Product Code Database
Example Keywords: the legend -data $31-163
   » » Wiki: Charles Krauthammer
Tag Wiki 'Charles Krauthammer'.

Charles Krauthammer (; March 13, 1950 – June 21, 2018) was an American political . A conservative political , in 1987 Krauthammer won the for his column in The Washington Post. His weekly column was syndicated to more than 400 publications worldwide.

While in his first year studying at Harvard Medical School, Krauthammer became permanently paralyzed from the waist down after suffering a diving board accident that severed his spinal cord at cervical spinal nerve 5. After spending 14 months recovering in a hospital, he returned to medical school, graduating to become a involved in the creation of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders III in 1980. He joined the Carter administration in 1978 as a director of psychiatric research, eventually becoming the to Vice President in 1980.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Krauthammer embarked on a career as a columnist and political commentator. In 1985, he began writing a weekly editorial for The Washington Post, which earned him the 1987 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary for his "witty and insightful columns on national issues." He was a weekly panelist on the PBS news program Inside Washington from 1990 until it ceased production in December 2013. Krauthammer had been a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard, a Fox News Channel contributor, and a nightly panelist on Fox News Channel's Special Report with Bret Baier.

Krauthammer received acclaim for his writing on foreign policy, among other matters. He was a leading voice and proponent of United States military and political engagement on the global stage, coining the term and advocating both the and the .

In August 2017, due to his battle with , Krauthammer stopped writing his column and serving as a Fox News contributor. Krauthammer died on June 21, 2018.

Early life and career
Krauthammer was born on March 13, 1950, in the New York City borough of . Interview with on , May 1, 2005. His father, Shulim Krauthammer (November 23, 1904 – June 1987), was from , (then the Austro-Hungarian Empire), and later became a naturalized citizen of France. His mother, Thea (Horowitz), was from , . The Krauthammer family was a French-speaking household. When he was 5, the Krauthammers moved to . Through the school year, they resided in Montreal and spent the summers in Long Beach, New York. Charles Krauthammer bio from The Washington Post Writers Group. Retrieved October 26, 2013. Both of his parents were , and he graduated from Herzliah High School.

Krauthammer attended McGill University in Montreal, graduating in 1970 with first-class honours in and political science.

(1999). 9781573561112, Greenwood Publishing Group. .
At that time, McGill University was a hotbed of radical sentiment, something that Krauthammer said influenced his dislike of political extremism. "I became very acutely aware of the dangers, the hypocrisies, and sort of the extremism of the political extremes. And it cleansed me very early in my political evolution of any romanticism." He later said: "I detested the extreme Left and extreme Right, and found myself somewhere in the middle." The following year, after graduating from McGill, he studied as a Commonwealth Scholar in politics at Balliol College, Oxford, before returning to the United States to attend medical school at Harvard.

Krauthammer was injured in a diving board accident during his first year of medical school. He sustained injuries that left him paralyzed from the waist down and required him to be hospitalized for 14 months. He remained with his Harvard Medical School class during his hospitalization, graduating in 1975. From 1975 through 1978, Krauthammer was a resident in at Massachusetts General Hospital, serving as chief resident his final year. During his time as chief resident, he noted a variant of (bipolar disorder) that he identified and named . He published his findings in the Archives of General Psychiatry. He also co-authored a path-finding study on the epidemiology of mania.C. Krauthammer and G. L. Klerman. "The Epidemiology of Mania", in Manic Illness, ed. B. Shopsin, New York: Raven Press, 1979.

In 1978, Krauthammer relocated to Washington, D.C., to direct planning in psychiatric research under the Carter administration. He began contributing articles about politics to The New Republic and, in 1980, served as a to Vice President . He contributed to the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. In 1984, he was in psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology.

Career as columnist and political commentator
In 1979, Krauthammer joined The New Republic as both a writer and editor. In 1983, he began writing essays for Time magazine, including one on the , which first brought him national acclaim as a writer. Krauthammer began writing regular editorials for The Washington Post in 1985 and became a nationally syndicated columnist. Krauthammer coined and developed the term Reagan Doctrine in 1985, and he defined the U.S. role as sole superpower in his essay "The Unipolar Moment", published shortly after the fall of the in 1989.

In 1990, Krauthammer became a panelist for the weekly PBS political roundtable Inside Washington, remaining with the show until it ceased production in December 2013. Krauthammer also appeared on Fox News Channel as a contributor for many years.

Krauthammer's 2004 speech "Democratic Realism", which was delivered to the American Enterprise Institute when Krauthammer won the Irving Kristol Award, set out a framework for tackling the post-9/11 world, focusing on the promotion of in the .

In 2013, Krauthammer published . An immediate bestseller, the book remained on The New York Times bestseller list for 38 weeks and spent 10 weeks in a row at number one.

His son Daniel is working on final edits for a book to be posthumously released, The Point of It All: A Lifetime of Great Loves and Endeavors, to be released in December 2018.

Awards and accolades
Krauthammer's New Republic essays won him the "National Magazine Award for Essays and Criticism". The weekly column he began writing for The Washington Post in 1985 won him the for commentary in 1987. On June 14 1993, he was awarded the of Doctor of Letters from McGill University.

In 2006, the named Krauthammer the most influential commentator in America, stating that "Krauthammer has influenced US foreign policy for more than two decades."

In 2009, Politico columnist Ben Smith wrote that Krauthammer had "emerged in the Age of Obama as a central conservative voice, the kind of leader of the opposition that economist and New York Times columnist represented for the left during the Bush years: a coherent, sophisticated and implacable critic of the new president." In 2010, The New York Times columnist David Brooks said Krauthammer was "the most important conservative columnist." In 2011, former congressman and host called him "without a doubt the most powerful force in American conservatism. He has been for two, three, four years."

In a December 2010, press conference, former president – a Democrat – called Krauthammer "a brilliant man". Krauthammer responded, , that "my career is done" and "I'm toast."

On September 26, 2013, Krauthammer received the William F. Buckley Award for Media Excellence.

Krauthammer's other awards included the People for the American Way's First Amendment Award, the Champion Media Award for Economic Understanding from Amos Tuck School of Business Administration,

(1999). 9781573561112, Oryx Press. .
the first annual , the 2002 "Mightier Pen" award from the Center for Security Policy, the 2004 Irving Kristol Award, and the 2009 Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism, an annual award given by the .

Views and perspectives

Bioethics and medicine
Krauthammer was a supporter of legalization (although he believed Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided) and opposed to . "Giuliani's Abortion 'Gaffe'" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, May 11, 2007. "Roe v. Roberts" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, September 16, 2005. "Federalism's New Friends" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, November 8, 1999.

Krauthammer was appointed to President George W. Bush's Council on Bioethics in 2002. He supported relaxing the Bush administration's limits on federal funding of discarded human embryonic stem cell research. "Cell Lines, Moral Lines; Research Should Expand—With a Key Limit" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, Friday, August 5, 2005. Krauthammer supported embryonic stem cell research using embryos discarded by fertility clinics with restrictions in its applications. "Stem Cell Miracle?" by Charles Krauthammer The Washington Post, January 12, 2007. "Cell Lines, Moral Lines" by Charles Krauthammer The Washington Post, August 5, 2005. "Research Cloning? No." by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, May 10, 2002. However, he opposed human .Krauthammer: "The Great Stem Cell Hoax" by Charles Krauthammer, The Weekly Standard, August 13, 2001. He warned that scientists were beginning to develop the power of "creating a class of superhumans". A fellow member of the Council, Janet D. Rowley, insists that Krauthammer's vision was still an issue far in the future and not a topic to be discussed at the present time. "Bush's Advisers on Ethics Discuss Human Cloning" by Sheryl Gay Stolberg, The New York Times, January 18, 2002.

In March 2009, Krauthammer was invited to the signing of an executive order by President at the White House but declined to attend because of his fears about the cloning of human embryos and the creation of normal human embryos solely for purposes of research. He also contrasted the "moral seriousness" of Bush's stem cell address of August 9, 2001, with that of Obama's address on stem cells. "Obama's 'Science' Fiction" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, March 13, 2009.

Krauthammer was critical of the idea of and the current state of end-of-life counseling and feared that would just worsen the situation:

Energy and global warming
Krauthammer was a longtime advocate of radically higher energy taxes to induce conservation."The Oil-Bust Panic" by Charles Krauthammer, The New Republic, February 21, 1983. "Pump Some Seriousness Into Energy Policy" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, November 11, 2005. "Energy Independence?" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, January 26, 2007. "The Tax-Free Lunch" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, June 29, 2007.

Krauthammer wrote in The Washington Post on February 20, 2014, "I'm not a believer. I'm not a global warming denier." Objecting to declaring global warming settled science, he contended that much that is believed to be settled turns out not to be so.

Foreign policy
Krauthammer first gained attention in the mid-1980s when he first used the phrase "" in his column. The Reagan Doctrine by Charles Krauthammer, Time magazine, April 1, 1985. The phrase was a reference to the American foreign policy of supporting anti-communist insurgencies around the globe (most notably , , and ) as a response to the Brezhnev Doctrine and reflected a U.S. foreign policy that went beyond of the to of recent Soviet influence in the . The policy, which was strongly supported by Heritage Foundation foreign policy analysts and other conservatives, was ultimately embraced by Reagan's senior national security and foreign policy officials. Krauthammer's description of it as the "Reagan Doctrine" has since endured.

In "The Poverty of Realism" ( New Republic, February 17, 1986), he asserted:

The foreign policy, he argued, should be both "universal in aspiration" and "prudent in application", thus combining American idealism and realism. Over the next 20 years these ideas developed into what is now called "democratic realism."

Following the , Krauthammer penned an article entitled "The Unipolar Moment". Krauthammer coined the term unipolarity to describe the world structure that was emerging with the fall of the Soviet Union. Krauthammer predicted that the bipolar world of the Cold War would give way not to a multipolar world in which the U.S. was one of many centers of power, but a unipolar world dominated by the United States with a power gap between the most powerful state and the second most powerful state that would exceed any other in history. He also suggested that American would inevitably exist for only a historical "moment" lasting at most three or four decades.

Hegemony gave the United States the capacity and responsibility to act unilaterally if necessary, Krauthammer argued. Throughout the 1990s, however, he was circumspect about how that power ought to be used. He split from his neoconservative colleagues who were arguing for an interventionist policy of "American greatness". Krauthammer wrote that in the absence of a global existential threat, the United States should stay out of "teacup wars" in failed states, and instead adopt a "dry powder" foreign policy of nonintervention and readiness. Democratic Realism by Charles Krauthammer, American Enterprise Institute, February 2004. Krauthammer opposed purely "humanitarian intervention" (with the exception of overt genocide). While he supported the 1991 Gulf War on the grounds of both humanitarianism and strategic necessity (preventing from gaining control of the and its resources), he opposed American intervention in the on the grounds that America should not be committing the lives of its soldiers to purely humanitarian missions in which there is no American national interest at stake. The Path to Putin by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, April 3, 2000.

Krauthammer's major 2004 monograph on foreign policy, "Democratic Realism: An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World", was critical both of the neoconservative Bush doctrine for being too expansive and utopian, and of foreign policy "realism" for being too narrow and immoral; instead, he proposed an alternative he called "Democratic Realism".

In a 2005 speech later published in Commentary magazine, Krauthammer called neoconservatism "a governing ideology whose time has come." He noted that the original "fathers of neoconservatism" were "former liberals or leftists." More recently, they have been joined by "realists, newly mugged by reality" such as , , and George W. Bush, who "have given weight to neoconservatism, making it more diverse and, given the newcomers' past experience, more mature."

In a 2008 column entitled "'s Gaffe", Krauthammer elaborated on the changing meanings of the in light of Gibson's questioning of Republican vice-presidential candidate regarding what exactly the Bush Doctrine was, which resulted in criticism of Palin's response. Krauthammer states that the phrase originally referred to "the unilateralism that characterized the pre-9/11 first year of the Bush administration," but elaborates, "There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration." "Charlie Gibson's Gaffe" By Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, September 13, 2008.

Krauthammer strongly opposed the and said that Palestinian Liberation Organization leader would use the foothold it gave him in the and the to continue the war against Israel that he had ostensibly renounced in the Israel–Palestine Liberation Organization letters of recognition. In a July 2006 essay in Time, Krauthammer wrote that the Israeli–Palestinian conflict was fundamentally defined by the Palestinians' unwillingness to accept compromise.

During the 2006 Lebanon War, Krauthammer wrote a column, "Let Israel Win the War": "What other country, when attacked in an unprovoked aggression across a recognized international frontier, is then put on a countdown clock by the world, given a limited time window in which to fight back, regardless of whether it has restored its own security?" "Let Israel Win the War" by Charles Krauthammer,, July 28, 2006. He later criticized Israeli prime minister 's conduct, arguing that Olmert "has provided unsteady and uncertain leadership. Foolishly relying on air power alone, he denied his generals the ground offensive they wanted, only to reverse himself later."

Krauthammer supported a two-state solution to the conflict. Unlike many conservatives, he supported Israel's as a step toward rationalizing the frontiers between Israel and a future Palestinian state. He believed a security barrier between the two states' final borders will be an important element of any lasting peace.Chester, Alexander (April 19, 2004; updated August 12, 2009) . The Commentator. at Retrieved October 26, 2013.

When Richard Goldstone retracted the claim 1 1/2 years after the issuance of the UN report on the 2008 Gaza war that Israel intentionally killed Palestinian civilians, including children, Krauthammer strongly criticized Goldstone, saying that "this weasel-y excuse-laden retraction is too little and too late" and called "the original report a ranking with the libels of the 19th century in which Jews were accused of ritually slaughtering children in order to use the blood in rituals." Krauthammer thought that Goldstone "should spend the rest of his life undoing the damage and changing and retracting that report."

9/11, Iraq, and the War on Terror
Krauthammer laid out the underlying principle of strategic necessity restraining democratic idealism in his controversial 2004 Kristol Award Lecture: "We will support democracy everywhere, but we will commit blood and treasure only in places where there is a strategic necessity—meaning, places central to the larger war against the existential enemy, the enemy that poses a global mortal threat to freedom."

The 9/11 attacks, Krauthammer wrote, made clear the new existential threat and the necessity for a new interventionism. On September 12, 2001, he wrote that, if the suspicion that was behind the attack proved correct, the United States had no choice but to go to war in Afghanistan. "This Is Not a Crime, This is War" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, September 12, 2001. He supported the Second Iraq War on the "realist" grounds of the strategic threat the Saddam regime posed to the region as UN sanctions were eroding and of his alleged weapons of mass destruction and on the "idealist" grounds that a self-sustaining democracy in Iraq would be a first step toward changing the poisonous political culture of tyranny, intolerance, and religious fanaticism in the Arab world that had incubated the anti-American extremism from which 9/11 emerged.

In October 2002, he presented what he believed were the primary arguments for and against the war, writing, "Hawks favor war on the grounds that is reckless, tyrannical, and instinctively aggressive, and that if he comes into possession of in addition to the weapons of mass destruction he already has, he is likely to use them or share them with . The threat of mass death on a scale never before seen residing in the hands of an unstable madman is intolerable—and must be . Doves oppose war on the grounds that the risks exceed the gains. War with Iraq could be very costly, possibly degenerating into ."

He continued: "I happen to believe that the is correct, that the risks of allowing Saddam Hussein to acquire his weapons will only grow with time. Nonetheless, I can both understand and respect those few Democrats who make the principled argument against war with Iraq on the grounds of deterrence, believing that safety lies in reliance on a proven (if perilous) balance of terror rather than the risky innovation of forcible disarmament by preemption." "What Good Is Delay?" by Charles Krauthammer, Jewish World Review, October 7, 2002.

On the eve of the invasion, Krauthammer wrote, "Reformation and reconstruction of an alien culture are a daunting task. Risky and, yes, arrogant." In February 2003, Krauthammer cautioned that "it may yet fail. But we cannot afford not to try. There is not a single, remotely plausible, alternative strategy for attacking the monster behind 9/11. It's not Osama bin Laden; it is the cauldron of political oppression, religious intolerance, and social ruin in the Arab-Islamic world—oppression transmuted and deflected by regimes with no legitimacy into virulent, murderous ." Krauthammer in 2003 wrote that the reconstruction of Iraq would provide many benefits for the Iraqi people, once the political and economic infrastructure destroyed by Saddam was restored: "With its oil, its urbanized middle class, its educated population, its essential modernity, Iraq has a future. In two decades Saddam Hussein reduced its GDP by 75 percent. Once its political and industrial infrastructures are reestablished, Iraq's potential for rebound, indeed for explosive growth, is unlimited."

On April 22, 2003, Krauthammer predicted that he would have a "credibility problem" if weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq within the next five months.

In a speech to the Foreign Policy Association in Philadelphia, he argued that the beginnings of democratization in the Arab world had been met in 2006 with a "fierce counterattack" by radical forces in , Palestine, and especially Iraq, which witnessed a major intensification in sectarian warfare. Past the Apogee by Charles Krauthammer, Foreign Policy Research Institute, December 2006. In late 2006 and 2007, he was one of the few commentators to support the troop surge in Iraq. "In Baker's Blunder, a Chance for Bush" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, December 5, 2006. "The Surge: First Fruits" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, April 13, 2007.

In 2009, Krauthammer argued that the use of against enemy combatants was impermissible except in two contexts: (a) when "an innocent's life is at stake," "the bad guy you have captured possesses information that could save this life, and refuses to divulge"; and (b) when torture may lead to "the extraction of information from a high-value enemy in possession of high-value information likely to save lives" Https://< /ref>"Charles Krauthammer." Contemporary Authors Online, Gale, 2014. Biography In Context. Accessed 22 June 2018.

, editorial page editor for The Washington Post who edited Krauthammer's columns for 15 years, called his weekly column "independent and hard to peg politically. It's a very tough column. There's no '' in it. You never know what is going to happen next." Hendrik Hertzberg, also a former colleague of Krauthammer while they worked at The New Republic in the 1980s, said that when the two first met in 1978, Krauthammer was "70 percent liberal, 30 percent ' Democrat,' that is, hard-line on Israel and relations with the Soviet Union"; in the mid-1980s, he was still "50–50: fairly liberal on economic and social questions but a full-bore foreign-policy neoconservative." Hertzberg in 2009 called Krauthammer a "pretty solid 90–10 Republican." Krauthammer was described by some as having been a conservative.

Presidential elections
A few days before the 2012 United States presidential election, Krauthammer predicted it would be "very close" with Republican candidate winning the "popular vote by, I think, about half a point, Electoral College probably a very narrow margin." Although admitting his incorrect prediction, Krauthammer maintained, "Obama won but had no mandate. He won by going very small, very negative."

Before the 2016 presidential election, Krauthammer stated that "I will not vote for , but, as I’ve explained in my columns, I could never vote for ".

In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.

Krauthammer received a rigorous Jewish education. He attended a school where half the day was devoted to secular studies and half the day was devoted to religious education conducted in . By the time he graduated from high school at the age of 16, Krauthammer was able to write philosophical essays in Hebrew. His father demanded that he learn ; in addition to his school's required Talmud studies, Krauthammer took extra Talmud classes three days a week. This was not enough for his father who hired a to provide private instruction on the Talmud three nights a week.

Krauthammer's attachment to was strengthened through his study of at McGill University under Rabbi David Hartman. Krauthammer said, "I had discovered the world, and was going to leave all of this Judaism behind, because I was too sophisticated for it. And then in my third year I took Hartman’s course in Maimonides, and I’m thinking this is pretty serious stuff. It stands up to the Greeks, stands up to the philosophers of the age, and it gave me sort of a renewed commitment to and respect for my own tradition, which I already knew, but was ready to throw away. And I didn’t throw it away as a result of that encounter."

Krauthammer stated that " is the least plausible of all theologies. I mean, there are a lot of wild ones out there, but the one that clearly runs so contrary to what is possible, is atheism".

Krauthammer opposed the Park51 project in for "reasons of common decency and respect for the sacred. No commercial tower over Gettysburg, no at Auschwitz, and no at Ground Zero. Build it anywhere but there."

Supreme Court nominations
Krauthammer criticized President George W. Bush's 2005 nomination of to succeed Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. He called the nomination of Miers a "mistake" on several occasions. He noted her lack of constitutional experience as the main obstacle to her nomination.

On October 21, 2005, Krauthammer published "Miers: The Only Exit Strategy", "Miers: The Only Exit Strategy" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, October 12, 2006. in which he explained that all of Miers's relevant constitutional writings are protected by both attorney–client privilege and executive privilege, which presented a unique face-saving solution to the mistake: "Miers withdraws out of respect for both the Senate and the executive's prerogatives." Six days later, Miers withdrew, employing that argument:

The same day, NPR noted, "Krauthammer's scenario played out almost exactly as he wrote." "Conservative Columnist's Miers Plan Played Out" NPR. Columnist E. J. Dionne wrote that the White House was following Krauthammer's strategy "almost to the letter". "Conservatives Will Regret the Miers Withdrawal" E.J. Dionne. A few weeks later, The New York Times reported that Krauthammer's "exit strategy" was "exactly what happened" and that Krauthammer "had no prior inkling from the administration that they were taking that route; he was later given credit for giving the Bush administration a plan."

Other issues
Krauthammer was an opponent of capital punishment,"Silent Executions", by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, June 14, 1985."The Court is Just Doing its Job" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, June 30, 1989."Without the Noose, Without the Gag" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, April 24, 1992. "Sparing Moussaoui for the wrong reasons" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, May 12, 2006. a critic of the intelligent design movement, and an advocate of the scientific consensus on ; calling the religion-science controversy a "false conflict." "Phony Theory, False Conflict" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, November 18, 2005. In 2005, Krauthammer wrote several articles likening intelligent design to "tarted-up ." "Phony Theory, False Conflict; 'Intelligent Design' Foolishly Pits Evolution Against Faith" by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, November 18, 2005.

Churchill bust
On July 27, 2012, Krauthammer wrote a column in which he stated that President "started his presidency by returning to the British Embassy the bust of Winston Churchill that had graced the Oval Office." "Why he's going where he's going", Opinions, The Washington Post. In 2010, White House curator William Allman noted that the bust had been on loan to President George W. Bush by British Prime Minister and "was already scheduled to go back" once Bush left office. However, , then Obama's communications director, called Krauthammer's claim "patently false" and "ridiculous", expounding: "The bust is still in the White House. In the Residence. Outside the Treaty Room." Dan Pfeiffer, "Fact Check: The Bust of Winston Churchill", White House Blog, July 27, 2012. It quickly emerged that the bust which Pfeiffer referred to was in fact a completely different bust of Churchill that had been given to President Lyndon B. Johnson decades earlier. On July 30, Krauthammer demanded both a retraction and an apology from the White House. "Busted: Mr. Pfeiffer and the White House blog", Opinions, The Washington Post. He initially received a private apology, Dan Pfeiffer, "The Churchill Bust & Charles Krauthammer", White House Blog, July 31, 2012. but, upon his request, the apology was made public in the White House Blog on July 31. Krauthammer later said that he was "the only entity on Earth, other than , that has received an apology from the White House." Krauthammer: "I'm The Only Entity On Earth, Other Than Rogue States, That Has Received An Apology From The White House" Real Clear politics Video, August 1, 2012.

Pfeiffer continued to maintain the view that returning the bust was "not something that President Obama or his administration chose to do," let alone "a symbol of President Obama's failure to appreciate the special relationship"—a charge that had gained currency after an Obama administration official told The Sunday Telegraph "There's nothing special about . You're just the same as the other 190 countries in the world" in 2009. Finally, Obama recounted in 2016 that he made the decision to return the bust of Churchill to make room for a bust of Martin Luther King Jr., thus contradicting previous White House denials that he had been involved, and refuting contemporary news reports which stated that Churchill's bust had been replaced by a bust of President . Obama explained his reasoning: "As the first African American president, I it might be appropriate to have a bust of Dr. Martin Luther King in my office."

Personal life
In 1974, Krauthammer married his wife, Robyn, a , who stopped practicing in order to focus on her work as an , and she is among his survivors. They had one child, Daniel, who is also among his survivors. Krauthammer's brother, Marcel, died in 2006.

Krauthammer was , but described himself as "not religious" and "a Jewish " who engages in "ancestor worship". He was influenced by his study of at McGill University with Rabbi David Hartman, the head of 's Shalom Hartman Institute and professor of at McGill during Krauthammer's student days.

Krauthammer was a member of both the Chess Journalists of America and the Council on Foreign Relations. He was co-founder of Pro Musica Hebraica, a not-for-profit organization devoted to presenting Jewish classical music, much of it lost or forgotten, in a concert hall setting.

In August 2017, Krauthammer had a cancerous tumor removed from his . The surgery was thought to have been successful; however, on June 8, 2018, Krauthammer announced that his cancer had returned and that doctors had given him only weeks to live. On June 21, just thirteen days later, he died of small intestine cancer in an , Georgia hospital. He was 68.

  • Cutting Edges: Making Sense of the Eighties (1988)
  • Democratic Realism: An American Foreign Policy for a Unipolar World, (2004 speech)
  • (2013)
  • The Point of It All: A Lifetime of Great Loves and Endeavors (with Daniel Krauthammer)'', Crown Forum, 2018

External links

Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1


Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 


General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 


Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time