Product Code Database
Example Keywords: software -ocarina $73
   » » Wiki: Great Migration (african American)
Tag Wiki 'Great Migration (african American)'.

The Great Migration, sometimes known as the Great Northward Migration, or the Black Migration, was the movement of six million African Americans out of the rural Southern United States to the urban Northeast, Midwest, and West that occurred between 1916 and 1970. In every U.S. Census prior to 1910, more than 90 percent of the African-American population lived in the American South. In 1900, only one-fifth of African Americans living in the South were living in urban areas. By the end of the Great Migration, just over 50 percent of the African-American population remained in the South, while a little less than 50 percent lived in the North and West, and the African-American population had become highly urbanized. By 1960, of those African Americans still living in the South, half now lived in urban areas, and by 1970, more than 80 percent of African Americans nationwide lived in cities. In 1991, wrote that:

The Great Migration was one of the largest and most rapid mass internal movements in history—perhaps the greatest not caused by the immediate threat of execution or starvation. In sheer numbers it outranks the migration of any other ethnic group—Italians or Irish or Jews or Poles—to the. For blacks, the migration meant leaving what had always been their economic and social base in America, and finding a new one.
(1991). 9780394560045, Alfred A. Knopf.

Some historians differentiate between a first Great Migration (1916–1940), which saw about 1.6 million people move from mostly rural areas in the south to northern industrial cities, and a Second Great Migration (1940–1970), which began after the and brought at least 5 million people—including many townspeople with urban skills—to the north and west. William H. Frey, "The New Great Migration: Black Americans' Return to the South, 1965–2000", The Brookings Institution, May 2004, pp. 1–3 , accessed 19 March 2008.

Since the Civil Rights Movement, a less rapid reverse migration has occurred. Dubbed the New Great Migration, it has seen a gradual increase of African American migration to the South, generally to states and cities where economic opportunities are the best. The reasons include economic difficulties of cities in the Northeastern and Midwestern United States, growth of jobs in the "" and its lower cost of living, family and ties, and improved racial relations. As early as 1975 to 1980, several southern states were net African-American migration gainers, while in 2014, African-American moved in the highest numbers to , Georgia, , , and . African-American populations have continued to drop throughout much of the Northeast, especially from the state of New York and northern New Jersey, as they rise in the South.

Numbers and destinations
James Gregory calculates decade-by-decade migration volumes in his book, The Southern Diaspora. Black migration picked up from the start of the new century, with 204,000 leaving in the first decade. The pace accelerated with the outbreak of World War I and continued through the 1920s. By 1930, there were 1.3 million former southerners living in other regions.Gregory, James N. (2009) "The Second Great Migration: An Historical Overview," African American Urban History: The Dynamics of Race, Class and Gender since World War II, eds. Joe W. Trotter Jr. and Kenneth L. Kusmer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 22.

The wiped out job opportunities in the northern industrial belt, especially for African Americans, and caused a sharp reduction in migration. In the 1930s and 1940s, increasing mechanization of agriculture virtually brought the institution of that had existed since the Civil War to an end in the United States causing many landless black farmers to be forced off of the land.Gordon Marshall, " Sharecropping,", 1998.

As a result, approximately 1.4 million black southerners moved north or west in the 1940s, followed by 1.1 million in the 1950s, and another 2.4 million people in the 1960s and early 1970s. By the late 1970s, as deindustrialization and the Rust Belt crisis took hold, the Great Migration came to an end. But, in a reflection of changing economics, as well as the end of Jim Crow laws in the 1960s and improving race relations in the South, in the 1980s and early 1990s, more black Americans were heading South than leaving that region.Gregory, James N. (2005) The Southern Diaspora: How the Great Migrations of Black and White Southerners Transformed America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 12–17.

African Americans moved from the 14 states of the South, especially , , , , and Georgia. Census figures show that African Americans went from 52.2% of the population in 1920 to 45.3% of the population in 1950 in Mississippi, from 41.7% in 1920 to 30.9% of the population in 1950 in Georgia, from 38.9% in 1920 to 32.9% of the population in 1950 in Louisiana, from 38.4% in 1920 to 32.0% of the population in 1950 in Alabama, and 36.0% in 1920 to 31.0% of the population in Texas. Based on the total populations in each of the four states, only Georgia (-143,188) showed a net decrease in its African American population in 1950 compared to 1920. Louisiana (+183,256), Texas (+67,664), Alabama (+78,206) and Mississippi (+52,346) showed net increases in their African American populations in 1950 compared to 1920, with the percentage decreasing due to the white population increasing more. Big cities were the principal destinations of southerners throughout the two phases of the Great Migration. In the first phase, eight major cities attracted two-thirds of the migrants: New York and , followed in order by , St. Louis, , , , and . The Second great black migration increased the populations of these cities while adding others as destinations, including the Western states. Western cities such as , , , Phoenix, , and Portland attracted African Americans in large numbers.

There were clear migratory patterns that linked particular states and cities in the South to corresponding destinations in the North and West. Almost half of those who migrated from Mississippi during the first Great Migration, for example, ended up in , while those from Virginia tended to move to . For the most part, these patterns were related to geography, with the closest cities attracting the most migrants (such as Los Angeles and San Francisco receiving a disproportionate number of migrants from Texas and Louisiana). When multiple destinations were equidistant, played a larger role, with migrants following the path set by those before them.

Demographics, tensions and employment sectors
When the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863, less than eight percent of the African-American population lived in the Northeastern or Midwestern United States. This began to change over the next decade; by 1880, a migration was underway to Kansas. The U.S. Senate ordered an investigation into it. In 1900, about 90 percent of blacks still lived in Southern states.

African Americans moved as individuals or small family groups. There was no government assistance, but often northern industries, such as the , meatpacking, and stockyards, sometimes paid for transportation and relocation.

Between 1910 and 1930, the African-American population increased by about forty percent in Northern states as a result of the migration, mostly in the major cities. The cities of , , , , , and New York City had some of the biggest increases in the early part of the twentieth century. Tens of thousands of blacks were recruited for industrial jobs, such as positions related to the expansion of the Pennsylvania Railroad. Because changes were concentrated in cities, which had also attracted millions of new or recent European immigrants, tensions rose as the people competed for jobs and scarce housing. Tensions were often most severe between ethnic Irish, defending their recently gained positions and territory, and recent immigrants and blacks.

Tensions and violence
In the late summer and autumn of 1919, racial tensions became violent and came to be known as the . This period of time was defined by violence and prolonged rioting between blacks and whites in major United States cities. The reasons for this violence vary. Cities that were affected by the violence included Washington D.C.; Chicago; Omaha; Knoxville, Tennessee; and Elaine, Arkansas, a small rural town southwest of Memphis.Chicago Commission on Race Relations. The Negro in Chicago: A Study in Race Relations and a Race Riot in 1919. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1922.

The race riots peaked in Chicago, for the most violence and death occurred there during the riots."Chicago Race Riot of 1919." Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., n.d. Web. 20 May 2017.. According to The Negro in Chicago; a study of race relations and a race riot, an official report from 1922 on race relations in Chicago, came to the conclusion that there were many factors that led to the violent outbursts in Chicago. Principally, many blacks were assuming the jobs of white men who went to go fight in World War I. As the war ended in 1918, many men returned home to find out their jobs had been taken by black men who were willing to work for far less. By the time the rioting and violence had subsided in Chicago, 38 people had lost their life, with hundreds more injured. In other cities across the nation many more had been affected by the violence of the . The Red Summer enlightened many to the growing racial tension in America. The violence in these major cities prefaced the soon to follow Harlem Renaissance, an African-American cultural revolution, in the 1920s.

The primary factors for migration among southern African Americans were segregation, an increase in the spread of racist ideology, widespread (nearly 3,500 African Americans were lynched between 1882 and 1968), and lack of social and economic opportunities in the South. In the south, Blacks were harshly treated, and were not expected to be anything other than a slave. This theory created by society allowed for Blacks to move full force into the movement. There were also factors that pulled migrants to the north, such as labor shortages in northern factories brought about by World War I, resulting in thousands of jobs in steel mills, railroads, meatpacking plants, and the automobile industry.
(2019). 9780205806270, Pearson Education, Inc..
The pull of jobs in the north was strengthened by the efforts of labor agents sent by northern businessmen to recruit southern workers. Northern companies offered special incentives to encourage black workers to relocate, including free transportation and low-cost housing.

Cultural changes
After moving from the racist pressures of the south to the northern states, African Americans were inspired to different kinds of creativity. The Great Migration resulted in the Harlem Renaissance, which was also fired by immigrants from the Caribbean. In her –winning book The Warmth of Other Suns, journalist discusses the migration of "six million black Southerners moving out of the terror of to an uncertain existence in the North and Midwest."

The struggle of African-American migrants to adapt to Northern cities was the subject of 's Migration Series of paintings, created when he was a young man in New York. Exhibited in 1941 at the Museum of Modern Art, Lawrence's Series attracted wide attention; he was quickly perceived as one of the most important African-American artists of the time.

The Great Migration had effects on music as well as other cultural subjects. Many singers migrated from the Mississippi Delta to Chicago to escape racial discrimination. , , and are among the most well-known blues artists who migrated to Chicago. Great Delta-born pianist told magazine, "I thought of coming to Chicago where I could get away from some of that racism and where I would have an opportunity to, well, do something with my talent.... It wasn't peaches and cream in, man, but it was a hell of a lot better than down there where I was born.", Rockin' in Time, 8th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2014), p. 8


Demographic changes
The Great Migration drained off much of the rural black population of the South, and for a time, froze or reduced African-American population growth in parts of the region. In a number of states, there were decades of black population decline, especially across the Deep South "black belt" where cotton had been king. The migration changed the demographics of the South. In 1910, African Americans constituted the majority of the population of South Carolina and Mississippi, and more than 40 percent in Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana and Texas; by 1970, only in Mississippi did the African-American population constitute more than 30 percent of the state's total. "The disappearance of the 'black belt' was one of the striking effects" of the Great Migration, James Gregory wrote.Gregory (2005), p. 18.

In Mississippi, blacks decreased from about 56% of the population in 1910 to about 37% by 1970,Gibson, Campbell and Kay Jung (September 2002). Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, For The United States, Regions, Divisions, and States. U.S. Bureau of the Census – Population Division. remaining the majority only in some Delta counties. In Georgia, blacks decreased from about 45% of the population in 1910 to about 26% by 1970. In South Carolina, blacks decreased from about 55% of the population in 1910 to about 30% by 1970.

The growing black presence outside the South changed the dynamics and demographics of numerous cities in the North, Midwest and West. In 1900, only 740,000 African Americans lived outside the South, just 8 percent of the nation's total black population. By 1970, more than 10.6 million African Americans lived outside the South, 47 percent of the nation's total.

Because the migrants concentrated in the big cities of the north and west, their influence was magnified in those places. Cities that had been virtually all white at the start of the century became centers of black culture and politics by mid-century. Informal residential segregation and the tendency of people to settle with others of their home communities led to concentrations of blacks in certain areas. The northern "Black metropolises" developed an important infrastructure of newspapers, businesses, jazz clubs, churches, and political organizations that provided the staging ground for new forms of racial politics and new forms of black culture.

As a result of the Great Migration, the first large urban black communities developed in northern cities beyond New York, Boston, Baltimore, Washington D.C., and Philadelphia, which had black communities even before the Civil War, and attracted migrants after the war. It is conservatively estimated that 400,000 African Americans left the South in 1916 through 1918 to take advantage of a labor shortage in industrial cities during the First World War. James Gilbertlove, "African Americans and the American Labor Movement", Prologue, Summer 1997, Vol. 29.

In 1910, the African-American population of was 6,000. The Great Migration, along with immigrants from and as well as their descendants, rapidly turned the city into the country's fourth-largest. By the start of the Great Depression in 1929, the city's African-American population had increased to 120,000.

In 1900–01, Chicago had a total population of 1,754,473.Gibson, Campbell (June 1998). Population of the 100 Largest Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States: 1790 to 1990 . U.S. Bureau of the Census – Population Division. By 1920, the city had added more than 1 million residents. During the second wave of the Great Migration (1940–60), the African-American population in the city grew from 278,000 to 813,000.

The flow of African Americans to Ohio, particularly to , changed the demographics of the state and its primary industrial city. Before the Great Migration, an estimated 1.1% to 1.6% of Cleveland's population was African American.Gibson, Campbell, and Kay Jung. "Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals by Race, 1790 to 1990, and by Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, for Large Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States." U.S. Census Bureau, February 2005. By 1920, 4.3% of Cleveland's population was African American. The number of African Americans in Cleveland continued to rise over the next 20 years of the Great Migration.

Other northeastern and midwestern industrial cities, such as Philadelphia, New York City, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, and Omaha, also had dramatic increases in their African-American populations. By the 1920s, New York's became a center of black cultural life, influenced by the American migrants as well as new immigrants from the area.

Second-tier industrial cities that were destinations for numerous black migrants were Buffalo, Rochester, , , , Kansas City, Columbus, Cincinnati, Grand Rapids and , and smaller industrial cities such as Chester, Gary, Dayton, Erie, Toledo, Youngstown, Peoria, Muskegon, Newark, Flint, Saginaw, New Haven, and Albany. People tended to take the cheapest rail ticket possible and go to areas where they had relatives and friends. For example, many people from moved directly north by train to Chicago, from to Cleveland and Detroit, from Georgia and to New York City, , Washington D.C. and , and in the second migration, from Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi to Oakland, , Portland, Phoenix, , and .

Discrimination and working conditions
Educated African Americans were better able to obtain jobs after the Great Migration, eventually gaining a measure of class mobility, but the migrants encountered significant forms of discrimination. Because so many people migrated in a short period of time, the African-American migrants were often resented by the urban white working class (often recent immigrants themselves); fearing their ability to negotiate rates of pay or secure employment, the ethnic whites felt threatened by the influx of new labor competition. Sometimes those who were most fearful or resentful were the last immigrants of the 19th and new immigrants of the 20th century.

African Americans made substantial gains in industrial employment, particularly in the steel, automobile, shipbuilding, and meatpacking industries. Between 1910 and 1920, the number of blacks employed in industry nearly doubled from 500,000 to 901,000. After the , more advances took place after workers in the steel and meatpacking industries organized into in the 1930s and 1940s, under the interracial Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO). The unions ended the segregation of many jobs, and African Americans began to advance into more skilled jobs and supervisory positions previously informally reserved for whites.

Between 1940 and 1960, the number of blacks in managerial and administrative occupations doubled, along with the number of blacks in white-collar occupations, while the number of black agricultural workers in 1960 fell to one-fourth of what it was in 1940. Also, between 1936 and 1959, black income relative to white income more than doubled in various skilled trades. Despite employment discrimination, blacks had higher labor force participation rates than whites in every U.S. Census from 1890 to 1950. As a result of these advancements, the percentage of black families living below the poverty line declined from 87 percent in 1940 to 47 percent by 1960 and to 30 percent by 1970.

Populations increased so rapidly among both African-American migrants and new European immigrants that there were housing shortages in most major cities. With fewer resources, the newer groups were forced to compete for the oldest, most run-down housing. Ethnic groups created territories which they defended against change. Discrimination often restricted African Americans to crowded neighborhoods. The more established populations of cities tended to move to newer housing as it was developing in the outskirts. Mortgage discrimination and in areas limited the newer African-American migrants' ability to determine their own housing, or obtain a fair price. In the long term, the National Housing Act of 1934 contributed to limiting the availability of loans to urban areas, particularly those areas inhabited by African Americans.

Integration and segregation
In cities such as Newark, New York and Chicago, African Americans became increasingly integrated into society. As they lived and worked more closely with European Americans, the divide became increasingly indefinite. This period marked the transition for many African Americans from lifestyles as rural farmers to urban industrial workers.
(1991). 9781604738216, University Press of Mississippi. .

This migration gave birth to a cultural boom in cities such as Chicago and New York. In Chicago for instance, the neighborhood of Bronzeville became known as the "Black Metropolis". From 1924 to 1929, the "Black Metropolis" was at the peak of its golden years. Many of the community's entrepreneurs were black during this period. "The foundation of the first African American YMCA took place in Bronzeville, and worked to help incoming migrants find jobs in the city of Chicago." The "Black Belt" geographical and racial isolation of this community, bordered to the north and east by whites, and to the south and west by industrial sites and ethnic immigrant neighborhoods, made it a site for the study of the development of an urban black community. For urbanized people, eating proper foods in a sanitary, civilized setting such as the home or a restaurant was a social ritual that indicated one's level of respectability. The people native to Chicago had pride in the high level of integration in Chicago restaurants, which they attributed to their unassailable manners and refined tastes.Poe, Tracy N. (1999). "The Origins of Soul Food in Black Urban Identity: Chicago, 1915-1947," American Studies International. XXXVII No. 1 (February)

Migrants often encountered residential discrimination, in which white home owners and realtors prevented migrants from purchasing homes or renting apartments in white neighborhoods. In addition, when numerous blacks moved into white neighborhoods, out of fear of a potential rise in property crime, rape, drugs and violence that was attributed to neighborhoods with large black populations. These tendencies contributed to maintaining the "racial divide" in the North, perhaps accentuating it. By the late 1950s and 1960s, African Americans were hyper-urban, more densely concentrated in inner cities than other groups.

Since African-American migrants retained many Southern cultural and linguistic traits, such cultural differences created a sense of "otherness" in terms of their reception by others who were already living in the cities. 'Ruralizing' the City: Theory, Culture, History, and Power in the Urban Environment Stereotypes ascribed to black people during this period and ensuing generations often derived from African-American migrants' rural cultural traditions, which were maintained in stark contrast to the urban environments in which the people resided.

Second and New Great Migration
The of the 1930s resulted in reduced migration because of decreased opportunities. With the defense buildup for World War II and with the post-war economic prosperity, migration was revived, with larger numbers of blacks leaving the South through the 1960s. After the political and civil gains of the Civil Rights Movement, in the 1970s migration began to increase again. It moved in a different direction, as blacks traveled to new regions of the South for economic opportunity.

White southern reaction
The beginning of the Great Migration exposed a paradox in race relations in the American South at that time. Although blacks were treated with extreme hostility and subjected to legal discrimination, the southern economy was deeply dependent on them as an abundant supply of cheap labor, and black workers were seen as the most critical factor in the economic development of the South. One South Carolina politician summed up the dilemma: "Politically speaking, there are far too many negroes, but from an industrial standpoint there is room for many more."Reich, Steven A.: The Great Black Migration: A Historical Encyclopedia of the American Mosaic

When the Great Migration started in the 1910s, white southern elites seemed to be unconcerned, and industrialists and cotton planters saw it as a positive, as it was siphoning off surplus industrial and agricultural labor. As the migration picked up, however, southern elites began to panic, fearing that a prolonged black exodus would bankrupt the South, and newspaper editorials warned of the danger. White employers eventually took notice and began expressing their fears. White southerners soon began trying to stem the flow in order to prevent the hemorrhaging of their labor supply, and some began attempting to address the poor living standards and racial oppression experienced by Southern blacks in order to induce them to stay.

As a result, southern employers increased their wages to match those on offer in the North, and some individual employers opposed the worst excesses of Jim Crow laws. When the measures failed to stem the tide, white southerners, in concert with federal officials who feared the rise of black nationalism, co-operated in attempting to coerce blacks to stay in the South. The Southern Metal Trades Association urged decisive action to stop black migration, and some employers undertook serious efforts against it. The largest southern steel manufacturer refused to cash checks sent to finance black migration, efforts were made to restrict bus and train access for blacks, agents were stationed in northern cities to report on wage levels, unionization, and the rise of black nationalism, and newspapers were pressured to divert more coverage to negative aspects of black life in the North. A series of local and federal directives were put into place with the goal of restricting black mobility, including local vagrancy ordinances, "work or fight" laws demanding all males either be employed or serve in the army, and conscription orders. Intimidation and beatings were also used to terrorize blacks into staying.Anderson, Talmadge and Stewart, James Benjamin: Introduction to African American Studies: Transdisciplinary Approaches and ImplicationsThese intimidation tactics were described by Secretary of Labor William B. Wilson as interfering with "the natural right of workers to move from place to place at their own discretion".

9781632864123 .

During the wave of migration that took place in the 1940s, white southerners were less concerned, as mechanization of agriculture in the late 1930s had resulted in another labor surplus so southern planters put up less resistance.

In popular culture
The Great Migration is a backdrop of the 2013 film , as the character Cecil Gaines moves from a plantation in Georgia to become a butler at the White House.

+African Americans as a Percentage of the Total Population By U.S. Region (1900–2010) Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, For The United States, Regions, Divisions, and States
  !style="background:#9bddff;"11.6% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.9% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.8% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.0% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.5% !style="background:#9bddff;"11.1% !style="background:#9bddff;"11.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.1% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.3% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.6% !style="background:#9bddff;"+1.0%
Northeast !style="background:#9f9;"1.8% !style="background:#9f9;"1.9% !style="background:#9f9;"2.3% !style="background:#9f9;"3.3% !style="background:#9f9;"3.8% !style="background:#9f9;"5.1% !style="background:#9f9;"6.8% !style="background:#9f9;"8.9% !style="background:#9f9;"9.9% !style="background:#9f9;"11.0% !style="background:#9f9;"11.4% !style="background:#9f9;"11.8% !style="background:#9f9;"+10.0%
Midwest !style="background:#9f9;"1.9% !style="background:#9f9;"1.8% !style="background:#9f9;"2.3% !style="background:#9f9;"3.3% !style="background:#9f9;"3.5% !style="background:#9f9;"5.0% !style="background:#9f9;"6.7% !style="background:#9f9;"8.1% !style="background:#9f9;"9.1% !style="background:#9f9;"9.6% !style="background:#9f9;"10.1% !style="background:#9f9;"10.4% !style="background:#9f9;"+8.5%
South !style="background:#9f9;"32.3% !style="background:#9f9;"29.8% !style="background:#9f9;"26.9% !style="background:#9f9;"24.7% !style="background:#9f9;"23.8% !style="background:#9f9;"21.7% !style="background:#9f9;"20.6% !style="background:#9f9;"19.1% !style="background:#9f9;"18.6% !style="background:#9f9;"18.5% !style="background:#9f9;"18.9% !style="background:#9f9;"19.2% !style="background:#9f9;"
West !style="background:#9f9;"0.7% !style="background:#9f9;"0.7% !style="background:#9f9;"0.9% !style="background:#9f9;"1.0% !style="background:#9f9;"1.2% !style="background:#9f9;"2.9% !style="background:#9f9;"3.9% !style="background:#9f9;"4.9% !style="background:#9f9;"5.2% !style="background:#9f9;"5.4% !style="background:#9f9;"4.9% !style="background:#9f9;"4.8% !style="background:#9f9;"+4.1%

+African Americans as a Percentage of the Total Population By U.S. State (1900–2010)
  !style="background:#9bddff;"N/A !style="background:#9bddff;"11.6% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.9% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"9.8% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.0% !style="background:#9bddff;"10.5% !style="background:#9bddff;"11.1% !style="background:#9bddff;"11.7% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.1% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.3% !style="background:#9bddff;"12.6% !style="background:#9bddff;"+1.0%
  !South !45.2% !42.5% !38.4% !35.7% !34.7% !32.0% !30.0% !26.2% !25.6% !25.3% !26.0% !26.2% !-19.0%
  !West !0.3% !0.3% !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% ! !3.0% !3.0% !3.4% !4.1% !3.5% !3.3% !+3.0%
  !West !1.5% !1.0% !2.4% !2.5% !3.0% !3.5% !3.3% !3.0% !2.8% !3.0% !3.1% !4.1% !+2.6%
  !South !28.0% !28.1% !27.0% !25.8% !24.8% !22.3% !21.8% !18.3% !16.3% !15.9% !15.7% !15.4% !-12.6%
  !West !0.7% !0.9% !1.1% !1.4% !1.8% !4.4% !5.6% !7.0% !7.7% !7.4% !6.7% !6.2% !+5.5%
  !West !1.6% !1.4% !1.2% !1.1% !1.1% !1.5% !2.3% !3.0% !3.5% !4.0% !3.8% !4.0% !+2.4%
  !Northeast !1.7% !1.4% !1.5% !1.8% !1.9% !2.7% !4.2% !6.0% !7.0% !8.3% !9.1% !10.1% !+8.4%
  !South !16.6% !15.4% !13.6% !13.7% !13.5% !13.7% !13.6% !14.3% !16.1% !16.9% !19.2% !21.4% !+4.8%
 District of Columbia !South !31.1% !28.5% !25.1% !27.1% !28.2% !35.0% !53.9% !71.1% !70.3% !65.8% !60.0% !50.7% !+19.6%
  !South !43.7% !41.0% !34.0% !29.4% !27.1% !21.8% !17.8% !15.3% !13.8% !13.6% !14.6% !16.0% !-27.7%
 Georgia !South !46.7% !45.1% !41.7% !36.8% !34.7% !30.9% !28.5% !25.9% !26.8% !27.0% !28.7% !30.5% !-16.2%
  !West !0.2% !0.4% !0.1% !0.2% !0.1% !0.5% !0.8% !1.0% !1.8% !2.5% !1.8% !1.6% !+1.4%
  !West !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% !0.1% !0.2% !0.2% !0.3% !0.3% !0.3% !0.4% !0.6% !+0.4%
  !Midwest !1.8% !1.9% !2.8% !4.3% !4.9% !7.4% !10.3% !12.8% !14.7% !14.8% !15.1% !14.5% !+12.7%
  !Midwest !2.3% !2.2% !2.8% !3.5% !3.6% !4.4% !5.8% !6.9% !7.6% !7.8% !8.4% !9.1% !+6.8%
  !Midwest !0.6% !0.7% !0.8% !0.7% !0.7% !0.8% !0.9% !1.2% !1.4% !1.7% !2.1% !2.9% !+2.3%
  !Midwest !3.5% !3.2% !3.3% !3.5% !3.6% !3.8% !4.2% !4.8% !5.3% !5.8% !5.7% !5.9% !+2.4%
  !South !13.3% !11.4% !9.8% !8.6% !7.5% !6.9% !7.1% !7.2% !7.1% !7.1% !7.3% !7.8% !-5.5%
  !South !47.1% !43.1% !38.9% !36.9% !35.9% !32.9% !31.9% !29.8% !29.4% !30.8% !32.5% !32.0% !-15.1%
  !Northeast !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% !0.1% !0.2% !0.1% !0.3% !0.3% !0.3% !0.4% !0.5% !1.2% !+1.0%
  !South !19.8% !17.9% !16.9% !16.9% !16.6% !16.5% !16.7% !17.8% !22.7% !24.9% !27.9% !29.4% !+9.6%
  !Northeast !1.1% !1.1% !1.2% !1.2% !1.3% !1.6% !2.2% !3.1% !3.9% !5.0% !5.4% !6.6% !+5.5%
  !Midwest !0.7% !0.6% !1.6% !3.5% !4.0% !6.9% !9.2% !11.2% !12.9% !13.9% !14.2% !14.2% !+13.5%
  !Midwest !0.3% !0.3% !0.4% !0.4% !0.4% !0.5% !0.7% !0.9% !1.3% !2.2% !3.5% !5.2% !+4.9%
  !South !58.5% !56.2% !52.2% !50.2% !49.2% !45.3% !42.0% !36.8% !35.2% !35.6% !36.3% !37.0% !-21.5%
  !Midwest !5.2% !4.8% !5.2% !6.2% !6.5% !7.5% !9.0% !10.3% !10.5% !10.7% !11.2% !11.6% !+6.4%
  !West !0.6% !0.2% !0.3% !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% !0.2% !0.3% !0.2% !0.3% !0.3% !0.4% !-0.2%
  !Midwest !0.6% !0.6% !1.0% !1.0% !1.1% !1.5% !2.1% !2.7% !3.1% !3.6% !4.0% !4.5% !+3.9%
  !West !0.3% !0.6% !0.4% !0.6% !0.6% !2.7% !4.7% !5.7% !6.4% !6.6% !6.8% !8.1% !+7.8%
  !Northeast !0.2% !0.1% !0.1% !0.2% !0.1% !0.1% !0.3% !0.3% !0.4% !0.6% !0.7% !1.1% !+0.9%
  !Northeast !3.7% !3.5% !3.7% !5.2% !5.5% !6.6% !8.5% !10.7% !12.6% !13.4% !13.6% !13.7% !+10.0%
  !West !0.8% !0.5% !1.6% !0.7% !0.9% !1.2% !1.8% !1.9% !1.8% !2.0% !1.9% !2.1% !+1.3%
 New York !Northeast !1.4% !1.5% !1.9% !3.3% !4.2% !6.2% !8.4% !11.9% !13.7% !15.9% !15.9% !15.9% !+14.5%
  !South !33.0% !31.6% !29.8% !29.0% !27.5% !25.8% !24.5% !22.2% !22.4% !22.0% !21.6% !21.5% !-11.5%
  !West !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.0% !0.0% !0.1% !0.4% !0.4% !0.6% !0.6% !1.2% !+1.1%
  !Midwest !2.3% !2.3% !3.2% !4.7% !4.9% !6.5% !8.1% !9.1% !10.0% !10.6% !11.5% !12.2% !+9.9%
  !South !7.0% !8.3% !7.4% !7.2% !7.2% !6.5% !6.6% !6.7% !6.8% !7.4% !7.6% !7.4% !+0.4%
  !West !0.3% !0.2% !0.3% !0.2% !0.2% !0.8% !1.0% !1.3% !1.4% !1.6% !1.6% !1.8% !+1.5%
  !Northeast !2.5% !2.5% !3.3% !4.5% !4.7% !6.1% !7.5% !8.6% !8.8% !9.2% !10.0% !10.8% !+8.3%
  !Northeast !2.1% !1.8% !1.7% !1.4% !1.5% !1.8% !2.1% !2.7% !2.9% !3.9% !4.5% !5.7% !+3.6%
  !South !58.4% !55.2% !51.4% !45.6% !42.9% !38.8% !34.8% !30.5% !30.4% !29.8% !29.5% !27.9% !-30.5%
  !West !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.2% !0.2% !0.3% !0.5% !0.6% !1.3% !+1.2%
  !South !23.8% !21.7% !19.3% !18.3% !17.4% !16.1% !16.5% !15.8% !15.8% !16.0% !16.4% !16.7% !-7.1%
  !South !20.4% !17.7% !15.9% !14.7% !14.4% !12.7% !12.4% !12.5% !12.0% !11.9% !11.5% !11.8% !-8.6%
  !West !0.2% !0.3% !0.3% !0.2% !0.2% !0.4% !0.5% !0.6% !0.6% !0.7% !0.8% !1.1% !+0.9%
  !Northeast !0.2% !0.5% !0.2% !0.2% !0.1% !0.1% !0.1% !0.2% !0.2% !0.3% !0.5% !1.0% !+0.8%
  !South !35.6% !32.6% !29.9% !26.8% !24.7% !22.1% !20.6% !18.5% !18.9% !18.8% !19.6% !19.4% !-16.2%
 Washington !West !0.5% !0.5% !0.5% !0.4% !0.4% !1.3% !1.7% !2.1% !2.6% !3.1% !3.2% !3.6% !+3.1%
  !South !4.5% !5.3% !5.9% !6.6% !6.2% !5.7% !4.8% !3.9% !3.3% !3.1% !3.2% !3.4% !-1.1%
  !Midwest !0.1% !0.1% !0.2% !0.4% !0.4% !0.8% !1.9% !2.9% !3.9% !5.0% !5.7% !6.3% !+6.2%
  !West !1.0% !1.5% !0.7% !0.6% !0.4% !0.9% !0.7% !0.8% !0.7% !0.8% !0.8% !0.8% !-0.2%

+African Americans as a Percentage of the Population By Large U.S. Cities (Those With a Peak Population of 500,000 or More by 1990) Outside of the Former Confederacy Population Division Working Paper – Historical Census Statistics On Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990 – U.S. Census Bureau
Phoenix, Arizona2.7%2.9%3.7%4.9%6.5%4.9%4.8%4.8%4.8%5.2%+2.5%
, 2.1%2.4%2.7%3.1%4.2%8.7%13.5%17.9%17.0%14.0%+11.9%
, 1.8%1.5%1.3%1.8%2.0%4.5%6.0%7.6%8.9%9.4%+7.6%
, 0.5%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.8%5.6%10.0%13.4%12.7%10.9%+10.4%
San Jose, 1.0%0.6%0.5%0.4%0.4%0.6%1.0%2.5%4.6%4.7%+3.7%
, 2.9%2.5%2.4%2.5%2.4%3.6%6.1%9.1%12.0%12.8%+9.9%
Washington, District of Columbia31.1%28.5%25.1%27.1%28.2%35.0%53.9%71.1%70.3%65.8%+34.7%
, 1.8%2.0%4.1%6.9%8.2%13.6%22.9%32.7%39.8%39.1%+37.3%
, 9.4%9.3%11.0%12.1%13.2%15.0%20.6%18.0%21.8%22.6%+13.2%
, 15.6%15.2%14.8%17.7%19.3%23.7%34.7%46.4%54.8%59.2%+43.6%
, 2.1%2.0%2.2%2.6%3.1%5.0%9.1%16.3%22.4%25.6%+23.5%
, 1.4%1.2%4.1%7.7%9.2%16.2%28.9%43.7%63.1%75.7%+74.3%
, 0.8%0.9%1.0%0.9%0.9%1.3%2.4%4.4%7.7%13.0%+12.2%
Kansas City, 10.7%9.5%9.5%9.6%10.4%12.2%17.5%22.1%27.4%29.6%+18.9%
St. Louis, 6.2%6.4%9.0%11.4%13.3%17.9%28.6%40.9%45.6%47.5%+41.3%
Buffalo, New York0.5%0.4%0.9%2.4%3.1%6.3%13.3%20.4%26.6%30.7%+30.2%
New York City, New York1.8%1.9%2.7%4.7%6.1%9.5%14.0%21.1%25.2%28.7%+26.9%
, 4.4%5.4%7.5%10.6%12.2%15.5%21.6%27.6%33.8%37.9%+33.5%
, 1.6%1.5%4.3%8.0%9.6%16.2%28.6%38.3%43.8%46.6%+45.0%
Columbus, 6.5%7.0%9.4%11.3%11.7%12.4%16.4%18.5%22.1%22.6%+16.1%
, 4.8%5.5%7.4%11.3%13.0%18.2%26.4%33.6%37.8%39.9%+35.1%
, 5.3%4.8%6.4%8.2%9.3%12.2%16.7%20.2%24.0%25.8%+20.5%
, 0.5%1.0%0.9%0.9%1.0%3.4%4.8%7.1%9.5%10.1%+9.6%
, 0.3%0.3%0.5%1.3%1.5%3.4%8.4%14.7%23.1%30.5%+30.2%

+African Americans as a Percentage of the Population By Large U.S. Cities (Those With a Peak Population of 500,000 or More by 1990) Inside the Former Confederacy
, 57.1%50.8%45.3%37.2%35.7%35.4%41.1%22.3%25.4%25.2%-31.9%
, 27.1%26.3%26.1%28.3%30.1%31.9%37.2%45.0%55.3%61.9%+34.8%
Memphis, 48.8%40.0%37.7%38.1%41.5%37.2%37.0%38.9%47.6%54.8%+6.0%
, 21.2%19.6%15.1%14.9%17.1%13.1%19.0%24.9%29.4%29.5%+8.3%
, 2.9%3.7%1.7%1.8%2.3%2.4%2.1%2.3%3.2%3.4%+0.5%
, 32.7%30.4%24.6%21.7%22.4%20.9%22.9%25.7%27.6%28.1%-4.6%
, 14.1%11.1%8.9%7.8%7.6%7.0%7.1%7.6%7.3%7.0%-7.1%

File:Black % by U.S. state 1900.svg|A map of the black percentage of the U.S. population by each state/territory in 1900.
Black = 35.00+%
Brown = 20.00-34.99%
Red = 10.00-19.99%
Orange = 5.00-9.99%
Light orange = 1.00-4.99%
Gray = 0.99% or less
Magenta = No data available File:Black % by U.S. state 1990.svg|A map of the black percentage of the U.S. population by each state/territory in 1990.
Black = 35.00+%
Brown = 20.00–34.99%
Red = 10.00–19.99%
Orange = 5.00–9.99%
Light orange = 1.00–4.99%
Gray = 0.99% or less
Pink = No data available File:Black population % change by U.S. state 1900 1990.svg|A map showing the change in the total Black population (in percent) between 1900 and 1990 by U.S. state.
Light purple = Population decline
Very light green = Population growth of 0.01–9.99%
Light green = Population growth of 10.00–99.99%
Green = Population growth of 100.00–999.99%
Dark green = Population growth of 1,000.00–9,999.99%
Very dark green (or Black) = Population growth of 10,000.00% or more
Gray = No data available

See also
  • 1912 Racial Conflict of Forsyth County, Georgia
  • Black Belt (U.S. region)
  • Historical racial and ethnic demographics of the United States


Further reading
  • Carl Zimmer, "Tales of African-American History Found in DNA", New York Times, 27 May 2016
  • (2019). 9780312391294, St. Martin's Press.
  • Baldwin, Davarian L. Chicago's New Negroes: Modernity, the Great Migration, & Black Urban Life (Univ of North Carolina Press, 2007)
  • DeSantis, Alan D. "Selling the American dream myth to black southerners: The Chicago Defender and the Great Migration of 1915–1919." Western Journal of Communication (1998) 62#4 pp: 474-511. online
  • (1986). 9780887480218, Carnegie Mellon University Press.
  • (2019). 9780807856512, University of North Carolina Press.
  • (1991). 9780226309958, University of Chicago Press.
  • Holley, Donald. The Second Great Emancipation: The Mechanical Cotton Picker, Black Migration, and How They Shaped the Modern South (University of Arkansas Press, 2000)
  • (1991). 9780679733478, Vintage Press.
  • Marks, Carole. Farewell--We're Good and Gone: the great Black migration (Indiana Univ Press, 1989)
  • Reich, Steven A. ed. The Great Black Migration: A Historical Encyclopedia of the American Mosaic (2014), one-volume abridged version of 2006 three volume set; Topical entries plus primary sources
  • Rodgers, Lawrence Richard. Canaan Bound: The African-American Great Migration Novel (University of Illinois Press, 1997)
  • (1997). 9780822319931, Duke University Press.
  • Sernett, Milton C. Bound for the promised land: African American religion and the great migration (Duke University Press, 1997)
  • Tolnay, Stewart E. "The African American" Great Migration" and Beyond." Annual Review of Sociology (2003): 209-232. in JSTOR
  • Tolnay, Stewart E. "The great migration and changes in the northern black family, 1940 to 1990." Social Forces (1997) 75#4 pp: 1213–1238.
  • Trotter, Joe William, ed. The Great Migration in historical perspective: New dimensions of race, class, and gender (Indiana University Press, 1991)
  • (2019). 9780679604075, Random House.

External links

Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1


Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 


General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 


Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
5s Time