Kamrup is the modern region situated between two rivers, the Manas River and the Barnadi River in Western Assam, with the same territorial extent as the Colonial and post-Colonial "Undivided Kamrup district".[Pratap Chandra Choudhury, The history of civilisation of the people of Assam to the twelfth century , Page 448, 1959 The Kamapitha of the Tantras was no other than Kamarupa and Kamakhya.]["These theoretical divisions are not known from the early epigraphic records and may have been fabricated in the late medieval period." ] It was the capital region of two of the three dynasties of Kamarupa and Guwahati, the current political center of Assam, is situated here. It is characterized by its Kamrupi culture.[Upendranath Goswami (1970), A Study on Kāmrūpī: A Dialect of Assamese]
Etymology
The origin of name, its original form being Kamarupa, is attributed to a legend in the
Kalika Purana which mentions that it is in this region that
Kamadeva regained his form.
[Hemanta Kumar Sarma (1992), Socio-Religious Life of the Assamese Hindus: A Study of the Fasts and Festivals of Kamrup District, p.4, p.p.262, Daya Publishing House]
Ancient Kamrup (350–1140)
The history of the Kamrup region dates back to the 4th century under
Kamarupa Kingdom. The kingdom was successively ruled by three dynasties - the
Varman dynasty, the Mlechchha (Mech) and the Pala dynasties. Among these, the capitals of the Varman Dynasty and the Pala Dynasty, called
Pragjyotishpura and
Durjaya respectively, were in Kamrup, whereas the capital of the Mlechchha dynasty was in Tezpur outside the Kamrup region.
Samudragupta's 4th-century Allahabad prasasti mention Kamarupa as well as Davaka (Nagaon district in central Assam) and it is presumed that a later Kamarupa king absorbed Davaka.["It is presumed that (Kalyana Varman) conquered Davaka, incorporating it within the kingdom of Kamarupa" ] Though the kingdom came to be known as Kamarupa, the kings called themselves the rulers of Pragjyotisha ( Pragjyotishadhipati), and not Kamarupa.["The name Kamarupa does not appear in local grants where Pragjyotisha alone figures with the local rulers called Pragjyotishadhipati." ] Vaidydeva, an 11th-century ruler, named Kamarupa as a mandala within the Pragjyotisha bhukti. According to Sircar, the Kamarupa mandala is congruent to undivided Kamrup of the modern times.
Medieval Kamrup
Kamata (1250-1581)
The Kamarupa region soon lost a unified political rule. Sandhya, a 13th-century ruler in the Kamarupanagara (
North Guwahati), moved his capital to present-day
North Bengal and his new kingdom came to be called Kamata;
["Hema Saraswati in his Prahrada-carit says that Durlabhanarayan was the unequaled king of Kamata-mandala" ] or sometimes as Kamata-Kamrup.
Though Kamata included Koch Bihar,
Darrang district,
Kamrup district districts, and northern Mymensingh in general,
its control over the Kamrup region was lax.
["The invasion of Mughisuddin, though abortive, had shaken the Kamarupa kingdom. It was reorganized as a new state. 'Kamata' by name with Kamatapur as capital. The exact time when the change was made is uncertain. But possibly it had been made by Sandhya (c1250-1270) as a safeguard against mounting dangers from the east and the west. Its control over the eastern regions beyond the Manah (Manas river) was lax." ] In the extreme east of the erstwhile Kamarupa kingdom the
Chutiya kingdom,
Kachari kingdom and the
Ahom kingdom kingdoms emerged, with the
in Kamrup, Nagaon, Lakhimpur and Darrang providing the buffer between these kingdoms in the east and the Kamata kingdom in the west.
Koch Hajo (1581-1612)
In the beginning of the 16th century
Viswa Singha filled the vacuum left by the destruction of the
Khen dynasty of Kamata and consolidated his rule over the Baro-Bhuyan chieftains ruling over the Kamrup region, and by the time of
Nara Narayan, the kingdom extended a firm rule between the
Karatoya River and the
Kameng River rivers. Even though the Koch kings called themselves Kamateshwars (lords of Kamata),
their kingdom came to be called the Koch kingdom and not as Kamrup.
In 1581 the Koch kingdom was bifurcated with Raghudev gaining control over the portion to the east of the Sankosh River up to the Bharali River[Though Chilarai and Naranarayana established control up to Subansiri River via the Treaty of Majuli, the Sukhaamphaa recovered control between Bhareli River and Subansiri soon after.] in the north bank; and east of the Brahmaputra in present-day Bangladesh. Raghudev's kingdom came to be called Koch Hajo in Muslim chronicles, and Kamrup in Ekasarana Dharma documents.["The eastern division (of the Koch kingdom) was known as 'Kamrup' in the local sources and as 'Koch Hajo' in the Persian chronicles." ] As the Mughal Empire established the rule of the Bengal Subah in Dhaka, Koch Bihar entered into an alliance with them against Parikshitnarayana, the son and successor of Raghudev. The Mughals pushed eastward, removed Parikshit from power and consolidated power right up to the eastern border of Kamrup by 1615 (up to the Barnadi River). Though the Mughals pushed further east they came into direct military conflict with the Ahom kingdom and finally settled the boundary at Barnadi River following the Treaty of Asurar Ali in 1639.
Sarkar Kamrup (1612-1682)
The Mughals established four sarkars in the newly acquired land---among which were Dhekeri (between Sankosh and Manas) and Kamrup (between Manas and Barnadi).
Kamrup was also renamed as Shujabad, after Shah Shuja, the
Subahdar of
Bengal Subah.
The Mughal governors were called
Faujdars of Shujabad.
The sixth faujdar, Lutfullah Shirazi, built a hilltop
mosque in
Koch Hajo in 1657. The mosque contained the mazar (mausoleum) of Prince Ghiyath ad-Din Awliya of
Iraq, who is commonly credited for introducing Islam to the region.
The Mughals lost Kamrup forever in 1682 after the Battle of Itakhuli.
Incomplete list of Faujdars of Guahati:
-
Makram Khan (1612-1614)
-
Mir Sufi (1614-1616)
-
Shaykh Kamal (1616-1632)
-
Abd as-Salam (1632-1638)
-
Noorullah (1638-1656)
-
Lutfullah Shirazi (1656-1658)
Borphukan's domain (1682-1820)
After the Battle of Itakhuli (1682), the
Ahom kingdom established control over Sarkar Kamrup, and it became the domain of the
Borphukan, based in Guwahati. The region continued to be called Kamrup and its eastern and western boundaries were identical to the later British district.
["Camroop (Kamrup), on the west, or towards Bengal, is bounded by the Manaha river (Manas river); on the north by Raotan, on the east by Bushnudeee (Barnadi river) which separates it from Dehrungh (Darrang) and on the south by Berhampooter (Brahmaputra river)", Wade, Dr John Peter, (1805) " A Geographical Sketch of Assam" in Asiatic Annual Register, reprinted ] In addition to the Kamrup region, the Borphukan's domain included the additional region to the east up to
Kaliabor. The Koch prince that oversaw
Darrang district, too, reported to the Borphukan. The Ahoms did not impose their administrative system fully over Kamrup, and the resultant
pargana-based system was a mixed Mughal-Ahom system, in contrast to the
Paik system in the rest of the kingdom in the east.
Burmese empire (1821-1824)
The region became part of the
Konbaung dynasty between 1821 and 1824.
Colonial Kamrup (1833–1947)
The region came under Burmese control in 1822. The British, in control over the region to the west of the Manas river since the transfer of Bengal in 1765, marched into Guwahati on 28 March 1824 at the beginning of the First Anglo-Burmese War and established administrative control by October.
The Kamrup district that the British constituted in 1833/1836 was largely congruous to the Mughal Sarkar Kamrup of 1639.
Modern Kamrup
After Indian Independence in 1947, the Kamrup district maintained its form. The district was divided, beginning in 1983,
and the original district is occasionally called "Undivided Kamrup district". The Kamapitha, Sarkar Kamrup of 1639 and the Undivided Kamrup district from the Colonial as well as the Independent periods is today defined as the Kamrup.
See also
Bibliography
External links