Product Code Database
Example Keywords: world of -bioshock $67-129
   » » BarcodeComment: Average-sec-usb-power-silicon-file-69397693

Experiment to compa

Transcend 64GB JetFlash 710 USB 3.0 Flash Drive (TS64GJF710S)
4.0 out of 5 stars
I bought this flash drive to make an experiment on my Design for Quality class. I compared this flash drive with another (Silicon Power), both are USB 3.0 and 16 GB. This flash drive had great performance reading in a USB 3.0. However, analyzing other factors it was not as good as the Silicon Power one. After copying 32 files with each of them, these are the results:

Reading a 300 MB file using USB 3.0:
Transcend: 3.72 sec (average)
Silicon Power: 8.34 sec (average)

Writing a 300 MB file using USB 3.0:
Transcend: 15.45 sec (average)
Silicon Power: 9.87 sec (average)

Reading a 300 MB file using USB 2.0:
Transcend: 14.68 sec (average)
Silicon Power: 14.59 sec (average)

Writing a 300 MB file using USB 2.0:
Transcend: 28.09 sec (average)
Silicon Power: 16.21 sec (average)

Conclusion: To read files using USB 3.0, it is an excellent flash drive. To write using USB 3.0, it is on average. To read...Read more

Page 1 of 1
1
Topic Title Summary Views
Pros: As a portable USB storage device, this works perfectly. Read/Write speeds are as advertised and formatting it to work with your operating system is a breeze and takes very little time. Mounting it the first time resulted in no response from the OS, but who knows, maybe I didn't plug it in correctly? However, it's been working fine since. This aspect of the USB drive works perfectly now.It is built extremely well and I feel that it's dust/shock resistance is a real statement to it's build quality - I believe it after dropping my keys with this thing attached quite a few times. Nothing seems cheap about the construction, considering the price, however the laser-etched logo on one side is a tad blurry, not that you want to be staring at a logo while using it. It serves its purpose as branding and if this is what helps keeps a great product like this stay cheap, by all means, keep doing it. Faster read/write performance would be a key area of interest for me...Read more amznJQ.onReady('jQuery', function() { amznJQ.available('popover', function() { var widgetDom = jQuery("#R16ZO24IYGCTHR_imageSection_704D4582-D54F-11E5-99AE-049111E5F9C9"); var images = widgetDom.find(".review-image-thumbnail"); for (var c=0;c
16
I bought this flash drive to make an experiment on my Design for Quality class. I compared this flash drive with another (Silicon Power), both are USB 3.0 and 16 GB. This flash drive had great performance reading in a USB 3.0. However, analyzing other factors it was not as good as the Silicon Power one. After copying 32 files with each of them, these are the results:Reading a 300 MB file using USB 3.0:Transcend: 3.72 sec (average)Silicon Power: 8.34 sec (average)Writing a 300 MB file using USB 3.0:Transcend: 15.45 sec (average)Silicon Power: 9.87 sec (average)Reading a 300 MB file using USB 2.0:Transcend: 14.68 sec (average)Silicon Power: 14.59 sec (average)Writing a 300 MB file using USB 2.0:Transcend: 28.09 sec (average)Silicon Power: 16.21 sec (average)Conclusion: To read files using USB 3.0, it is an excellent flash drive. To write using USB 3.0, it is on average. To read...Read more
11

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
11 Page Refs