Product Code Database
Example Keywords: linux -pokimon $83-186
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Zunbil Dynasty
Tag Wiki 'Zunbil Dynasty'.
Tag

Zunbil, also written as Zhunbil, or Rutbils of Zabulistan, was a royal dynasty south of the in present southern region. They were a dynasty of origin. They ruled from circa 680 AD until the Saffarid conquest in 870 AD. The Zunbil dynasty was founded by Rutbil (Turkic: Iltäbär), the elder brother of the ruler (either or ), who ruled over the kingdom from his capital in .Andre Wink, Al-Hind, the Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Vol.1, (Brill, 1996), 115;" "The Zunbils of the early Islamic period and the Kabulshahs were almost certainly epigoni of the southern-Hephthalite rulers of Zabul."History of Civilizations of central Asia, B A Litivinsky Zhang Guang-Da, R Shabani Samghabadi, p.376

(2020). 9781785703065, Cambridge University Press. .
The Zunbils are described as having Turkish troops in their service by Arabic sources like and . However the term "Turk" was used in an inaccurate and loose way.

The faith of this community has not been researched as much. According to the interpretation of Chinese sources by Marquarts and de Groots in 1915, the king of Ts'ao is said to have worn a crown with a golden fish head and was related to the Sogdians. The Temple of the Zun was recognizable by a large fish skeleton on display; this would indicate a related merchantry deity.H. Miyakawa und A. Kollautz: Ein Dokument zum Fernhandel zwischen Byzanz und China zur Zeit Theophylakts In: Byzantinische Zeitschrift, S. 14 (Anhang). De Gruyter Januar 1984. . In addition to that Marquarts states the Zunbils to have worshipped a which might have been connected to Aditya (). However, according to Shōshin Kuwayama there was a clear dichotomy between worshipers of the Hindu god Surya and followers of Zhun. This is exemplified by the conflict between Surya and Zhun followers, which led to the followers of Zhun migrating southwards towards from Kapisa. According to André Wink the god Zhun was primarily , though parallels have also been noted with in and had Zoroastrian influence in its ritual. Other scholars such as H. Schaeder and N. Sims-William have connected it with .

Their territory included between what is now the city of in southwestern Afghanistan and in the northeast, with and serving as their capitals.André Wink, "Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World", Brill 1990, p. 118 In the south their territory reached at times the cities of Rakhwad () and (near ).

The title Zunbil can be traced back to the original Zūn-dātbar, 'Zun the Justice-giver'. The geographical name Zamindawar would also reflect this, from Middle Persian 'Zamin-i dātbar' (Land of the Justice-giver).Bosworth, Clifford Edmund. 2002. The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Leiden: Brill. Zamindawar. p.439.


Zabulistan under the Turks
.

]] During more than two centuries of their rule, the , followed by the and the Zunbils were consistently an obstacle to the eastward expansion of Muslims forces.


Early Arab incursions in Zabulistan

Rashiduns
About 643-644 AD, the Arabs raided Sistan for the first time, and then started to attack the Turkic territory from the southwest.

In 653-4 AD, an army of around 6,000 Arabs was led by general Abd al-Rahman ibn Samura of the Rashidun Caliphate, and they arrived to the shrine of Zoon in Zamindawar. It is reported that Samura "broke off a hand of the idol and plucked out the rubies which were its eyes in order to persuade the marzbān of Sīstān of the god's worthlessness."André Wink, "Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World", Brill 1990. p 120 Samura explained to the marzbān: "my intention was to show you that this idol can do neither any harm nor good."


Umayyad Caliphate
Circa 665 AD, the Arabs under Abd al-Rahman ibn Samura, a general of the Umayyad Caliphate and caliphal governor of , captured Kabul for the first time, critically weakening the .
(2015). 9781317340904, Routledge. .
But the Turkic ruler was soon able to mount a counter-offensive and repulse the Arabs, taking back the areas of Kabul and (around ), as well as the region of as far as , and founding the new dynasty of the circa 665 AD.

Rutbil is first mentioned to have existed during his time, as his earliest mention in Arab sources dates to 666 CE. Rutbil may have been the brother or nephew of Barha Tegin, and may have been appointed as the governor in by Barha Tegin after he conquered the region from .

Rutbil and the king of Kabul campaigned together against the Arabs after Abdur Rahman ibn Samura was replaced as the governor of . Rabi ibn Ziyad al-Harithi upon assuming governorship in 671 CE attacked Rutbil at , and drove him to . Rabi's successor Ubayd Allah ibn Abi Bakra continued the war upon being appointed in 673 CE, leading Rutbil to negotiate a peace treaty for both and , in which the governor of acknowledged control of these territories by Rutbil and the King of Kabul.


Establishment of the Zunbils (680 CE)
Around the time the first ruler of the Turk Shahis died, his dynasty split into two kingdoms. From 680 AD, became the king of the , and ruled the area from to as well as Zabulistan. His title was "Khorasan Tegin Shah" (meaning "Tegin, King of the East"), and he was known in Chinese sources as Wusan teqin sa. His grand title probably refers to his resistance to the peril of the from the west.

In 680-683 AD, Rutbil split from his brother the Shahi of Kabul according to , and established the Zunbil dynasty, paying temporary allegiance to Salm ibn Ziyad, the Arab governor of Sistan.

(2015). 9781438420394, SUNY Press. .
The area of Zabulistan came to be ruled by Rutbil, also spelled Zibil or Jibul (from Turkic: Iltäbär "Commander").
(1996). 9789231032110, UNESCO. .

The relationship between the two relatives was at times antagonistic, but they fought together against Arab incursions. Rubtil issued coins derived from Sassanian prototypes, with a legend on the obverse, a legend on the reverse, and a short legend in the name of Śrī Vākhudevaḥ ("His Highness the Majestic Lord"):

According to Anthony McNicoll, "the Zunbils ruled in the area for nearly 250 years until the late 9th century AD".Excavations at Kandahar 1974 & 1975 (Society for South Asian Studies Monograph) by Anthony McNicoll Their main capital Zamindawar was located in the present-day of . The shrine of Zoon was located about three miles south of in Helmand, which may still be traced today. Some believe that the Sunagir temple mentioned by the famous Chinese traveler in 640 AD pertains to this exact house of worship.


Umayyad Caliphate offensives (698-700 CE)
In 698 Ubayd Allah ibn Abi Bakra, governor of and a military commander of the Umayyad Caliphate, led an 'Army of Destruction' against the Zunbils. He was defeated and was forced to offer a large tribute, give hostages including three of his sons, and take an oath not to invade the territory of the Zunbils again.
(2025). 9780297865599, Hachette UK. .

About 700, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf appointed Ibn al-Ash'ath as commander of a huge Iraqi army, the so-called "Peacock Army", to subdue the troublesome principality of .Hugh Kennedy, The Great Arab Conquests', 2007, pages 194-198 During the campaign, al-Hajjaj's overbearing behaviour caused Ibn al-Ash'ath and the army to rebel. After patching up an agreement with the Zunbils, the army started on its march back to Iraq. On the way, a mutiny against al-Hajjaj developed into a full-fledged anti-Umayyad rebellion.

The Arabs regularly claimed nominal overlordship over the Zunbils, and in 711 Qutayba ibn Muslim managed to force them to pay tribute. In 725–726, Yazid ibn al-Ghurayf, governor of failed to do so. The Arabs would not be able to obtain tribute from the Zunbils again until 769 CE, when Ma'n b. Za'ida al-Shaybanl defeated them near .


Khuras and his son Alkhis, lords of Ghazni (714-715 CE)
The Bactrian inscription of Tang-i Safedak, dated to around 714/15 CE, mentions the dedication of a stupa by , son of Khuras, lord of "Gazan", thought to be . Alkhis is considered as the patron of the second period of florescence of the Buddhist sanctuary of , characterized in this period by the creation of hybrid Sinicized-Indian Buddhist art.


Vassalage to the Yabghus of Tokharistan
According to Chinese sources, in particular the chronicles of the , the Turks in Kabul were vassals of the Yabghus of . When a young brother of the Yabghu Pantu Nili, named Puluo (僕羅 Púluó in Chinese sources), visited the court of the in Xi'an in 718 AD, he gave an account of the military forces in the Tokharistan region. Puluo described the power of "the kings of Tokharistan", explaining that "Two hundred and twelve kingdoms, governors and prefects" recognise the authority of the Yabghus, and that it has been so since the time of his grandfather, that is, probably since the time of the establishment of the Yabghus of Tokharistan. This account also shows that the Yabghu of Tokharistan ruled a vast area circa 718 AD, formed of the territories north and south of the , including the areas of and ."The account herewith quoted as 3.5. shows that this king of Tokhara had political power to control the principalities belonging to the Governors-General to the north and the south of the Hindukush, not to mention the Yuezhi Governor General." in Finally, Puluo reaffirmed the loyalty of Yabghu Pantu Nili towards the Tang dynasty.

Part of the Chinese entry for this account by Puluo is:


Chinese influence

Tang dynasty investiture
A few Zunbil rulers are named in Chinese sources, especially Shiquer or Zigil (Chinese:誓屈爾 Shìqū'ér), ruler of Zabulistan from 720 CE and for a few years until 738. A Chinese account from the mentions how (Chinese: 誓䫻 Shìyù) was a vassal to the around 710-720 CE, and how the Zunbil ruler, named "Shiquer", was recognized by the Chinese court in 720 CE.
(2021). 9789004460669, BRILL. .
Shiquer received the title of Gedaluozhi Xielifa (Chinese: 葛達羅支頡利發). The word " Geluodazhi" in this extract (Chinese: 葛罗达支, pronounced in Early Middle Chinese: kat-la-dat-tcǐe), is thought to be a transliteration of the ethnonym .
(2020). 9789493194014, Barkhuis. .
Xielifa is the known Chinese transcription of the Turkish "Iltäbär", hence Shiquer was "Iltäbär of the Khalaj":Original Chinese in , book 0964 冊府元龜 (四庫全書本)/卷0964 "九月遣使冊葛達羅支頡利發誓屈爾為謝䫻國王葛達羅支特勒為𦋺賔國王", simplified Chinese "九月遣使册葛达罗支颉利发誓屈尔为谢䫻国王葛达罗支特勒为𦋺賔国王", "In September 720 ambassadors recorded that Gedalouzhi Xielifa Shiquer was enthroned as king of Zabulistan, Gedaluozhi Tele was enthroned as king of ." see
(2025). 9783700168850, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. .
also " 開元八年,天子冊葛達羅支頡利發誓屈爾為王。至天寶中數朝獻。" "In the eighth year of Kaiyuan (720), the Emperor approved the enthronement of Gedalouzhi Xielifa Shiquer. Their envoys came to the royal court several times until the Tianbao era (742–756)." in


Visit by Hyecho (726 CE)
In 726 CE, the Korean Buddhist monk visited Zabulistan (谢䫻国 Xiėyùguó) and recorded that Kabul and Zabul were ruled by Turkic kings, who followed Buddhism. According to him, the King of Kabul was the uncle of the king of Zabul.
(2021). 9789004460669, BRILL. .


Chinese artistic influences (680-750 CE)
Chinese artistic influences, on top of nomical political influence, are discernable in the artistic creations under the Zunbils around that time, as seen in the Buddhist monastery of . During the period from 680 to 720 CE, essentially Indian post- start to blend with Chinese stylistic influences, "a Chinese touch" discernable in Buddhist works of art.

A full-blown "Chinese phase" is attributed to the period from 720 to 750 CE, corresponding to the last major phase of construction and decorations of Buddhist monuments before the Arab conquests. This construction period was possibly marked by the patronage of , a contemporary ruler of the area who was probably of the same ethnicity as the nearby of and a member of the Zunbils, or his successors. The period sees a marked evolution in the facial types of the statues, with the Chinese-Indian traits of the previous period moving markedly towards styles, and clearly following Tang prototypes. Such phenomenon is also seen in the site of . It is thought that Buddhism was particularly strong in China during the rule of Empress (624-705 CE), and that, together the several missions of Chinese pilgrims to Afghanistan and India, Chinese monks settled in from around 700 CE. This activity mirrored the active development of monasteries in during the 7th-8th centuries, and highlight a broad territorial unity of Buddhist kingdoms in Western Central Asia at that time, based on intense exchanges and a westward influence of Chinese Buddhism and artistic styles.

The influence of Chinese artistic styles vanishes after the Anshi rebellion.


Abbasid Caliphate claim to overlordship (750 CE)
Arabic sources recount that, after the came to power in 750, the Zunbils made submissions to the third (r. 775–785), but these appear to have been nominal acts,Al-Ya'qubi, Historiae, p. 479; al-Tabari, v. 30: p. 143 and the people of the region continued to resist Muslim rule.For example, joining Rafi' ibn Layth's rebellion and reneging on tribute agreements: al-Ya'qubi, Historiae, p. 528; al-Baladhuri, pp. 203-04 The Muslim historian Ya'qubi (died 897/8) in his Ta'rikh ("History"), recounts that al-Mahdi asked for, and apparently obtained, the submission of various rulers, including that of the Zunbils. The original account by Ya'qubi reads:

In 769 CE, the Arabs were again able to obtain tribute from the Zunbils after nearly half a century, when Ma'n b. Za'ida al-Shaybanl defeated them near .

Arab destructions are documented around 795 CE, as the Muslim writer Kitāb al-buldān records the destruction of a Šāh Bahār (“Temple of the King”), thought to be , at that time: he recounts that the Arabs attacked the Šāh Bahār, "in which were idols worshipped by the people. They destroyed and burnt them".


End of the Turk Shahis (822 CE)
In 815 CE, the led by caliph Al-Ma'mun defeated the Kabul branch of the in 815 CE, in what was essentially a political retribution: hoping to take advantage of the Great Abbasid Civil War (811-819 AD), the Turk Shahi ruler, named "Pati Dumi" in Arab sources, had invaded parts of .
(2021). 9789004460669, BRILL. .
The Turk Shahis not only had to convert to Islam but also had to cede key cities and regions. Another campaign against the Gandhara branch seem to have followed soon, with the Caliphate reaching , and imposing a critical defeat. A new dynasty, the dynasty, took over in Gandhara and Kabul in 822 CE. The Zunbils were unaffected by Al-Ma'mun's raids and continued to rule for about two more decades, before getting embroiled in the conflict to eventual extinction.


Saffarids Conquest (870 CE)
The Zunbils were finally defeated in 870 AD by the Muslim conqueror Yaqub bin Laith al-Saffar (r. 861–879 AD, founder of the ), who conquered the entire Zunbil territory from his base in Sistan.

Yaqub bin Laith al-Saffar started his eastern conquests in 870/871 CE, when he marched against the Kharijites of , and defeated them. He then marched towards , and defeated another Khariji leader who was named Abd al-Rahman. His army would then march to , conquering the Zunbils, and further to Bamyan and , pushing the to the East, conquering these territories in the name of Islam by appointing Muslim governors. From there they moved to north of the and by 870 AD the whole of Khorasan was brought under Saffarid control. The was now under Ya'qub's control, which made him able to mint silver coins. Pandjhir, Encyclopedia of Islam, Vol. VIII, 258.

According to C.E. Bosworth, the Saffarids achieved, for the first time, Muslim expansion in eastern Afghanistan, after more than two centuries of plundering raids by the Muslim governors of and fierce resistance from the rulers of the region."One of the most important aspects of early policy of significance for the spread of Islam in Afghanistan and on the borders of India long after their empire had collapsed was that of expansion into east Afghanistan. The early governors of Sistan had at times penetrated as far as and , but these had been little more than slave and plunder raids. There was a fierce resistance from the local rulers of these regions, above all from the line of Zunbils who ruled in Zamindavar and Zabulistan and who were probably epigoni of the southern or Chionite kingdom of Zabul; on more than one occasion, these Zunbils inflicted sharp defeats on the Muslims. The Zunbils were linked with the Turk-Shahs of the Turk Shahi dynasty; the whole river valley was at this time culturally and religiously an outpost of the Indian world, as of course it had been in the earlier centuries during the heyday of the civilization." in .

The , setting up defenses in , continued the resistance to the eastern expansion of Islam until circa 1026 CE.


Religion
In his travel diaries, the Chinese monk reported in the early 700s that the temple of the Indo-Iranian god Zun/Sun(Surya) was in the region. He also reported there were numerous Buddhist stupas in the area of Zabul. There were dozens of Hindu temples and hundreds of Buddhist monasteries. In addition, drawing many pilgrims. According to Wink, it was clear that Zunbils ruled over a predominately Indian realm.
(2025). 9780391041738, BRILL. .


Buddhism
In 726 CE, the Korean Buddhist monk visited Zabulistan (谢䫻国 Xiėyùguó) and recorded that Kabul and Zabul were ruled by Turkic kings, who followed Buddhism. The last phase of the Buddhist monastery in , dates to the time of the Zunbils.


Zhun
The Zunbils worshiped a deity called Zhūn (or Zūn), from whom they derived their name.
(2025). 9780391041738, BRILL. .
He is represented with flames radiating from his head on coins. Statues were adorned with gold and used rubies for eyes. calls him "sunagir".

The origin and nature of Zhun is disputed. M. Shenkar in his study comes to the conclusion that Zhun was possibly connected to the deity of the river Oxus, the modern river Amudarya. Furthermore, he holds it most likely that Zhun was the greatest deity worshiped in Zabulistan. F. Grenet believes that Zhun might have been connected with the Iranian solar deity . Zhun has been linked with the at , and of as well as . Some scholars have considered the cult to be neither Buddhist nor Zoroastrian, but primarily Hindu. Scholars point out the connections between the deity Zhun/Zun and .

His shrine lay on a sacred mountain in and another at a temple in . Originally he appears to have been brought at Zamindawar by Hepthalites, displacing an earlier god on the same site. Parallels have been noted with the pre-Buddhist monarchy of , next to influence on its ritual. Whatever his origins, he was certainly superimposed on a mountain and on a pre-existing mountain god while merging with Shaiva doctrines of worship.

(1991). 9789004095090, Brill. .


Zurvan hypothesis
Other scholars however have connected Zun with the Sassanid Zoroastrian deity , the deity of time.

According to Gulman S, its Afghan followers were, most probably, initially Zoroastrians. Mention of Žun and its devotees disappeared with the end of Žunbil dynasty of Zabulistan in 870. Its followers, according to Ibn Athir, accepted Islam.

According to N. Sims-Williams:

Ulf Jäger states: We should interpret "Zhun" as the name of the ancient Iranian deity of time, "Zurwan".


See also
  • Islamic conquest of Afghanistan
  • Pre-Islamic period of Afghanistan
  • Religion in Afghanistan


Sources


External links
  • Zunbil in Encyclopædia Britannica


Notes
1. "Xuanzang's story is simple, but suggests a historical background:there happened a conflict between the two religious groups, the Surya group and the Zhuna group".

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time