A fraction (from , "broken") represents a part of a whole or, more generally, any number of equal parts. When spoken in everyday English, a fraction describes how many parts of a certain size there are, for example, one-half, eight-fifths, three-quarters. A common, vulgar, or simple fraction (examples: and ) consists of an integer numerator, displayed above a line (or before a slash like ), and a non-zero integer denominator, displayed below (or after) that line. If these integers are positive, then the numerator represents a number of equal parts, and the denominator indicates how many of those parts make up a unit or a whole. For example, in the fraction , the numerator 3 indicates that the fraction represents 3 equal parts, and the denominator 4 indicates that 4 parts make up a whole. The picture to the right illustrates of a cake.
Fractions can be used to represent and division.H. Wu, "The Mis-Education of Mathematics Teachers", Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 58, Issue 03 (March 2011), p. 374. . Thus the fraction can be used to represent the ratio 3:4 (the ratio of the part to the whole), and the division (three divided by four).
We can also write negative fractions, which represent the opposite of a positive fraction. For example, if represents a half-dollar profit, then − represents a half-dollar loss. Because of the rules of division of signed numbers (which states in part that negative divided by positive is negative), −, and all represent the same fraction negative one-half. And because a negative divided by a negative produces a positive, represents positive one-half.
In mathematics a rational number is a number that can be represented by a fraction of the form , where a and b are integers and b is not zero; the set of all rational numbers is commonly represented by the symbol or Q, which stands for quotient. The term fraction and the notation can also be used for mathematical expressions that do not represent a rational number (for example ), and even do not represent any number (for example the rational fraction ).
Informally, the numerator and denominator may be distinguished by placement alone, but in formal contexts they are usually separated by a fraction bar. The fraction bar may be horizontal (as in ), oblique (as in 2/5), or diagonal (as in ). These marks are respectively known as the horizontal bar; the virgule, slash mark (American English), or oblique stroke (British English); and the fraction bar, solidus,, "275. The solidus", pp. 312–314 or fraction slash. In typography, fractions stacked vertically are also known as en or en dash fractions, and diagonal ones as em or mutton fractions, based on whether a fraction with a single-digit numerator and denominator occupies the proportion of a narrow en square, or a wider em square.
. In traditional typefounding, a piece of type bearing a complete fraction (e.g. ) was known as a case fraction, while those representing only parts of fractions were called piece fractions.The denominators of English fractions are generally expressed as ordinal numbers, in the plural if the numerator is not 1. (For example, and are both read as a number of fifths.) Exceptions include the denominator 2, which is always read half or halves, the denominator 4, which may be alternatively expressed as quarter/ quarters or as fourth/ fourths, and the denominator 100, which may be alternatively expressed as hundredth/ hundredths or percent.
When the denominator is 1, it may be expressed in terms of wholes but is more commonly ignored, with the numerator read out as a whole number. For example, may be described as three wholes, or simply as three. When the numerator is 1, it may be omitted (as in a tenth or each quarter).
The entire fraction may be expressed as a single composition, in which case it is hyphenated, or as a number of fractions with a numerator of one, in which case they are not. (For example, two-fifths is the fraction and two fifths is the same fraction understood as 2 instances of .) Fractions should always be hyphenated when used as adjectives. Alternatively, a fraction may be described by reading it out as the numerator over the denominator, with the denominator expressed as a cardinal number. (For example, may also be expressed as three over one.) The term over is used even in the case of solidus fractions, where the numbers are placed left and right of a slash mark. (For example, 1/2 may be read one-half, one half, or one over two.) Fractions with large denominators that are not powers of ten are often rendered in this fashion (e.g., as one over one hundred seventeen), while those with denominators divisible by ten are typically read in the normal ordinal fashion (e.g., as six-millionths, six millionths, or six one-millionths).
Common fractions can be positive or negative, and they can be proper or improper (see below). Compound fractions, complex fractions, mixed numerals, and decimal expressions (see below) are not common fractions; though, unless irrational, they can be evaluated to a common fraction.
In Unicode, precomposed fraction characters are in the Number Forms block.
In general, a common fraction is said to be a proper fraction if the absolute value of the fraction is strictly less than one—that is, if the fraction is greater than −1 and less than 1. It is said to be an improper fraction, or sometimes top-heavy fraction,
if the absolute value of the fraction is greater than or equal to 1. Examples of proper fractions are 2/3, −3/4, and 4/9, whereas examples of improper fractions are 9/4, −4/3, and 3/3. As described below, any improper fraction can be converted to a mixed number (integer plus proper fraction), and vice versa.
When the numerator and denominator of a fraction are equal (for example, ), its value is 1, and the fraction therefore is improper. Its reciprocal is identical and hence also equal to 1 and improper.
Any integer can be written as a fraction with the number one as denominator. For example, 17 can be written as , where 1 is sometimes referred to as the invisible denominator.
Therefore, every fraction and every integer, except for zero, has a reciprocal. For example, the reciprocal of 17 is .
A ratio is often converted to a fraction when it is expressed as a ratio to the whole. In the above example, the ratio of yellow cars to all the cars on the lot is 4:12 or 1:3. We can convert these ratios to a fraction, and say that of the cars or of the cars in the lot are yellow. Therefore, if a person randomly chose one car on the lot, then there is a one in three chance or probability that it would be yellow.
Decimal fractions can also be expressed using scientific notation with negative exponents, such as , a convenient alternative to the unwieldy 0.0000006023. The represents a denominator of . Dividing by moves the decimal point seven places to the left.
A decimal fraction with infinitely many digits to the right of the decimal separator represents an infinite series. For example, = 0.333... represents the infinite series 3/10 + 3/100 + 3/1000 + ....
Another kind of fraction is the percentage (from , meaning "per hundred", represented by the symbol %), in which the implied denominator is always 100. Thus, 51% means . Percentages greater than 100 or less than zero are treated in the same way, e.g. 311% means and −27% means .
The related concept of permille, or parts per thousand (ppt), means a denominator of 1000, and this parts-per notation is commonly used with larger denominators, such as million and billion, e.g. 75 parts per million ( ppm) means that the proportion is .
The choice between fraction and decimal notation is often a matter of taste and context. Fractions are used most often when the denominator is relatively small. By mental calculation, it is easier to multiply 16 by than to do the same calculation using the fraction's decimal equivalent (0.1875). And it is more precise (exact, in fact) to multiply 15 by , for example, than it is to multiply 15 by any decimal approximation of one third. Monetary values are commonly expressed as decimal fractions with denominator 100, i.e., with two digits after the decimal separator, for example $3.75. However, as noted above, in pre-decimal British currency, shillings and pence were often given the form (but not the meaning) of a fraction, as, for example, "3/6", commonly read three and six, means three shillings and sixpence and has no relationship to the fraction three sixths.
As a basic example, two entire cakes and three quarters of another cake might be written as cakes or cakes, with the numeral representing the whole cakes and the fraction representing the additional partial cake juxtaposed; this is more concise than the more explicit notation cakes. The mixed number is spoken two and three quarters or two and three fourths, with the integer and fraction portions connected by the word and.
Subtraction or negation is applied to the entire mixed numeral, so meansAny mixed number can be converted to an improper fraction by applying the rules of adding unlike quantities. For example, Conversely, an improper fraction can be converted to a mixed number using division with remainder, with the proper fraction consisting of the remainder divided by the divisor. For example, since 4 goes into 11 twice, with 3 left over,
In primary school, teachers often insist that every fractional result should be expressed as a mixed number.
Outside school, mixed numbers are commonly used for describing measurements, for instance hours or 5 3/16 , and remain widespread in daily life and in trades, especially in regions that do not use the decimalized metric system. However, scientific measurements typically use the metric system, which is based on decimal fractions, and starting from the secondary school level, mathematics pedagogy treats every fraction uniformly as a rational number, the quotient of integers, leaving behind the concepts of improper fraction and mixed number. College students with years of mathematical training are sometimes confused when re-encountering mixed numbers because they are used to the convention that juxtaposition in algebraic expressions means multiplication.
A complex fraction should never be written without an obvious marker showing which fraction is nested inside the other, as such expressions are ambiguous. For example, the expression could be plausibly interpreted as either or as The meaning can be made explicit by writing the fractions using distinct separators or by adding explicit parentheses, in this instance or
A compound fraction is a fraction of a fraction, or any number of fractions connected with the word of, corresponding to multiplication of fractions. To reduce a compound fraction to a simple fraction, just carry out the multiplication (see ). For example, of is a compound fraction, corresponding to . The terms compound fraction and complex fraction are closely related and sometimes one is used as a synonym for the other. (For example, the compound fraction is equivalent to the complex fraction .)
Nevertheless, complex fraction and compound fraction may both be considered outdated and now used in no well-defined manner, partly even taken as synonymous with each other or with mixed numerals. They have lost their meaning as technical terms and the attributes complex and compound tend to be used in their everyday meaning of consisting of parts.
Mixed-number arithmetic can be performed either by converting each mixed number to an improper fraction, or by treating each as a sum of integer and fractional parts.
If one takes for the greatest common divisor of the numerator and the denominator, one gets the equivalent fraction whose numerator and denominator have the lowest . One says that the fraction has been reduced to its lowest terms.
If the numerator and the denominator do not share any factor greater than 1, the fraction is already reduced to its lowest terms, and it is said to be irreducible, reduced, or in simplest terms. For example, is not in lowest terms because both 3 and 9 can be exactly divided by 3. In contrast, is in lowest terms—the only positive integer that goes into both 3 and 8 evenly is 1.
Using these rules, we can show that , for example.
As another example, since the greatest common divisor of 63 and 462 is 21, the fraction can be reduced to lowest terms by dividing the numerator and denominator by 21:
The Euclidean algorithm gives a method for finding the greatest common divisor of any two integers.
If the equal denominators are negative, then the opposite result of comparing the numerators holds for the fractions:
If two positive fractions have the same numerator, then the fraction with the smaller denominator is the larger number. When a whole is divided into equal pieces, if fewer equal pieces are needed to make up the whole, then each piece must be larger. When two positive fractions have the same numerator, they represent the same number of parts, but in the fraction with the smaller denominator, the parts are larger.
One way to compare fractions with different numerators and denominators is to find a common denominator. To compare and , these are converted to and (where the dot signifies multiplication and is an alternative symbol to ×). Then bd is a common denominator and the numerators ad and bc can be compared. It is not necessary to determine the value of the common denominator to compare fractions – one can just compare ad and bc, without evaluating bd, e.g., comparing ? gives .
For the more laborious question ? multiply top and bottom of each fraction by the denominator of the other fraction, to get a common denominator, yielding ? . It is not necessary to calculate – only the numerators need to be compared. Since 5×17 (= 85) is greater than 4×18 (= 72), the result of comparing is .
Because every negative number, including negative fractions, is less than zero, and every positive number, including positive fractions, is greater than zero, it follows that any negative fraction is less than any positive fraction. This allows, together with the above rules, to compare all possible fractions.
For adding quarters to thirds, both types of fraction are converted to twelfths, thus:
Consider adding the following two quantities:
Second, convert into fifteenths by multiplying both the numerator and denominator by five: . Now it can be seen that
This method can be expressed algebraically:
This algebraic method always works, thereby guaranteeing that the sum of simple fractions is always again a simple fraction. However, if the single denominators contain a common factor, a smaller denominator than the product of these can be used. For example, when adding and the single denominators have a common factor 2, and therefore, instead of the denominator 24 (4 × 6), the halved denominator 12 may be used, not only reducing the denominator in the result, but also the factors in the numerator.
The smallest possible denominator is given by the least common multiple of the single denominators, which results from dividing the rote multiple by all common factors of the single denominators. This is called the least common denominator.
To subtract a mixed number, an extra one can be borrowed from the minuend, for instance
To explain the process, consider one third of one quarter. Using the example of a cake, if three small slices of equal size make up a quarter, and four quarters make up a whole, twelve of these small, equal slices make up a whole. Therefore, a third of a quarter is a twelfth. Now consider the numerators. The first fraction, two thirds, is twice as large as one third. Since one third of a quarter is one twelfth, two thirds of a quarter is two twelfth. The second fraction, three quarters, is three times as large as one quarter, so two thirds of three quarters is three times as large as two thirds of one quarter. Thus two thirds times three quarters is six twelfths.
A short cut for multiplying fractions is called cancellation. Effectively the answer is reduced to lowest terms during multiplication. For example:
^{~1}} \times \frac ^{~1}} ^{~2}}= \frac{1}{1} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2}.
A two is a common Divisor in both the numerator of the left fraction and the denominator of the right and is divided out of both. Three is a common factor of the left denominator and right numerator and is divided out of both.
This method works because the fraction 6/1 means six equal parts, each one of which is a whole.
Alternately, mixed numbers can be treated as sums, and FOIL method. In this example,
A conventional way to indicate a repeating decimal is to place a bar (known as a vinculum) over the digits that repeat, for example = 0.789789789.... For repeating patterns that begin immediately after the decimal point, the result of the conversion is the fraction with the pattern as a numerator, and the same number of nines as a denominator. For example:
Alternatively, algebra can be used, such as below:
These definitions agree in every case with the definitions given above; only the notation is different. Alternatively, instead of defining subtraction and division as operations, the inverse fractions with respect to addition and multiplication might be defined as:
-(a,b) &= (-a, b) & & \text{additive inverse fractions,} \\ &&&\text{with } (0,b) \text{ as additive unities, and}\\ (a,b)^{-1} &= (b,a) & & \text{multiplicative inverse fractions, for } a \ne 0, \\ &&&\text{with } (b,b) \text{ as multiplicative unities}. \end{align}
Furthermore, the relation, specified as
In the case of fractions of integers, the fractions with and coprime and are often taken as uniquely determined representatives for their equivalent fractions, which are considered to be the same rational number. This way the fractions of integers make up the field of the rational numbers.
More generally, a and b may be elements of any integral domain R, in which case a fraction is an element of the field of fractions of R. For example, in one indeterminate, with coefficients from some integral domain D, are themselves an integral domain, call it P. So for a and b elements of P, the generated field of fractions is the field of rational fractions (also known as the field of rational functions).
If the numerator and the denominator are , as in , the algebraic fraction is called a rational fraction (or rational expression). An irrational fraction is one that is not rational, as, for example, one that contains the variable under a fractional exponent or root, as in .
The terminology used to describe algebraic fractions is similar to that used for ordinary fractions. For example, an algebraic fraction is in lowest terms if the only factors common to the numerator and the denominator are 1 and −1. An algebraic fraction whose numerator or denominator, or both, contain a fraction, such as , is called a complex fraction.
The field of rational numbers is the field of fractions of the integers, while the integers themselves are not a field but rather an integral domain. Similarly, the rational fractions with coefficients in a field form the field of fractions of polynomials with coefficient in that field. Considering the rational fractions with real coefficients, radical expressions representing numbers, such as , are also rational fractions, as are a transcendental numbers such as since all of and are , and thus considered as coefficients. These same numbers, however, are not rational fractions with integer coefficients.
The term partial fraction is used when decomposing rational fractions into sums of simpler fractions. For example, the rational fraction can be decomposed as the sum of two fractions: . This is useful for the computation of of rational functions (see partial fraction decomposition for more).
The process of rationalization of binomial denominators involves multiplying the top and the bottom of a fraction by the conjugate of the denominator so that the denominator becomes a rational number. For example:
|
|