Purushanda (also variously Puruskhanda, Purushhattum, Purushhatum or Burushattum) was an kingdom of the early second millennium prior to the common era. It was conquered by the Hittites circa 1700 BC. The name disappears from history soon thereafter.
Etymology
The name is written as
māt Purušḫattim in the oldest Assyrian texts,
[Karl Hecker, Zur Beurkundung V011 Kauf und Verkauf im Altassyrischen, Die Welt des Orients 11 (1980); RIA band 11, Purušhatum, 119.]
and it has been speculated that the root
Puruš- is of Indo-European (i.e.
Luwian) heritage, though it is uncertain if the kingdom was of Indo-European origin.
[Blasweiler, Joost. "The kingdom of Purušhanda in the land Luwiya.” Arnhem, Arnhem (NL) Bronze Age, 2016. ISBN 978-90-820497-2-5.] The suffix
-ḫattim most certainly refers to the
Hattians.
[Lewy, J. ”Hatta, Hattu, Hatti, Hattua, and ‘Old Assyrian’ Hattum." Archív Orientální; Praha Vol. 18, Iss. 3, (Nov 1, 1950): 366-441.] It was transliterated as
Pu-ru-us-ha-an-da in the oldest Hittite texts (1650 -1500 BCE) and
Pu-u-ru-us-ha-an-da (or
-ta) in the newer ones (13th century BCE), resulting in the modern spelling Purušhanda.
[Neu, Erich. Der Anitta-Text. Germany, O. Harrassowitz, 1974; Der Anitta-Text, 35-36.] The
allophone variation of P/B is from the Akkadian language, which variously transliterated the name as Puruš-haddum, Puruš-ḫattim, Buruš-haddum, Puruš-hadim and Puruš-handar.
[Benjamin Studevent-Hickman and Christopher Morgan, "Old Akkadian Period Texts," in The Ancient Near East: Historical Sources in Translation, ed. Mark W. Chavalas, Blackwell Sourcebooks in Ancient History I (Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2006), 33.]
Geography
Purushanda has yet to be archaeologically located. It can be discerned as a polity in the general central Anatolian region from Old Assyrian texts,
[Barjamovic, Gojko.(2011). A Historical Geography of Anatolia in the Old Assyrian Colony Period, p. 357-366, 373-374. United States, Carsten Niebuhr Institute of Near Eastern Studies, University of Copenhagen. Academic.edu] appeared to have access to the silver mines of the
Taurus Mountains[Dercksen, Jan Gerrit. The old Assyrian copper trade in Anatolia, p.125-128, 170-171. Jan Gerrit Dercksen. Istanbul, Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul, 1996.][Yener, K Aslihan. “The Anatolian Middle Bronze Age kingdoms and Alalakh: Mukish, Kanesh and trade.” Anatolian Studies 57 (2007): 151 - 160.] and control of the
Cilician Gates.
[SMEA. Italy, Edizioni Quasar, 2007, p. 278.][Anatolia and the Jazira During the Old Assyrian Period, p. 67. Netherlands, Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 2008.] It has been posited as lying astride an inland passage of Anatolia known as “the Great Caravan Route” during the Early Bronze Age,
connecting
Cilicia with the
Troad.
[Efe, Turan. The theories of the ‘Great Caravan Route’ between Cilicia and Troy: the Early Bronze Age III period in inland western Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 57 (2007): 47−64.] Scholarship has reduced its location to three likely sites.
[[2]Naohiko Kawakami, "The location of Purušḫanta", AL-RÃFIDÃN, Vol. XXVII, pp. 59-64, 2006] Majority opinion locates it at the mound of Acemhöyük.
[ -- 'The kingdom of the Hittites' at academia.edu][Forlanini, Massimo. 1977. “L’Anatolia Nord-Occidentale Nell’impero Eteo.” Studi Micenei Ed Egeo-Anatolici 3-4: 291-300.] The site consists of a 700 by 600 meter mound, shows occupation back to the third millennium BCE with central Anatolian, Mesopotamian and North Syrian pottery of the same era, a lower city that existed only during the Old Assyrian period, a burnt level at the end of that period and contemporaneous abandonment.
Minority views hold it to be at either the mound of Karahöyük
or somewhere west of
Konya in the land of
Pitassa.
[Blasweiler, Joost. "The kingdom of Purušhanda and its relations with the kings of Mari and Kanesh.” Arnhem, Arnhem (NL) Bronze Age, 2019. ISBN 978-90-820497-5-6.]
History
Early Bronze Age
Hattic period
Archaeology at Acemhöyük has confirmed the remains of central Anatolian, Mesopotamian and north Syrian pottery - as well as traces of monumental structures - dated 2659 to 2157 BC.
[Yakar, Jak. (2003). Towards an absolute chronology for middle and late bronze age Anatolia, Studies. Presented A.M. Mansel, 562. Academia.edu] The etymology suggests a city in the land of
Hattians south of the Kızılırmak River.
In the late 3rd millennium BCE, Acemhöyük was an important node in the Anatolian Trade Network.
A text known as the "King of Battle" dating to the 14th century BC recounts the fictional expedition of Akkadian Empire king Sargon (r. 2334-2279 BCE) against Purushanda and its ruler, Nur-Dagan (or Nur-Daggal). An even older legend - the "Cuthean Legend of Naram-Sin" - implies that Purushanda belonged to Sargon's grandson.[1. Lewy H. Anatolia in the Old Assyrian Period. In: Edwards IES, Gadd CJ, Hammond NGL, eds. The Cambridge Ancient History. The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press; 1971:707-728.] Both works are anachronistic and ahistorical but may hint at a relationship between the Akkadians and Proto-Luwians in the twenty-fourth and twenty-third centuries BC before the latter's immigration to Anatolia.
Middle Bronze Age
Luwian period
In the early 2nd millennium BCE, Acemhöyük was an important node in the Assyrian Trade Network.
Linguistic models suggest the existence of a common Luwian-speaking region circa 2000 BC, stretching from the central Anatolian plateau (modern Konya province) northward to the western bend of the Maraššantiya (where modern Ankara Province, Kırıkkale and Kırşehir provinces meet).[Yakubovich, Ilya. (2011). Luwian and the Luwians. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Anatolia: (10,000-323 BCE), p. 535. Spain: OUP USA. Google Books.][Yakubovich, Ilya. (2011). In Search of Luwiya, the Original Luwian-speaking Area. Journal of Ancient History, Vol. 4, p. 295. http://vdi.igh.ru] This region was dominated by the kingdom of Purushanda,[Blasweiler, Joost. (2016). The kingdom of Purušhanda in the land Luwiya, pp. 31-38. Arnhem, Arnhem (NL) Bronze Age. Academia.edu] the etymology of which suggests a takeover of Hattic lands by Luwian elites.[ History of Humanity: From the third millennium to the seventh century B.C., p. 549. United Kingdom: Routledge, 1994.] It is believed Purushanda would have functioned as "copper clearinghouse" between central and western Anatolia between 1974–1836 BC, with evidence of monumental structures dating to the 1900s BC at the end of the early Bronze Age.[Efe, Turan. (2021) The Early Bronze Age in Western Anatolia. Eds. Laura Harrison, Nejat Bilgen and Asuman Kapuci. United Kingdom: State University of New York Press.]
Purushanda is first mentioned toward the end of the 19th century BCE in the records of Mari. Subsequent seals found at Acemhöyük suggest substantial trade between the two kingdoms as well as the possibility of dynastic intermarriage between the two royal houses. Syrian cylinder seals appear to be the dominant style during this period and resemble the seal of Matruna, the daughter of the king Aplahanda of Carchemish who reigned 1786-1766 BC. Some scholarship says that "that city was associated with an Anatolian or North Syrian network in which the Assyrians did not participate," [Stephen Paul Lumsden. (1990). Symbols of Power: Hittite Royal Iconography in Seal, 87. Also Briggs Buchanan 1969, The end of
the Assyrian Colonies: The evidence of the seal, JAOS 89.4, 762.][Özgüç, Nimet: "Excavations at Acemhöyük“, Anadolu (Anatolia) 10 (1966)] while others state it "formed the westernmost limit of
Assyrian commercial activity."[Wilhelm, G. (2008). Ha̮ttuša-Boğazköy: das Hethiterreich im Spannungsfeld des Alten Orients : 6. Internationales Colloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft, 22.-24. März 2006, Würzburg. Germany: Harrassowitz. Academia.edu]
Late Bronze Age
Hittite period
The city is prominently mentioned in the Anitta Texts,
a collection of Hittite writings unearthed at
Kanesh. They depict it as a major seat of power in the region, describing its ruler as "Great King" (
rubā'um rabi'um) whereas other rulers are merely "kings".
Purushanda features again in the stories of the campaigns of the 17th century BC Hittite ruler Anitta. The Purushandan kingdom appears to have been a significant rival of Kanesh, the kingdom ruled by Anitta. The Hittite king launched a war against Purushanda but according to the Anitta Text, a Hittite account of later date, the Purushandan king surrendered to the Hittite army:[Bryce, p. 39]
The text indicates that the right to rule over Purushanda's territory – symbolised by the regalia of office, the throne and sceptre – was surrendered to Anitta. Its king was reduced to the status of a privileged vassal, entitled to join Anitta at the court in Kanesh in recognition of his voluntary surrender and his high-born status. The kingdom itself probably ceased to exist at this point and was absorbed into Hittite-ruled territory.
Kings
+
! Ruler | Comment |
legendary great king contemporary with Sargon of Akkad. |
*Conquered the kingdom with the Rise of the Hittite Old Kingdom. |
|
See also