Product Code Database
Example Keywords: hat -tekken $12
   » » Wiki: Set (mathematics)
Tag Wiki 'Set (mathematics)'.

In , a set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects, considered as an object in its own right.

(1995). 9788122408010, New Age International. .
(1986). 9780486652528, Courier Corporation. .
For example, the numbers 2, 4, and 6 are distinct objects when considered separately, but when they are considered collectively they form a single set of size three, written .
(2014). 9781483150390, Elsevier Science. .
The concept of a set is one of the most fundamental in mathematics.
(2017). 9780486814872, Courier Dover Publications. .
Developed at the end of the 19th century,
(2007). 9783764383497, Birkhäuser Basel. .
is now a ubiquitous part of mathematics, and can be used as a foundation from which nearly all of mathematics can be derived.

The German word Menge, rendered as "set" in English, was coined by in his work The Paradoxes of the Infinite.
(2004). 9780191513701, OUP Oxford. .
(1996). 9780198505358, OUP Oxford. .
(2019). 9780192556837, OUP Oxford. .

A set is a well-defined collection of distinct objects. The objects that make up a set (also known as the set's elements or members)
(2020). 9780262032933, MIT Press. .
can be anything: numbers, people, letters of the alphabet, other sets, and so on. , one of the founders of set theory, gave the following definition of a set at the beginning of his Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre:"Eine Menge, ist die Zusammenfassung bestimmter, wohlunterschiedener Objekte unserer Anschauung oder unseres Denkens – welche Elemente der Menge genannt werden – zu einem Ganzen."

Sets are conventionally denoted with .

(1997). 9780071368414, McGraw Hill Professional. .
Sets A and B are equal if and only if they have precisely the same elements.

For technical reasons, Cantor's definition turned out to be inadequate; today, in contexts where more rigor is required, one can use axiomatic set theory, in which the notion of a "set" is taken as a and the properties of sets are defined by a collection of .

(2001). 9783764357498, Springer Science & Business Media. .
The most basic properties are that a set can have elements, and that two sets are equal (one and the same) if and only if every element of each set is an element of the other; this property is called the extensionality of sets.

Set notation
There are two common ways of describing, or specifying the members of, a set: roster notation and set builder notation.
(2009). 9781420069563, CRC Press. .
(2013). 9781133107422, Cengage Learning. .
. These are examples of extensional and intensional definitions of sets, respectively.
(2011). 9781441174130, Bloomsbury Publishing. .

Roster notation
The Roster notation (or enumeration notation) method of defining a set consist of listing each member of the set.
(2004). 9780716762973, W. H. Freeman. .
(2010). 9780495391326, Cengage Learning. .
More specifically, in roster notation (an example of extensional definition), the set is denoted by enclosing the list of members in :

A =
B = .

For sets with many elements, the enumeration of members can be abbreviated.

(2013). 9781285608433, Cengage Learning. .
(2013). 9780618951345, Cengage Learning. .
For instance, the set of the first thousand positive integers may be specified in roster notation as


where the ellipsis ("...") indicates that the list continues in according to the demonstrated pattern.

In roster notation, listing a member repeatedly does not change the set, for example, the set is identical to the set .

(2005). 9781439863756, CRC Press. .
Moreover, the order in which the elements of a set are listed is irrelevant (unlike for a or ), so is yet again the same set.

Set-builder notation
In set-builder notation,
(1990). 9780912675732, Rowman & Littlefield. .
the set is specified as a subset of a larger set, where the subset is determined by a statement or condition involving the elements. For example, a set F can be specified as follows:

F = \{n \mid n \text{ is an integer, and } 0 \leq n \leq 19\}.

In this notation, the ("|") means "such that", and the description can be interpreted as " F is the set of all numbers n, such that n is an integer in the range from 0 to 19 inclusive". Sometimes the colon (":") is used instead of the vertical bar.

(1987). 9780314295316, West Publishing Company. .

Set-builder notation is an example of intensional definition.

Other ways of defining sets
Another method is by using a rule or semantic description:

A is the set whose members are the first four positive .
B is the set of colors of the French flag.

This is another example of intensional definition.

If B is a set and x is one of the objects of B, this is denoted as xB, and is read as "x is an element of B", as "x belongs to B", or "x is in B". If y is not a member of B then this is written as yB, read as "y is not an element of B", or "y is not in B".
(2020). 9781852337810, Springer Science & Business Media. .

For example, with respect to the sets A = , B = , and F = ,

4 ∈ A and 12 ∈ F; and
20 ∉ F and green ∉ B.

If every element of set A is also in B, then A is said to be a subset of B, written AB (pronounced A is contained in B).
(2020). 9780821838358, American Mathematical Soc.. .
Equivalently, one can write BA, read as B is a superset of A, B includes A, or B contains A.
(2010). 9781846282928, Springer Science & Business Media. .
The relationship between sets established by ⊆ is called inclusion or containment. Two sets are equal if they contain each other: AB and BA is equivalent to A = B.

If A is a subset of B, but not equal to B, then A is called a proper subset of B, written AB, or simply AB ( A is a proper subset of B), or BA ( B is a proper superset of A, BA).

The expressions AB and BA are used differently by different authors; some authors use them to mean the same as AB (respectively BA), whereas others use them to mean the same as AB (respectively BA).


  • The set of all humans is a proper subset of the set of all mammals.
  • ⊆ .
  • ⊆ .

There is a unique set with no members,

(1992). 9789622090262, Hong Kong University Press. .
called the (or the null set), which is denoted by the symbol ∅ (other notations are used; see ). The empty set is a subset of every set, and every set is a subset of itself:
  • ∅ ⊆ A.
  • AA.

A partition of a set S is a set of nonempty subsets of S such that every element x in S is in exactly one of these subsets. That is, the subsets are pairwise disjoint (meaning any two sets of the partition contain no element in common), and the union of all the subsets of the partition is S.
(2012). 9781439863336, CRC Press. .

Power sets
The power set of a set S is the set of all subsets of S. The power set contains S itself and the empty set because these are both subsets of S. For example, the power set of the set is . The power set of a set S is usually written as P( S).

The power set of a finite set with n elements has 2 n elements. For example, the set contains three elements, and the power set shown above contains 23 = 8 elements.

The power set of an infinite (either or ) set is always uncountable. Moreover, the power set of a set is always strictly "bigger" than the original set in the sense that there is no way to pair every element of S with exactly one element of P( S). (There is never an onto map or from S onto P( S).)

(2004). 9781931914413, Springer Science & Business Media. .

The cardinality of a set S, denoted , is the number of members of S.
(1994). 9783540941804, Springer Science & Business Media. .
For example, if B = , then . Repeated members in roster notation are not counted,
(2020). 9789810245009, World Scientific. .
(2015). 9781939512079, The Mathematical Association of America. .
so , too.

The cardinality of the empty set is zero.

(2008). 9780495389132, Cengage Learning. .

Some sets have cardinality. The set N of , for instance, is infinite. Some infinite cardinalities are greater than others. For instance, the set of has greater cardinality than the set of natural numbers.

(2013). 9783319015774, Springer Science & Business Media. .
However, it can be shown that the cardinality of (which is to say, the number of points on) a is the same as the cardinality of any of that line, of the entire plane, and indeed of any finite-dimensional .
(2006). 9780306472039, Springer Science & Business Media. .

Special sets
There are some sets or kinds of sets that hold great mathematical importance and are referred to with such regularity that they have acquired special names and notational conventions to identify them. One of these is the , denoted or ∅. A set with exactly one element, x, is a , or singleton, .

Many of these sets are represented using or bold typeface.

(2003). 9781139439435, Cambridge University Press. .

Special sets of numbers include

  • P or ℙ, denoting the set of all : P = .
    (2016). 9781482205824, CRC Press. .
  • N or \mathbb{N}, denoting the set of all : N = (sometimes defined excluding 0).
  • Z or \mathbb{Z}, denoting the set of all (whether positive, negative or zero): Z = .
  • Q or ℚ, denoting the set of all (that is, the set of all and improper fractions): Q = . For example, 1/4 ∈ Q and 11/6 ∈ Q. All integers are in this set since every integer a can be expressed as the fraction a/1 ( ZQ).
  • R or \mathbb{R}, denoting the set of all . This set includes all rational numbers, together with all irrational numbers (that is, that cannot be rewritten as fractions such as , as well as transcendental numbers such as π, e).
  • C or ℂ, denoting the set of all : C = . For example, 1 + 2 iC.
  • H or ℍ, denoting the set of all : H = . For example, 1 + i + 2 jkH.
    (2012). 9781447106036, Springer Science & Business Media. .

Each of the above sets of numbers has an infinite number of elements, and each can be considered to be a proper subset of the sets listed below it. The primes are used less frequently than the others outside of and related fields.

Positive and negative sets are sometimes denoted by superscript plus and minus signs, respectively. For example, ℚ+ represents the set of positive rational numbers.

Basic operations
There are several fundamental operations for constructing new sets from given sets.

Two sets can be "added" together. The union of A and B, denoted by A ∪  B, is the set of all things that are members of either A or B.


  • {1, 2, 3} ∪ {3, 4, 5} = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

Some basic properties of unions:

  • if and only if

A new set can also be constructed by determining which members two sets have "in common". The intersection of A and B, denoted by is the set of all things that are members of both A and B. If then A and B are said to be disjoint.


Some basic properties of intersections:

  • if and only if

Two sets can also be "subtracted". The relative complement of B in A (also called the set-theoretic difference of A and B), denoted by (or ), is the set of all elements that are members of A but not members of B. It is valid to "subtract" members of a set that are not in the set, such as removing the element green from the set ; doing so has no effect.

In certain settings all sets under discussion are considered to be subsets of a given universal set U. In such cases, is called the absolute complement or simply complement of A, and is denoted by A′.


  • If U is the set of integers, E is the set of even integers, and O is the set of odd integers, then U \ E = E′ = O.

Some basic properties of complements:

  • for .
  • and
  • and
  • .
  • if then

An extension of the complement is the symmetric difference, defined for sets A, B as

A\,\Delta\,B = (A \setminus B) \cup (B \setminus A).
For example, the symmetric difference of and is the set . The power set of any set becomes a with symmetric difference as the addition of the ring (with the empty set as neutral element) and intersection as the multiplication of the ring.

Cartesian product
A new set can be constructed by associating every element of one set with every element of another set. The Cartesian product of two sets A and B, denoted by A × B is the set of all ( a, b) such that a is a member of A and b is a member of B.


Some basic properties of Cartesian products: Let A and B be finite sets; then the cardinality of the Cartesian product is the product of the cardinalities:

  • |  A × B | = |  B × A | = |  A | × |  B |.

Set theory is seen as the foundation from which virtually all of mathematics can be derived. For example, structures in , such as groups, fields and rings, are sets closed under one or more operations.

One of the main applications of naive set theory is constructing relations. A relation from a domain A to a B is a subset of the Cartesian product A × B. Given this concept, we are quick to see that the set F of all ordered pairs ( x, x2), where x is real, is quite familiar. It has a domain set R and a codomain set that is also R, because the set of all squares is subset of the set of all real numbers. If placed in functional notation, this relation becomes f( x) = x2. The reason these two are equivalent is for any given value, y that the function is defined for, its corresponding ordered pair, ( y, y2) is a member of the set F.

Axiomatic set theory
Although initially naive set theory, which defines a set merely as any collection, was well accepted, it soon ran into several obstacles. It was found that this definition spawned , most notably:
  • Russell's paradoxIt shows that the "set of all sets that do not contain themselves," i.e. the "set" does not exist.
  • Cantor's paradoxIt shows that "the set of all sets" cannot exist.

The reason is that the phrase well-defined is not very well-defined. It was important to free set theory of these paradoxes because nearly all of mathematics was being redefined in terms of set theory. In an attempt to avoid these paradoxes, set theory was axiomatized based on first-order logic, and thus axiomatic set theory was born.

For most purposes, however, naive set theory is still useful.

Principle of inclusion and exclusion
The inclusion–exclusion principle is a counting technique that can be used to count the number of elements in a union of two sets, if the size of each set and the size of their intersection are known. It can be expressed symbolically as
|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|.

A more general form of the principle can be used to find the cardinality of any finite union of sets:

\left|A_{1}\cup A_{2}\cup A_{3}\cup\ldots\cup A_{n}\right|=& \left(\left|A_{1}\right|+\left|A_{2}\right|+\left|A_{3}\right|+\ldots\left|A_{n}\right|\right) \\ &{} - \left(\left|A_{1}\cap A_{2}\right|+\left|A_{1}\cap A_{3}\right|+\ldots\left|A_{n-1}\cap A_{n}\right|\right) \\ &{} + \ldots \\ &{} + \left(-1\right)^{n-1}\left(\left|A_{1}\cap A_{2}\cap A_{3}\cap\ldots\cap A_{n}\right|\right). \end{align}

De Morgan's laws
Augustus De Morgan stated two laws about sets.

If A and B are any two sets then,

  • (A ∪ B)′ = A′ ∩ B′
The complement of A union B equals the complement of A intersected with the complement of B.
  • (A ∩ B)′ = A′ ∪ B′
The complement of A intersected with B is equal to the complement of A union to the complement of B.

See also


External links

Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1


Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 


General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 


Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
5s Time