Product Code Database
Example Keywords: kindle -grand $41
   » » Wiki: Mamluk
Tag Wiki 'Mamluk'.
Tag

Mamluk or Mamaluk (; (singular), مماليك, mamālīk (plural); translated as "one who is owned", meaning "slave") were non-, ethnically diverse (mostly , Caucasian, and ) enslaved , , and who were assigned high-ranking military and administrative duties, serving the ruling Arab and dynasties in the .

The most enduring Mamluk realm was the military class in medieval Egypt, which developed from the ranks of . Originally the Mamluks were slaves of from the , but the institution of military slavery spread to include , ,А.Ш.Кадырбаев, Сайф-ад-Дин Хайр-Бек – абхазский "король эмиров" Мамлюкского Египта (1517–1522), "Материалы первой международной научной конференции, посвященной 65-летию В.Г.Ардзинба". Сухум: АбИГИ, 2011, pp. 87–95Thomas Philipp, Ulrich Haarmann (eds), The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 115–116.Jane Hathaway, The Politics of Households in Ottoman Egypt: The Rise of the Qazdaglis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 103–104. , , , and , as well as peoples from the such as , , and ( see ). They also recruited from the .

(1998). 9780521033060, Cambridge University Press.
The "Mamluk/Ghulam Phenomenon", as dubbed the creation of the specific warrior class,
(1979). 9780860780496, Variorum Reprints.
was of great political importance; for one thing, it endured for nearly 1,000 years, from the 9th century to the early 19th.

Over time, Mamluks became a powerful military knightly class in various that were controlled by dynastic Arab rulers. Particularly in and , but also in the , , , and India, mamluks held political and military power. In some cases, they attained the rank of , while in others they held regional power as or . Most notably, Mamluk factions seized the sultanate centered on and , and controlled it as the Mamluk Sultanate (1250–1517). The Mamluk Sultanate famously defeated the at the Battle of Ain Jalut. They had earlier fought the western European Christian in 1154–1169 and 1213–1221, effectively driving them out of Egypt and the Levant. In 1302 the Mamluk Sultanate formally expelled the last Crusaders from the Levant, ending the era of the Crusades.

While Mamluks were purchased as property, their status was above ordinary slaves, who were not allowed to carry weapons or perform certain tasks. In places such as Egypt, from the to the time of Muhammad Ali of Egypt, mamluks were considered to be "true lords" and "true warriors", with social status above the general population in and the . In a sense, they were like enslaved .


Overview
Daniel Pipes argued that the first indication of the Mamluk military class was rooted in the practice of early such as Zubayr ibn al-Awwam and who, before Islam, owned many slaves and practiced (Islamic manumission of slaves). The army under Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr, son of Zubayr, used these freed slave retainers during the second civil war.

Meanwhile, historians agree that the massive implementation of a slave military class such as the Mamluks appears to have developed in beginning with the 9th-century Abbasid Caliphate based in , under the Abbasid caliph al-Muʿtaṣim. Until the 1990s, it was widely believed that the earliest Mamluks were known as or Ghulam (another broadly synonymous term for slaves) and were bought by the Abbasid caliphs, especially al-Muʿtaṣim (833–842).

By the end of the 9th century, such slave warriors had become the dominant element in the military. Conflict between the Ghilman and the population of Baghdad prompted the caliph al-Muʿtaṣim to move his capital to the city of , but this did not succeed in calming tensions. The caliph was assassinated by some of these slave soldiers in 861 (see Anarchy at Samarra).D. Sourdel. "Ghulam" in the Encyclopedia of Islam.

Since the early 21st century, historians have suggested that there was a distinction between the Mamluk system and the (earlier) Ghilman system, in , which did not have specialized training and was based on pre-existing Central Asian hierarchies. Adult slaves and freemen both served as warriors in the Ghilman system. The Mamluk system developed later, after the return of the caliphate to Baghdad in the 870s. It included the systematic training of young slaves in military and martial skills.See E. de la Vaissière, Samarcande et Samarra, 2007, and also M. Gordon, The Breaking of a Thousand Swords, 2001. The Mamluk system is considered to have been a small-scale experiment of , to combine the slaves' efficiency as warriors with improved reliability. This recent interpretation seems to have been accepted.See for instance the review in Der Islam 2012 of de la Vaissière's book by Christopher Melchert: 'Still, de la Vaissière's dating of the Mamluk phenomenon herewith becomes the conventional wisdom'

After the fragmentation of the Abbasid Empire, military slaves, known as either Mamluks or Ghilman, were used throughout the Islamic world as the basis of military power. The Fatimid Caliphate (909–1171) of Egypt had forcibly taken adolescent male Armenians, , Sudanese, and from their families to be trained as slave soldiers. They formed the bulk of their military, and the rulers selected prized slaves to serve in their administration. The powerful vizier , for example, was a Mamluk from . In Iran and Iraq, the used slaves throughout their empire. The rebel was a Mamluk who eventually ushered in in Baghdad after attempting a failed rebellion. When the later Abbasids regained military control over Iraq, they also relied on the Ghilman as their warriors.Eric Hanne. Putting the Caliph in His Place.

Under and the Ayyubids of Egypt, the power of the Mamluks increased and they claimed the sultanate in 1250, ruling as the Mamluk Sultanate. Throughout the Islamic world, rulers continued to use enslaved warriors until the 19th century. The 's devşirme, or "gathering" of young slaves for the , lasted until the 17th century. Regimes based on Mamluk power thrived in such Ottoman provinces as the Levant and Egypt until the 19th century.


Organization
Under the Mamluk Sultanate of Cairo, Mamluks were purchased while still young males. They were raised in the barracks of the . Because of their isolated social status (no social ties or political affiliations) and their austere military training, they were trusted to be loyal to their rulers. When their training was completed, they were discharged, but remained attached to the patron who had purchased them. Mamluks relied on the help of their patron for career advancement, and likewise the patron's reputation and power depended on his recruits. A Mamluk was "bound by a strong esprit de corps to his peers in the same household".

Mamluks lived within their garrisons and mainly spent their time with each other. Their entertainments included sporting events such as competitions and presentations of mounted combat skills at least once a week. The intensive and rigorous training of each new recruit helped ensure continuity of Mamluk practices.

Sultans owned the largest number of mamluks, but lesser also owned their own troops. Many Mamluks were appointed or promoted to high positions throughout the empire, including army command. At first their status was non-hereditary. Sons of Mamluks were prevented from following their father's role in life. However, over time, in places such as Egypt, the Mamluk forces became linked to existing power structures and gained significant amounts of influence on those powers.


Relations with homelands and families
In Egypt, studies have shown that mamluks from Georgia retained their native language, were aware of the politics of the , and received frequent visits from their parents or other relatives. In addition, they sent gifts to family members or gave money to build useful structures (a defensive tower, or even a church) in their native villages."Relations of the Georgian Mamluks of Egypt with Their Homeland in the Last Decades of the Eighteenth Century." Daniel Crecelius and Gotcha Djaparidze. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 45, No. 3 (2002), pp. 320–341. .


Egypt

Early origins in Egypt
The practice of recruiting slaves as soldiers in the Muslim world and turning them into Mamluks began in during the 9th century CE, and was started by the Abbasid caliph al-Muʿtaṣim.

From the 900s through the 1200s, medieval Egypt was controlled by dynastic foreign rulers, notably the Ikhshidids, , and . Throughout these dynasties, thousands of Mamluk and guards continued to be used and even took high offices. This increasing level of influence among the Mamluks worried the in particular. Eventually, a Mamluk rose to become Sultan of Egypt.David Nicole The Mamluks 1250–1570 The Mamluks in medieval Egypt were predominantly of and origins, and most of them descended from enslaved Christians. After they were taken from their families, they became renegades. Because Egyptian Mamluks were enslaved Christians, Muslim rulers and did not believe they were true believers of Islam despite the fact that they were deployed for fighting in wars on behalf of several Islamic kingdoms as slave-soldiers.

By 1200, 's brother succeeded in securing control over the whole empire by defeating and killing or imprisoning his brothers and nephews in turn. With each victory, al-ʿĀdil incorporated the defeated Mamluk retinue into his own. This process was repeated at al-ʿĀdil's death in 1218, and at his son 's death in 1238. The Ayyubids became increasingly surrounded by the Mamluks, who acted semi-autonomously as regional . The Mamluks increasingly became involved in the internal court politics of the kingdom itself as various factions used them as allies.


French attack and Mamluk takeover
In June 1249, the under Louis IX of France landed in Egypt and took . After the Egyptian troops retreated at first, the sultan had more than 50 commanders hanged as .

When the Egyptian sultan died, the power passed briefly to his son al-Muazzam Turanshah and then his favorite wife , a according to most historians, while others say she was an . She took control with Mamluk support and launched a counterattack against the French. Troops of the commander defeated Louis's troops. The king delayed his retreat too long and was captured by the Mamluks in March 1250. He agreed to pay a ransom of 400,000 livres tournois to gain release (150,000 livres were never paid).Madden, Thomas F. Crusades: The Illustrated History. 1st ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. p. 159

Because of political pressure for a male leader, married the Mamluk commander, . He was assassinated in his bath. In the ensuing power struggle, , also a Mamluk, took over. He formally founded the Mamluke Sultanate and the .

The first Mamluk dynasty was named Bahri after the name of one of the regiments, the Bahriyyah or River Island regiment. Its name referred to their center on in the . The regiment consisted mainly of and .


Relationship with the Mongols
When the 's troops of sacked Baghdad in 1258 and advanced towards Syria, the Mamluk emir left Damascus for . There he was welcomed by Sultan ., p. 509/vol. 1, Al Selouk Leme'refatt Dewall al-Melouk, Dar al-kotob, 1997. After taking Damascus, Hulagu demanded that Qutuz surrender Egypt. Qutuz had Hulagu's envoys killed and, with Baibars' help, mobilized his troops.

When Möngke Khan died in action against the Southern Song, Hulagu pulled the majority of his forces out of Syria to attend the (funeral ceremony). He left his lieutenant, the Christian , in charge with a token force of about 18,000 men as a garrison.David Chambers, The Devil's Horsemen, Atheneum, 1979. pp. 153–155 The Mamluk army, led by Qutuz, drew the reduced army into an ambush near the , routed them at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260, and captured and executed Kitbuqa.

After this great triumph, Qutuz was assassinated by conspiring Mamluks. It was widely said that Baibars, who seized power, had been involved in the assassination plot. In the following centuries, the Mamluks ruled discontinuously, with an average span of seven years.

The Mamluks defeated the Ilkhanids a second time in the First Battle of Homs and began to drive them back east. In the process they consolidated their power over Syria, fortified the area, and formed mail routes and diplomatic connections among the local princes. Baibars' troops attacked Acre in 1263, captured Caesarea in 1265, and took in 1268.

Mamluks also defeated new Ilkhanate attacks in Syria in 1271 and 1281 (the Second Battle of Homs). They were defeated by the Ilkhanids and their Christian allies at the Battle of Wadi al-Khazandar in 1299. Soon after that the Mamluks defeated the Ilkhanate again in 1303/1304 and 1312. Finally, the Ilkhanids and the Mamluks signed a treaty of peace in 1323.


Burji dynasty
By the late fourteenth century, the majority of the Mamluk ranks were made up of from the region, whose young males had been frequently captured for slavery. In 1382 the took over when was proclaimed sultan. The name "Burji" referred to their center at the of .

Barquq became an enemy of , who threatened to invade Syria. Timur invaded Syria, defeating the Mamluk army, and he sacked Aleppo and captured Damascus. The Ottoman sultan, , then invaded Syria. After Timur's death in 1405, the Mamluk sultan regained control of Syria. Frequently facing rebellions by local , he was forced to abdicate in 1412. In 1421, Egypt was attacked by the Kingdom of Cyprus, but the Egyptians forced the Cypriotes to acknowledge the suzerainty of the Egyptian sultan . During Barsbay's reign, Egypt's population became greatly reduced from what it had been a few centuries before; it had one-fifth the number of towns.

Al-Ashraf came to power in 1453. He had friendly relations with the Ottoman Empire, which captured later that year, causing great rejoicings in Muslim Egypt. However, under the reign of Khushqadam, Egypt began a struggle with the Ottoman sultanate. In 1467, sultan offended the Ottoman sultan , whose brother was poisoned. Bayezid II seized , Tarsus and other places within Egyptian territory, but was eventually defeated. Qaitbay also tried to help the Muslims in Spain, who were suffering after the Catholic , by threatening the Christians in Syria, but he had little effect in Spain. He died in 1496, several hundred thousand ducats in debt to the great trading families of the Republic of Venice.


Portuguese–Mamluk Wars
Vasco da Gama in 1497 sailed around the Cape of Good Hope and pushed his way east across the Indian Ocean to the shores of and . There he attacked the fleets that carried freight and Muslim pilgrims from India to the , and struck terror into the potentates all around. Various engagements took place. Cairo's Mamluk sultan Al-Ashraf Qansuh al-Ghawri was affronted at the attacks around the Red Sea, the loss of tolls and traffic, the indignities to which and its port were subjected, and above all for losing one of his ships. He vowed vengeance upon Portugal, first sending monks from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre as envoys, he threatened Pope Julius II that if he did not check Manuel I of Portugal in his depredations on the Indian Sea, he would destroy all Christian holy places.Palmira Johnson Brummett, Ottoman Seapower and Levantine Diplomacy in the Age of Discovery , SUNY Press, 1994,

The rulers of in India and also turned for help to the Mamluk Sultan of Egypt. They wanted a fleet to be armed in the Red Sea that could protect their important trading sea routes from Portuguese attacks. was soon fortified as a harbor of refuge so and the Red Sea were protected. But the fleets in the Indian Ocean were still at the mercy of the enemy.

The last Mamluk sultan, Al-Ghawri, fitted out a fleet of 50 vessels. As Mamluks had little expertise in naval warfare, he sought help from the Ottomans to develop this naval enterprise.Andrew James McGregor, A Military History of Modern Egypt: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Ramadan War , Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006 In 1508 at the Battle of Chaul, the Mamluk fleet defeated the Portuguese viceroy's son Lourenço de Almeida.

But, in the following year, the Portuguese won the Battle of Diu and wrested the port city of Diu from the Gujarat Sultanate. Some years after, Afonso de Albuquerque attacked Aden, and Egyptian troops suffered disaster from the Portuguese in Yemen. Al-Ghawri fitted out a new fleet to punish the enemy and protect the Indian trade. Before it could exert much power, Egypt had lost its sovereignty. The Ottoman Empire took over Egypt and the Red Sea, together with and all its Arabian interests.


Ottomans and the end of the Mamluk Sultanate
The Ottoman Sultan was engaged in warfare in southern Europe when a new era of hostility with Egypt began in 1501. It arose out of the relations with the in . Shah sent an embassy to the Republic of Venice via Syria, inviting Venice to ally with Persia and recover its territory taken by the Ottomans. Mameluk Egyptian sultan Al-Ghawri was charged by with giving the Persian envoys passage through Syria on their way to Venice and harboring refugees. To appease him, Al-Ghawri placed in confinement the Venetian merchants then in Syria and Egypt, but after a year released them.James Waterson, "The Mamluks"

After the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, Selim attacked the bey of , as Egypt's vassal had stood aloof, and sent his head to Al-Ghawri. Now secure against Persia, in 1516 he formed a great army for the conquest of Egypt, but gave out that he intended further attacks on Persia.

In 1515, Selim began the war which led to the conquest of Egypt and its dependencies. Mamluk cavalry proved no match for the Ottoman artillery and . On 24 August 1516, at the Battle of Marj Dabiq, Sultan Al-Ghawri was killed. Syria passed into Turkish possession, an event welcomed in many places as it was seen as deliverance from the Mameluks.

The Mamluk Sultanate survived in Egypt until 1517, when Selim captured Cairo on 20 January. Although not in the same form as under the Sultanate, the Ottoman Empire retained the Mamluks as an Egyptian ruling class and the Mamluks and the Burji family succeeded in regaining much of their influence, but as vassals of the Ottomans.Thomas Philipp, Ulrich Haarmann (1998). The Mamluks in Egyptian Politics and Society


Independence from the Ottomans
In 1768, Ali Bey Al-Kabir declared independence from the Ottomans. However, the Ottomans crushed the movement and retained their position after his defeat. By this time new slave recruits were introduced from Georgia in the Caucasus.


Napoleon invades
In 1798, the ruling of the Republic of France authorised a campaign in "The Orient" to protect French trade interests and undermine Britain's access to India. To this end, Napoleon Bonaparte led an Armée d'Orient to Egypt.

The French defeated a Mamluk army in the Battle of the Pyramids and drove the survivors out to . The Mamluks relied on massed cavalry charges, changed only by the addition of . The French infantry and held firm. Despite multiple victories and an initially successful expedition into Syria, mounting conflict in Europe and the earlier defeat of the supporting French fleet by the British at the Battle of the Nile decided the issue.

On 14 September 1799, General Jean-Baptiste Kléber established a mounted company of Mamluk auxiliaries and Syrian from Turkish troops captured at the siege of Acre. Menou reorganized the company on 7 July 1800, forming three companies of 100 men each and renaming it the "Mamluks de la République". In 1801 General was sent to Marseille to organize a squadron of 250 Mamluks. On 7 January 1802 the previous order was canceled and the squadron reduced to 150 men. The list of effectives on 21 April 1802 reveals three officers and 155 of other rank. By decree of 25 December 1803 the Mamluks were organized into a company attached to the of the Imperial Guard (see Mamelukes of the Imperial Guard).

Napoleon left with his personal guard in late 1799. His successor in Egypt, General Jean-Baptiste Kléber, was assassinated on 14 June 1800. Command of the Army in Egypt fell to Jacques-François Menou. Isolated and out of supplies, Menou surrendered to the British in 1801.


After Napoleon
After the departure of French troops in 1801 the Mamluks continued their struggle for independence; this time against the Ottoman Empire. In 1803, Mamluk leaders Ibrahim Bey and Osman Bey al-Bardisi wrote to the consul-general, asking him to mediate with the Sultan to allow them to negotiate for a cease-fire, and a return to their homeland Georgia. The Russian ambassador in refused however to intervene, because of nationalist unrest in Georgia that might have been encouraged by a Mamluk return.

In 1805, the population of Cairo rebelled. This provided a chance for the Mamluks to seize power, but internal friction prevented them from exploiting this opportunity. In 1806, the Mamluks defeated the Turkish forces in several clashes. in June the rival parties concluded an agreement by which Muhammad Ali, (appointed as governor of Egypt on 26 March 1806), was to be removed and authority returned to the Mamluks. However, they were again unable to capitalize on this opportunity due to discord between factions. Muhammad Ali retained his authority.


End of power in Egypt
Muhammad Ali knew that he would have to deal with the Mamluks if he wanted to control Egypt. They were still the feudal owners of Egypt and their land was still the source of wealth and power. However, the economic strain of sustaining the military manpower necessary to defend the Mamluks's system from the Europeans and Turks would eventually weaken them to the point of collapse.Abu-Lughod, Janet L. Before European Hegemony The World System A.D. 1250–1350. New York: Oxford UP, 1991. 213 pp.

On 1 March 1811, Muhammad Ali invited all of the leading Mamluks to his palace to celebrate the declaration of war against the Wahhabis in Arabia. Between 600 and 700 Mamluks paraded for this purpose in . Muhammad Ali's forces killed almost all of these near the Al-Azab gates in a narrow road down from Mukatam Hill. This ambush came to be known as the Massacre of the Citadel. According to contemporary reports, only one Mamluk, whose name is given variously as Amim (also Amyn), or Heshjukur (a ), survived when he forced his horse to leap from the walls of the citadel.For the use of the name Amim, see Giovanni Finati, Narrative of the Life and Adventure of Giovanni Finati native of Ferrara, 1830; for Heshjukur, Mustafa Mahir, Marks of the Caucasian Tribes and Some Stories and Notable Events Related to Their Leaders, Boulaq, Cairo, 1892

During the following week an estimated 3,000 Mamluks and their relatives were killed throughout Egypt, by Muhammad's regular troops. In the citadel of Cairo alone more than 1,000 Mamluks died.

Despite Muhammad Ali's destruction of the Mamluks in Egypt, a party of them escaped and fled south into what is now . In 1811, these Mamluks established a state at in the Sennar as a base for their slave trading. In 1820, the sultan of Sennar informed Muhammad Ali that he was unable to comply with a demand to expel the Mamluks. In response, the sent 4,000 troops to invade Sudan, clear it of Mamluks, and reclaim it for Egypt. The Pasha's forces received the submission of the Kashif, dispersed the Dunqulah Mamluks, conquered , and accepted Sennar's surrender from the last sultan, .


Impact
According to Eric Chaney and Lisa Blades, the reliance on mamluks by Muslim rulers had a profound impact on the Arab world's political development. They argue that, because European rulers had to rely on local elites for military forces, lords and bourgeois acquired the necessary bargaining power to push for representative government. Muslim rulers did not face the same pressures partly because the Mamluks allowed the Sultans to bypass local elites.


Other regimes
There were various places in which Mamluks gained political or military power as a self-replicating military community. Some examples of this can be seen in the Tripolitania region of Libya, where Mamluk governors instated their various policies under the Ottoman Empire until October 18, 1912, when Italian forces took over the region in the Italo-Turkish War.


South Asia

India
In 1206, the Mamluk commander of the Muslim forces in the Indian subcontinent, Qutb al-Din Aibak, proclaimed himself Sultan, creating the Mamluk Sultanate in Delhi which lasted until 1290.


West Asia

Iraq
Mamluk corps were first introduced in by Hassan Pasha of in 1702. From 1747 to 1831 Iraq was ruled, with short intermissions, by Mamluk officers of origin The Arab Lands under Ottoman Rule: 1516–1800. Jane Hathaway, Karl Barbir. Person Education Ltd., 2008, p. 96. . who succeeded in asserting autonomy from the , suppressed tribal revolts, curbed the power of the Janissaries, restored order, and introduced a program of modernization of the economy and the military. In 1831 the Ottomans overthrew Dawud Pasha, the last Mamluk ruler, and imposed direct control over Iraq. "Iraq" Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 15 October 2007


Rulers

In Egypt

Bahri Dynasty
  • 1250 ('s Widow de facto ruler of Egypt)
  • 1250
  • 1257
  • 1259
  • 1260
  • 1277
  • 1280
  • 1280
  • 1290 al-Ashraf Salah-ad-Din Khalil
  • 1294 al-Nasir Muhammad first reign
  • 1295
  • 1297
  • 1299 al-Nasir Muhammad second reign
  • 1309 al-Muzaffar Rukn-ad-Din Baybars II al-Jashankir
  • 1310 al-Nasir Muhammad third reign
  • 1340 Saif ad-Din Abu-Bakr
  • 1341
  • 1342 An-Nasir Ahmad, Sultan of Egypt
  • 1342 As-Salih Ismail, Sultan of Egypt
  • 1345 Al-Kamil Sha'ban
  • 1346 Al-Muzaffar Hajji
  • 1347 al-Nasir Badr-ad-Din Abu al-Ma'aly al-Hassan first reign
  • 1351 al-Salih Salah-ad-Din Ibn Muhammad
  • 1354 al-Nasir Badr-ad-Din Abu al-Ma'aly al-Hassan second reign
  • 1361 al-Mansur Salah-ad-Din Mohamed Ibn Hajji
  • 1363 al-Ashraf Zein al-Din Abu al-Ma'ali ibn Shaban
  • 1376 al-Mansur Ala-ad-Din Ali Ibn al-Ashraf Shaban
  • 1382 al-Salih Salah Zein al-Din Hajji II first reign


Burji Dynasty
  • 1382 , first reign
  • 1389 second reign (with honorific title al-Muzaffar or al-Mansur) – Temporary Bahri rule
  • 1390 , Second reign – Burji rule re-established
  • 1399 An-Nasir Naseer ad-Din Faraj
  • 1405 Al-Mansoor Azzaddin Abdal Aziz
  • 1405 An-Nasir Naseer ad-Din Faraj (second time)
  • 1412 al-Musta'in (, proclaimed as Sultan)
  • 1412 Al-Muayad Sayf ad-Din Shaykh
  • 1421 Al-Muzaffar Ahmad
  • 1421 Az-Zahir Saif ad-Din Tatar
  • 1421 As-Salih Nasir ad-Din Muhammad
  • 1422
  • 1438 Al-Aziz Jamal ad-Din Yusuf
  • 1438
  • 1453 Al-Mansoor Fakhr ad-Din Osman
  • 1453 Al-Ashraf Sayf ad-Din Enal
  • 1461 Al-Muayad Shihab ad-Din Ahmad
  • 1461 Az-Zahir Sayf ad-Din Khushkadam
  • 1467 Az-Zahir Sayf ad-Din Bilbay
  • 1468 Az-Zahir Temurbougha
  • 1468
  • 1496 al-Nasir Abu al-Sa'adat Muhammad bin Qait Bay first reign
  • 1497
  • 1497 al-Nasir Abu al-Sa'adat Muhammad bin Qait Bay second reign
  • 1498 Qansuh Al-Ashrafi
  • 1500 Al-Bilal Ayub
  • 1500 Al-Ashraf Janbalat
  • 1501 Tuman bay I
  • 1501 Al-Ashraf Qansuh al-Ghawri
  • 1517 Tuman bay II


In India
  • 1206 Qutb-ud-din Aybak, founded Mamluk Sultanate, Delhi
  • 1210
  • 1211 Shams ud din Iltutmish. Son-in-law of Qutb-ud-din Aybak.
  • 1236 Rukn ud din Firuz. Son of Iltutmish.
  • 1236 . Daughter of Iltutmish.
  • 1240 Muiz ud din Bahram. Son of Iltutmish.
  • 1242 Ala ud din Masud. Son of Rukn ud din.
  • 1246 Nasiruddin Mahmud. Grandson of Iltutmish.
  • 1266 Ghiyas ud din Balban. Ex-slave, son-in-law of Iltutmish.
  • 1286 Muiz ud din Qaiqabad. Grandson of Balban and Nasiruddin.
  • 1290 Kayumars. Son of Muiz ud din.


In Iraq
  • 1704 Hassan Pasha
  • 1723 Ahmad Pasha, son of Hasan
  • 1749 Sulayman Abu Layla Pasha, son-in-law of Ahmad
  • 1762 Omar Pasha, son of Ahmad
  • 1780 Sulayman Pasha the Great, son of Omar
  • 1802 Ali Pasha, son of Omar
  • 1807 Sulayman Pasha the Little, son of Sulayman Great
  • 1813 Said Pasha, son of Sulayman Great
  • 1816 Dawud Pasha (1816–1831)


In Acre
  • 1805 Sulayman Pasha al-Adil, mamluk of
  • 1819 Abdullah Pasha ibn Ali (1819–1831)


Office titles and terminology
The following terms originally come from either or Ottoman Turkish language (the latter composed of Turkish, Arabic, and Persian words and grammar structures).

Alama Sultaniyaعلامة سلطانيةThe mark or signature of the Sultan put on his decrees, letters and documents.
Al-Nafir al-Amالنفير العامGeneral emergency declared during war
AmirأميرPrince
Amir Akhurأمير آخورsupervisor of the royal stable (from Persian آخور meaning stable)
Amir Majlisأمير مجلسGuard of Sultan's seat and bed
AtabekأتابكCommander in chief (literally "father-lord," originally meaning an appointed step-father for a non-Mamluk minor prince)
AstadarأستادارChief of the royal servants
Barid Jawiبريد جوىAirmail (mail sent by carrier-pigeons, amplified by Sultan )
Bayt al-Malبيت المالtreasury
CheshmehششمهA pool of water, or fountain (literally "eye"), from Persian چشمه]]
دوادارHolder of Sultan's ink bottle (from Persian دوات‌دار meaning bearer of the ink bottle)
FondokفندقHotel (some famous hotels in Cairo during the Mamluk era were Dar al-Tofah, Fondok Bilal and Fondok al-Salih)
HajibحاجبDoorkeeper of sultan's court
IqtaإقطاعRevenue from land allotment
JamkiyaجامكيةSalary paid to a Mamluk
JashnakirجاشنكيرFood taster of the sultan (to assure his beer was not poisoned)
JomdarجمدارAn official at the department of the Sultan's clothing (from Persian جامه‌دار, meaning keeper of cloths)
Kafel al-mamalek al-sharifah al-islamiya al-amir al-amriكافل الممالك الشريفة الاسلامية الأمير الأمرىTitle of the Vice-sultan (Guardian of the Prince of Command lit. of the Dignified Islamic Kingdoms)
KhanخانA store that specialized in selling a certain commodity
KhaskiyaخاصكيةCourtiers of the sultan and most trusted royal mamluks who functioned as the Sultan's bodyguards/ A privileged group around a prominent Amir (from Persian خاصگیان, meaning close associates)
KhastakhanehخاصتاخانةHospital (from Ottoman Turkish خسته‌خانه]], from Persian)
KhondخندWife of the sultan
KhushdashiyaخشداشيةMamluks belonging to the same Amir or Sultan.
Mahkamat al-Mazalimمحكمة المظالمCourt of complaint. A court that heard cases of complaints of people against state officials. This court was headed by the sultan himself.
Mamalik Kitabeyaمماليك كتابيةMamluks still attending training classes and who still live at the Tebaq (campus)
Mamalik Sultaneyaمماليك سلطانيةMamluks of the sultan; to distinguish from the Mamluks of the Amirs (princes)
Modwarat al-Sultanمدورة السلطانSultan's tent which he used during travel.
MohtasebمحتسبController of markets, public works and local affairs.
MorqadarمرقدارWorks in the Royal Kitchen (from Persian مرغ‌دار meaning one responsible for the fowl)
MushrifمشرفSupervisor of the Royal Kitchen
Na'ib Al-Sultanنائب السلطانVice-sultan
Qa'at al-insha'aقاعة الإنشاءChancery hall
Qadi al-Qodaقاضى القضاةChief justice
Qalat al-Jabalقلعة الجبلCitadel of the Mountain (the abode and court of the sultan in Cairo)
QaranisaقرانصةMamluks who moved to the service of a new Sultan or from the service of an Amir to a sultan.
QussadقصادSecret couriers and agents who kept the sultan informed
OstazأستاذBenefactor of Mamluks (the Sultan or the Emir) (from Persian استاد)
RankرنكAn emblem that distinguished the rank and position of a Mamluk (probably from Persian رنگ]] meaning color)
SanjaqiسنجاقىA standard-bearer of the Sultan.
SharabkhanaشرابخانةStorehouse for drinks, medicines and glass-wares of the sultan. (from Persian شراب‌خانه meaning wine cellar)
SilihdarسلحدارArm-Bearer (from Arabic سلاح + Persian دار, meaning arm-bearer)
TabalkhanaطبلخانهThe amir responsible for the Mamluk military band, from Persian طبل‌خانه
TashrifتشريفHead-covering worn by a Mamluk during the ceremony of inauguration to the position of Amir.
TawashiطواشىA Eunuch responsible for serving the wives of the sultan and supervising new Mamluks. Mamluk writers seem not to have consulted the eunuchs themselves about "their origins."
(1995). 9780195071016, Oxford University Press. .
TebaqطباقCampus of the Mamluks at the citadel of the mountain
TishtkhanaطشتخانةStorehouse used for the laundry of the sultan (from Persian تشت‌خانه, meaning tub room)
Waliوالىviceroy
YuqيوقA large linen closet used in every mamluk home, which stored pillows and sheets. (Related to the present Crimean Tatar word Yuqa, "to sleep". In modern Turkish: Yüklük.)


Gallery
File:Mamluk.jpg|Portrait of a Mamluk, 1779 File:Mourad bey.jpg|, Circassian Mamluk chieftain and commander, 1800 File:Mamluke.jpg|A Mamluk cavalryman, drawing by , 1810 File:El dos de mayo de 1808 en Madrid.jpg| by Francisco de Goya (1814) File:Le Mameluke Roustam by Jacques Nicolas Paillot de Montabert 1806.jpg|Armenian Mamluk was 's personal bodyguard; portrait by Jacques-Nicolas Paillot de Montabert (1806) File:62emeMarmaluke.jpg|Soldiers of Napoleon's 62ème régiment de ligne and a Mamluk (historical reenactment) File:USMC Marmeluke.JPG|Today's U.S. Marine Corps officers' resembles those used by the Mamluks


Dynasties founded by Mamluks
  • (868–905)
  • (935–969)
  • (977–1186)
  • Khwarazmian dynasty (1077–1231)
  • Mamluk dynasty (Delhi) (1206–1290)
  • Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo) (1250–1517)
  • Mamluk dynasty (Iraq) (1704–1831)


See also


Notes

Further reading
  • (1991). 9780195067743, Oxford University Press US. .
  • Allouche, A. (1994). Mamluk Economics: A Study and Translation of Al-Maqrizi's Ighathat. Salt Lake City
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .
  • (1995). 9780521462266, Cambridge University Press. .
  • Blaydes, Lisa, and Eric Chaney. "The feudal revolution and Europe's rise: Political divergence of the Christian west and the Muslim world before 1500 CE." American Political Science Review 107.1 (2013): 16–34. online
  • Blaydes, Lisa. "Mamluks, Property Rights, and Economic Development: Lessons from Medieval Egypt." Politics & Society 47.3 (2019): 395–424 online .
  • Borer, Mary Cathcart. What Became of the Mamelukes? (Pergamon Press, 1969)
  • Fay, Mary Ann. "Women and waqf: Toward a reconsideration of women's place in the Mamluk household." International Journal of Middle East Studies 29.1 (1997): 33–51.
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .
  • Glubb, John. Soldiers of Fortune: The Story of the Mamlukes (Hodder & Stoughton, 1973)
  • Hathaway, Jane. "The military household in Ottoman Egypt." International Journal of Middle East Studies 27.1 (1995): 39–52 online .
  • Luz, Nimrod. The Mamluk City in the Middle East: History, Culture, and the Urban Landscape (Cambridge UP, 2014) excerpt
  • Muslu, Cihan Yuksel. The Ottomans and the Mamluks: Imperial Diplomacy and Warfare in the Islamic World (2014) excerpt
  • Oualdi, M'hamed. "Mamluks in Ottoman Tunisia: A Category Connecting State and Social Forces." International Journal of Middle East Studies 48.3 (2016): 473–490.
  • (1981). 9780300024470, Yale University Press. .
  • Piterberg, Gabriel. "The Formation of an Ottoman Egyptian Elite in the 18th Century." International Journal of Middle East Studies 22.3 (1990): 275–289.
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .
  • Van Steenbergen, Jo, Patrick Wing, and Kristof D'hulster. "The Mamlukization of the Mamluk Sultanate? State Formation and the History of Fifteenth Century Egypt and Syria: Part I – Old Problems and New Trends." History Compass 14.11 (2016): 549–559.
    • "The Mamlukization of the Mamluk Sultanate? State Formation and the History of Fifteenth Century Egypt and Syria: Part IIComparative Solutions and a New Research Agenda." History Compass 14.11 (2016): 560–569.
  • Walker, Bethany. Jordan in the Late Middle Ages: Transformation of the Mamluk Frontier (2011)
  • Waterson, James. "The Mamluks" History Today (March 2006) 56#3 pp 21–27 online.
  • Ulrich Haarmann (2004). Das Herrschaftssystem der Mamluken, in: Halm / Haarmann (eds.): Geschichte der arabischen Welt. C.H. Beck,
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .
  • E. de la Vaissière (2007). Samarcande et Samarra. Elites d'Asie centrale dans l'empire Abbasside, Peeters, Peeters-leuven.be
  • (2025). 9789004340466, .


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
7s Time