." dates from 1769. Compare:
- "1759   Compl. Let.-writer (ed. 6)    London: Printed for Stanley Crowder, and Co."
     
Compare:
- 'by 1670s as an abbreviation of company in the business sense, indicating the partners in the firm whose names do not appear in its name. Hence and co. to indicate "the rest" of any group (1757)'.
     

In , a company is a body corporate or corporation company registered under the Companies Acts or under similar legislation.


Nomenclature
  • Limited and unlimited companies
    • A limited company is a "company in which the liability of each shareholder is limited to the amount individually invested".Black's Law Dictionary. Second Pocket Edition. Bryan A. Garner, editor. West. 2001. An unlimited company is a company with no limit on the liability of its members.
  • Private and public companies
    • A public company is a company whose shares may be traded publicly.


Types
Common types of companies include:


See also
  • List of company registers
  • List of largest employers
  • Lists of companies


Further reading
  • Alan Dignam and John Lowry. Company Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. .
  • John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea. New York: Modern Library, 2003.


External links
Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time