Product Code Database
Example Keywords: ocarina of -tetris $80-189
   » » Wiki: Kuliak Languages
Tag Wiki 'Kuliak Languages'.
Tag

The Kuliak languages, also called the Rub languages,Ehret, Christopher (2001) A Historical-Comparative Reconstruction of Nilo-Saharan (SUGIA, Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika: Beihefte 12), Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, . or Nyangiyan languages are a group of languages spoken by small communities in the mountainous region of northeastern .

Nyang'i and are moribund, with a handful of elderly speakers. However, is vigorous and growing.

in Kuliak languages is verb-initial.Beer, Sam, Amber McKinney, Lokiru Kosma 2009. The So Language: A Grammar Sketch. m.s.


Names
The Kuliak languages are also called the Rub languages by Ehret (1981), since Ehret reconstructed "Rub" to mean 'person' in Proto-Kuliak. He suggests that "Kuliak" may actually be a derogatory term used by neighboring Nilotic-speaking peoples to disparage Kuliak speakers as "poor," hence his preference for using Rub instead.Ehret, Christopher. 1981. Revising Proto-Kuliak. Afrika und Übersee 64: 81-100. However, Kuliak continues to be the most widely used name, and is preferred by , Terrill Schrock, Sam Beer and other linguists, who note that the name "Kuliak" is not perceived as offensive or pejorative by any Kuliak speakers.


History
The Kuliak languages have previously had a much more extensive range in the past. Kuliak loanwords in the , , Kalenjin and languages show that these peoples inhabited western Kenya and the southern parts of before being absorbed by the ancestors of these Bantu and Nilotic speakers. These now extinct Kuliak peoples are known as the "Southern Rub". The Southern Rub lived as far south as , as shown by Kuliak loanwords in and , and possibly as far east as the Kilimanjaro Region, as shown by Kuliak loanwords in the and Thagiicu languages.


Classification

Internal
According to the classification of Heine (1976), Soo and Nyang'i form a subgroup, Western Kuliak, while Ik stands by itself.

According to Schrock (2015), "" is a spurious language, is not a fourth Kuliak language, and may at most be a dialect of Ik.Schrock, Terrill. 2015. On Whether 'Dorobo' was a Fourth Kuliak Language. Studies in African Linguistics 44: 47-58.

Heine finds the following numbers of correspondences between the languages on the 200-word :

  • Soo – Nyang'i: 43.2%
  • Nyang'i – Ik: 26.7%
  • Soo – Ik: 24.2%


External
Bender (1989) had classified the Kuliak languages within the Eastern Sudanic languages. Later, Bender (2000) revised this position by placing Kuliak as basal branch of Nilo-Saharan. treats Kuliak as an independent language family and does not accept Nilo-Saharan as a valid language family.

An early suggestion for Ik as a member of Afroasiatic was made by in the 1960s; this was criticized as weak and abandoned by the 1980s.


Evolution
The following sound correspondences are identified by (1976),Heine, Bernd. 1976. The Kuliak Languages of Eastern Uganda. Nairobi: East African Publishing House. who proposes also corresponding Proto-Kuliak reconstructions.

+ Kuliak consonant correspondences
*b
*d
Initially. Fricative z in Dorobo.
Medially. No reflexes known in Nyang'i.
Initially, before back vowels
Initially, before front vowels
Medially
*p
*t
*c
Initially and medially
Finally
*k
Word-initially
*kʰ
Initially
Medially
*kʼ
Initially
Medially
Initially
Finally
Initially
Finally
No reflex known in Tepes
*m
*n
Initially, by default
Initially, before *ɛ
Medially and finally
Finally, a plosive /t/ in Dorobo.
Initially and at the end of monosyllabic words
Elsewhere
Medially
Initially and finally
Medially
Default
Finally after *k, *g

+ Kuliak vowel correspondences
Default
Preceded by any non-open vowel
Followed by a high vowel *i, *u
Unstressed, when followed by a semivowel *j, *w
In Tepes and Nyang'i, /e/ and /ɛ/ can alternate morphophonologically.
*e
*ẹ
*I
*i
In Tepes and Nyang'i, /o/ and /ɔ/ can alternate morphophonologically.
*o
*ọ
*U
*u
For other vowel correspondences, Heine reconstructs clusters of vowels:
  • Front vowel + *o: yields Ik /ɔ/ or /o/, a front vowel in Tepes and Nyang'i.
  • Close vowel + *a or *ɔ: cluster retained in Nyang'i, contracted to a single vowel in the other languages.
  • *a, *i + *e, *i, *u: cluster retained in Ik, contracted to a single vowel in the other languages.
  • *ui: yields Ik /i/, Tepes /u/ or /wi/, Nyang'i /wi/.

Heine reconstructs two classes of stress in Proto-Kuliak: "primary", which could occur in any position and remains in place in all Kuliak languages, and "secondary", which always occurred on the 2nd syllable of a word, and remains there in Ik and Nyang'i, but shifts to the first syllable in Tepes.

BlenchBlench, Roger. Segment reversal in Kuliak and its relationship to Nilo-Saharan. notes that Kuliak languages do not have extensive internal diversity and clearly had a relatively recent common ancestor. There are many monosyllabic VC (vowel + consonant) lexical roots in Kuliak languages, which is typologically unusual among Nilo-Saharan languages and is more typical of some Australian languages such as . Blench considers these VC roots to have cognates in other Nilo-Saharan languages, and suggests that the VC roots may have been eroded from earlier Nilo-Saharan roots that had initial consonants.

Significant influences from Cushitic languages,Lamberti, Marcello. 1988. Kuliak and Cushitic: A Comparative Study. (Studia linguarum africae orientalis, 3.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter. and more recently Eastern Nilotic languages, are observable in the vocabulary and phonology of Kuliak languages. Blench notes that Kuliak appears to retain a core of non-Nilo-Saharan vocabulary, suggesting from an indigenous language like that seen in .


Numerals
Comparison of numerals in individual languages:

tomín
tomín
mɔk tomin
mì'míɾínìk
tuɗ en-ek iɠe (hand-PL all)


See also
  • (Wiktionary)

  • Laughlin, C. D. (1975). "Lexicostatistics and the Mystery of So Ethnolinguistic Relations" in Anthropological Linguistics 17:325-41.
  • Fleming, Harold C. (1982). "Kuliak External Relations: Step One" in Nilotic Studies (Proceedings of the International Symposium on Languages and History of the Nilotic Peoples, Cologne, January 4–6, 1982, Vol 2, 423–478.
  • Blench, Roger M. (2006). Archaeology, Language, and the African Past. Lanham: Altamira Press.

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs